Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes
This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9499 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 9477 |
container_title | Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry |
container_volume | 149 |
creator | Changizian, Maziar Shirkhani, Zahra Tamsilian, Yousef |
description | This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg
−1
liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg
−1
. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3106713668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3106713668</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwscSWwthun4YZQ-ZGQuMDZcp11MSpJ8KaoeQDemy1B4sZpR6Od9fjLslMJFxKgvCQJValzULNc6llp8mEvm8hiPs9Vpcw-a83ayAIOsyOiNwCoKpCT7Gux7dZtis1KYAjRR2z8cCVcI2KT19j1r6zdeqBIog2if0WBDabVcC5wO07X1IKwodjHz9gPHBSh3STRJ1ez13JcrOPHBkPEWjSu3yR2Vo5El1qPREjH2UFwa8KT3znNXm4Xzzf3-ePT3cPN9WPuFUCfB1R-7j0455eK_4JOmsLAsgx18EWB3hmtmMSy0DOvNJSoC1mBC8oBanam2dl4l1_mQtTbN27KBclqCaaU2pg5b6lxy6eWKGGwXYrvLg1Wgt3htiNuy7jtD247cEiPIep2NDH9nf4n9Q1n5IZO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3106713668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</creator><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><description>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg
−1
liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg
−1
. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-6150</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Analytical Chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Compressors ; Efficiency ; Energy consumption ; Exergy ; Gas expanders ; Inorganic Chemistry ; Liquefaction ; Liquefied natural gas ; Measurement Science and Instrumentation ; Parameter sensitivity ; Physical Chemistry ; Polymer Sciences ; Pressure drop ; Refrigerants ; Sensitivity analysis ; Specific energy</subject><ispartof>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirkhani, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><title>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</title><addtitle>J Therm Anal Calorim</addtitle><description>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg
−1
liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg
−1
. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</description><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Compressors</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Gas expanders</subject><subject>Inorganic Chemistry</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><subject>Measurement Science and Instrumentation</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Physical Chemistry</subject><subject>Polymer Sciences</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Refrigerants</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Specific energy</subject><issn>1388-6150</issn><issn>1588-2926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhCMEEqXwApwscSWwthun4YZQ-ZGQuMDZcp11MSpJ8KaoeQDemy1B4sZpR6Od9fjLslMJFxKgvCQJValzULNc6llp8mEvm8hiPs9Vpcw-a83ayAIOsyOiNwCoKpCT7Gux7dZtis1KYAjRR2z8cCVcI2KT19j1r6zdeqBIog2if0WBDabVcC5wO07X1IKwodjHz9gPHBSh3STRJ1ez13JcrOPHBkPEWjSu3yR2Vo5El1qPREjH2UFwa8KT3znNXm4Xzzf3-ePT3cPN9WPuFUCfB1R-7j0455eK_4JOmsLAsgx18EWB3hmtmMSy0DOvNJSoC1mBC8oBanam2dl4l1_mQtTbN27KBclqCaaU2pg5b6lxy6eWKGGwXYrvLg1Wgt3htiNuy7jtD247cEiPIep2NDH9nf4n9Q1n5IZO</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Changizian, Maziar</creator><creator>Shirkhani, Zahra</creator><creator>Tamsilian, Yousef</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</title><author>Changizian, Maziar ; Shirkhani, Zahra ; Tamsilian, Yousef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-fe2c8cc0aacb2150ea16560b7fdfc55eca632109b534c2307e35190af2a0e3c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Compressors</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Gas expanders</topic><topic>Inorganic Chemistry</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><topic>Measurement Science and Instrumentation</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Physical Chemistry</topic><topic>Polymer Sciences</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Refrigerants</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Specific energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Changizian, Maziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirkhani, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamsilian, Yousef</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Changizian, Maziar</au><au>Shirkhani, Zahra</au><au>Tamsilian, Yousef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry</jtitle><stitle>J Therm Anal Calorim</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>149</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>9477</spage><epage>9499</epage><pages>9477-9499</pages><issn>1388-6150</issn><eissn>1588-2926</eissn><abstract>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg
−1
liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg
−1
. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-2061</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1388-6150 |
ispartof | Journal of thermal analysis and calorimetry, 2024-09, Vol.149 (17), p.9477-9499 |
issn | 1388-6150 1588-2926 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3106713668 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analytical Chemistry Chemistry Chemistry and Materials Science Compressors Efficiency Energy consumption Exergy Gas expanders Inorganic Chemistry Liquefaction Liquefied natural gas Measurement Science and Instrumentation Parameter sensitivity Physical Chemistry Polymer Sciences Pressure drop Refrigerants Sensitivity analysis Specific energy |
title | Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T11%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20efficiency:%20an%20in-depth%20analysis%20of%20the%20energy,%20exergy,%20and%20sensitivity%20in%20four%20traditional%20liquefied%20natural%20gas%20processes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thermal%20analysis%20and%20calorimetry&rft.au=Changizian,%20Maziar&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=149&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=9477&rft.epage=9499&rft.pages=9477-9499&rft.issn=1388-6150&rft.eissn=1588-2926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3106713668%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3106713668&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |