The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution
This article builds a theoretical framework with which to confront the racializing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered real-time Event Detection and Alert Creation (EDAC) software when used for protest detection. It is well-known that many AI-powered systems exacerbate social inequa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science, technology, & human values technology, & human values, 2024-09, Vol.49 (5), p.1045-1072 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1072 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1045 |
container_title | Science, technology, & human values |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Drage, Eleanor Frabetti, Federica |
description | This article builds a theoretical framework with which to confront the racializing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered real-time Event Detection and Alert Creation (EDAC) software when used for protest detection. It is well-known that many AI-powered systems exacerbate social inequalities by racializing certain groups and individuals. We propose the feminist concept of performativity, as defined by Judith Butler and Karen Barad, as a more comprehensive way to expose and contest the harms wrought by EDAC than that of other “de-biasing” mechanisms. Our use of performativity differs from and complements other Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS) work because of its rigorous approach to how iterative, citational, and material practices produce the effect of race. We focus on Geofeedia and Dataminr, two EDAC companies that claim to be able to “predict” and “recognize” the emergence of dangerous protests, and show how their EDAC tools performatively produce the phenomena which they are supposed to observe. Specifically, we argue that this occurs because these companies and their stakeholders dictate the thresholds of (un)intelligibility, (ab)normality, and (un)certainty by which these tools operate and that this process is oriented toward the production of commercially actionable information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/01622439231164660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3095232432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_01622439231164660</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3095232432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-ed01efdd33e3437f817c1966b9e8f90f57ab85de716d4fe8b6967b75095c8b3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFPwjAUhRujiYj-AN9u4vNwXdd28w0RhYQoUYyPS7fdwhBWbAcEn_zplmDig_G-NLnnO-c2h5BLGnYolfI6pCKKYpZGjFIRCxEekRblPAqSiNNj0trrwR44JWfOzUM_ScRa5GsyQxij1cYuVVNtqmYHRkN3GKzMFi2W0N9g3cAdNlg0lalvYGC2XoeeRdWgAwXPqqjUovr08Ngav2tA1SW8zXYwMua9qqfg4-G2Ug6GDh6N1-HFLNb7vHNyotXC4cXP2yav9_1JbxCMnh6Gve4oKBjnTYBlSFGXJWPIYiZ1QmVBUyHyFBOdhppLlSe8RElFGWtMcpEKmUseprxIclayNrk65K6s-Vj7P2Zzs7a1P5kxD0XMlxN5ih6owhrnLOpsZaulsruMhtm-6OxP0d7TOXicmuJv6v-Gb61TfL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3095232432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Drage, Eleanor ; Frabetti, Federica</creator><creatorcontrib>Drage, Eleanor ; Frabetti, Federica</creatorcontrib><description>This article builds a theoretical framework with which to confront the racializing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered real-time Event Detection and Alert Creation (EDAC) software when used for protest detection. It is well-known that many AI-powered systems exacerbate social inequalities by racializing certain groups and individuals. We propose the feminist concept of performativity, as defined by Judith Butler and Karen Barad, as a more comprehensive way to expose and contest the harms wrought by EDAC than that of other “de-biasing” mechanisms. Our use of performativity differs from and complements other Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS) work because of its rigorous approach to how iterative, citational, and material practices produce the effect of race. We focus on Geofeedia and Dataminr, two EDAC companies that claim to be able to “predict” and “recognize” the emergence of dangerous protests, and show how their EDAC tools performatively produce the phenomena which they are supposed to observe. Specifically, we argue that this occurs because these companies and their stakeholders dictate the thresholds of (un)intelligibility, (ab)normality, and (un)certainty by which these tools operate and that this process is oriented toward the production of commercially actionable information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-2439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8251</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/01622439231164660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Butler, Judith ; Companies ; Demonstrations & protests ; Feminism ; Information processing ; Intelligibility ; Normality ; Performativity ; Race ; Racialization ; Real time ; Science and technology ; Social inequality ; Social studies ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Science, technology, & human values, 2024-09, Vol.49 (5), p.1045-1072</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-ed01efdd33e3437f817c1966b9e8f90f57ab85de716d4fe8b6967b75095c8b3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-ed01efdd33e3437f817c1966b9e8f90f57ab85de716d4fe8b6967b75095c8b3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1696-4536 ; 0000-0002-0700-9572</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/01622439231164660$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01622439231164660$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21817,27922,27923,43619,43620</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drage, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frabetti, Federica</creatorcontrib><title>The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution</title><title>Science, technology, & human values</title><description>This article builds a theoretical framework with which to confront the racializing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered real-time Event Detection and Alert Creation (EDAC) software when used for protest detection. It is well-known that many AI-powered systems exacerbate social inequalities by racializing certain groups and individuals. We propose the feminist concept of performativity, as defined by Judith Butler and Karen Barad, as a more comprehensive way to expose and contest the harms wrought by EDAC than that of other “de-biasing” mechanisms. Our use of performativity differs from and complements other Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS) work because of its rigorous approach to how iterative, citational, and material practices produce the effect of race. We focus on Geofeedia and Dataminr, two EDAC companies that claim to be able to “predict” and “recognize” the emergence of dangerous protests, and show how their EDAC tools performatively produce the phenomena which they are supposed to observe. Specifically, we argue that this occurs because these companies and their stakeholders dictate the thresholds of (un)intelligibility, (ab)normality, and (un)certainty by which these tools operate and that this process is oriented toward the production of commercially actionable information.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Butler, Judith</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Demonstrations & protests</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Intelligibility</subject><subject>Normality</subject><subject>Performativity</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racialization</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Science and technology</subject><subject>Social inequality</subject><subject>Social studies</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0162-2439</issn><issn>1552-8251</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kFFPwjAUhRujiYj-AN9u4vNwXdd28w0RhYQoUYyPS7fdwhBWbAcEn_zplmDig_G-NLnnO-c2h5BLGnYolfI6pCKKYpZGjFIRCxEekRblPAqSiNNj0trrwR44JWfOzUM_ScRa5GsyQxij1cYuVVNtqmYHRkN3GKzMFi2W0N9g3cAdNlg0lalvYGC2XoeeRdWgAwXPqqjUovr08Ngav2tA1SW8zXYwMua9qqfg4-G2Ug6GDh6N1-HFLNb7vHNyotXC4cXP2yav9_1JbxCMnh6Gve4oKBjnTYBlSFGXJWPIYiZ1QmVBUyHyFBOdhppLlSe8RElFGWtMcpEKmUseprxIclayNrk65K6s-Vj7P2Zzs7a1P5kxD0XMlxN5ih6owhrnLOpsZaulsruMhtm-6OxP0d7TOXicmuJv6v-Gb61TfL4</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Drage, Eleanor</creator><creator>Frabetti, Federica</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-4536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-9572</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution</title><author>Drage, Eleanor ; Frabetti, Federica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-ed01efdd33e3437f817c1966b9e8f90f57ab85de716d4fe8b6967b75095c8b3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Butler, Judith</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Demonstrations & protests</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Intelligibility</topic><topic>Normality</topic><topic>Performativity</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racialization</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Science and technology</topic><topic>Social inequality</topic><topic>Social studies</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drage, Eleanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frabetti, Federica</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Science, technology, & human values</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drage, Eleanor</au><au>Frabetti, Federica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution</atitle><jtitle>Science, technology, & human values</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1045</spage><epage>1072</epage><pages>1045-1072</pages><issn>0162-2439</issn><eissn>1552-8251</eissn><abstract>This article builds a theoretical framework with which to confront the racializing capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI)-powered real-time Event Detection and Alert Creation (EDAC) software when used for protest detection. It is well-known that many AI-powered systems exacerbate social inequalities by racializing certain groups and individuals. We propose the feminist concept of performativity, as defined by Judith Butler and Karen Barad, as a more comprehensive way to expose and contest the harms wrought by EDAC than that of other “de-biasing” mechanisms. Our use of performativity differs from and complements other Social Studies of Science and Technology (STS) work because of its rigorous approach to how iterative, citational, and material practices produce the effect of race. We focus on Geofeedia and Dataminr, two EDAC companies that claim to be able to “predict” and “recognize” the emergence of dangerous protests, and show how their EDAC tools performatively produce the phenomena which they are supposed to observe. Specifically, we argue that this occurs because these companies and their stakeholders dictate the thresholds of (un)intelligibility, (ab)normality, and (un)certainty by which these tools operate and that this process is oriented toward the production of commercially actionable information.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/01622439231164660</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1696-4536</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-9572</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0162-2439 |
ispartof | Science, technology, & human values, 2024-09, Vol.49 (5), p.1045-1072 |
issn | 0162-2439 1552-8251 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3095232432 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Butler, Judith Companies Demonstrations & protests Feminism Information processing Intelligibility Normality Performativity Race Racialization Real time Science and technology Social inequality Social studies Thresholds |
title | The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection: How AI Creates a Racialized Protest and Why Looking for Bias Is Not a Solution |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A03%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Performativity%20of%20AI-powered%20Event%20Detection:%20How%20AI%20Creates%20a%20Racialized%20Protest%20and%20Why%20Looking%20for%20Bias%20Is%20Not%20a%20Solution&rft.jtitle=Science,%20technology,%20&%20human%20values&rft.au=Drage,%20Eleanor&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1045&rft.epage=1072&rft.pages=1045-1072&rft.issn=0162-2439&rft.eissn=1552-8251&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/01622439231164660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3095232432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3095232432&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_01622439231164660&rfr_iscdi=true |