Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan
During China’s First Five-Year Plan (1953–1957), a state purchasing monopsony on grain injected sudden, concentrated spurts of cash into the rural economy. Grassroots cadres faced a new problem: peasants with too much cash burning a hole in their collectivized pocket were prone to “spontaneous capit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Twentieth-century China 2019, Vol.44 (1), p.53-74 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 74 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 53 |
container_title | Twentieth-century China |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Lowenstein, Matthew |
description | During China’s First Five-Year Plan (1953–1957), a state purchasing monopsony on grain injected sudden, concentrated spurts of cash into the rural economy. Grassroots cadres faced a new problem: peasants with too much cash burning a hole in their collectivized pocket were prone to “spontaneous capitalist tendencies,” including high-interest lending, hoarding, and black-market activity. By examining previously unused documents from the Wenzhou Party Committee, this study explores the role of “huilong”—the return flow of cash into the coffers of the People’s Bank of China—as a tool of local governance to mitigate such tendencies. Ultimately, the study shows that illicit economic activity was not merely a function of capitalist ideology but was a structural side effect of the planned economy itself. Regional authorities recognized this. Their attempts to curb capitalist behavior reflected a sophisticated appreciation of the perils of excess money and an almost monetarist policy prescription to counter them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/tcc.2019.0003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098516606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098516606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-a8ce697fcca670357e543f9d91e9a4bc7f1f9300fc1c14e2797511a1e04247963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPWzObr8ablFaFisWPg6cQ46zd0u7WJBV682_49_wlZqkoDDNzeOedmYeQU2AD4JKfJ-8HJQMzYIzxPdIDI1ghmZL7uZclFJIP5SE5inHBmIIcPTK-x7QJDU0tTXOkI_eGF_S2bTC5sKWzdln7La0bOprXjfv-_Ip0UoeYcv7A4hldoLOla47JQeWWEU9-a588TcaPo-tiend1M7qcFp4Lkwo39KiMrrx3SjMuNUrBK_NqAI0TL15XUBnOWOXBg8BSGy0BHCATpdBG8T452_muQ_u-wZjsos3X55WWMzOUoBTrVMVO5UMbY8DKrkO9yv9YYLYjZTMp25GyHamsF3-uC_RptYn4b6yBc6PsQ0ezgwkGuinBfwAHlGqJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098516606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan</title><source>ProQuest Central Essentials</source><source>ProQuest Central Student</source><source>ProQuest Central Korea</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Lowenstein, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>During China’s First Five-Year Plan (1953–1957), a state purchasing monopsony on grain injected sudden, concentrated spurts of cash into the rural economy. Grassroots cadres faced a new problem: peasants with too much cash burning a hole in their collectivized pocket were prone to “spontaneous capitalist tendencies,” including high-interest lending, hoarding, and black-market activity. By examining previously unused documents from the Wenzhou Party Committee, this study explores the role of “huilong”—the return flow of cash into the coffers of the People’s Bank of China—as a tool of local governance to mitigate such tendencies. Ultimately, the study shows that illicit economic activity was not merely a function of capitalist ideology but was a structural side effect of the planned economy itself. Regional authorities recognized this. Their attempts to curb capitalist behavior reflected a sophisticated appreciation of the perils of excess money and an almost monetarist policy prescription to counter them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-5385</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1940-5065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-5065</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/tcc.2019.0003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baton Rouge: Johns Hopkins University Press</publisher><subject>Appreciation ; Committees ; Economic activity ; Free markets ; Governance ; Grass roots movement ; Hoarding ; Inflation ; Monetary policy ; Money ; Monopsony ; Peasants ; Planned economy ; Rural areas</subject><ispartof>Twentieth-century China, 2019, Vol.44 (1), p.53-74</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Twentieth Century China Journal, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Johns Hopkins University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-a8ce697fcca670357e543f9d91e9a4bc7f1f9300fc1c14e2797511a1e04247963</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3098516606/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3098516606?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,21387,21389,21390,23255,27922,27923,27924,33702,33743,34004,34313,43786,43804,43952,44066,64384,64388,72240,74054,74073,74244,74361</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan</title><title>Twentieth-century China</title><description>During China’s First Five-Year Plan (1953–1957), a state purchasing monopsony on grain injected sudden, concentrated spurts of cash into the rural economy. Grassroots cadres faced a new problem: peasants with too much cash burning a hole in their collectivized pocket were prone to “spontaneous capitalist tendencies,” including high-interest lending, hoarding, and black-market activity. By examining previously unused documents from the Wenzhou Party Committee, this study explores the role of “huilong”—the return flow of cash into the coffers of the People’s Bank of China—as a tool of local governance to mitigate such tendencies. Ultimately, the study shows that illicit economic activity was not merely a function of capitalist ideology but was a structural side effect of the planned economy itself. Regional authorities recognized this. Their attempts to curb capitalist behavior reflected a sophisticated appreciation of the perils of excess money and an almost monetarist policy prescription to counter them.</description><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Free markets</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Hoarding</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Monopsony</subject><subject>Peasants</subject><subject>Planned economy</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><issn>1521-5385</issn><issn>1940-5065</issn><issn>1940-5065</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtH7wHPWzObr8ablFaFisWPg6cQ46zd0u7WJBV682_49_wlZqkoDDNzeOedmYeQU2AD4JKfJ-8HJQMzYIzxPdIDI1ghmZL7uZclFJIP5SE5inHBmIIcPTK-x7QJDU0tTXOkI_eGF_S2bTC5sKWzdln7La0bOprXjfv-_Ip0UoeYcv7A4hldoLOla47JQeWWEU9-a588TcaPo-tiend1M7qcFp4Lkwo39KiMrrx3SjMuNUrBK_NqAI0TL15XUBnOWOXBg8BSGy0BHCATpdBG8T452_muQ_u-wZjsos3X55WWMzOUoBTrVMVO5UMbY8DKrkO9yv9YYLYjZTMp25GyHamsF3-uC_RptYn4b6yBc6PsQ0ezgwkGuinBfwAHlGqJ</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Lowenstein, Matthew</creator><general>Johns Hopkins University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan</title><author>Lowenstein, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-a8ce697fcca670357e543f9d91e9a4bc7f1f9300fc1c14e2797511a1e04247963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Free markets</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Hoarding</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Monopsony</topic><topic>Peasants</topic><topic>Planned economy</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lowenstein, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Twentieth-century China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lowenstein, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan</atitle><jtitle>Twentieth-century China</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>53-74</pages><issn>1521-5385</issn><issn>1940-5065</issn><eissn>1940-5065</eissn><abstract>During China’s First Five-Year Plan (1953–1957), a state purchasing monopsony on grain injected sudden, concentrated spurts of cash into the rural economy. Grassroots cadres faced a new problem: peasants with too much cash burning a hole in their collectivized pocket were prone to “spontaneous capitalist tendencies,” including high-interest lending, hoarding, and black-market activity. By examining previously unused documents from the Wenzhou Party Committee, this study explores the role of “huilong”—the return flow of cash into the coffers of the People’s Bank of China—as a tool of local governance to mitigate such tendencies. Ultimately, the study shows that illicit economic activity was not merely a function of capitalist ideology but was a structural side effect of the planned economy itself. Regional authorities recognized this. Their attempts to curb capitalist behavior reflected a sophisticated appreciation of the perils of excess money and an almost monetarist policy prescription to counter them.</abstract><cop>Baton Rouge</cop><pub>Johns Hopkins University Press</pub><doi>10.1353/tcc.2019.0003</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1521-5385 |
ispartof | Twentieth-century China, 2019, Vol.44 (1), p.53-74 |
issn | 1521-5385 1940-5065 1940-5065 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3098516606 |
source | ProQuest Central Essentials; ProQuest Central Student; ProQuest Central Korea; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Appreciation Committees Economic activity Free markets Governance Grass roots movement Hoarding Inflation Monetary policy Money Monopsony Peasants Planned economy Rural areas |
title | Return to the Cage: Monetary Policy in China’s First Five-Year Plan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Return%20to%20the%20Cage:%20Monetary%20Policy%20in%20China%E2%80%99s%20First%20Five-Year%20Plan&rft.jtitle=Twentieth-century%20China&rft.au=Lowenstein,%20Matthew&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=53-74&rft.issn=1521-5385&rft.eissn=1940-5065&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/tcc.2019.0003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3098516606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098516606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |