Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China
The tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme is an important approach for mitigating carbon emissions within the context of a renewable energy development strategy and regional sustainable development. However, studies investigating the role of TGCs in encouraging carbon emissions reduction in China...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7335 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 7335 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Huang, Guori Chen, Zheng Shang, Nan Hu, Xiaoyue Wang, Chen Wen, Huan Liu, Zhiliang |
description | The tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme is an important approach for mitigating carbon emissions within the context of a renewable energy development strategy and regional sustainable development. However, studies investigating the role of TGCs in encouraging carbon emissions reduction in China are limited and inconclusive due to ignoring the interference of other renewable energy policies and little distinguishing the impact of different green certificates. Using Chinese provincial data from 2013 to 2023, this study employs a difference-in-differences strategy to estimate the effect of the TGC policy on regional carbon emissions. The results reveal that the TGC policy significantly reduces provincial carbon emissions, and this reduction is predominantly contributed by certificate-electricity integration green certificates rather than certificate-electricity separation certificates. A 1% increase in the provincial trade volume of certificate-electricity integration green certificates can reduce total provincial carbon emissions by 0.8–1.3%. These findings hold across a series of rigorous robustness tests. This study also explains the different effects between certificate-electricity integration and certificate-electricity separation green certificates by the concept of additionality. To effectively reduce carbon emissions in the future, the TGC system must meet the requirement of additionality. These insights can provide reference for the improvement of TGC policy to better achieve the carbon reduction objective and sustainable development. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16177335 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3104153242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104153242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-c91854edc7a9316c6b42ce1f1f511e5fd2d71ea4174f00964609d221fa2216f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0FLAzEQhYMgWGov_oKA59VMks26J5Ht2goFReu5pMlEt-xuapLtxT9vUOcw7_Hm8cEQcgXsRoia3cYJFFSVEOUZmXFWQQGsZBdkEeOB5RECalAz8r30dBu01fse6SogjrTBkDrXGZ0w0pfgB5-QvuJH50fd00aHvR9pO3Qx5iTmi51MypY6H-jbFJPuxl_cEk_Y--OAY7qn7amzOBqkLhNp85k7l-Tc6T7i4l_n5P2x3TbrYvO8emoeNsURQKTC1HBXSrSm0rUAZdRecoPgwJUAWDrLbQWoJVTSMVYrqVhtOQen81JOiTm5_uMeg_-aMKbdwU8hPxN3ApiEUnDJxQ_Oj14m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104153242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Huang, Guori ; Chen, Zheng ; Shang, Nan ; Hu, Xiaoyue ; Wang, Chen ; Wen, Huan ; Liu, Zhiliang</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Guori ; Chen, Zheng ; Shang, Nan ; Hu, Xiaoyue ; Wang, Chen ; Wen, Huan ; Liu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><description>The tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme is an important approach for mitigating carbon emissions within the context of a renewable energy development strategy and regional sustainable development. However, studies investigating the role of TGCs in encouraging carbon emissions reduction in China are limited and inconclusive due to ignoring the interference of other renewable energy policies and little distinguishing the impact of different green certificates. Using Chinese provincial data from 2013 to 2023, this study employs a difference-in-differences strategy to estimate the effect of the TGC policy on regional carbon emissions. The results reveal that the TGC policy significantly reduces provincial carbon emissions, and this reduction is predominantly contributed by certificate-electricity integration green certificates rather than certificate-electricity separation certificates. A 1% increase in the provincial trade volume of certificate-electricity integration green certificates can reduce total provincial carbon emissions by 0.8–1.3%. These findings hold across a series of rigorous robustness tests. This study also explains the different effects between certificate-electricity integration and certificate-electricity separation green certificates by the concept of additionality. To effectively reduce carbon emissions in the future, the TGC system must meet the requirement of additionality. These insights can provide reference for the improvement of TGC policy to better achieve the carbon reduction objective and sustainable development.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16177335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy sources ; Carbon ; Electricity ; Emissions control ; Energy consumption ; Energy industry ; Energy resources ; Renewable resources ; Subsidies ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7335</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Guori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><title>Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme is an important approach for mitigating carbon emissions within the context of a renewable energy development strategy and regional sustainable development. However, studies investigating the role of TGCs in encouraging carbon emissions reduction in China are limited and inconclusive due to ignoring the interference of other renewable energy policies and little distinguishing the impact of different green certificates. Using Chinese provincial data from 2013 to 2023, this study employs a difference-in-differences strategy to estimate the effect of the TGC policy on regional carbon emissions. The results reveal that the TGC policy significantly reduces provincial carbon emissions, and this reduction is predominantly contributed by certificate-electricity integration green certificates rather than certificate-electricity separation certificates. A 1% increase in the provincial trade volume of certificate-electricity integration green certificates can reduce total provincial carbon emissions by 0.8–1.3%. These findings hold across a series of rigorous robustness tests. This study also explains the different effects between certificate-electricity integration and certificate-electricity separation green certificates by the concept of additionality. To effectively reduce carbon emissions in the future, the TGC system must meet the requirement of additionality. These insights can provide reference for the improvement of TGC policy to better achieve the carbon reduction objective and sustainable development.</description><subject>Alternative energy sources</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy resources</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0FLAzEQhYMgWGov_oKA59VMks26J5Ht2goFReu5pMlEt-xuapLtxT9vUOcw7_Hm8cEQcgXsRoia3cYJFFSVEOUZmXFWQQGsZBdkEeOB5RECalAz8r30dBu01fse6SogjrTBkDrXGZ0w0pfgB5-QvuJH50fd00aHvR9pO3Qx5iTmi51MypY6H-jbFJPuxl_cEk_Y--OAY7qn7amzOBqkLhNp85k7l-Tc6T7i4l_n5P2x3TbrYvO8emoeNsURQKTC1HBXSrSm0rUAZdRecoPgwJUAWDrLbQWoJVTSMVYrqVhtOQen81JOiTm5_uMeg_-aMKbdwU8hPxN3ApiEUnDJxQ_Oj14m</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Huang, Guori</creator><creator>Chen, Zheng</creator><creator>Shang, Nan</creator><creator>Hu, Xiaoyue</creator><creator>Wang, Chen</creator><creator>Wen, Huan</creator><creator>Liu, Zhiliang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China</title><author>Huang, Guori ; Chen, Zheng ; Shang, Nan ; Hu, Xiaoyue ; Wang, Chen ; Wen, Huan ; Liu, Zhiliang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-c91854edc7a9316c6b42ce1f1f511e5fd2d71ea4174f00964609d221fa2216f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy sources</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy resources</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Guori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shang, Nan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wen, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhiliang</creatorcontrib><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Guori</au><au>Chen, Zheng</au><au>Shang, Nan</au><au>Hu, Xiaoyue</au><au>Wang, Chen</au><au>Wen, Huan</au><au>Liu, Zhiliang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>7335</spage><pages>7335-</pages><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The tradable green certificate (TGC) scheme is an important approach for mitigating carbon emissions within the context of a renewable energy development strategy and regional sustainable development. However, studies investigating the role of TGCs in encouraging carbon emissions reduction in China are limited and inconclusive due to ignoring the interference of other renewable energy policies and little distinguishing the impact of different green certificates. Using Chinese provincial data from 2013 to 2023, this study employs a difference-in-differences strategy to estimate the effect of the TGC policy on regional carbon emissions. The results reveal that the TGC policy significantly reduces provincial carbon emissions, and this reduction is predominantly contributed by certificate-electricity integration green certificates rather than certificate-electricity separation certificates. A 1% increase in the provincial trade volume of certificate-electricity integration green certificates can reduce total provincial carbon emissions by 0.8–1.3%. These findings hold across a series of rigorous robustness tests. This study also explains the different effects between certificate-electricity integration and certificate-electricity separation green certificates by the concept of additionality. To effectively reduce carbon emissions in the future, the TGC system must meet the requirement of additionality. These insights can provide reference for the improvement of TGC policy to better achieve the carbon reduction objective and sustainable development.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16177335</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-09, Vol.16 (17), p.7335 |
issn | 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3104153242 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Alternative energy sources Carbon Electricity Emissions control Energy consumption Energy industry Energy resources Renewable resources Subsidies Sustainable development |
title | Do Tradable Green Certificates Promote Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction for Sustainable Development? Evidence from China |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T01%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Tradable%20Green%20Certificates%20Promote%20Regional%20Carbon%20Emissions%20Reduction%20for%20Sustainable%20Development?%20Evidence%20from%20China&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Huang,%20Guori&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=7335&rft.pages=7335-&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16177335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3104153242%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104153242&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |