Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design
The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of mechanical engineering education 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.403-428 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 428 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | International journal of mechanical engineering education |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos Hernández-Luna, Alberto A. Sobek, Durward K. Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A. |
description | The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/03064190231181339 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3099866361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03064190231181339</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3099866361</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7b6df26fbb67e19bbc6a68d72bc541e1d27407aefa1e4c85d2b579f33046c74d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeAFz2k5t8mm6MUuxYKPbSel2Qz227p7tYkFfz2bqngQTwNw7zfm8dD6J7RKWNaP1NBlWSGcsFYzoQwV2jEaUaJzHJ1jUbnOzkLbtEkxsZRZpSQPDMjVBbNJ3Rk3nSeLDq8Ch4C3vRkfXJ7qBL4YcGPxXyxfsItpF3vcd0HnHaAj6F3B2hxTDZBC13CTYcjJOJsHDgPsdl2d-imtocIk585Ru_z183sjSxXxWL2siQVVzIR7ZSvuaqdUxqYca5SVuVec1dlkgHzXEuqLdSWgazyzHOXaVMLQaWqtPRijB4uvkOqjxPEVO77U-iGl6WgxuRKCcUGFbuoqtDHGKAuj6FpbfgqGS3PVZZ_qhyY6YWJdgu_rv8D3692ccU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3099866361</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos ; Hernández-Luna, Alberto A. ; Sobek, Durward K. ; Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos ; Hernández-Luna, Alberto A. ; Sobek, Durward K. ; Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><description>The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-4190</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-4586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03064190231181339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Comparative studies ; Course Content ; Decision making ; Decision Making Skills ; Design ; Feasibility ; Functionals ; Preferences ; Students ; Uncertainty ; Undergraduate study</subject><ispartof>International journal of mechanical engineering education, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.403-428</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7b6df26fbb67e19bbc6a68d72bc541e1d27407aefa1e4c85d2b579f33046c74d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8300-7632</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03064190231181339$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03064190231181339$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Luna, Alberto A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobek, Durward K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><title>Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design</title><title>International journal of mechanical engineering education</title><description>The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal.</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making Skills</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Functionals</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Undergraduate study</subject><issn>0306-4190</issn><issn>2050-4586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE9LAzEQxYMoWGo_gLeAFz2k5t8mm6MUuxYKPbSel2Qz227p7tYkFfz2bqngQTwNw7zfm8dD6J7RKWNaP1NBlWSGcsFYzoQwV2jEaUaJzHJ1jUbnOzkLbtEkxsZRZpSQPDMjVBbNJ3Rk3nSeLDq8Ch4C3vRkfXJ7qBL4YcGPxXyxfsItpF3vcd0HnHaAj6F3B2hxTDZBC13CTYcjJOJsHDgPsdl2d-imtocIk585Ru_z183sjSxXxWL2siQVVzIR7ZSvuaqdUxqYca5SVuVec1dlkgHzXEuqLdSWgazyzHOXaVMLQaWqtPRijB4uvkOqjxPEVO77U-iGl6WgxuRKCcUGFbuoqtDHGKAuj6FpbfgqGS3PVZZ_qhyY6YWJdgu_rv8D3692ccU</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Hernández-Luna, Alberto A.</creator><creator>Sobek, Durward K.</creator><creator>Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-7632</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design</title><author>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos ; Hernández-Luna, Alberto A. ; Sobek, Durward K. ; Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-7b6df26fbb67e19bbc6a68d72bc541e1d27407aefa1e4c85d2b579f33046c74d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making Skills</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Functionals</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Undergraduate study</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Luna, Alberto A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobek, Durward K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>International journal of mechanical engineering education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernández-Caballero, Juan Carlos</au><au>Hernández-Luna, Alberto A.</au><au>Sobek, Durward K.</au><au>Ramírez-Mendoza, Ricardo A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design</atitle><jtitle>International journal of mechanical engineering education</jtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>403-428</pages><issn>0306-4190</issn><eissn>2050-4586</eissn><abstract>The Given-Find-Solution (GFS) method is a widely used procedure to systematically understand “what the problem is” in engineering problems. Nevertheless, the GFS method does not provide a clear guide on how to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference for design problems. Addressing this issue is crucial since the designer usually requires making assumptions to be able to propose functional solutions. The Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method and roadmap are here proposed to systematically state a design problem and requirements using fuzzy desirability functions to handle uncertainty, feasibility, and preference. The GFIS method lists the parameters, variables, specifications, restrictions, and preferences to facilitate the decision-making process. A comparative study was conducted with undergraduate students from Tecnológico de Monterrey enrolled in the course Design Methodologies. The students solved a band brake design problem before and after applying the GFIS method, and their performance was compared. The results showed a significant improvement in their decision-making ability, their capability to find feasible solutions, and the time required to make a design proposal.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03064190231181339</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-7632</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0306-4190 |
ispartof | International journal of mechanical engineering education, 2024-10, Vol.52 (4), p.403-428 |
issn | 0306-4190 2050-4586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3099866361 |
source | SAGE Complete |
subjects | Comparative Analysis Comparative studies Course Content Decision making Decision Making Skills Design Feasibility Functionals Preferences Students Uncertainty Undergraduate study |
title | Given-Find-In Order To-Subjected To (GFIS) method for the problem statement in set-based design |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Given-Find-In%20Order%20To-Subjected%20To%20(GFIS)%20method%20for%20the%20problem%20statement%20in%20set-based%20design&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20mechanical%20engineering%20education&rft.au=Fern%C3%A1ndez-Caballero,%20Juan%20Carlos&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=403-428&rft.issn=0306-4190&rft.eissn=2050-4586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03064190231181339&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3099866361%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3099866361&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03064190231181339&rfr_iscdi=true |