Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars
Public policy makers are interested in public finance professors’ opinions on key tax policy issues. A report on a 1934 survey of this kind appeared in Walker’s work, which was relied upon by Slemrod’s work. While valuable for its historical context and influence on subsequent studies, Walker’s samp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | National tax journal 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.533-564 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 564 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 533 |
container_title | National tax journal |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong Zhang, Pengju Hildreth, W. Bartley |
description | Public policy makers are interested in public finance professors’ opinions on key tax policy issues. A report on a 1934 survey of this kind appeared in Walker’s work, which was relied upon by Slemrod’s work. While valuable for its historical context and influence on subsequent studies, Walker’s sample has limitations compared to the later-reported full sample central to our current analysis, including a lower response rate, a smaller sample size (52 responses), and a less diverse sample composition. This paper enhances our understanding of tax opinions in the 1930s by unveiling the findings from the full sample (127 responses). We find significant differences in many questions between the full sample and Walker’s sample. We discuss how the full sample’s results would have informed Slemrod’s discussions on temporal shifts in tax opinions. We also discover many questions that were not reported in Walker’s work and later studies. Many of these unreported questions hold significant relevance, both during the time when the subsequent studies were published and in the present context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/729778 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_uchic</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3105508158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3105508158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-a7705189748a68672ed5da2431d6855f487c9586728fc51668cc210927e928133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoDiXTUnHz3plYyxqTBQnMPLErPUdsylJu1g_97OTrw4HHjPw3vgIeQS2C0wnd4hzxD1ERlAJmWCEvGYDBjjOulGnJKzGFeMMZCAAzJ_Lytb0nkbtm5HX13tQ0MbTxfR3dNRF2yrWP0mTekoZEL-sb6gL-3HurJ0Wm3Mxjo6t6VfmxDPyUlh1tFdHPaQLKaTt_FjMnt-eBqPZokFFE1iEJkCnaHUJtUpcrdUS8OlgGWqlSqkRpup_UEXVkGaams5sIyjy7gGIYbkqu-tg_9uXWzylW_DpnuZC2BKMQ1Kd9RNT9ngYwyuyOtQfZmwy4Hle2F5L6wDr3uwtZ0T8-nr4GL87zxgPx-tZW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3105508158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong ; Zhang, Pengju ; Hildreth, W. Bartley</creator><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong ; Zhang, Pengju ; Hildreth, W. Bartley</creatorcontrib><description>Public policy makers are interested in public finance professors’ opinions on key tax policy issues. A report on a 1934 survey of this kind appeared in Walker’s work, which was relied upon by Slemrod’s work. While valuable for its historical context and influence on subsequent studies, Walker’s sample has limitations compared to the later-reported full sample central to our current analysis, including a lower response rate, a smaller sample size (52 responses), and a less diverse sample composition. This paper enhances our understanding of tax opinions in the 1930s by unveiling the findings from the full sample (127 responses). We find significant differences in many questions between the full sample and Walker’s sample. We discuss how the full sample’s results would have informed Slemrod’s discussions on temporal shifts in tax opinions. We also discover many questions that were not reported in Walker’s work and later studies. Many of these unreported questions hold significant relevance, both during the time when the subsequent studies were published and in the present context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-0283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/729778</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Policy analysis ; Policy making ; Polls & surveys ; Public finance ; Public policy ; Taxation ; University professors</subject><ispartof>National tax journal, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.533-564</ispartof><rights>2024 National Tax Association. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Press Sep 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-a7705189748a68672ed5da2431d6855f487c9586728fc51668cc210927e928133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Pengju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildreth, W. Bartley</creatorcontrib><title>Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars</title><title>National tax journal</title><description>Public policy makers are interested in public finance professors’ opinions on key tax policy issues. A report on a 1934 survey of this kind appeared in Walker’s work, which was relied upon by Slemrod’s work. While valuable for its historical context and influence on subsequent studies, Walker’s sample has limitations compared to the later-reported full sample central to our current analysis, including a lower response rate, a smaller sample size (52 responses), and a less diverse sample composition. This paper enhances our understanding of tax opinions in the 1930s by unveiling the findings from the full sample (127 responses). We find significant differences in many questions between the full sample and Walker’s sample. We discuss how the full sample’s results would have informed Slemrod’s discussions on temporal shifts in tax opinions. We also discover many questions that were not reported in Walker’s work and later studies. Many of these unreported questions hold significant relevance, both during the time when the subsequent studies were published and in the present context.</description><subject>Policy analysis</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Public finance</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>University professors</subject><issn>0028-0283</issn><issn>1944-7477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKf-hoDiXTUnHz3plYyxqTBQnMPLErPUdsylJu1g_97OTrw4HHjPw3vgIeQS2C0wnd4hzxD1ERlAJmWCEvGYDBjjOulGnJKzGFeMMZCAAzJ_Lytb0nkbtm5HX13tQ0MbTxfR3dNRF2yrWP0mTekoZEL-sb6gL-3HurJ0Wm3Mxjo6t6VfmxDPyUlh1tFdHPaQLKaTt_FjMnt-eBqPZokFFE1iEJkCnaHUJtUpcrdUS8OlgGWqlSqkRpup_UEXVkGaams5sIyjy7gGIYbkqu-tg_9uXWzylW_DpnuZC2BKMQ1Kd9RNT9ngYwyuyOtQfZmwy4Hle2F5L6wDr3uwtZ0T8-nr4GL87zxgPx-tZW8</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong</creator><creator>Zhang, Pengju</creator><creator>Hildreth, W. Bartley</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars</title><author>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong ; Zhang, Pengju ; Hildreth, W. Bartley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c173t-a7705189748a68672ed5da2431d6855f487c9586728fc51668cc210927e928133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Policy analysis</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Public finance</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>University professors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Pengju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hildreth, W. Bartley</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>National tax journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nguyen-Hoang, Phuong</au><au>Zhang, Pengju</au><au>Hildreth, W. Bartley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars</atitle><jtitle>National tax journal</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>533</spage><epage>564</epage><pages>533-564</pages><issn>0028-0283</issn><eissn>1944-7477</eissn><abstract>Public policy makers are interested in public finance professors’ opinions on key tax policy issues. A report on a 1934 survey of this kind appeared in Walker’s work, which was relied upon by Slemrod’s work. While valuable for its historical context and influence on subsequent studies, Walker’s sample has limitations compared to the later-reported full sample central to our current analysis, including a lower response rate, a smaller sample size (52 responses), and a less diverse sample composition. This paper enhances our understanding of tax opinions in the 1930s by unveiling the findings from the full sample (127 responses). We find significant differences in many questions between the full sample and Walker’s sample. We discuss how the full sample’s results would have informed Slemrod’s discussions on temporal shifts in tax opinions. We also discover many questions that were not reported in Walker’s work and later studies. Many of these unreported questions hold significant relevance, both during the time when the subsequent studies were published and in the present context.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/729778</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-0283 |
ispartof | National tax journal, 2024-09, Vol.77 (3), p.533-564 |
issn | 0028-0283 1944-7477 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3105508158 |
source | PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Policy analysis Policy making Polls & surveys Public finance Public policy Taxation University professors |
title | Which Survey Report to Use? A Revisit to the 1934 Survey of Public Finance Scholars |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T02%3A24%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_uchic&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20Survey%20Report%20to%20Use?%20A%20Revisit%20to%20the%201934%20Survey%20of%20Public%20Finance%20Scholars&rft.jtitle=National%20tax%20journal&rft.au=Nguyen-Hoang,%20Phuong&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=533&rft.epage=564&rft.pages=533-564&rft.issn=0028-0283&rft.eissn=1944-7477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/729778&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_uchic%3E3105508158%3C/proquest_uchic%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3105508158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |