Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios
In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Universal access in the information society 2024-08, Vol.23 (3), p.1031-1049 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1049 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 1031 |
| container_title | Universal access in the information society |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J. Conde, Miguel Á. Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J. Chaparro-Peláez, Julián |
| description | In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3097590334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3097590334</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b6fa1b48badabf0c40584385aad555cc988c19ff1d0e146d673c370b6fcafb5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gsMRue4zixR1TxKRALzNazY9OUNg52isS_JyUINqZ3h3vukw4hpxzOOUB9kTkUoBkUggGHEpjaIzNecclkoev936z0ITnKeQVQcMX5jNw_eszb1HavdFh62m56dAONgS6xH1pHg_eNRfdG2466uF6jjQmH9sPTFG3cNbLzHaY25mNyEHCd_cnPnZOX66vnxS17eLq5W1w-MCcqMTBbBeS2VBYbtAFcCVKVQknERkrpnFbKcR0Cb8DzsmqqWjhRw4g5DFZaMSdn026f4vvW58Gs4jZ140sjQNdSgxDl2Cqmlksx5-SD6VO7wfRpOJidMzM5M6Mz8-3MqBESE5T7nRKf_qb_ob4AvslvyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097590334</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J. ; Conde, Miguel Á. ; Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J. ; Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J. ; Conde, Miguel Á. ; Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J. ; Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Empirical analysis ; Feedback ; Graphical user interface ; Haptics ; Heterogeneity ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Long Paper ; Usability ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Visual aspects ; Visual tasks ; Workload ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2024-08, Vol.23 (3), p.1031-1049</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b6fa1b48badabf0c40584385aad555cc988c19ff1d0e146d673c370b6fcafb5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b6fa1b48badabf0c40584385aad555cc988c19ff1d0e146d673c370b6fcafb5b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5881-7775 ; 0000-0001-5909-1566 ; 0000-0002-0920-4005 ; 0000-0002-8400-7079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde, Miguel Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender.</description><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graphical user interface</subject><subject>Haptics</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Long Paper</subject><subject>Usability</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Visual aspects</subject><subject>Visual tasks</subject><subject>Workload</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5gsMRue4zixR1TxKRALzNazY9OUNg52isS_JyUINqZ3h3vukw4hpxzOOUB9kTkUoBkUggGHEpjaIzNecclkoev936z0ITnKeQVQcMX5jNw_eszb1HavdFh62m56dAONgS6xH1pHg_eNRfdG2466uF6jjQmH9sPTFG3cNbLzHaY25mNyEHCd_cnPnZOX66vnxS17eLq5W1w-MCcqMTBbBeS2VBYbtAFcCVKVQknERkrpnFbKcR0Cb8DzsmqqWjhRw4g5DFZaMSdn026f4vvW58Gs4jZ140sjQNdSgxDl2Cqmlksx5-SD6VO7wfRpOJidMzM5M6Mz8-3MqBESE5T7nRKf_qb_ob4AvslvyQ</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Conde, Miguel Á.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-7775</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-1566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-4005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-7079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios</title><author>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J. ; Conde, Miguel Á. ; Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J. ; Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-b6fa1b48badabf0c40584385aad555cc988c19ff1d0e146d673c370b6fcafb5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graphical user interface</topic><topic>Haptics</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Long Paper</topic><topic>Usability</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Visual aspects</topic><topic>Visual tasks</topic><topic>Workload</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conde, Miguel Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez-Sedano, Francisco J.</au><au>Conde, Miguel Á.</au><au>Rodríguez-Lera, Francisco J.</au><au>Chaparro-Peláez, Julián</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1031</spage><epage>1049</epage><pages>1031-1049</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the interaction of a human operator with teleoperated robotic systems has been much improved. One of the factors influencing this improvement is the addition of force feedback to complement the visual feedback provided by traditional graphical user interfaces. However, the users of these systems performing tasks in isolated and safe environments are often inexperienced and occasional users. In addition, there is no common framework to assess the usability of these systems, due to the heterogeneity of applications and tasks, and therefore, there is a need for new usability assessment methods that are not domain specific. This study addresses this issue by proposing a measure of usability that includes five variables: user efficiency, user effectiveness, mental workload, perceived usefulness, and perceived ease of use. The empirical analysis shows that the integration of haptic feedback improves the usability of these systems for non-expert users, even though the differences are not statistically significant; further, the results suggest that mental workload is higher when haptic feedback is added. The analysis also reveals significant differences between participants depending on gender.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5881-7775</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5909-1566</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-4005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-7079</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1615-5289 |
| ispartof | Universal access in the information society, 2024-08, Vol.23 (3), p.1031-1049 |
| issn | 1615-5289 1615-5297 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3097590334 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Computers and Society Empirical analysis Feedback Graphical user interface Haptics Heterogeneity Information Storage and Retrieval Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) IT in Business Long Paper Usability User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction Visual aspects Visual tasks Workload Workloads |
| title | Measuring the impact of haptic feedback in collaborative robotic scenarios |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A05%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20impact%20of%20haptic%20feedback%20in%20collaborative%20robotic%20scenarios&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez-Sedano,%20Francisco%20J.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1031&rft.epage=1049&rft.pages=1031-1049&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-023-01040-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3097590334%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097590334&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |