Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes

This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499
Hauptverfasser: Changizian, Maziar, Shirkhani, Zahra, Tamsilian, Yousef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9499
container_issue 17
container_start_page 9477
container_title Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry
container_volume 149
creator Changizian, Maziar
Shirkhani, Zahra
Tamsilian, Yousef
description This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg −1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg −1 . The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3106713668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106713668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwscSWwthun4YZQ-ZGQuMDZcp11MSpJ8KaoeQDemy1B4sZpR6Od9fjLslMJFxKgvCQJValzULNc6llp8mEvm8hiPs9Vpcw-a83ayAIOsyOiNwCoKpCT7Gux7dZtis1KYAjRR2z8cCVcI2KT19j1r6zdeqBIog2if0WBDabVcC5wO07X1IKwodjHz9gPHBSh3STRJ1ez13JcrOPHBkPEWjSu3yR2Vo5El1qPREjH2UFwa8KT3znNXm4Xzzf3-ePT3cPN9WPuFUCfB1R-7j0455eK_4JOmsLAsgx18EWB3hmtmMSy0DOvNJSoC1mBC8oBanam2dl4l1_mQtTbN27KBclqCaaU2pg5b6lxy6eWKGGwXYrvLg1Wgt3htiNuy7jtD247cEiPIep2NDH9nf4n9Q1n5IZO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106713668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</creator><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><description>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg −1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg −1 . The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-6150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Compressors ; Efficiency ; Energy consumption ; Exergy ; Gas expanders ; Inorganic Chemistry ; Liquefaction ; Liquefied natural gas ; Measurement Science and Instrumentation ; Parameter sensitivity ; Physical Chemistry ; Polymer Sciences ; Pressure drop ; Refrigerants ; Sensitivity analysis ; Specific energy</subject><ispartof>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirkhani, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><title>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</title><addtitle>J Therm Anal Calorim</addtitle><description>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg −1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg −1 . The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Compressors</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Gas expanders</subject><subject>Inorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>Measurement Science and Instrumentation</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Refrigerants</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><issn>1388-6150</issn><issn>1588-2926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwscSWwthun4YZQ-ZGQuMDZcp11MSpJ8KaoeQDemy1B4sZpR6Od9fjLslMJFxKgvCQJValzULNc6llp8mEvm8hiPs9Vpcw-a83ayAIOsyOiNwCoKpCT7Gux7dZtis1KYAjRR2z8cCVcI2KT19j1r6zdeqBIog2if0WBDabVcC5wO07X1IKwodjHz9gPHBSh3STRJ1ez13JcrOPHBkPEWjSu3yR2Vo5El1qPREjH2UFwa8KT3znNXm4Xzzf3-ePT3cPN9WPuFUCfB1R-7j0455eK_4JOmsLAsgx18EWB3hmtmMSy0DOvNJSoC1mBC8oBanam2dl4l1_mQtTbN27KBclqCaaU2pg5b6lxy6eWKGGwXYrvLg1Wgt3htiNuy7jtD247cEiPIep2NDH9nf4n9Q1n5IZO</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Changizian, Maziar</creator><creator>Shirkhani, Zahra</creator><creator>Tamsilian, Yousef</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><author>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Compressors</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Gas expanders</topic><topic>Inorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>Measurement Science and Instrumentation</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Refrigerants</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirkhani, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Changizian, Maziar</au><au>Shirkhani, Zahra</au><au>Tamsilian, Yousef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</jtitle><stitle>J Therm Anal Calorim</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>9477</spage><epage>9499</epage><pages>9477-9499</pages><issn>1388-6150</issn><eissn>1588-2926</eissn><abstract>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg −1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg −1 . The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-6150
ispartof Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499
issn 1388-6150
1588-2926
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3106713668
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analytical Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Compressors
Efficiency
Energy consumption
Exergy
Gas expanders
Inorganic Chemistry
Liquefaction
Liquefied natural gas
Measurement Science and Instrumentation
Parameter sensitivity
Physical Chemistry
Polymer Sciences
Pressure drop
Refrigerants
Sensitivity analysis
Specific energy
title Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20efficiency:%20an%20in-depth%20analysis%20of%20the%20energy,%20exergy,%20and%20sensitivity%20in%20four%20traditional%20liquefied%20natural%20gas%20processes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thermal%20analysis%20and%20calorimetry&rft.au=Changizian,%20Maziar&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=9477&rft.epage=9499&rft.pages=9477-9499&rft.issn=1388-6150&rft.eissn=1588-2926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106713668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106713668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true