Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir
Tight reservoirs, which are categorized as unconventional reservoirs, introduced significant challenges in oil extraction when compared to conventional reservoirs. In this simulation study, CMG-STARS simulator was employed to conduct six single-factor sensitivity studies (S-FSA) including porosity,...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Tagungsbericht |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 3161 |
| creator | Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al Yazid, M. S. A. M. Aziz, I. A. |
| description | Tight reservoirs, which are categorized as unconventional reservoirs, introduced significant challenges in oil extraction when compared to conventional reservoirs. In this simulation study, CMG-STARS simulator was employed to conduct six single-factor sensitivity studies (S-FSA) including porosity, pay thickness, permeability, injection rate, bottom-hole pressure (BHP), and temperature. The results indicated that porosity had the most pronounced impact on the change of cumulative production, accounting for 42.2%, followed by pay thickness, BHP, injection rate, and permeability, as reported in a prior study. Additionally, it was observed that carbon dioxide (CO2) exhibited a lower minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of 2,014 psi when compared to the solution gas with 3,608 psi. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0229703 |
| format | Conference Proceeding |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098898603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098898603</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p633-7492fde21ec79f511a52f7e2c474d8ddf8f5ece405f2626dddac382a0ce1663e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1j8ljllK0CpUu7MJdCMmNpkxnapIp9N87tl0dzuHjcO9B6J6SGSWSP4kZYaxRhF-gCRWCVkpSeYkmhDR1xWr-dY1uct4QMkJKT9DHZ9wOrS2x73Af8HzFcOw24I6B7TzO0OVY4j6Ww-hte8gxjwi2uMTvn4L72OIEGdK-j-kWXQXbZrg76xStX1_W87dquVq8z5-X1U5yXqm6YcEDo-BUEwSlVrCggLla1V57H3QQ4KAmIjDJpPfeOq6ZJQ6olBz4FD2canep_x0gF7PphzQelw0njdaNloSP1OOJyi6W44dml-LWpoOhxPyvZYQ5r8X_ANxbXF8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3098898603</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir</title><source>美国小型学会期刊集（AIP Scitation平台）</source><creator>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al ; Yazid, M. S. A. M. ; Aziz, I. A.</creator><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al ; Yazid, M. S. A. M. ; Aziz, I. A. ; Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon ; Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva ; Yong, Lau Chee ; Sivanesan, Siva Kumar ; Thiruchelvam, Vinesh ; Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</creatorcontrib><description>Tight reservoirs, which are categorized as unconventional reservoirs, introduced significant challenges in oil extraction when compared to conventional reservoirs. In this simulation study, CMG-STARS simulator was employed to conduct six single-factor sensitivity studies (S-FSA) including porosity, pay thickness, permeability, injection rate, bottom-hole pressure (BHP), and temperature. The results indicated that porosity had the most pronounced impact on the change of cumulative production, accounting for 42.2%, followed by pay thickness, BHP, injection rate, and permeability, as reported in a prior study. Additionally, it was observed that carbon dioxide (CO2) exhibited a lower minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of 2,014 psi when compared to the solution gas with 3,608 psi.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0229703</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Carbon dioxide ; Miscibility ; Permeability ; Porosity ; Reservoirs ; Sensitivity analysis ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0229703$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,794,4512,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,76384</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</contributor><contributor>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</contributor><contributor>Yong, Lau Chee</contributor><contributor>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</contributor><contributor>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</contributor><contributor>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazid, M. S. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, I. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>Tight reservoirs, which are categorized as unconventional reservoirs, introduced significant challenges in oil extraction when compared to conventional reservoirs. In this simulation study, CMG-STARS simulator was employed to conduct six single-factor sensitivity studies (S-FSA) including porosity, pay thickness, permeability, injection rate, bottom-hole pressure (BHP), and temperature. The results indicated that porosity had the most pronounced impact on the change of cumulative production, accounting for 42.2%, followed by pay thickness, BHP, injection rate, and permeability, as reported in a prior study. Additionally, it was observed that carbon dioxide (CO2) exhibited a lower minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of 2,014 psi when compared to the solution gas with 3,608 psi.</description><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Miscibility</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0HAnTA1j8ljllK0CpUu7MJdCMmNpkxnapIp9N87tl0dzuHjcO9B6J6SGSWSP4kZYaxRhF-gCRWCVkpSeYkmhDR1xWr-dY1uct4QMkJKT9DHZ9wOrS2x73Af8HzFcOw24I6B7TzO0OVY4j6Ww-hte8gxjwi2uMTvn4L72OIEGdK-j-kWXQXbZrg76xStX1_W87dquVq8z5-X1U5yXqm6YcEDo-BUEwSlVrCggLla1V57H3QQ4KAmIjDJpPfeOq6ZJQ6olBz4FD2canep_x0gF7PphzQelw0njdaNloSP1OOJyi6W44dml-LWpoOhxPyvZYQ5r8X_ANxbXF8</recordid><startdate>20240830</startdate><enddate>20240830</enddate><creator>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al</creator><creator>Yazid, M. S. A. M.</creator><creator>Aziz, I. A.</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240830</creationdate><title>Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir</title><author>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al ; Yazid, M. S. A. M. ; Aziz, I. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p633-7492fde21ec79f511a52f7e2c474d8ddf8f5ece405f2626dddac382a0ce1663e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Miscibility</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazid, M. S. A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, I. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ammari, Q. M. S. H. Al</au><au>Yazid, M. S. A. M.</au><au>Aziz, I. A.</au><au>Cheong, Alexander Chee Hon</au><au>Perumal, Sathish Kumar Selva</au><au>Yong, Lau Chee</au><au>Sivanesan, Siva Kumar</au><au>Thiruchelvam, Vinesh</au><au>Nataraj, Chandrasekharan</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2024-08-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3161</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>Tight reservoirs, which are categorized as unconventional reservoirs, introduced significant challenges in oil extraction when compared to conventional reservoirs. In this simulation study, CMG-STARS simulator was employed to conduct six single-factor sensitivity studies (S-FSA) including porosity, pay thickness, permeability, injection rate, bottom-hole pressure (BHP), and temperature. The results indicated that porosity had the most pronounced impact on the change of cumulative production, accounting for 42.2%, followed by pay thickness, BHP, injection rate, and permeability, as reported in a prior study. Additionally, it was observed that carbon dioxide (CO2) exhibited a lower minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of 2,014 psi when compared to the solution gas with 3,608 psi.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0229703</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
| ispartof | AIP Conference Proceedings, 2024, Vol.3161 (1) |
| issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3098898603 |
| source | 美国小型学会期刊集（AIP Scitation平台） |
| subjects | Carbon dioxide Miscibility Permeability Porosity Reservoirs Sensitivity analysis Thickness |
| title | Simulation of CO2 injection and sensitivity analysis in a tight oil reservoir |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A17%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Simulation%20of%20CO2%20injection%20and%20sensitivity%20analysis%20in%20a%20tight%20oil%20reservoir&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Ammari,%20Q.%20M.%20S.%20H.%20Al&rft.date=2024-08-30&rft.volume=3161&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0229703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3098898603%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098898603&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |