Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study

Introduction: Patients with multi-morbidity and complex care-needs typically face multiple care processes, care providers, organizations and specialties over longer periods1. Fragmented care is not only a source of human suffering; it also drives health care costs for this patient group.Theory and M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of integrated care 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.478
Hauptverfasser: Berntsen, Gro Rosvold, Hurley, Joseph Stephen, Dalbakk, Monika, Bergmo, Trine, Bellika, Johan Gustav, Solbakken, Beate, Brattland, Trond, Rumpsfeld, Markus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 478
container_title International journal of integrated care
container_volume 17
creator Berntsen, Gro Rosvold
Hurley, Joseph Stephen
Dalbakk, Monika
Bergmo, Trine
Bellika, Johan Gustav
Solbakken, Beate
Brattland, Trond
Rumpsfeld, Markus
description Introduction: Patients with multi-morbidity and complex care-needs typically face multiple care processes, care providers, organizations and specialties over longer periods1. Fragmented care is not only a source of human suffering; it also drives health care costs for this patient group.Theory and Methods: The PACT project is directed at frail multi-morbid patients with increased risk for emergency hospitalization or re-admission. It is an integrated, multi-professional intervention bridging primary and secondary care while emphasizing a 1) person-centered 2) holistic and 3) proactive approach2.This is a propensity score matched controlled comparison of PACT versus usual care using routine data from the specialist electronic health care record: age, gender, diagnosis codes (ICD10), episodes of health service utilization. Eligibility criteria were patients >=60 years, referred to and treated by the PACT team (intervention) or an emergency admission in a somatic secondary care ward at the Univ hospital of Northern Norway (controls, approx. 10 500 episodes) in 2015. Primary outcome: inpatient emergency days (InPtEmergDays) in secondary care at 6 months follow-up from start and 6 months from stop of intervention. Secondary: 6-month mortality risk. The propensity score (PS) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) was based on 17 and 3 pre-intervention variables respectively. Control PS had to be within a +/- 0,2 SD caliper of intervention PS to be eligible. Within calipers, we chose the match with closest MD. Poisson and Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) between groups.Results:Of 272 PACT episodes of care we excluded 39 (not eligibile), 28 (lacking pre-intervention data) and 22 (no suitable match) leaving 183 PACT episodes, in 177 PACT patients, matched to 183 unique controls. We achieved excellent pre-intervention balance between groups according to Rubin’s criteria3. Participant description: 34% male, average 80 years, 5 long-term ICD-10 diagnoses last year, 4 inpatient emergency days last 30 days prior to intervention.Primary outcome: PACT patients enjoyed a 30% reduction (p
doi_str_mv 10.5334/ijic.3798
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3100318358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3100318358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c978-155fb0c6ecf40942607b9ed71b332abe79e001c8416ef323a36930e519dcff9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUUtOwzAQjRBIlMKCG4zEhkqk2HW-yyriJ1WiEtlHrjOmLklcbLdSWXEHbsRROAkO7YLNzGg08-bNe0FwSck4Ziy6VSslxizNs6NgQOMkCyMfj__Vp8GZtStCJkmcJYPge47G6i4U2Dk0WN-AMNpa0OaVd-qDO6U73gDvamg3jVNroyVau-865C0sebNFC602jjfK7cAo-zaGcokwnzrlcaE4gEPBDULZb13Pp0U5ghe3qXfw8_kFc4ONalXHjUdA629ZkEa3wEHods2Np7JFQClR9FXnWYDt18-DE8kbixeHPAzK-7uyeAxnzw9PxXQWijzNQhrHckFEgkJGJI8mCUkXOdYpXTA24QtMcySEiiyiCUo2YZwlOSMY07wWUuY1GwZXe1gvwfsGratWemO8DLZilBBGMxZnfmq0n_qT0aCs1ka1_qmKkqp3qOodqnqH2C80J4la</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100318358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study</title><source>Uopen Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Ubiquity Partner Network Journals (Open Access)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold ; Hurley, Joseph Stephen ; Dalbakk, Monika ; Bergmo, Trine ; Bellika, Johan Gustav ; Solbakken, Beate ; Brattland, Trond ; Rumpsfeld, Markus</creator><creatorcontrib>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold ; Hurley, Joseph Stephen ; Dalbakk, Monika ; Bergmo, Trine ; Bellika, Johan Gustav ; Solbakken, Beate ; Brattland, Trond ; Rumpsfeld, Markus</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Patients with multi-morbidity and complex care-needs typically face multiple care processes, care providers, organizations and specialties over longer periods1. Fragmented care is not only a source of human suffering; it also drives health care costs for this patient group.Theory and Methods: The PACT project is directed at frail multi-morbid patients with increased risk for emergency hospitalization or re-admission. It is an integrated, multi-professional intervention bridging primary and secondary care while emphasizing a 1) person-centered 2) holistic and 3) proactive approach2.This is a propensity score matched controlled comparison of PACT versus usual care using routine data from the specialist electronic health care record: age, gender, diagnosis codes (ICD10), episodes of health service utilization. Eligibility criteria were patients &gt;=60 years, referred to and treated by the PACT team (intervention) or an emergency admission in a somatic secondary care ward at the Univ hospital of Northern Norway (controls, approx. 10 500 episodes) in 2015. Primary outcome: inpatient emergency days (InPtEmergDays) in secondary care at 6 months follow-up from start and 6 months from stop of intervention. Secondary: 6-month mortality risk. The propensity score (PS) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) was based on 17 and 3 pre-intervention variables respectively. Control PS had to be within a +/- 0,2 SD caliper of intervention PS to be eligible. Within calipers, we chose the match with closest MD. Poisson and Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) between groups.Results:Of 272 PACT episodes of care we excluded 39 (not eligibile), 28 (lacking pre-intervention data) and 22 (no suitable match) leaving 183 PACT episodes, in 177 PACT patients, matched to 183 unique controls. We achieved excellent pre-intervention balance between groups according to Rubin’s criteria3. Participant description: 34% male, average 80 years, 5 long-term ICD-10 diagnoses last year, 4 inpatient emergency days last 30 days prior to intervention.Primary outcome: PACT patients enjoyed a 30% reduction (p&lt;0,001) in InPtEmergDays in the 6 month follow-up from intervention start. However, in the 6-month follow-up from intervention end, PACT patients showed a 30% (p&lt; 0,001) increase in InPtEmergDays. Secondary outcome: The crude mortality risks in PACT and control patients were 14,3% and 28,4% respectively, giving a Cox Hazard Ratio of 0,46 (p&lt;0,001). Crude mortality risk in excluded PACT-patients was 13% (lacking pre-intervention data) and 14% (no match) respectively.Discussions: Our study challenges de Bruins review which found no effect of integrated care on mortality4. The positive effect of PACT on InPtEmergDays seems to be lost after intervention end.Conclusions: PACT provided an initial reduction in InPtEmergDays. The main benefit of PACT is halved risk of death.Limitations:As this is not an RCT, unmeasured confounding could bias results.Suggestions for future research:How do we sustain and reproduce the life-saving effects of PACT in other settings?References:1. Tinetti ME, Fried T, Boyd C. JAMA: 2012;307(23):2493-94.2. Bergmo TS, Berntsen GK, Dalbakk M, et al. BMC Geriatrics 2015;15(133)3. Rubin DB. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2001;2(3-4):169-88.4. de Bruin SR, Health Policy 2012;107(2-3):108-45.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1568-4156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1568-4156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5334/ijic.3798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paterna: Ubiquity Press</publisher><subject>Mortality ; Patients</subject><ispartof>International journal of integrated care, 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.478</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joseph Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalbakk, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmo, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellika, Johan Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solbakken, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brattland, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumpsfeld, Markus</creatorcontrib><title>Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study</title><title>International journal of integrated care</title><description>Introduction: Patients with multi-morbidity and complex care-needs typically face multiple care processes, care providers, organizations and specialties over longer periods1. Fragmented care is not only a source of human suffering; it also drives health care costs for this patient group.Theory and Methods: The PACT project is directed at frail multi-morbid patients with increased risk for emergency hospitalization or re-admission. It is an integrated, multi-professional intervention bridging primary and secondary care while emphasizing a 1) person-centered 2) holistic and 3) proactive approach2.This is a propensity score matched controlled comparison of PACT versus usual care using routine data from the specialist electronic health care record: age, gender, diagnosis codes (ICD10), episodes of health service utilization. Eligibility criteria were patients &gt;=60 years, referred to and treated by the PACT team (intervention) or an emergency admission in a somatic secondary care ward at the Univ hospital of Northern Norway (controls, approx. 10 500 episodes) in 2015. Primary outcome: inpatient emergency days (InPtEmergDays) in secondary care at 6 months follow-up from start and 6 months from stop of intervention. Secondary: 6-month mortality risk. The propensity score (PS) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) was based on 17 and 3 pre-intervention variables respectively. Control PS had to be within a +/- 0,2 SD caliper of intervention PS to be eligible. Within calipers, we chose the match with closest MD. Poisson and Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) between groups.Results:Of 272 PACT episodes of care we excluded 39 (not eligibile), 28 (lacking pre-intervention data) and 22 (no suitable match) leaving 183 PACT episodes, in 177 PACT patients, matched to 183 unique controls. We achieved excellent pre-intervention balance between groups according to Rubin’s criteria3. Participant description: 34% male, average 80 years, 5 long-term ICD-10 diagnoses last year, 4 inpatient emergency days last 30 days prior to intervention.Primary outcome: PACT patients enjoyed a 30% reduction (p&lt;0,001) in InPtEmergDays in the 6 month follow-up from intervention start. However, in the 6-month follow-up from intervention end, PACT patients showed a 30% (p&lt; 0,001) increase in InPtEmergDays. Secondary outcome: The crude mortality risks in PACT and control patients were 14,3% and 28,4% respectively, giving a Cox Hazard Ratio of 0,46 (p&lt;0,001). Crude mortality risk in excluded PACT-patients was 13% (lacking pre-intervention data) and 14% (no match) respectively.Discussions: Our study challenges de Bruins review which found no effect of integrated care on mortality4. The positive effect of PACT on InPtEmergDays seems to be lost after intervention end.Conclusions: PACT provided an initial reduction in InPtEmergDays. The main benefit of PACT is halved risk of death.Limitations:As this is not an RCT, unmeasured confounding could bias results.Suggestions for future research:How do we sustain and reproduce the life-saving effects of PACT in other settings?References:1. Tinetti ME, Fried T, Boyd C. JAMA: 2012;307(23):2493-94.2. Bergmo TS, Berntsen GK, Dalbakk M, et al. BMC Geriatrics 2015;15(133)3. Rubin DB. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2001;2(3-4):169-88.4. de Bruin SR, Health Policy 2012;107(2-3):108-45.</description><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patients</subject><issn>1568-4156</issn><issn>1568-4156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUUtOwzAQjRBIlMKCG4zEhkqk2HW-yyriJ1WiEtlHrjOmLklcbLdSWXEHbsRROAkO7YLNzGg08-bNe0FwSck4Ziy6VSslxizNs6NgQOMkCyMfj__Vp8GZtStCJkmcJYPge47G6i4U2Dk0WN-AMNpa0OaVd-qDO6U73gDvamg3jVNroyVau-865C0sebNFC602jjfK7cAo-zaGcokwnzrlcaE4gEPBDULZb13Pp0U5ghe3qXfw8_kFc4ONalXHjUdA629ZkEa3wEHods2Np7JFQClR9FXnWYDt18-DE8kbixeHPAzK-7uyeAxnzw9PxXQWijzNQhrHckFEgkJGJI8mCUkXOdYpXTA24QtMcySEiiyiCUo2YZwlOSMY07wWUuY1GwZXe1gvwfsGratWemO8DLZilBBGMxZnfmq0n_qT0aCs1ka1_qmKkqp3qOodqnqH2C80J4la</recordid><startdate>20171017</startdate><enddate>20171017</enddate><creator>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold</creator><creator>Hurley, Joseph Stephen</creator><creator>Dalbakk, Monika</creator><creator>Bergmo, Trine</creator><creator>Bellika, Johan Gustav</creator><creator>Solbakken, Beate</creator><creator>Brattland, Trond</creator><creator>Rumpsfeld, Markus</creator><general>Ubiquity Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171017</creationdate><title>Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study</title><author>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold ; Hurley, Joseph Stephen ; Dalbakk, Monika ; Bergmo, Trine ; Bellika, Johan Gustav ; Solbakken, Beate ; Brattland, Trond ; Rumpsfeld, Markus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c978-155fb0c6ecf40942607b9ed71b332abe79e001c8416ef323a36930e519dcff9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patients</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, Joseph Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalbakk, Monika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmo, Trine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellika, Johan Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solbakken, Beate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brattland, Trond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rumpsfeld, Markus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of integrated care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berntsen, Gro Rosvold</au><au>Hurley, Joseph Stephen</au><au>Dalbakk, Monika</au><au>Bergmo, Trine</au><au>Bellika, Johan Gustav</au><au>Solbakken, Beate</au><au>Brattland, Trond</au><au>Rumpsfeld, Markus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of integrated care</jtitle><date>2017-10-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>478</spage><pages>478-</pages><issn>1568-4156</issn><eissn>1568-4156</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Patients with multi-morbidity and complex care-needs typically face multiple care processes, care providers, organizations and specialties over longer periods1. Fragmented care is not only a source of human suffering; it also drives health care costs for this patient group.Theory and Methods: The PACT project is directed at frail multi-morbid patients with increased risk for emergency hospitalization or re-admission. It is an integrated, multi-professional intervention bridging primary and secondary care while emphasizing a 1) person-centered 2) holistic and 3) proactive approach2.This is a propensity score matched controlled comparison of PACT versus usual care using routine data from the specialist electronic health care record: age, gender, diagnosis codes (ICD10), episodes of health service utilization. Eligibility criteria were patients &gt;=60 years, referred to and treated by the PACT team (intervention) or an emergency admission in a somatic secondary care ward at the Univ hospital of Northern Norway (controls, approx. 10 500 episodes) in 2015. Primary outcome: inpatient emergency days (InPtEmergDays) in secondary care at 6 months follow-up from start and 6 months from stop of intervention. Secondary: 6-month mortality risk. The propensity score (PS) and Mahalanobis distance (MD) was based on 17 and 3 pre-intervention variables respectively. Control PS had to be within a +/- 0,2 SD caliper of intervention PS to be eligible. Within calipers, we chose the match with closest MD. Poisson and Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted risk ratios (RR) between groups.Results:Of 272 PACT episodes of care we excluded 39 (not eligibile), 28 (lacking pre-intervention data) and 22 (no suitable match) leaving 183 PACT episodes, in 177 PACT patients, matched to 183 unique controls. We achieved excellent pre-intervention balance between groups according to Rubin’s criteria3. Participant description: 34% male, average 80 years, 5 long-term ICD-10 diagnoses last year, 4 inpatient emergency days last 30 days prior to intervention.Primary outcome: PACT patients enjoyed a 30% reduction (p&lt;0,001) in InPtEmergDays in the 6 month follow-up from intervention start. However, in the 6-month follow-up from intervention end, PACT patients showed a 30% (p&lt; 0,001) increase in InPtEmergDays. Secondary outcome: The crude mortality risks in PACT and control patients were 14,3% and 28,4% respectively, giving a Cox Hazard Ratio of 0,46 (p&lt;0,001). Crude mortality risk in excluded PACT-patients was 13% (lacking pre-intervention data) and 14% (no match) respectively.Discussions: Our study challenges de Bruins review which found no effect of integrated care on mortality4. The positive effect of PACT on InPtEmergDays seems to be lost after intervention end.Conclusions: PACT provided an initial reduction in InPtEmergDays. The main benefit of PACT is halved risk of death.Limitations:As this is not an RCT, unmeasured confounding could bias results.Suggestions for future research:How do we sustain and reproduce the life-saving effects of PACT in other settings?References:1. Tinetti ME, Fried T, Boyd C. JAMA: 2012;307(23):2493-94.2. Bergmo TS, Berntsen GK, Dalbakk M, et al. BMC Geriatrics 2015;15(133)3. Rubin DB. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 2001;2(3-4):169-88.4. de Bruin SR, Health Policy 2012;107(2-3):108-45.</abstract><cop>Paterna</cop><pub>Ubiquity Press</pub><doi>10.5334/ijic.3798</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1568-4156
ispartof International journal of integrated care, 2017-10, Vol.17 (5), p.478
issn 1568-4156
1568-4156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3100318358
source Uopen Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Ubiquity Partner Network Journals (Open Access); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Mortality
Patients
title Person-centered, cross organizational and multiprofessional team halves mortality risk. The PAtient Centered Care Team (PACT) Study – Preliminary results from a comparative effectiveness study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A43%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Person-centered,%20cross%20organizational%20and%20multiprofessional%20team%20halves%20mortality%20risk.%20The%20PAtient%20Centered%20Care%20Team%20(PACT)%20Study%20%E2%80%93%20Preliminary%20results%20from%20a%20comparative%20effectiveness%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20integrated%20care&rft.au=Berntsen,%20Gro%20Rosvold&rft.date=2017-10-17&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=478&rft.pages=478-&rft.issn=1568-4156&rft.eissn=1568-4156&rft_id=info:doi/10.5334/ijic.3798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100318358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100318358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true