AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines
Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, hi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2024-08 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Spaanderman, Douwe J Marzetti, Matthew Wan, Xinyi Scarsbrook, Andrew F Robinson, Philip Oei, Edwin H G Visser, Jacob J Hemke, Robert Kirsten van Langevelde Hanff, David F Geert J L H van Leenders Verhoef, Cornelis Gruühagen, Dirk J Niessen, Wiro J Klein, Stefan Starmans, Martijn P A |
description | Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9\(\pm\)7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1\(\pm\)2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3096438449</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3096438449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30964384493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcFqAjEURUNBqKj_8MD1wDQZrboTUSropuhans6b8CSTtPMSi8v-eYP4AV1duPcezovqa2Peilml9asaiVzLstTTdz2ZmL76XW6BPXRYc3DB8gUdcIuWvYXQgIQmFpFFEgH6Gs7BE8TUhtTJAhDkLpFajHyBjm5MP0A3dCkXmUeL7CXCarfc7h_45ng4fq6L7LSJa3LsSYaq16ATGj1zoMab9WH1UXx14TuRxNM123yeTqacTyszq6q5-d_rD9NdT-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3096438449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines</title><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Spaanderman, Douwe J ; Marzetti, Matthew ; Wan, Xinyi ; Scarsbrook, Andrew F ; Robinson, Philip ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Visser, Jacob J ; Hemke, Robert ; Kirsten van Langevelde ; Hanff, David F ; Geert J L H van Leenders ; Verhoef, Cornelis ; Gruühagen, Dirk J ; Niessen, Wiro J ; Klein, Stefan ; Starmans, Martijn P A</creator><creatorcontrib>Spaanderman, Douwe J ; Marzetti, Matthew ; Wan, Xinyi ; Scarsbrook, Andrew F ; Robinson, Philip ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Visser, Jacob J ; Hemke, Robert ; Kirsten van Langevelde ; Hanff, David F ; Geert J L H van Leenders ; Verhoef, Cornelis ; Gruühagen, Dirk J ; Niessen, Wiro J ; Klein, Stefan ; Starmans, Martijn P A</creatorcontrib><description>Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9\(\pm\)7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1\(\pm\)2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Availability ; Best practice ; Guidelines ; Medical imaging ; Systematic review ; Tumors ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-08</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spaanderman, Douwe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzetti, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsbrook, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Edwin H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Jacob J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemke, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten van Langevelde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanff, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geert J L H van Leenders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoef, Cornelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruühagen, Dirk J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niessen, Wiro J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starmans, Martijn P A</creatorcontrib><title>AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9\(\pm\)7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1\(\pm\)2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcFqAjEURUNBqKj_8MD1wDQZrboTUSropuhans6b8CSTtPMSi8v-eYP4AV1duPcezovqa2Peilml9asaiVzLstTTdz2ZmL76XW6BPXRYc3DB8gUdcIuWvYXQgIQmFpFFEgH6Gs7BE8TUhtTJAhDkLpFajHyBjm5MP0A3dCkXmUeL7CXCarfc7h_45ng4fq6L7LSJa3LsSYaq16ATGj1zoMab9WH1UXx14TuRxNM123yeTqacTyszq6q5-d_rD9NdT-A</recordid><startdate>20240822</startdate><enddate>20240822</enddate><creator>Spaanderman, Douwe J</creator><creator>Marzetti, Matthew</creator><creator>Wan, Xinyi</creator><creator>Scarsbrook, Andrew F</creator><creator>Robinson, Philip</creator><creator>Oei, Edwin H G</creator><creator>Visser, Jacob J</creator><creator>Hemke, Robert</creator><creator>Kirsten van Langevelde</creator><creator>Hanff, David F</creator><creator>Geert J L H van Leenders</creator><creator>Verhoef, Cornelis</creator><creator>Gruühagen, Dirk J</creator><creator>Niessen, Wiro J</creator><creator>Klein, Stefan</creator><creator>Starmans, Martijn P A</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240822</creationdate><title>AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines</title><author>Spaanderman, Douwe J ; Marzetti, Matthew ; Wan, Xinyi ; Scarsbrook, Andrew F ; Robinson, Philip ; Oei, Edwin H G ; Visser, Jacob J ; Hemke, Robert ; Kirsten van Langevelde ; Hanff, David F ; Geert J L H van Leenders ; Verhoef, Cornelis ; Gruühagen, Dirk J ; Niessen, Wiro J ; Klein, Stefan ; Starmans, Martijn P A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30964384493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spaanderman, Douwe J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marzetti, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Xinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarsbrook, Andrew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oei, Edwin H G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visser, Jacob J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemke, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsten van Langevelde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanff, David F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geert J L H van Leenders</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoef, Cornelis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruühagen, Dirk J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niessen, Wiro J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Starmans, Martijn P A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spaanderman, Douwe J</au><au>Marzetti, Matthew</au><au>Wan, Xinyi</au><au>Scarsbrook, Andrew F</au><au>Robinson, Philip</au><au>Oei, Edwin H G</au><au>Visser, Jacob J</au><au>Hemke, Robert</au><au>Kirsten van Langevelde</au><au>Hanff, David F</au><au>Geert J L H van Leenders</au><au>Verhoef, Cornelis</au><au>Gruühagen, Dirk J</au><au>Niessen, Wiro J</au><au>Klein, Stefan</au><au>Starmans, Martijn P A</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-08-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Soft-tissue and bone tumours (STBT) are rare, diagnostically challenging lesions with variable clinical behaviours and treatment approaches. This systematic review provides an overview of Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods using radiological imaging for diagnosis and prognosis of these tumours, highlighting challenges in clinical translation, and evaluating study alignment with the Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and the FUTURE-AI international consensus guidelines for trustworthy and deployable AI to promote the clinical translation of AI methods. The review covered literature from several bibliographic databases, including papers published before 17/07/2024. Original research in peer-reviewed journals focused on radiology-based AI for diagnosing or prognosing primary STBT was included. Exclusion criteria were animal, cadaveric, or laboratory studies, and non-English papers. Abstracts were screened by two of three independent reviewers for eligibility. Eligible papers were assessed against guidelines by one of three independent reviewers. The search identified 15,015 abstracts, from which 325 articles were included for evaluation. Most studies performed moderately on CLAIM, averaging a score of 28.9\(\pm\)7.5 out of 53, but poorly on FUTURE-AI, averaging 5.1\(\pm\)2.1 out of 30. Imaging-AI tools for STBT remain at the proof-of-concept stage, indicating significant room for improvement. Future efforts by AI developers should focus on design (e.g. define unmet clinical need, intended clinical setting and how AI would be integrated in clinical workflow), development (e.g. build on previous work, explainability), evaluation (e.g. evaluating and addressing biases, evaluating AI against best practices), and data reproducibility and availability (making documented code and data publicly available). Following these recommendations could improve clinical translation of AI methods.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-08 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3096438449 |
source | Free E- Journals |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Availability Best practice Guidelines Medical imaging Systematic review Tumors Workflow |
title | AI in radiological imaging of soft-tissue and bone tumours: a systematic review evaluating against CLAIM and FUTURE-AI guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A10%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=AI%20in%20radiological%20imaging%20of%20soft-tissue%20and%20bone%20tumours:%20a%20systematic%20review%20evaluating%20against%20CLAIM%20and%20FUTURE-AI%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Spaanderman,%20Douwe%20J&rft.date=2024-08-22&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3096438449%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3096438449&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |