Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people

Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing intervie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Punishment & society 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731
Hauptverfasser: Sugie, Naomi F., Sandoval, Juan R., Kaiser, Daniela E., Mosca, Delaney, Winnen, Kyle, Zhang, Emily Rong, Zhang, Iris H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 731
container_issue 4
container_start_page 711
container_title Punishment & society
container_volume 26
creator Sugie, Naomi F.
Sandoval, Juan R.
Kaiser, Daniela E.
Mosca, Delaney
Winnen, Kyle
Zhang, Emily Rong
Zhang, Iris H.
description Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14624745241230199
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3100294892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14624745241230199</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3100294892</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59WZJNtsjqX4Dwpe9Lxks5N2S7dZk1TotzelggfxNMPM-70Hj7FbhHtEpR5QzrhUsuISuQDU-oxNUEksBejqPO_5Xx4Fl-wqxg0A1qCqCavn1lKM_W5VpDUVoV-tU5F88eUTFWbw-R4PMdFQ9sNobKKuGMmPW7pmF85sI938zCn7eHp8X7yUy7fn18V8WVouVCp1TYKog9pWAjt0LeoWW1lzIYV1hnNZazmruHMkpEaw5EC2BLprDZ8JJabs7uQ7Bv-5p5iajd-HXY5sBAJwnQ14VuFJZYOPMZBrxtAPJhwahOZYUPOnoMzcn5hoVvTr-j_wDaGCZAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100294892</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><description>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-4745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14624745241230199</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Barriers ; Community organizations ; Community structure ; Confusion ; Criminal justice ; Criminal records ; Disenfranchisement ; Elections ; Recidivism ; Text messaging ; Voting rights</subject><ispartof>Punishment &amp; society, 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14624745241230199$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14624745241230199$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval, Juan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Delaney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnen, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Emily Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><title>Punishment &amp; society</title><description>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Community organizations</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal records</subject><subject>Disenfranchisement</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Text messaging</subject><subject>Voting rights</subject><issn>1462-4745</issn><issn>1741-3095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwNuC59WZJNtsjqX4Dwpe9Lxks5N2S7dZk1TotzelggfxNMPM-70Hj7FbhHtEpR5QzrhUsuISuQDU-oxNUEksBejqPO_5Xx4Fl-wqxg0A1qCqCavn1lKM_W5VpDUVoV-tU5F88eUTFWbw-R4PMdFQ9sNobKKuGMmPW7pmF85sI938zCn7eHp8X7yUy7fn18V8WVouVCp1TYKog9pWAjt0LeoWW1lzIYV1hnNZazmruHMkpEaw5EC2BLprDZ8JJabs7uQ7Bv-5p5iajd-HXY5sBAJwnQ14VuFJZYOPMZBrxtAPJhwahOZYUPOnoMzcn5hoVvTr-j_wDaGCZAU</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Sugie, Naomi F.</creator><creator>Sandoval, Juan R.</creator><creator>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creator><creator>Mosca, Delaney</creator><creator>Winnen, Kyle</creator><creator>Zhang, Emily Rong</creator><creator>Zhang, Iris H.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</title><author>Sugie, Naomi F. ; Sandoval, Juan R. ; Kaiser, Daniela E. ; Mosca, Delaney ; Winnen, Kyle ; Zhang, Emily Rong ; Zhang, Iris H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-98e3eed08c531d1fb19b1b482343cfa224894652ffe34910cef04be09dba26373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Community organizations</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal records</topic><topic>Disenfranchisement</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Text messaging</topic><topic>Voting rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sugie, Naomi F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandoval, Juan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaiser, Daniela E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosca, Delaney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winnen, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Emily Rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Iris H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Punishment &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sugie, Naomi F.</au><au>Sandoval, Juan R.</au><au>Kaiser, Daniela E.</au><au>Mosca, Delaney</au><au>Winnen, Kyle</au><au>Zhang, Emily Rong</au><au>Zhang, Iris H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people</atitle><jtitle>Punishment &amp; society</jtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>711</spage><epage>731</epage><pages>711-731</pages><issn>1462-4745</issn><eissn>1741-3095</eissn><abstract>Recent efforts to dismantle felon disenfranchisement regimes have the potential to substantially expand electoral eligibility among people with criminal records; however, even among those with criminal legal histories who are eligible to vote, voting rates are often extremely low. Analyzing interview, focus group, and text message conversations among a multi-state sample around the November 2022 election, we identify and describe how administrative barriers to voting—including a lack of understanding about the voting process, confusion about legal eligibility, and perceived risks of rearrest of voting while ineligible—pose an access to justice issue among system-impacted people. These barriers are amplified by government mistrust, specifically the perception that barriers are intentionally constructed to suppress voting, and they are potentially mitigated by outreach by community organizations that are viewed as credible. The findings emphasize that legislative reforms repealing disenfranchisement laws must be accompanied by on-the-ground efforts to address administrative burdens to broaden access to the franchise.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14624745241230199</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2346-4786</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-4745
ispartof Punishment & society, 2024-10, Vol.26 (4), p.711-731
issn 1462-4745
1741-3095
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3100294892
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Access
Barriers
Community organizations
Community structure
Confusion
Criminal justice
Criminal records
Disenfranchisement
Elections
Recidivism
Text messaging
Voting rights
title Accessing the right to vote among system-impacted people
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A57%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accessing%20the%20right%20to%20vote%20among%20system-impacted%20people&rft.jtitle=Punishment%20&%20society&rft.au=Sugie,%20Naomi%20F.&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=711&rft.epage=731&rft.pages=711-731&rft.issn=1462-4745&rft.eissn=1741-3095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14624745241230199&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100294892%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100294892&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14624745241230199&rfr_iscdi=true