Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models
Impacts of a range of policy scenarios on end-use energy demand are examined using a coupling of MARKAL, an energy system model with extensive supply and end-use technological detail, and Inforum LIFT, a large-scale model of the U.S. economy with inter-industry, government, and consumer behavioral d...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2011-10, Vol.32 (1_suppl), p.173-192 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 192 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1_suppl |
| container_start_page | 173 |
| container_title | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.) |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Steckley, Samuel G. Meade, Douglas S. Lenox, Carol Shay Hoffman, Kenneth C. Reid, David H. H. Schoener, Bradley C. |
| description | Impacts of a range of policy scenarios on end-use energy demand are examined using a coupling of MARKAL, an energy system model with extensive supply and end-use technological detail, and Inforum LIFT, a large-scale model of the U.S. economy with inter-industry, government, and consumer behavioral dynamics. Responses in end-use energy demand are the result of energy efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and indirect economy-wide impacts. Carbon emissions reductions attributed to end-use demand response are analyzed and compared to carbon emissions reductions attributed to changes in the electric sector. Scenarios with the greatest impacts are a carbon tax case, resulting in a shift away from coal generation in the electric sector, and a normative case using a 7% discount rate for end-use technology investment decisions, resulting in increased adoption of energy efficient technology. In the course of addressing the specific EMF 25 scenarios and specified assumptions, a number of interesting issues were identified for follow-on analyses.
doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098710409</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A303450624</galeid><sage_id>10.5547_ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A303450624</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9303a1c2bc84c8c68f0ee2d24a217c5d85020f3f1cf2813f66215bbc0b6b79c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rHCEYRiU0kG2S_zBQelGoqTrOh4VeLNtpuiFpIZv0Vpx3dGJwx804A91_Xzebr4W9qIKCnCPy-CD0kZKzLOPFl_li8YtQkeE8KziuLvAf71KGF3OKKTlAEyo4x4KU4h2avHBH6H0I9yQOXpQTdF51um_XyXe9VF2TTDvl1oOFkNwG27XJzI8rp5vkRsNd551vLSiXbMgKfOeXFpIr32gXTtChUS7o06f9GN3-qG5mP_Hl7_P5bHqJgadiwCIlqaLAaig5lJCXhmjNGsYVowVkTZkRRkxqKBhW0tTkOaNZXQOp87oQkKfH6MP23lXvH0YdBnnvxz6-OsiUiLKghBPxSrXKaWk744dewdIGkNP4Ap6RnPFI4T1Uq2MiyvlOGxuPd_izPXycjY5B7BU-7QiRGfTfoVVjCHK-uN5lP79h6zHGr0Ncgm3vhrBVdvBvWxx6H0KvjVz1dqn6taREbtohn9shN78uqwv52A4Z2xGR6H_d-kG1-jXD_5P_AWWEvec</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098710409</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Steckley, Samuel G. ; Meade, Douglas S. ; Lenox, Carol Shay ; Hoffman, Kenneth C. ; Reid, David H. ; H. Schoener, Bradley C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steckley, Samuel G. ; Meade, Douglas S. ; Lenox, Carol Shay ; Hoffman, Kenneth C. ; Reid, David H. ; H. Schoener, Bradley C.</creatorcontrib><description>Impacts of a range of policy scenarios on end-use energy demand are examined using a coupling of MARKAL, an energy system model with extensive supply and end-use technological detail, and Inforum LIFT, a large-scale model of the U.S. economy with inter-industry, government, and consumer behavioral dynamics. Responses in end-use energy demand are the result of energy efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and indirect economy-wide impacts. Carbon emissions reductions attributed to end-use demand response are analyzed and compared to carbon emissions reductions attributed to changes in the electric sector. Scenarios with the greatest impacts are a carbon tax case, resulting in a shift away from coal generation in the electric sector, and a normative case using a 7% discount rate for end-use technology investment decisions, resulting in increased adoption of energy efficient technology. In the course of addressing the specific EMF 25 scenarios and specified assumptions, a number of interesting issues were identified for follow-on analyses.
doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adoption of innovations ; Carbon ; Coal ; Economic aspects ; Economic models ; Electromagnetic fields ; Emissions ; Emissions control ; Energy ; Energy demand ; Energy efficiency ; Energy industry ; Energy management ; Environmental tax ; Forecasts and trends ; Production management ; Scale models ; Taxation</subject><ispartof>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2011-10, Vol.32 (1_suppl), p.173-192</ispartof><rights>The Author(s)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 International Association for Energy Economics</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9303a1c2bc84c8c68f0ee2d24a217c5d85020f3f1cf2813f66215bbc0b6b79c63</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27847,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steckley, Samuel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Douglas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenox, Carol Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H. Schoener, Bradley C.</creatorcontrib><title>Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models</title><title>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</title><description>Impacts of a range of policy scenarios on end-use energy demand are examined using a coupling of MARKAL, an energy system model with extensive supply and end-use technological detail, and Inforum LIFT, a large-scale model of the U.S. economy with inter-industry, government, and consumer behavioral dynamics. Responses in end-use energy demand are the result of energy efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and indirect economy-wide impacts. Carbon emissions reductions attributed to end-use demand response are analyzed and compared to carbon emissions reductions attributed to changes in the electric sector. Scenarios with the greatest impacts are a carbon tax case, resulting in a shift away from coal generation in the electric sector, and a normative case using a 7% discount rate for end-use technology investment decisions, resulting in increased adoption of energy efficient technology. In the course of addressing the specific EMF 25 scenarios and specified assumptions, a number of interesting issues were identified for follow-on analyses.
doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</description><subject>Adoption of innovations</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coal</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Electromagnetic fields</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Scale models</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><issn>0195-6574</issn><issn>1944-9089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rHCEYRiU0kG2S_zBQelGoqTrOh4VeLNtpuiFpIZv0Vpx3dGJwx804A91_Xzebr4W9qIKCnCPy-CD0kZKzLOPFl_li8YtQkeE8KziuLvAf71KGF3OKKTlAEyo4x4KU4h2avHBH6H0I9yQOXpQTdF51um_XyXe9VF2TTDvl1oOFkNwG27XJzI8rp5vkRsNd551vLSiXbMgKfOeXFpIr32gXTtChUS7o06f9GN3-qG5mP_Hl7_P5bHqJgadiwCIlqaLAaig5lJCXhmjNGsYVowVkTZkRRkxqKBhW0tTkOaNZXQOp87oQkKfH6MP23lXvH0YdBnnvxz6-OsiUiLKghBPxSrXKaWk744dewdIGkNP4Ap6RnPFI4T1Uq2MiyvlOGxuPd_izPXycjY5B7BU-7QiRGfTfoVVjCHK-uN5lP79h6zHGr0Ncgm3vhrBVdvBvWxx6H0KvjVz1dqn6taREbtohn9shN78uqwv52A4Z2xGR6H_d-kG1-jXD_5P_AWWEvec</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Steckley, Samuel G.</creator><creator>Meade, Douglas S.</creator><creator>Lenox, Carol Shay</creator><creator>Hoffman, Kenneth C.</creator><creator>Reid, David H.</creator><creator>H. Schoener, Bradley C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>International Association for Energy Economics</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models</title><author>Steckley, Samuel G. ; Meade, Douglas S. ; Lenox, Carol Shay ; Hoffman, Kenneth C. ; Reid, David H. ; H. Schoener, Bradley C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c439t-9303a1c2bc84c8c68f0ee2d24a217c5d85020f3f1cf2813f66215bbc0b6b79c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adoption of innovations</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coal</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Electromagnetic fields</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Scale models</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steckley, Samuel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meade, Douglas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lenox, Carol Shay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, Kenneth C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, David H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>H. Schoener, Bradley C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steckley, Samuel G.</au><au>Meade, Douglas S.</au><au>Lenox, Carol Shay</au><au>Hoffman, Kenneth C.</au><au>Reid, David H.</au><au>H. Schoener, Bradley C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models</atitle><jtitle>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1_suppl</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>173-192</pages><issn>0195-6574</issn><eissn>1944-9089</eissn><abstract>Impacts of a range of policy scenarios on end-use energy demand are examined using a coupling of MARKAL, an energy system model with extensive supply and end-use technological detail, and Inforum LIFT, a large-scale model of the U.S. economy with inter-industry, government, and consumer behavioral dynamics. Responses in end-use energy demand are the result of energy efficiency improvements, fuel switching, and indirect economy-wide impacts. Carbon emissions reductions attributed to end-use demand response are analyzed and compared to carbon emissions reductions attributed to changes in the electric sector. Scenarios with the greatest impacts are a carbon tax case, resulting in a shift away from coal generation in the electric sector, and a normative case using a 7% discount rate for end-use technology investment decisions, resulting in increased adoption of energy efficient technology. In the course of addressing the specific EMF 25 scenarios and specified assumptions, a number of interesting issues were identified for follow-on analyses.
doi: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-6574 |
| ispartof | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2011-10, Vol.32 (1_suppl), p.173-192 |
| issn | 0195-6574 1944-9089 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3098710409 |
| source | PAIS Index; Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Adoption of innovations Carbon Coal Economic aspects Economic models Electromagnetic fields Emissions Emissions control Energy Energy demand Energy efficiency Energy industry Energy management Environmental tax Forecasts and trends Production management Scale models Taxation |
| title | Energy Demand Analytics Using Coupled Technological and Economic Models |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A24%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Energy%20Demand%20Analytics%20Using%20Coupled%20Technological%20and%20Economic%20Models&rft.jtitle=The%20Energy%20journal%20(Cambridge,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Steckley,%20Samuel%20G.&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1_suppl&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=173-192&rft.issn=0195-6574&rft.eissn=1944-9089&rft_id=info:doi/10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA303450624%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098710409&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A303450624&rft_sage_id=10.5547_ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol32-SI1-10&rfr_iscdi=true |