Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds

A recent bathymetric survey of Lake Constance revealed ~ 170 mounds composed of loosely deposited rocks aligned in a ~ 10-km long chain along the southern Swiss shoreline in a water depth of 3–5 m. The mounds are 10–30 m in diameter and up to 1.5 m high. Over their entire length of occurrence, the m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of paleolimnology 2024-08, Vol.72 (2), p.221-239
Hauptverfasser: Perler, Dominic, Benguerel, Simone, Brem, Hansjörg, Gilliard, Florence, Hornung, Jens, Keiser, Thomas, Leuzinger, Urs, Schaller, Sebastian, Szidat, Sönke, Vogel, Hendrik, Wessels, Martin, Anselmetti, Flavio S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 239
container_issue 2
container_start_page 221
container_title Journal of paleolimnology
container_volume 72
creator Perler, Dominic
Benguerel, Simone
Brem, Hansjörg
Gilliard, Florence
Hornung, Jens
Keiser, Thomas
Leuzinger, Urs
Schaller, Sebastian
Szidat, Sönke
Vogel, Hendrik
Wessels, Martin
Anselmetti, Flavio S.
description A recent bathymetric survey of Lake Constance revealed ~ 170 mounds composed of loosely deposited rocks aligned in a ~ 10-km long chain along the southern Swiss shoreline in a water depth of 3–5 m. The mounds are 10–30 m in diameter and up to 1.5 m high. Over their entire length of occurrence, the mounds are estimated to be composed of ~ 60 million individual boulders, with a total weight of ~ 78,000 t. A ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey showed that the mounds are not linked to the glacial substrate but were rather deposited artificially on the edge of a prograding shelf composed of Holocene lake sediments. Here, we present the results of a coring campaign with four piston cores along a GPR transect across one of the mounds. The cores recovered the full Holocene sedimentary succession all the way into the basal till that is overlain by lacustrine sediments dating back to ~ 14,400 cal. yrs BP. The four cores are merged into a ~ 12.4-m long composite section reflecting continuous sedimentation from the siliciclastic-dominated Late Glacial to the carbonate-rich Late Holocene. The stratigraphic horizon representing the mound’s construction was radiocarbon-dated to ~ 5600–5300 cal. yrs BP, placing them in the Neolithic period. This age was confirmed by radiocarbon dating of wood samples collected during underwater excavation of the mounds. Geochemical analysis of the Holocene sedimentary succession shows generally high carbonate contents (average of 69%). The interval from 5750 to 4950 cal. yrs BP, a part of the mound period, is characterized by a Holocene minimum in carbonate content (average of 57%) and by larger mean grain sizes. Comparing these values to those from a recent surface-sediment depth transect indicates that this was a period of rather low lake levels, which might have favoured mound construction. Correlations to nearby archaeological sites and to the general West-Central European lake-level record indicates that the mounds likely were built during a short phase of low lake levels during a general trend of climatic cooling followed by a lake-level transgression.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3102212580</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3102212580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5b6290d7cd721e9d9c6c8409e86c61f2f8a077c108cdc458c1fa98182c1ec4593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdWtV-pFkKYMvGNSFrkMmnX7MdHfGJD3g39tOC-5cFVWcewsOIVcINwjAbwOCTNMEWJYApIwl7IgsMOfTKUN-TBYgGSaMM3FKzkLYAIAUPF-Q_ZsLse60aXVH7d51Y2zdQF1FY2PpSm8tXbohRD0YS0Nju4rqoaRtDNTbTh_g6KimCMm2p50bamoa3R4qwrjura9tSV-s69rYtIb2bhzKcEFOKt0Fe_k7z8nHw_378ilZvT4-L-9WiUkxi0m-LpiEkpuSM7SylKYwIgNpRWEKrFglNHBuEIQpTZYLg5WWAgUzaKddpufkeu7defc52hDVxo1-mF6qFIExZLmAiWIzZbwLwdtK7Xzba_-lENSPXzX7VZNfdfCr2BRK51CY4KG2_q_6n9Q3uAl9pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102212580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Perler, Dominic ; Benguerel, Simone ; Brem, Hansjörg ; Gilliard, Florence ; Hornung, Jens ; Keiser, Thomas ; Leuzinger, Urs ; Schaller, Sebastian ; Szidat, Sönke ; Vogel, Hendrik ; Wessels, Martin ; Anselmetti, Flavio S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Perler, Dominic ; Benguerel, Simone ; Brem, Hansjörg ; Gilliard, Florence ; Hornung, Jens ; Keiser, Thomas ; Leuzinger, Urs ; Schaller, Sebastian ; Szidat, Sönke ; Vogel, Hendrik ; Wessels, Martin ; Anselmetti, Flavio S.</creatorcontrib><description>A recent bathymetric survey of Lake Constance revealed ~ 170 mounds composed of loosely deposited rocks aligned in a ~ 10-km long chain along the southern Swiss shoreline in a water depth of 3–5 m. The mounds are 10–30 m in diameter and up to 1.5 m high. Over their entire length of occurrence, the mounds are estimated to be composed of ~ 60 million individual boulders, with a total weight of ~ 78,000 t. A ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey showed that the mounds are not linked to the glacial substrate but were rather deposited artificially on the edge of a prograding shelf composed of Holocene lake sediments. Here, we present the results of a coring campaign with four piston cores along a GPR transect across one of the mounds. The cores recovered the full Holocene sedimentary succession all the way into the basal till that is overlain by lacustrine sediments dating back to ~ 14,400 cal. yrs BP. The four cores are merged into a ~ 12.4-m long composite section reflecting continuous sedimentation from the siliciclastic-dominated Late Glacial to the carbonate-rich Late Holocene. The stratigraphic horizon representing the mound’s construction was radiocarbon-dated to ~ 5600–5300 cal. yrs BP, placing them in the Neolithic period. This age was confirmed by radiocarbon dating of wood samples collected during underwater excavation of the mounds. Geochemical analysis of the Holocene sedimentary succession shows generally high carbonate contents (average of 69%). The interval from 5750 to 4950 cal. yrs BP, a part of the mound period, is characterized by a Holocene minimum in carbonate content (average of 57%) and by larger mean grain sizes. Comparing these values to those from a recent surface-sediment depth transect indicates that this was a period of rather low lake levels, which might have favoured mound construction. Correlations to nearby archaeological sites and to the general West-Central European lake-level record indicates that the mounds likely were built during a short phase of low lake levels during a general trend of climatic cooling followed by a lake-level transgression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2728</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0417</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Archaeological sites ; Archaeology ; Bathymetric surveys ; Boulders ; Carbonates ; Climate Change ; Construction ; Construction sites ; Core analysis ; Core sampling ; Cores ; Coring ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecological succession ; Excavation ; Excavation underwater ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Geology ; Glacial periods ; Grain size ; Ground penetrating radar ; Historic sites ; Holocene ; Lacustrine sedimentation ; Lake deposits ; Lake sediments ; Lakes ; Mounds ; Neolithic ; Original Paper ; Paleontology ; Physical Geography ; Radar ; Radiocarbon dating ; Radiometric dating ; Sediment ; Sedimentology ; Sediments ; Shelving ; Stone Age ; Stratigraphy ; Substrates ; Surveys ; Water depth</subject><ispartof>Journal of paleolimnology, 2024-08, Vol.72 (2), p.221-239</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5b6290d7cd721e9d9c6c8409e86c61f2f8a077c108cdc458c1fa98182c1ec4593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perler, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benguerel, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brem, Hansjörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilliard, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornung, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keiser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szidat, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmetti, Flavio S.</creatorcontrib><title>Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds</title><title>Journal of paleolimnology</title><addtitle>J Paleolimnol</addtitle><description>A recent bathymetric survey of Lake Constance revealed ~ 170 mounds composed of loosely deposited rocks aligned in a ~ 10-km long chain along the southern Swiss shoreline in a water depth of 3–5 m. The mounds are 10–30 m in diameter and up to 1.5 m high. Over their entire length of occurrence, the mounds are estimated to be composed of ~ 60 million individual boulders, with a total weight of ~ 78,000 t. A ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey showed that the mounds are not linked to the glacial substrate but were rather deposited artificially on the edge of a prograding shelf composed of Holocene lake sediments. Here, we present the results of a coring campaign with four piston cores along a GPR transect across one of the mounds. The cores recovered the full Holocene sedimentary succession all the way into the basal till that is overlain by lacustrine sediments dating back to ~ 14,400 cal. yrs BP. The four cores are merged into a ~ 12.4-m long composite section reflecting continuous sedimentation from the siliciclastic-dominated Late Glacial to the carbonate-rich Late Holocene. The stratigraphic horizon representing the mound’s construction was radiocarbon-dated to ~ 5600–5300 cal. yrs BP, placing them in the Neolithic period. This age was confirmed by radiocarbon dating of wood samples collected during underwater excavation of the mounds. Geochemical analysis of the Holocene sedimentary succession shows generally high carbonate contents (average of 69%). The interval from 5750 to 4950 cal. yrs BP, a part of the mound period, is characterized by a Holocene minimum in carbonate content (average of 57%) and by larger mean grain sizes. Comparing these values to those from a recent surface-sediment depth transect indicates that this was a period of rather low lake levels, which might have favoured mound construction. Correlations to nearby archaeological sites and to the general West-Central European lake-level record indicates that the mounds likely were built during a short phase of low lake levels during a general trend of climatic cooling followed by a lake-level transgression.</description><subject>Archaeological sites</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Bathymetric surveys</subject><subject>Boulders</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction sites</subject><subject>Core analysis</subject><subject>Core sampling</subject><subject>Cores</subject><subject>Coring</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecological succession</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Excavation underwater</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Glacial periods</subject><subject>Grain size</subject><subject>Ground penetrating radar</subject><subject>Historic sites</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>Lacustrine sedimentation</subject><subject>Lake deposits</subject><subject>Lake sediments</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Mounds</subject><subject>Neolithic</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radiocarbon dating</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shelving</subject><subject>Stone Age</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><issn>0921-2728</issn><issn>1573-0417</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAdWtV-pFkKYMvGNSFrkMmnX7MdHfGJD3g39tOC-5cFVWcewsOIVcINwjAbwOCTNMEWJYApIwl7IgsMOfTKUN-TBYgGSaMM3FKzkLYAIAUPF-Q_ZsLse60aXVH7d51Y2zdQF1FY2PpSm8tXbohRD0YS0Nju4rqoaRtDNTbTh_g6KimCMm2p50bamoa3R4qwrjura9tSV-s69rYtIb2bhzKcEFOKt0Fe_k7z8nHw_378ilZvT4-L-9WiUkxi0m-LpiEkpuSM7SylKYwIgNpRWEKrFglNHBuEIQpTZYLg5WWAgUzaKddpufkeu7defc52hDVxo1-mF6qFIExZLmAiWIzZbwLwdtK7Xzba_-lENSPXzX7VZNfdfCr2BRK51CY4KG2_q_6n9Q3uAl9pA</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Perler, Dominic</creator><creator>Benguerel, Simone</creator><creator>Brem, Hansjörg</creator><creator>Gilliard, Florence</creator><creator>Hornung, Jens</creator><creator>Keiser, Thomas</creator><creator>Leuzinger, Urs</creator><creator>Schaller, Sebastian</creator><creator>Szidat, Sönke</creator><creator>Vogel, Hendrik</creator><creator>Wessels, Martin</creator><creator>Anselmetti, Flavio S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds</title><author>Perler, Dominic ; Benguerel, Simone ; Brem, Hansjörg ; Gilliard, Florence ; Hornung, Jens ; Keiser, Thomas ; Leuzinger, Urs ; Schaller, Sebastian ; Szidat, Sönke ; Vogel, Hendrik ; Wessels, Martin ; Anselmetti, Flavio S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5b6290d7cd721e9d9c6c8409e86c61f2f8a077c108cdc458c1fa98182c1ec4593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Archaeological sites</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Bathymetric surveys</topic><topic>Boulders</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction sites</topic><topic>Core analysis</topic><topic>Core sampling</topic><topic>Cores</topic><topic>Coring</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecological succession</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Excavation underwater</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Glacial periods</topic><topic>Grain size</topic><topic>Ground penetrating radar</topic><topic>Historic sites</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>Lacustrine sedimentation</topic><topic>Lake deposits</topic><topic>Lake sediments</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Mounds</topic><topic>Neolithic</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radiocarbon dating</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shelving</topic><topic>Stone Age</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perler, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benguerel, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brem, Hansjörg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilliard, Florence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hornung, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keiser, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuzinger, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szidat, Sönke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wessels, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anselmetti, Flavio S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of paleolimnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perler, Dominic</au><au>Benguerel, Simone</au><au>Brem, Hansjörg</au><au>Gilliard, Florence</au><au>Hornung, Jens</au><au>Keiser, Thomas</au><au>Leuzinger, Urs</au><au>Schaller, Sebastian</au><au>Szidat, Sönke</au><au>Vogel, Hendrik</au><au>Wessels, Martin</au><au>Anselmetti, Flavio S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of paleolimnology</jtitle><stitle>J Paleolimnol</stitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>239</epage><pages>221-239</pages><issn>0921-2728</issn><eissn>1573-0417</eissn><abstract>A recent bathymetric survey of Lake Constance revealed ~ 170 mounds composed of loosely deposited rocks aligned in a ~ 10-km long chain along the southern Swiss shoreline in a water depth of 3–5 m. The mounds are 10–30 m in diameter and up to 1.5 m high. Over their entire length of occurrence, the mounds are estimated to be composed of ~ 60 million individual boulders, with a total weight of ~ 78,000 t. A ground penetrating radar (GPR) survey showed that the mounds are not linked to the glacial substrate but were rather deposited artificially on the edge of a prograding shelf composed of Holocene lake sediments. Here, we present the results of a coring campaign with four piston cores along a GPR transect across one of the mounds. The cores recovered the full Holocene sedimentary succession all the way into the basal till that is overlain by lacustrine sediments dating back to ~ 14,400 cal. yrs BP. The four cores are merged into a ~ 12.4-m long composite section reflecting continuous sedimentation from the siliciclastic-dominated Late Glacial to the carbonate-rich Late Holocene. The stratigraphic horizon representing the mound’s construction was radiocarbon-dated to ~ 5600–5300 cal. yrs BP, placing them in the Neolithic period. This age was confirmed by radiocarbon dating of wood samples collected during underwater excavation of the mounds. Geochemical analysis of the Holocene sedimentary succession shows generally high carbonate contents (average of 69%). The interval from 5750 to 4950 cal. yrs BP, a part of the mound period, is characterized by a Holocene minimum in carbonate content (average of 57%) and by larger mean grain sizes. Comparing these values to those from a recent surface-sediment depth transect indicates that this was a period of rather low lake levels, which might have favoured mound construction. Correlations to nearby archaeological sites and to the general West-Central European lake-level record indicates that the mounds likely were built during a short phase of low lake levels during a general trend of climatic cooling followed by a lake-level transgression.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2728
ispartof Journal of paleolimnology, 2024-08, Vol.72 (2), p.221-239
issn 0921-2728
1573-0417
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3102212580
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Archaeological sites
Archaeology
Bathymetric surveys
Boulders
Carbonates
Climate Change
Construction
Construction sites
Core analysis
Core sampling
Cores
Coring
Dredging
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecological succession
Excavation
Excavation underwater
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Geology
Glacial periods
Grain size
Ground penetrating radar
Historic sites
Holocene
Lacustrine sedimentation
Lake deposits
Lake sediments
Lakes
Mounds
Neolithic
Original Paper
Paleontology
Physical Geography
Radar
Radiocarbon dating
Radiometric dating
Sediment
Sedimentology
Sediments
Shelving
Stone Age
Stratigraphy
Substrates
Surveys
Water depth
title Postglacial evolution of the Lake Constance shelf and its relation to a 10-km long chain of submerged Neolithic mounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T22%3A59%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postglacial%20evolution%20of%20the%20Lake%20Constance%20shelf%20and%20its%20relation%20to%20a%2010-km%20long%20chain%20of%20submerged%20Neolithic%20mounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20paleolimnology&rft.au=Perler,%20Dominic&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=239&rft.pages=221-239&rft.issn=0921-2728&rft.eissn=1573-0417&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10933-024-00322-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3102212580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102212580&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true