Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process

This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908
Hauptverfasser: Shaby, Neta, Peleg, Ran, Coombs, Ian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 908
container_issue 5
container_start_page 891
container_title Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)
container_volume 54
creator Shaby, Neta
Peleg, Ran
Coombs, Ian
description This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3101176755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3101176755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4BTwHP0UySTbLeSvEFLRZR8BbSNLFb2m5Nskj_vakreBMGhhm-x8yH0CXQa6BU3SQAkBWhTBCgIBURR2gAleIEdK2P0YCWgTAh3k_RWUorSnlB8QGazmzMjWt2Nrdxj1988ja6Jf5q8hJPu-S7DZ5F63KTm3brY7rFIxx9WHt3WOBSeenxLrbOp3SOToJdJ3_x24fo7f7udfxIJs8PT-PRhDgOIpNK6WpRi1poJ5yogQalqITaciedrQWfS8oXjAXtPGgINIQ5WwQlteB2zhwfoqtet_h-dj5ls2q7uC2Whpf_QUlVVQXFepSLbUrlaLOLzcbGvQFqDrGZPjZTYjM_sRlRSLwnpQLefvj4J_0P6xueIW_C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3101176755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-244X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Audio data ; Data collection ; Education ; Museums ; Participatory research ; Project planning ; Research design ; Science Education</subject><ispartof>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6618-5843 ; 0000-0002-3788-6613 ; 0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><title>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</title><addtitle>Res Sci Educ</addtitle><description>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</description><subject>Audio data</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Project planning</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><issn>0157-244X</issn><issn>1573-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4BTwHP0UySTbLeSvEFLRZR8BbSNLFb2m5Nskj_vakreBMGhhm-x8yH0CXQa6BU3SQAkBWhTBCgIBURR2gAleIEdK2P0YCWgTAh3k_RWUorSnlB8QGazmzMjWt2Nrdxj1988ja6Jf5q8hJPu-S7DZ5F63KTm3brY7rFIxx9WHt3WOBSeenxLrbOp3SOToJdJ3_x24fo7f7udfxIJs8PT-PRhDgOIpNK6WpRi1poJ5yogQalqITaciedrQWfS8oXjAXtPGgINIQ5WwQlteB2zhwfoqtet_h-dj5ls2q7uC2Whpf_QUlVVQXFepSLbUrlaLOLzcbGvQFqDrGZPjZTYjM_sRlRSLwnpQLefvj4J_0P6xueIW_C</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Shaby, Neta</creator><creator>Peleg, Ran</creator><creator>Coombs, Ian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><author>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audio data</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Project planning</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaby, Neta</au><au>Peleg, Ran</au><au>Coombs, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</atitle><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle><stitle>Res Sci Educ</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>891-908</pages><issn>0157-244X</issn><eissn>1573-1898</eissn><abstract>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0157-244X
ispartof Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908
issn 0157-244X
1573-1898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3101176755
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Audio data
Data collection
Education
Museums
Participatory research
Project planning
Research design
Science Education
title Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participatory%20Research%20with%20Museum%20Practitioners:%20A%20reflection%20on%20the%20process&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20science%20education%20(Australasian%20Science%20Education%20Research%20Association)&rft.au=Shaby,%20Neta&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=891-908&rft.issn=0157-244X&rft.eissn=1573-1898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3101176755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3101176755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true