Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm

With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Processes 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Dudu, Guo, Haimin, Sun, Yongtuo, Liang, Haoxun, Li, Ao, Guo, Yuqing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1660
container_title Processes
container_volume 12
creator Wang, Dudu
Guo, Haimin
Sun, Yongtuo
Liang, Haoxun
Li, Ao
Guo, Yuqing
description With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative techni
doi_str_mv 10.3390/pr12081660
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3098190227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3098190227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm7CabDab3WNbbBUK7aGit2V2N3FTtps1SSm9-Q6-oU9iShWdyww_3_zD_AhdU3LHWE7ue0tjktE0JWdoEMexiHJBxfm_-RKNnNuQUDllGU8HSK-srHXltemwUXip26-Pzxfw0uL13kSrBpzEs9bs8Qp8UDuHJ0GqceAncJBOQ4eXvddb7eDXxTcSv84nxjiPx-2bsdo32yt0oaB1cvTTh-h59rCePkaL5fxpOl5EFc0SH0EGGeWiKsukFBVLeUVBxaoUsk7Ck5xwJUieUVJnaZ4yAkA5KKI4TZI4psCG6Obk21vzvpPOFxuzs104WbDjYk5CGoG6PVGVNc5ZqYre6i3YQ0FJcUyz-EuTfQM0h2dW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3098190227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><description>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr12081660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Bayesian analysis ; Biodiesel fuels ; Comparative analysis ; Complexity ; Datasets ; Decision making ; Decision trees ; Effectiveness ; Efficiency ; Experiments ; Flow distribution ; Flow simulation ; Flow velocity ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Inclination angle ; Machine learning ; Mathematical models ; Multiphase flow ; Oil ; Optimization ; Petroleum ; Petroleum engineering ; Prediction models ; Predictions ; Recall ; Simulation ; Two phase flow</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yongtuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Haoxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><title>Processes</title><description>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Flow distribution</subject><subject>Flow simulation</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multiphase flow</subject><subject>Oil</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum engineering</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Recall</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Two phase flow</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMFKAzEQhoMoWGovPkHAm7CabDab3WNbbBUK7aGit2V2N3FTtps1SSm9-Q6-oU9iShWdyww_3_zD_AhdU3LHWE7ue0tjktE0JWdoEMexiHJBxfm_-RKNnNuQUDllGU8HSK-srHXltemwUXip26-Pzxfw0uL13kSrBpzEs9bs8Qp8UDuHJ0GqceAncJBOQ4eXvddb7eDXxTcSv84nxjiPx-2bsdo32yt0oaB1cvTTh-h59rCePkaL5fxpOl5EFc0SH0EGGeWiKsukFBVLeUVBxaoUsk7Ck5xwJUieUVJnaZ4yAkA5KKI4TZI4psCG6Obk21vzvpPOFxuzs104WbDjYk5CGoG6PVGVNc5ZqYre6i3YQ0FJcUyz-EuTfQM0h2dW</recordid><startdate>20240807</startdate><enddate>20240807</enddate><creator>Wang, Dudu</creator><creator>Guo, Haimin</creator><creator>Sun, Yongtuo</creator><creator>Liang, Haoxun</creator><creator>Li, Ao</creator><creator>Guo, Yuqing</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240807</creationdate><title>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</title><author>Wang, Dudu ; Guo, Haimin ; Sun, Yongtuo ; Liang, Haoxun ; Li, Ao ; Guo, Yuqing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c184t-a8a8157cbb4b7c365c1af2fb7ed4390505f709810d869630aa15af0f5144221a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Flow distribution</topic><topic>Flow simulation</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multiphase flow</topic><topic>Oil</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum engineering</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Recall</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Two phase flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dudu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Haimin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Yongtuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Haoxun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yuqing</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Dudu</au><au>Guo, Haimin</au><au>Sun, Yongtuo</au><au>Liang, Haoxun</au><au>Li, Ao</au><au>Guo, Yuqing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2024-08-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1660</spage><pages>1660-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>With the continuous advancement of petroleum extraction technologies, the importance of horizontal and inclined wells in reservoir exploitation has been increasing. However, accurately predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes is challenging due to the complexity of subsurface fluid flow patterns. This paper introduces a novel approach to address this challenge by employing extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost, version 2.1.0) optimised through Bayesian techniques (using the Bayesian-optimization library, version 1.4.3) to predict oil–water two-phase flow regimes. The integration of Bayesian optimisation aims to enhance the efficiency of parameter tuning and the precision of predictive models. The methodology commenced with experimental studies utilising a multiphase flow simulation apparatus to gather data across a spectrum of water cut rate, well inclination angles, and flow rates. Flow patterns were meticulously recorded via direct visual inspection, and these empirical datasets were subsequently used to train and validate both the conventional XGBoost model and its Bayesian-optimised counterpart. A total of 64 datasets were collected, with 48 sets used for training and 16 sets for testing, divided in a 3:1 ratio. The findings highlight a marked improvement in predictive accuracy for the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost model, achieving a testing accuracy of 93.8%, compared to 75% for the traditional XGBoost model. Precision, recall, and F1-score metrics also showed significant improvements: precision increased from 0.806 to 0.938, recall from 0.875 to 0.938, and F1-score from 0.873 to 0.938. The training accuracy further supported these results, with the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) model achieving an accuracy of 0.948 compared to 0.806 for the traditional XGBoost model. Comparative analyses demonstrate that Bayesian optimisation enhanced the predictive capabilities of the algorithm. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analysis revealed that well inclination angles, water cut rates, and daily flow rates were the most significant features contributing to the predictions. This study confirms the efficacy and superiority of the Bayesian-optimised XGBoost (BO-XGBoost) algorithm in predicting oil–water two-phase flow regimes, offering a robust and effective methodology for investigating complex subsurface fluid dynamics. The research outcomes are crucial in improving the accuracy of oil–water two-phase flow predictions and introducing innovative technical approaches within the domain of petroleum engineering. This work lays a foundational stone for the advancement and application of multiphase flow studies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr12081660</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2227-9717
ispartof Processes, 2024-08, Vol.12 (8), p.1660
issn 2227-9717
2227-9717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3098190227
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Bayesian analysis
Biodiesel fuels
Comparative analysis
Complexity
Datasets
Decision making
Decision trees
Effectiveness
Efficiency
Experiments
Flow distribution
Flow simulation
Flow velocity
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Inclination angle
Machine learning
Mathematical models
Multiphase flow
Oil
Optimization
Petroleum
Petroleum engineering
Prediction models
Predictions
Recall
Simulation
Two phase flow
title Prediction of Oil–Water Two-Phase Flow Patterns Based on Bayesian Optimisation of the XGBoost Algorithm
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A44%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20of%20Oil%E2%80%93Water%20Two-Phase%20Flow%20Patterns%20Based%20on%20Bayesian%20Optimisation%20of%20the%20XGBoost%20Algorithm&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Wang,%20Dudu&rft.date=2024-08-07&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1660&rft.pages=1660-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr12081660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3098190227%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3098190227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true