Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean
The herbicide dicamba has injured millions of hectares of sensitive plant species in the United States since 2017. This injury has coincided with the commercialization of dicamba-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). We quantified atmospheric deposition and m...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed science 2024-07, Vol.72 (4), p.422-431 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 431 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 422 |
| container_title | Weed science |
| container_volume | 72 |
| creator | Oseland, Eric Bish, Mandy Lerch, Robert Bradley, Kevin W. |
| description | The herbicide dicamba has injured millions of hectares of sensitive plant species in the United States since 2017. This injury has coincided with the commercialization of dicamba-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). We quantified atmospheric deposition and mass flux of dicamba in 12 soybean production regions of Missouri. Dicamba was routinely detected in weekly deposition samples collected during agriculturally intensive spray periods. Observed concentrations were indicative of both local (1 km) of airborne dicamba. High-deposition events (>100 µg m–2) occurred annually in southeast Missouri, and peak dicamba deposited at these sites (12.5 to 84.0 µg m–2) was sufficient to injure non–dicamba resistant soybean. Adoption rate of dicamba-resistant crops and atmospheric stability explained much of the variance, and it is difficult for a herbicide product label to address these variables. Overall, these results demonstrated that dicamba was commonly deposited from the atmosphere during the growing season, and observed concentrations and fluxes were strongly related to the timing and magnitude of rainfall events and the amount of dicamba usage near collection sites. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wsc.2024.9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3106954116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_wsc_2024_9</cupid><sourcerecordid>3106954116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-2f376f62a4e8031d0600ee11a4caf0062642222d87e29125ed14aae44ba0283e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYvPsGCFxFTZzabTXMsrdpCQaR6XjbJRLfYbNxNlL69KS14EQeGuXzzD_MxdokwQsD07jsUIwFCjrIjNsAkgUikSXbMBgAyjjCVySk7C2ENgEpgNmDPk3bjQvNO3hZ8Ro0LtrWu5q7iM1uYTW74nHxuC1sSn5q67y4QX9Trzm956_iK6t3KF_GV2-Zk6nN2UpmPQBeHOWSvD_cv03m0fHpcTCfLKI9F1kaiilNVKWEkjSHGEhQAEaKRhakAlFBS9FWOUxIZioRKlMaQlLkBMY4pHrKrfW7j3WdHodVr1_m6P6ljBJUlElH11M2eKrwLwVOlG283xm81gt4p070yvVOmsx6-PcD9496Wb_Sb-Sd-vcdz61xN_yX_ALayeXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106954116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Oseland, Eric ; Bish, Mandy ; Lerch, Robert ; Bradley, Kevin W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oseland, Eric ; Bish, Mandy ; Lerch, Robert ; Bradley, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><description>The herbicide dicamba has injured millions of hectares of sensitive plant species in the United States since 2017. This injury has coincided with the commercialization of dicamba-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). We quantified atmospheric deposition and mass flux of dicamba in 12 soybean production regions of Missouri. Dicamba was routinely detected in weekly deposition samples collected during agriculturally intensive spray periods. Observed concentrations were indicative of both local (<1 km) and long-distance transport (>1 km) of airborne dicamba. High-deposition events (>100 µg m–2) occurred annually in southeast Missouri, and peak dicamba deposited at these sites (12.5 to 84.0 µg m–2) was sufficient to injure non–dicamba resistant soybean. Adoption rate of dicamba-resistant crops and atmospheric stability explained much of the variance, and it is difficult for a herbicide product label to address these variables. Overall, these results demonstrated that dicamba was commonly deposited from the atmosphere during the growing season, and observed concentrations and fluxes were strongly related to the timing and magnitude of rainfall events and the amount of dicamba usage near collection sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2759</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wsc.2024.9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: The Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Commercialization ; Cotton ; Crop production ; Crops ; Deposition ; dicamba ; Flowers & plants ; Glycine max ; Gossypium hirsutum ; Growing season ; herbicide injury ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Injuries ; off-target movement ; Pesticides ; Plant species ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Soybeans ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed science, 2024-07, Vol.72 (4), p.422-431</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-2f376f62a4e8031d0600ee11a4caf0062642222d87e29125ed14aae44ba0283e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-2f376f62a4e8031d0600ee11a4caf0062642222d87e29125ed14aae44ba0283e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4277-420X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0043174524000092/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oseland, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bish, Mandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><title>Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean</title><title>Weed science</title><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><description>The herbicide dicamba has injured millions of hectares of sensitive plant species in the United States since 2017. This injury has coincided with the commercialization of dicamba-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). We quantified atmospheric deposition and mass flux of dicamba in 12 soybean production regions of Missouri. Dicamba was routinely detected in weekly deposition samples collected during agriculturally intensive spray periods. Observed concentrations were indicative of both local (<1 km) and long-distance transport (>1 km) of airborne dicamba. High-deposition events (>100 µg m–2) occurred annually in southeast Missouri, and peak dicamba deposited at these sites (12.5 to 84.0 µg m–2) was sufficient to injure non–dicamba resistant soybean. Adoption rate of dicamba-resistant crops and atmospheric stability explained much of the variance, and it is difficult for a herbicide product label to address these variables. Overall, these results demonstrated that dicamba was commonly deposited from the atmosphere during the growing season, and observed concentrations and fluxes were strongly related to the timing and magnitude of rainfall events and the amount of dicamba usage near collection sites.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>dicamba</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Glycine max</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>Growing season</subject><subject>herbicide injury</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>off-target movement</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0043-1745</issn><issn>1550-2759</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFYvPsGCFxFTZzabTXMsrdpCQaR6XjbJRLfYbNxNlL69KS14EQeGuXzzD_MxdokwQsD07jsUIwFCjrIjNsAkgUikSXbMBgAyjjCVySk7C2ENgEpgNmDPk3bjQvNO3hZ8Ro0LtrWu5q7iM1uYTW74nHxuC1sSn5q67y4QX9Trzm956_iK6t3KF_GV2-Zk6nN2UpmPQBeHOWSvD_cv03m0fHpcTCfLKI9F1kaiilNVKWEkjSHGEhQAEaKRhakAlFBS9FWOUxIZioRKlMaQlLkBMY4pHrKrfW7j3WdHodVr1_m6P6ljBJUlElH11M2eKrwLwVOlG283xm81gt4p070yvVOmsx6-PcD9496Wb_Sb-Sd-vcdz61xN_yX_ALayeXw</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Oseland, Eric</creator><creator>Bish, Mandy</creator><creator>Lerch, Robert</creator><creator>Bradley, Kevin W.</creator><general>The Weed Science Society of America</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-420X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean</title><author>Oseland, Eric ; Bish, Mandy ; Lerch, Robert ; Bradley, Kevin W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b329t-2f376f62a4e8031d0600ee11a4caf0062642222d87e29125ed14aae44ba0283e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>dicamba</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Glycine max</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>Growing season</topic><topic>herbicide injury</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>off-target movement</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oseland, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bish, Mandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerch, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Kevin W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oseland, Eric</au><au>Bish, Mandy</au><au>Lerch, Robert</au><au>Bradley, Kevin W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean</atitle><jtitle>Weed science</jtitle><addtitle>Weed Sci</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>422</spage><epage>431</epage><pages>422-431</pages><issn>0043-1745</issn><eissn>1550-2759</eissn><abstract>The herbicide dicamba has injured millions of hectares of sensitive plant species in the United States since 2017. This injury has coincided with the commercialization of dicamba-resistant soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). We quantified atmospheric deposition and mass flux of dicamba in 12 soybean production regions of Missouri. Dicamba was routinely detected in weekly deposition samples collected during agriculturally intensive spray periods. Observed concentrations were indicative of both local (<1 km) and long-distance transport (>1 km) of airborne dicamba. High-deposition events (>100 µg m–2) occurred annually in southeast Missouri, and peak dicamba deposited at these sites (12.5 to 84.0 µg m–2) was sufficient to injure non–dicamba resistant soybean. Adoption rate of dicamba-resistant crops and atmospheric stability explained much of the variance, and it is difficult for a herbicide product label to address these variables. Overall, these results demonstrated that dicamba was commonly deposited from the atmosphere during the growing season, and observed concentrations and fluxes were strongly related to the timing and magnitude of rainfall events and the amount of dicamba usage near collection sites.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>The Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1017/wsc.2024.9</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-420X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0043-1745 |
| ispartof | Weed science, 2024-07, Vol.72 (4), p.422-431 |
| issn | 0043-1745 1550-2759 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3106954116 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Commercialization Cotton Crop production Crops Deposition dicamba Flowers & plants Glycine max Gossypium hirsutum Growing season herbicide injury Herbicide resistance Herbicides Injuries off-target movement Pesticides Plant species Rain Rainfall Soybeans Weeds |
| title | Atmospheric Deposition of Dicamba Herbicide Can Cause Injury to Sensitive Soybean |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A33%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Atmospheric%20Deposition%20of%20Dicamba%20Herbicide%20Can%20Cause%20Injury%20to%20Sensitive%20Soybean&rft.jtitle=Weed%20science&rft.au=Oseland,%20Eric&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=422&rft.epage=431&rft.pages=422-431&rft.issn=0043-1745&rft.eissn=1550-2759&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wsc.2024.9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106954116%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106954116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_wsc_2024_9&rfr_iscdi=true |