Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli
Bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli is a major challenge to common bean cultivation in Kenya. However, knowledge about its epidemiology and management is limited. This study conducted three experiments in Kakamega, Kenya, evaluating scab inoculum sources and control options. The first experiment ev...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of phytopathology 2024-07, Vol.172 (4), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of phytopathology |
container_volume | 172 |
creator | Masheti, Yona Muthomi, James W. Muiru, William M. Arunga, Esther E. Gepts, Paul |
description | Bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli is a major challenge to common bean cultivation in Kenya. However, knowledge about its epidemiology and management is limited. This study conducted three experiments in Kakamega, Kenya, evaluating scab inoculum sources and control options. The first experiment evaluated three different inoculum sources over two seasons; bean crop residue caused the highest scab incidence in both the 2021 (62.1%) and 2022 (81.1%) seasons. The second experiment assessed the effect of rotation history on scab over three seasons. Scab incidence consistently surpassed 90% within the first 30 days after planting in half‐yearly rotated fields across all seasons, while the disease was absent after planting in fields with no recent history of legumes. Fields rotated out of legumes consistently had the highest grain yield, averaging 1.5 t ha−1 over the seasons. Additionally, the rotation land treatment displayed significantly more pods per plant during the 2021 (9.7), 2022a (9.8), and 2022b (12.5) seasons. In the third experiment, the impact of five fungicides and four cropping systems on bean scab was investigated over two seasons. Neither fungicide treatments nor cropping systems had an effect on bean scab incidence even when only severe symptoms were considered. Carbendazim had the highest yield (1.9 t ha−1) outperforming the unsprayed control only in the 2022 season while none of the other fungicides outperformed the control treatment in yield parameters in either season. This study emphasizes the challenge of managing bean scab without proper crop rotation and underscores the role of crop residue as a critical inoculum source. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jph.13355 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3097619637</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3097619637</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2205-3f8ba64c305f0ddba5d8b02717d3b391570fc8e034ea63834ea8e0c3ec0cc9853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4A0icYFDN6du2vSIpsGGkOAA5yhNU9apTUqzCu2ZeAxejIxyQsKXX5Y-W_ZHyCWDGQs133abGUPk_IhMWIJ5BAkmx2QCObKIZYKfkjPvtwAxIMCErNbW6aEZWurd0GvjqbIlbZVVb6Y1dkddRQujLPVaFVSrwZuSFnu6bHxt3dcn7TbKG9fU5-SkUo03F785Ja93y5fFKnp8ul8vbh8jHcfAI6xEodJEI_AKyrJQvBQFxBnLSiwwZzyDSgsDmBiVojhE6DQaDVrnguOUXI97u969D8bvZFt7bZpGWeMGL5FxzDBOQAT06g-6DT_acJ1EyLOU5WlAp-RmpHTvvO9NJbu-blW_lwzkwakMTuWP08DOR_ajbsz-f1A-PK_GiW8Qvnet</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097619637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection</source><creator>Masheti, Yona ; Muthomi, James W. ; Muiru, William M. ; Arunga, Esther E. ; Gepts, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Masheti, Yona ; Muthomi, James W. ; Muiru, William M. ; Arunga, Esther E. ; Gepts, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli is a major challenge to common bean cultivation in Kenya. However, knowledge about its epidemiology and management is limited. This study conducted three experiments in Kakamega, Kenya, evaluating scab inoculum sources and control options. The first experiment evaluated three different inoculum sources over two seasons; bean crop residue caused the highest scab incidence in both the 2021 (62.1%) and 2022 (81.1%) seasons. The second experiment assessed the effect of rotation history on scab over three seasons. Scab incidence consistently surpassed 90% within the first 30 days after planting in half‐yearly rotated fields across all seasons, while the disease was absent after planting in fields with no recent history of legumes. Fields rotated out of legumes consistently had the highest grain yield, averaging 1.5 t ha−1 over the seasons. Additionally, the rotation land treatment displayed significantly more pods per plant during the 2021 (9.7), 2022a (9.8), and 2022b (12.5) seasons. In the third experiment, the impact of five fungicides and four cropping systems on bean scab was investigated over two seasons. Neither fungicide treatments nor cropping systems had an effect on bean scab incidence even when only severe symptoms were considered. Carbendazim had the highest yield (1.9 t ha−1) outperforming the unsprayed control only in the 2022 season while none of the other fungicides outperformed the control treatment in yield parameters in either season. This study emphasizes the challenge of managing bean scab without proper crop rotation and underscores the role of crop residue as a critical inoculum source.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1785</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0434</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jph.13355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agricultural production ; bean scab ; Beans ; Carbendazim ; Control systems ; Crop residues ; Crop rotation ; Crop yield ; Cropping systems ; Crops ; Elsinoe phaseoli ; Elsinoë phaseoli ; Epidemiology ; Fungicides ; grain yield ; Inoculum ; inoculum sources ; Kenya ; Legumes ; Medical treatment ; Pesticides ; Phaseolus vulgaris ; Plant diseases ; plant pathology ; Planting ; Residues ; Scab ; Seasons</subject><ispartof>Journal of phytopathology, 2024-07, Vol.172 (4), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2205-3f8ba64c305f0ddba5d8b02717d3b391570fc8e034ea63834ea8e0c3ec0cc9853</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-8554-0442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjph.13355$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjph.13355$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Masheti, Yona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthomi, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muiru, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arunga, Esther E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gepts, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli</title><title>Journal of phytopathology</title><description>Bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli is a major challenge to common bean cultivation in Kenya. However, knowledge about its epidemiology and management is limited. This study conducted three experiments in Kakamega, Kenya, evaluating scab inoculum sources and control options. The first experiment evaluated three different inoculum sources over two seasons; bean crop residue caused the highest scab incidence in both the 2021 (62.1%) and 2022 (81.1%) seasons. The second experiment assessed the effect of rotation history on scab over three seasons. Scab incidence consistently surpassed 90% within the first 30 days after planting in half‐yearly rotated fields across all seasons, while the disease was absent after planting in fields with no recent history of legumes. Fields rotated out of legumes consistently had the highest grain yield, averaging 1.5 t ha−1 over the seasons. Additionally, the rotation land treatment displayed significantly more pods per plant during the 2021 (9.7), 2022a (9.8), and 2022b (12.5) seasons. In the third experiment, the impact of five fungicides and four cropping systems on bean scab was investigated over two seasons. Neither fungicide treatments nor cropping systems had an effect on bean scab incidence even when only severe symptoms were considered. Carbendazim had the highest yield (1.9 t ha−1) outperforming the unsprayed control only in the 2022 season while none of the other fungicides outperformed the control treatment in yield parameters in either season. This study emphasizes the challenge of managing bean scab without proper crop rotation and underscores the role of crop residue as a critical inoculum source.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>bean scab</subject><subject>Beans</subject><subject>Carbendazim</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Crop residues</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Elsinoe phaseoli</subject><subject>Elsinoë phaseoli</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>grain yield</subject><subject>Inoculum</subject><subject>inoculum sources</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Phaseolus vulgaris</subject><subject>Plant diseases</subject><subject>plant pathology</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Scab</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><issn>0931-1785</issn><issn>1439-0434</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4A0icYFDN6du2vSIpsGGkOAA5yhNU9apTUqzCu2ZeAxejIxyQsKXX5Y-W_ZHyCWDGQs133abGUPk_IhMWIJ5BAkmx2QCObKIZYKfkjPvtwAxIMCErNbW6aEZWurd0GvjqbIlbZVVb6Y1dkddRQujLPVaFVSrwZuSFnu6bHxt3dcn7TbKG9fU5-SkUo03F785Ja93y5fFKnp8ul8vbh8jHcfAI6xEodJEI_AKyrJQvBQFxBnLSiwwZzyDSgsDmBiVojhE6DQaDVrnguOUXI97u969D8bvZFt7bZpGWeMGL5FxzDBOQAT06g-6DT_acJ1EyLOU5WlAp-RmpHTvvO9NJbu-blW_lwzkwakMTuWP08DOR_ajbsz-f1A-PK_GiW8Qvnet</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Masheti, Yona</creator><creator>Muthomi, James W.</creator><creator>Muiru, William M.</creator><creator>Arunga, Esther E.</creator><creator>Gepts, Paul</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8554-0442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli</title><author>Masheti, Yona ; Muthomi, James W. ; Muiru, William M. ; Arunga, Esther E. ; Gepts, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2205-3f8ba64c305f0ddba5d8b02717d3b391570fc8e034ea63834ea8e0c3ec0cc9853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>bean scab</topic><topic>Beans</topic><topic>Carbendazim</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Crop residues</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Elsinoe phaseoli</topic><topic>Elsinoë phaseoli</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>grain yield</topic><topic>Inoculum</topic><topic>inoculum sources</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Phaseolus vulgaris</topic><topic>Plant diseases</topic><topic>plant pathology</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Scab</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Masheti, Yona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muthomi, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muiru, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arunga, Esther E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gepts, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Masheti, Yona</au><au>Muthomi, James W.</au><au>Muiru, William M.</au><au>Arunga, Esther E.</au><au>Gepts, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli</atitle><jtitle>Journal of phytopathology</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>172</volume><issue>4</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0931-1785</issn><eissn>1439-0434</eissn><abstract>Bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli is a major challenge to common bean cultivation in Kenya. However, knowledge about its epidemiology and management is limited. This study conducted three experiments in Kakamega, Kenya, evaluating scab inoculum sources and control options. The first experiment evaluated three different inoculum sources over two seasons; bean crop residue caused the highest scab incidence in both the 2021 (62.1%) and 2022 (81.1%) seasons. The second experiment assessed the effect of rotation history on scab over three seasons. Scab incidence consistently surpassed 90% within the first 30 days after planting in half‐yearly rotated fields across all seasons, while the disease was absent after planting in fields with no recent history of legumes. Fields rotated out of legumes consistently had the highest grain yield, averaging 1.5 t ha−1 over the seasons. Additionally, the rotation land treatment displayed significantly more pods per plant during the 2021 (9.7), 2022a (9.8), and 2022b (12.5) seasons. In the third experiment, the impact of five fungicides and four cropping systems on bean scab was investigated over two seasons. Neither fungicide treatments nor cropping systems had an effect on bean scab incidence even when only severe symptoms were considered. Carbendazim had the highest yield (1.9 t ha−1) outperforming the unsprayed control only in the 2022 season while none of the other fungicides outperformed the control treatment in yield parameters in either season. This study emphasizes the challenge of managing bean scab without proper crop rotation and underscores the role of crop residue as a critical inoculum source.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jph.13355</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8554-0442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-1785 |
ispartof | Journal of phytopathology, 2024-07, Vol.172 (4), p.n/a |
issn | 0931-1785 1439-0434 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3097619637 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agricultural production bean scab Beans Carbendazim Control systems Crop residues Crop rotation Crop yield Cropping systems Crops Elsinoe phaseoli Elsinoë phaseoli Epidemiology Fungicides grain yield Inoculum inoculum sources Kenya Legumes Medical treatment Pesticides Phaseolus vulgaris Plant diseases plant pathology Planting Residues Scab Seasons |
title | Inoculum sources and management of bean scab caused by Elsinoë phaseoli |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A36%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inoculum%20sources%20and%20management%20of%20bean%20scab%20caused%20by%20Elsino%C3%AB%20phaseoli&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20phytopathology&rft.au=Masheti,%20Yona&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=172&rft.issue=4&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0931-1785&rft.eissn=1439-0434&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jph.13355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3097619637%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097619637&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |