Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm
With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1660 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Wang, Dudu Guo, Haimin Sun, Yongtuo Liang, Haoxun Li, Ao Guo, Yuqing |
description | With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative techni |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr12081660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098190227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098190227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm7CabDab3WNbbBUK7aGit2V2N3FTtps1SSm9-Q6-oU9iShWdyww_3_zD_AhdU3LHWE7ue0tjktE0JWdoEMexiHJBxfm_-RKNnNuQUDllGU8HSK-srHXltemwUXip26-Pzxfw0uL13kSrBpzEs9bs8Qp8UDuHJ0GqceAncJBOQ4eXvddb7eDXxTcSv84nxjiPx-2bsdo32yt0oaB1cvTTh-h59rCePkaL5fxpOl5EFc0SH0EGGeWiKsukFBVLeUVBxaoUsk7Ck5xwJUieUVJnaZ4yAkA5KKI4TZI4psCG6Obk21vzvpPOFxuzs104WbDjYk5CGoG6PVGVNc5ZqYre6i3YQ0FJcUyz-EuTfQM0h2dW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098190227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><description>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr12081660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Biodiesel fuels ; Comparative analysis ; Complexity ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Effectiveness ; Efficiency ; Experiments ; Flow distribution ; Flow simulation ; Flow velocity ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Inclination angle ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Multiphase flow ; Oil ; Optimization ; Petroleum ; Petroleum engineering ; Prediction models ; Predictions ; Recall ; Simulation ; Two phase flow</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yongtuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Haoxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><title>Processes</title><description>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Flow distribution</subject><subject>Flow simulation</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multiphase flow</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum engineering</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Two phase flow</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm7CabDab3WNbbBUK7aGit2V2N3FTtps1SSm9-Q6-oU9iShWdyww_3_zD_AhdU3LHWE7ue0tjktE0JWdoEMexiHJBxfm_-RKNnNuQUDllGU8HSK-srHXltemwUXip26-Pzxfw0uL13kSrBpzEs9bs8Qp8UDuHJ0GqceAncJBOQ4eXvddb7eDXxTcSv84nxjiPx-2bsdo32yt0oaB1cvTTh-h59rCePkaL5fxpOl5EFc0SH0EGGeWiKsukFBVLeUVBxaoUsk7Ck5xwJUieUVJnaZ4yAkA5KKI4TZI4psCG6Obk21vzvpPOFxuzs104WbDjYk5CGoG6PVGVNc5ZqYre6i3YQ0FJcUyz-EuTfQM0h2dW</recordid><startdate>20240807</startdate><enddate>20240807</enddate><creator>Wang, Dudu</creator><creator>Guo, Haimin</creator><creator>Sun, Yongtuo</creator><creator>Liang, Haoxun</creator><creator>Li, Ao</creator><creator>Guo, Yuqing</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240807</creationdate><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><author>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Flow distribution</topic><topic>Flow simulation</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multiphase flow</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum engineering</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Two phase flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yongtuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Haoxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Dudu</au><au>Guo, Haimin</au><au>Sun, Yongtuo</au><au>Liang, Haoxun</au><au>Li, Ao</au><au>Guo, Yuqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2024-08-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1660</spage><pages>1660-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr12081660</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3098190227 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Bayesian analysis Biodiesel fuels Comparative analysis Complexity Datasets Decision making Decision trees Effectiveness Efficiency Experiments Flow distribution Flow simulation Flow velocity Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Inclination angle Machine learning Mathematical models Multiphase flow Oil Optimization Petroleum Petroleum engineering Prediction models Predictions Recall Simulation Two phase flow |
title | Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Oil%E2%80%93Water%20Two-Phase%20Flow%20Patterns%20Based%20on%20Bayesian%20Optimisation%20of%20the%20XGBoost%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Wang,%20Dudu&rft.date=2024-08-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1660&rft.pages=1660-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr12081660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3098190227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098190227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |