Why Education Increases Voting
Most use policies associated with the "No Excuses" charter school movement: longer school days and years, a focus on academie achievement and behavior management, in-school tutoring, frequent teacher feedback, and data-driven instruction. Prior research has found that attending a Boston ch...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Education next 2024-07, Vol.24 (3), p.1-7 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Education next |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Cohodes, Sarah R Feigenbaum, James J |
description | Most use policies associated with the "No Excuses" charter school movement: longer school days and years, a focus on academie achievement and behavior management, in-school tutoring, frequent teacher feedback, and data-driven instruction. Prior research has found that attending a Boston charter school for one year boosts student scores on standardized tests by about one-third of a Standard deviation in math and one-fifth of a Standard deviation in reading. Charter students take longer to graduate high school, with a decline of 9 percentage points in the four-year graduation rate, but there are no statistically significant differences in five- or six-year high school graduation rates. Voting increases by 7.5 percentage points for students who receive free or reduced-price school lunch, 12.1 percentage points for English language learners, and 11.3 percentage points for students who earn relatively higher scores on state tests. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3095234920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3095234920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30952349203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDW21LU0MzdigbPNTDgYuIqLswwMDM3MDEw4GeTCMyoVXFNKkxNLMvPzFDzzkotSE4tTixXC8ksy89J5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre2MDS1MjYxNLIwJg4VQBTAC2L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095234920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why Education Increases Voting</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cohodes, Sarah R ; Feigenbaum, James J</creator><creatorcontrib>Cohodes, Sarah R ; Feigenbaum, James J</creatorcontrib><description>Most use policies associated with the "No Excuses" charter school movement: longer school days and years, a focus on academie achievement and behavior management, in-school tutoring, frequent teacher feedback, and data-driven instruction. Prior research has found that attending a Boston charter school for one year boosts student scores on standardized tests by about one-third of a Standard deviation in math and one-fifth of a Standard deviation in reading. Charter students take longer to graduate high school, with a decline of 9 percentage points in the four-year graduation rate, but there are no statistically significant differences in five- or six-year high school graduation rates. Voting increases by 7.5 percentage points for students who receive free or reduced-price school lunch, 12.1 percentage points for English language learners, and 11.3 percentage points for students who earn relatively higher scores on state tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-9664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-9672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Education Next Institute</publisher><subject>Charter Schools ; Educational Attainment ; Elections ; Enrollments ; Females ; Standardized Tests ; Students ; Voter behavior ; Voter registration ; Voting</subject><ispartof>Education next, 2024-07, Vol.24 (3), p.1-7</ispartof><rights>Copyright Education Next Institute Summer 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cohodes, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigenbaum, James J</creatorcontrib><title>Why Education Increases Voting</title><title>Education next</title><description>Most use policies associated with the "No Excuses" charter school movement: longer school days and years, a focus on academie achievement and behavior management, in-school tutoring, frequent teacher feedback, and data-driven instruction. Prior research has found that attending a Boston charter school for one year boosts student scores on standardized tests by about one-third of a Standard deviation in math and one-fifth of a Standard deviation in reading. Charter students take longer to graduate high school, with a decline of 9 percentage points in the four-year graduation rate, but there are no statistically significant differences in five- or six-year high school graduation rates. Voting increases by 7.5 percentage points for students who receive free or reduced-price school lunch, 12.1 percentage points for English language learners, and 11.3 percentage points for students who earn relatively higher scores on state tests.</description><subject>Charter Schools</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Standardized Tests</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voter registration</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>1539-9664</issn><issn>1539-9672</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDW21LU0MzdigbPNTDgYuIqLswwMDM3MDEw4GeTCMyoVXFNKkxNLMvPzFDzzkotSE4tTixXC8ksy89J5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDsptriLOHbkFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVEeUCre2MDS1MjYxNLIwJg4VQBTAC2L</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Cohodes, Sarah R</creator><creator>Feigenbaum, James J</creator><general>Education Next Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Why Education Increases Voting</title><author>Cohodes, Sarah R ; Feigenbaum, James J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30952349203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Charter Schools</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Standardized Tests</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voter registration</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cohodes, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feigenbaum, James J</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Education next</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cohodes, Sarah R</au><au>Feigenbaum, James J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why Education Increases Voting</atitle><jtitle>Education next</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>1539-9664</issn><eissn>1539-9672</eissn><abstract>Most use policies associated with the "No Excuses" charter school movement: longer school days and years, a focus on academie achievement and behavior management, in-school tutoring, frequent teacher feedback, and data-driven instruction. Prior research has found that attending a Boston charter school for one year boosts student scores on standardized tests by about one-third of a Standard deviation in math and one-fifth of a Standard deviation in reading. Charter students take longer to graduate high school, with a decline of 9 percentage points in the four-year graduation rate, but there are no statistically significant differences in five- or six-year high school graduation rates. Voting increases by 7.5 percentage points for students who receive free or reduced-price school lunch, 12.1 percentage points for English language learners, and 11.3 percentage points for students who earn relatively higher scores on state tests.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Education Next Institute</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-9664 |
ispartof | Education next, 2024-07, Vol.24 (3), p.1-7 |
issn | 1539-9664 1539-9672 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3095234920 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Charter Schools Educational Attainment Elections Enrollments Females Standardized Tests Students Voter behavior Voter registration Voting |
title | Why Education Increases Voting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T18%3A06%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20Education%20Increases%20Voting&rft.jtitle=Education%20next&rft.au=Cohodes,%20Sarah%20R&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=1539-9664&rft.eissn=1539-9672&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3095234920%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095234920&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |