Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people
Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing intervie...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Punishment & society 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 731 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 711 |
container_title | Punishment & society |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Sugie, Naomi F. Sandoval, Juan R. Kaiser, Daniela E. Mosca, Delaney Winnen, Kyle Zhang, Emily Rong Zhang, Iris H. |
description | Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/14624745241230199 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3100294892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14624745241230199</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3100294892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59WZJNtsjqX4Dwpe9Lxks5N2S7dZk1TotzelggfxNMPM-70Hj7FbhHtEpR5QzrhUsuISuQDU-oxNUEksBejqPO_5Xx4Fl-wqxg0A1qCqCavn1lKM_W5VpDUVoV-tU5F88eUTFWbw-R4PMdFQ9sNobKKuGMmPW7pmF85sI938zCn7eHp8X7yUy7fn18V8WVouVCp1TYKog9pWAjt0LeoWW1lzIYV1hnNZazmruHMkpEaw5EC2BLprDZ8JJabs7uQ7Bv-5p5iajd-HXY5sBAJwnQ14VuFJZYOPMZBrxtAPJhwahOZYUPOnoMzcn5hoVvTr-j_wDaGCZAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100294892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-4745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14624745241230199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Barriers ; Community organizations ; Community structure ; Confusion ; Criminal justice ; Criminal records ; Disenfranchisement ; Elections ; Recidivism ; Text messaging ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Punishment & society, 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14624745241230199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14624745241230199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval, Juan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Delaney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnen, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Emily Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><title>Punishment & society</title><description>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal records</subject><subject>Disenfranchisement</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Text messaging</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>1462-4745</issn><issn>1741-3095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59WZJNtsjqX4Dwpe9Lxks5N2S7dZk1TotzelggfxNMPM-70Hj7FbhHtEpR5QzrhUsuISuQDU-oxNUEksBejqPO_5Xx4Fl-wqxg0A1qCqCavn1lKM_W5VpDUVoV-tU5F88eUTFWbw-R4PMdFQ9sNobKKuGMmPW7pmF85sI938zCn7eHp8X7yUy7fn18V8WVouVCp1TYKog9pWAjt0LeoWW1lzIYV1hnNZazmruHMkpEaw5EC2BLprDZ8JJabs7uQ7Bv-5p5iajd-HXY5sBAJwnQ14VuFJZYOPMZBrxtAPJhwahOZYUPOnoMzcn5hoVvTr-j_wDaGCZAU</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Sugie, Naomi F.</creator><creator>Sandoval, Juan R.</creator><creator>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creator><creator>Mosca, Delaney</creator><creator>Winnen, Kyle</creator><creator>Zhang, Emily Rong</creator><creator>Zhang, Iris H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><author>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal records</topic><topic>Disenfranchisement</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Text messaging</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval, Juan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Delaney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnen, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Emily Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Punishment & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugie, Naomi F.</au><au>Sandoval, Juan R.</au><au>Kaiser, Daniela E.</au><au>Mosca, Delaney</au><au>Winnen, Kyle</au><au>Zhang, Emily Rong</au><au>Zhang, Iris H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</atitle><jtitle>Punishment & society</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>711-731</pages><issn>1462-4745</issn><eissn>1741-3095</eissn><abstract>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14624745241230199</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1462-4745 |
ispartof | Punishment & society, 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731 |
issn | 1462-4745 1741-3095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3100294892 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Access Barriers Community organizations Community structure Confusion Criminal justice Criminal records Disenfranchisement Elections Recidivism Text messaging Voting rights |
title | Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A57%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accessing%20the%20right%20to%20vote%20among%20system-impacted%20people&rft.jtitle=Punishment%20&%20society&rft.au=Sugie,%20Naomi%20F.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=711-731&rft.issn=1462-4745&rft.eissn=1741-3095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14624745241230199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100294892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100294892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14624745241230199&rfr_iscdi=true |