Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats
Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print) 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 108 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print) |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Agger, Annika Damgaard, Bodil |
description | Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3103148837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3103148837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWLQ_wFvA89b3ks0m660WrYWCBfUc0uyLblm7Ndkt9N-7tuJp5jDMDB9jNwgTZYRUd2mzc5O9ELWcIOYIZ2wkADDTOcrzfw_qko1T2gCAMEqLQo7YfLHtKDrf1Xviq7ap_YGvYuspJUr3fMpnn65paPtBPLSRv3aRqMv4kvbU8Ic-kut9dF26ZhfBNYnGf3rF3p8e32bP2fJlvphNl9laoILhRFFVpa9Ko0KpnMGcjHZrU4AGVVSDEJAvC6nX6HPpvNAUSm1EyCvUMsgrdnvq3cX2u6fU2U3bx-0waSWCxNwYqYcUnlI-tilFCnYX6y8XDxbBHpHZX2T2iMwekckfe1petA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3103148837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</creator><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><description>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2001-7405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2001-7413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</publisher><subject>Bureaucrats ; Citizen participation ; Neighborhoods ; Policy making ; Professionals ; Public policy ; Rule of law ; Skills ; Specialists</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print), 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6624-4903 ; 0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,12845,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><title>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</title><description>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</description><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><issn>2001-7405</issn><issn>2001-7413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWLQ_wFvA89b3ks0m660WrYWCBfUc0uyLblm7Ndkt9N-7tuJp5jDMDB9jNwgTZYRUd2mzc5O9ELWcIOYIZ2wkADDTOcrzfw_qko1T2gCAMEqLQo7YfLHtKDrf1Xviq7ap_YGvYuspJUr3fMpnn65paPtBPLSRv3aRqMv4kvbU8Ic-kut9dF26ZhfBNYnGf3rF3p8e32bP2fJlvphNl9laoILhRFFVpa9Ko0KpnMGcjHZrU4AGVVSDEJAvC6nX6HPpvNAUSm1EyCvUMsgrdnvq3cX2u6fU2U3bx-0waSWCxNwYqYcUnlI-tilFCnYX6y8XDxbBHpHZX2T2iMwekckfe1petA</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>Agger, Annika</creator><creator>Damgaard, Bodil</creator><general>University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-4903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><author>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agger, Annika</au><au>Damgaard, Bodil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</jtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>89-108</pages><issn>2001-7405</issn><eissn>2001-7413</eissn><abstract>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</abstract><cop>Gothenburg</cop><pub>University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</pub><doi>10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-4903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2001-7405 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print), 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108 |
issn | 2001-7405 2001-7413 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3103148837 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Bureaucrats Citizen participation Neighborhoods Policy making Professionals Public policy Rule of law Skills Specialists |
title | Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A11%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactive%20Policy%20Processes:%20A%20Challenge%20for%20Street-%20Level%20Bureaucrats&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20public%20administration%20(Print)&rft.au=Agger,%20Annika&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=89-108&rft.issn=2001-7405&rft.eissn=2001-7413&rft_id=info:doi/10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3103148837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3103148837&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |