Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats

Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print) 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108
Hauptverfasser: Agger, Annika, Damgaard, Bodil
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108
container_issue 3
container_start_page 89
container_title Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)
container_volume 22
creator Agger, Annika
Damgaard, Bodil
description Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3103148837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3103148837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWLQ_wFvA89b3ks0m660WrYWCBfUc0uyLblm7Ndkt9N-7tuJp5jDMDB9jNwgTZYRUd2mzc5O9ELWcIOYIZ2wkADDTOcrzfw_qko1T2gCAMEqLQo7YfLHtKDrf1Xviq7ap_YGvYuspJUr3fMpnn65paPtBPLSRv3aRqMv4kvbU8Ic-kut9dF26ZhfBNYnGf3rF3p8e32bP2fJlvphNl9laoILhRFFVpa9Ko0KpnMGcjHZrU4AGVVSDEJAvC6nX6HPpvNAUSm1EyCvUMsgrdnvq3cX2u6fU2U3bx-0waSWCxNwYqYcUnlI-tilFCnYX6y8XDxbBHpHZX2T2iMwekckfe1petA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3103148837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</creator><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><description>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2001-7405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2001-7413</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</publisher><subject>Bureaucrats ; Citizen participation ; Neighborhoods ; Policy making ; Professionals ; Public policy ; Rule of law ; Skills ; Specialists</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print), 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-6624-4903 ; 0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,12845,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><title>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</title><description>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</description><subject>Bureaucrats</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Neighborhoods</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Specialists</subject><issn>2001-7405</issn><issn>2001-7413</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEFLAzEUhIMoWLQ_wFvA89b3ks0m660WrYWCBfUc0uyLblm7Ndkt9N-7tuJp5jDMDB9jNwgTZYRUd2mzc5O9ELWcIOYIZ2wkADDTOcrzfw_qko1T2gCAMEqLQo7YfLHtKDrf1Xviq7ap_YGvYuspJUr3fMpnn65paPtBPLSRv3aRqMv4kvbU8Ic-kut9dF26ZhfBNYnGf3rF3p8e32bP2fJlvphNl9laoILhRFFVpa9Ko0KpnMGcjHZrU4AGVVSDEJAvC6nX6HPpvNAUSm1EyCvUMsgrdnvq3cX2u6fU2U3bx-0waSWCxNwYqYcUnlI-tilFCnYX6y8XDxbBHpHZX2T2iMwekckfe1petA</recordid><startdate>20180915</startdate><enddate>20180915</enddate><creator>Agger, Annika</creator><creator>Damgaard, Bodil</creator><general>University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-4903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180915</creationdate><title>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</title><author>Agger, Annika ; Damgaard, Bodil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2150-746dd9cd985f95a814e87ab8607056d607e0ec9637b1c43ac27ef9782f4d173f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bureaucrats</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Neighborhoods</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Specialists</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agger, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damgaard, Bodil</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agger, Annika</au><au>Damgaard, Bodil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print)</jtitle><date>2018-09-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>108</epage><pages>89-108</pages><issn>2001-7405</issn><eissn>2001-7413</eissn><abstract>Street-level bureaucrats (SLB) play a crucial role in ensuring better policy implementa- tion and generating trust between the system and citizens, according to the literature. In this article, we argue that Lipsky’s distinction between public managers and SLB needs an update. Today, public managers are increasingly expected to work closely and directly with affected stakeholders in order to solve cross-cutting ‘wicked problems’. Interactive and participative collaborative policy processes require public managers to move from back-office work to front-office work, in effect converting public managers into SLB. The key question raised is, thus: what kind of skills and capabilities do SLB need to engage in today’s more interactive forms of public policy-making? And what are the implications for how universities educate these groups?’ Drawing on a study of 32 urban professionals who work on the frontline in deprived neighbourhoods, we scrutinise the challenges and dilemmas that professionals face in their work with interactive processes. By distinguishing between ‘academic specialists’ and ‘academic generalists’, we are able to pinpoint and differentiate between skills needed for each of these groups in order to secure transparent processes that abide by the rule of law and support well-functioning local communities and, more broadly, the skills needed to secure democracy and econom- ic efficiency.</abstract><cop>Gothenburg</cop><pub>University of Gothenburg School of Public Administration</pub><doi>10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-4903</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-742X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2001-7405
ispartof Scandinavian journal of public administration (Print), 2018-09, Vol.22 (3), p.89-108
issn 2001-7405
2001-7413
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3103148837
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete
subjects Bureaucrats
Citizen participation
Neighborhoods
Policy making
Professionals
Public policy
Rule of law
Skills
Specialists
title Interactive Policy Processes: A Challenge for Street- Level Bureaucrats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A11%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactive%20Policy%20Processes:%20A%20Challenge%20for%20Street-%20Level%20Bureaucrats&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20public%20administration%20(Print)&rft.au=Agger,%20Annika&rft.date=2018-09-15&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=108&rft.pages=89-108&rft.issn=2001-7405&rft.eissn=2001-7413&rft_id=info:doi/10.58235/sjpa.v22i3.11410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3103148837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3103148837&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true