Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process
This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 908 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 891 |
container_title | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Shaby, Neta Peleg, Ran Coombs, Ian |
description | This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3101176755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3101176755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4BTwHP0UySTbLeSvEFLRZR8BbSNLFb2m5Nskj_vakreBMGhhm-x8yH0CXQa6BU3SQAkBWhTBCgIBURR2gAleIEdK2P0YCWgTAh3k_RWUorSnlB8QGazmzMjWt2Nrdxj1988ja6Jf5q8hJPu-S7DZ5F63KTm3brY7rFIxx9WHt3WOBSeenxLrbOp3SOToJdJ3_x24fo7f7udfxIJs8PT-PRhDgOIpNK6WpRi1poJ5yogQalqITaciedrQWfS8oXjAXtPGgINIQ5WwQlteB2zhwfoqtet_h-dj5ls2q7uC2Whpf_QUlVVQXFepSLbUrlaLOLzcbGvQFqDrGZPjZTYjM_sRlRSLwnpQLefvj4J_0P6xueIW_C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3101176755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</creator><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><description>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0157-244X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Audio data ; Data collection ; Education ; Museums ; Participatory research ; Project planning ; Research design ; Science Education</subject><ispartof>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6618-5843 ; 0000-0002-3788-6613 ; 0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><title>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</title><addtitle>Res Sci Educ</addtitle><description>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</description><subject>Audio data</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Participatory research</subject><subject>Project planning</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><issn>0157-244X</issn><issn>1573-1898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqJgrf4BTwHP0UySTbLeSvEFLRZR8BbSNLFb2m5Nskj_vakreBMGhhm-x8yH0CXQa6BU3SQAkBWhTBCgIBURR2gAleIEdK2P0YCWgTAh3k_RWUorSnlB8QGazmzMjWt2Nrdxj1988ja6Jf5q8hJPu-S7DZ5F63KTm3brY7rFIxx9WHt3WOBSeenxLrbOp3SOToJdJ3_x24fo7f7udfxIJs8PT-PRhDgOIpNK6WpRi1poJ5yogQalqITaciedrQWfS8oXjAXtPGgINIQ5WwQlteB2zhwfoqtet_h-dj5ls2q7uC2Whpf_QUlVVQXFepSLbUrlaLOLzcbGvQFqDrGZPjZTYjM_sRlRSLwnpQLefvj4J_0P6xueIW_C</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Shaby, Neta</creator><creator>Peleg, Ran</creator><creator>Coombs, Ian</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</title><author>Shaby, Neta ; Peleg, Ran ; Coombs, Ian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-5785d94948c4c4910f770619a3c6ca943b603d22f8ce181f0ffb2df76843ab2c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audio data</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Participatory research</topic><topic>Project planning</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shaby, Neta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peleg, Ran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coombs, Ian</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shaby, Neta</au><au>Peleg, Ran</au><au>Coombs, Ian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process</atitle><jtitle>Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association)</jtitle><stitle>Res Sci Educ</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>908</epage><pages>891-908</pages><issn>0157-244X</issn><eissn>1573-1898</eissn><abstract>This research explores the process of a Participatory Research (PR) project that brought together university researchers with museum practitioners to create reflective tools that can be used to better understand real practical challenges. This project followed Bourke’s (2009) definition of PR, viewing the process as a collaborative endeavour between researchers and practitioners in all steps of the way including project planning, research design, data collection and analysis, and distribution and application of research findings. In this project, we ran three main workshops with small group meetings in between, which were audio and video recorded and subsequently transcribed. These were then analysed to capture the PR process using James and Shaw’s (2023) Heuristic Framework as our analytical framework while using deductive and inductive techniques. Our analysis focused on understanding the dynamics between researchers and practitioners in this PR project in order to better understand how to conduct PR projects in this context. Our analysis offers a refined model that can be adapted and used with museum practitioners while identifying areas that need further attention in the process of PR. We included an important phase of reflection, and we offer recommendations for those who would like to take a PR approach in their research.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-5843</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3788-6613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9184-6030</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0157-244X |
ispartof | Research in science education (Australasian Science Education Research Association), 2024, Vol.54 (5), p.891-908 |
issn | 0157-244X 1573-1898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3101176755 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Audio data Data collection Education Museums Participatory research Project planning Research design Science Education |
title | Participatory Research with Museum Practitioners: A reflection on the process |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A00%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Participatory%20Research%20with%20Museum%20Practitioners:%20A%20reflection%20on%20the%20process&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20science%20education%20(Australasian%20Science%20Education%20Research%20Association)&rft.au=Shaby,%20Neta&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=908&rft.pages=891-908&rft.issn=0157-244X&rft.eissn=1573-1898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11165-024-10167-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3101176755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3101176755&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |