Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management
Demand-side Management (DSM) programs by electricity utilities report substantial energy savings that often receive little support from empirical studies. We argue that this discrepancy results from an inherently static view of technology adoption by utilities when estimating future energy savings....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.) Mass.), 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.219-232 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 232 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 219 |
container_title | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.) |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Cai, Wenbiao Grant, Hugh Pandey, Manish |
description | Demand-side Management (DSM) programs by electricity utilities report substantial energy savings that often receive little support from empirical studies. We argue that this discrepancy results from an inherently static view of technology adoption by utilities when estimating future energy savings. We illustrate this through a simple model of technology adoption, in which households operate different vintages of appliances and have heterogenous forecasts about the rate of future technological progress. An “energy efficiency gap” arises when households under-estimate the true rate of technological progress. We parameterize the model using data on refrigerators and show that a DSM program that subsidizes adoption of energy-efficient refrigerators yields small energy saving that, in most cases, do not justify the cost of the subsidy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5547/01956574.39.2.wcai |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098709868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A563081629</galeid><jstor_id>26534431</jstor_id><sage_id>10.5547_01956574.39.2.wcai</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A563081629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4de2708d4cea5d1f8e7d42882ec6a23afa853f978e119893199e1da2b633c0b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kl1rHCEUhqW00G3aP1AoDPQ2Mxm_Rr1ctukHTchF096K65yZuMzoVl3K_vu6bNoksERR4fA8HtAXofe4bThn4qLFindcsIaqhjR_rHEv0AIrxmrVSvUSLQ5AfSBeozcpbdoymJAL9P2X89mMUK3M1mUznVe3YO98mMK4r5Z92GYXfGV8X11OYHN01uV99QnmUqp_uB6qa-OLP4PPb9GrwUwJ3t2fZ-jn58vb1df66ubLt9XyqrZckFyzHohoZc8sGN7jQYLoGZGSgO0MoWYwktNBCQkYK6koVgpwb8i6o9S2a0nP0MfjvdsYfu8gZb0Ju-hLS01bJUVZ3bMU4YQJJgjlD9RoJtDODyFHY2eXrF7yjrYSd0QVqj5BjeAhmil4GFwpP-GbE3yZPczOnhTOHwnrXXIeUtmSG-9yGs0upac4OeI2hpQiDHob3WziXuNWHwKh_wVCU6WJPgSiSBdHKZX_eniMZ40PR2OTcoj_e5COU8Yopn8BVsu-bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524747235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Cai, Wenbiao ; Grant, Hugh ; Pandey, Manish</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenbiao ; Grant, Hugh ; Pandey, Manish</creatorcontrib><description>Demand-side Management (DSM) programs by electricity utilities report substantial energy savings that often receive little support from empirical studies. We argue that this discrepancy results from an inherently static view of technology adoption by utilities when estimating future energy savings. We illustrate this through a simple model of technology adoption, in which households operate different vintages of appliances and have heterogenous forecasts about the rate of future technological progress. An “energy efficiency gap” arises when households under-estimate the true rate of technological progress. We parameterize the model using data on refrigerators and show that a DSM program that subsidizes adoption of energy-efficient refrigerators yields small energy saving that, in most cases, do not justify the cost of the subsidy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6574</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5547/01956574.39.2.wcai</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Energy Economics Education Foundation</publisher><subject>Electric power demand ; Electric utilities ; Electricity ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy economics ; Energy efficiency ; Energy management ; Households ; Management ; Refrigerators ; Residential energy ; Technology adoption ; Technology application ; Technology utilization</subject><ispartof>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.219-232</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the IAEE</rights><rights>The Author(s)</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright 2018, Wenbiao Cai, Hugh Grant, and Manish Pandey</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4de2708d4cea5d1f8e7d42882ec6a23afa853f978e119893199e1da2b633c0b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4de2708d4cea5d1f8e7d42882ec6a23afa853f978e119893199e1da2b633c0b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26534431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26534431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Manish</creatorcontrib><title>Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management</title><title>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</title><description>Demand-side Management (DSM) programs by electricity utilities report substantial energy savings that often receive little support from empirical studies. We argue that this discrepancy results from an inherently static view of technology adoption by utilities when estimating future energy savings. We illustrate this through a simple model of technology adoption, in which households operate different vintages of appliances and have heterogenous forecasts about the rate of future technological progress. An “energy efficiency gap” arises when households under-estimate the true rate of technological progress. We parameterize the model using data on refrigerators and show that a DSM program that subsidizes adoption of energy-efficient refrigerators yields small energy saving that, in most cases, do not justify the cost of the subsidy.</description><subject>Electric power demand</subject><subject>Electric utilities</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy economics</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Refrigerators</subject><subject>Residential energy</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Technology utilization</subject><issn>0195-6574</issn><issn>1944-9089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kl1rHCEUhqW00G3aP1AoDPQ2Mxm_Rr1ctukHTchF096K65yZuMzoVl3K_vu6bNoksERR4fA8HtAXofe4bThn4qLFindcsIaqhjR_rHEv0AIrxmrVSvUSLQ5AfSBeozcpbdoymJAL9P2X89mMUK3M1mUznVe3YO98mMK4r5Z92GYXfGV8X11OYHN01uV99QnmUqp_uB6qa-OLP4PPb9GrwUwJ3t2fZ-jn58vb1df66ubLt9XyqrZckFyzHohoZc8sGN7jQYLoGZGSgO0MoWYwktNBCQkYK6koVgpwb8i6o9S2a0nP0MfjvdsYfu8gZb0Ju-hLS01bJUVZ3bMU4YQJJgjlD9RoJtDODyFHY2eXrF7yjrYSd0QVqj5BjeAhmil4GFwpP-GbE3yZPczOnhTOHwnrXXIeUtmSG-9yGs0upac4OeI2hpQiDHob3WziXuNWHwKh_wVCU6WJPgSiSBdHKZX_eniMZ40PR2OTcoj_e5COU8Yopn8BVsu-bg</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Cai, Wenbiao</creator><creator>Grant, Hugh</creator><creator>Pandey, Manish</creator><general>Energy Economics Education Foundation</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>International Association for Energy Economics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management</title><author>Cai, Wenbiao ; Grant, Hugh ; Pandey, Manish</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c572t-4de2708d4cea5d1f8e7d42882ec6a23afa853f978e119893199e1da2b633c0b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Electric power demand</topic><topic>Electric utilities</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy economics</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Refrigerators</topic><topic>Residential energy</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Technology utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Wenbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Hugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Manish</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Wenbiao</au><au>Grant, Hugh</au><au>Pandey, Manish</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management</atitle><jtitle>The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>219-232</pages><issn>0195-6574</issn><eissn>1944-9089</eissn><abstract>Demand-side Management (DSM) programs by electricity utilities report substantial energy savings that often receive little support from empirical studies. We argue that this discrepancy results from an inherently static view of technology adoption by utilities when estimating future energy savings. We illustrate this through a simple model of technology adoption, in which households operate different vintages of appliances and have heterogenous forecasts about the rate of future technological progress. An “energy efficiency gap” arises when households under-estimate the true rate of technological progress. We parameterize the model using data on refrigerators and show that a DSM program that subsidizes adoption of energy-efficient refrigerators yields small energy saving that, in most cases, do not justify the cost of the subsidy.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Energy Economics Education Foundation</pub><doi>10.5547/01956574.39.2.wcai</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0195-6574 |
ispartof | The Energy journal (Cambridge, Mass.), 2018-03, Vol.39 (2), p.219-232 |
issn | 0195-6574 1944-9089 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3098709868 |
source | Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Electric power demand Electric utilities Electricity Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy economics Energy efficiency Energy management Households Management Refrigerators Residential energy Technology adoption Technology application Technology utilization |
title | Vintage Capital, Technology Adoption and Electricity Demand-Side Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A53%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vintage%20Capital,%20Technology%20Adoption%20and%20Electricity%20Demand-Side%20Management&rft.jtitle=The%20Energy%20journal%20(Cambridge,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Cai,%20Wenbiao&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=219-232&rft.issn=0195-6574&rft.eissn=1944-9089&rft_id=info:doi/10.5547/01956574.39.2.wcai&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA563081629%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524747235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A563081629&rft_jstor_id=26534431&rft_sage_id=10.5547_01956574.39.2.wcai&rfr_iscdi=true |