Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Remote delivery of interventions (e.g., online sessions, telephone sessions, e-mails, SMS, applications) facilitate access to health care and might be an efficacious alternative to face to face treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Telehealth has evolved rapidly in rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of technology in behavioral science 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.452-462
Hauptverfasser: Samara, Myrto T., Michou, Niki, Argyrou, Aikaterini, Mathioudaki, Elissavet, Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia, Tsekitsidi, Eirini, Polyzopoulou, Zoi A., Lappas, Andreas S., Christodoulou, Nikos, Papazisis, Georgios, Chourdakis, Michail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 3
container_start_page 452
container_title Journal of technology in behavioral science
container_volume 9
creator Samara, Myrto T.
Michou, Niki
Argyrou, Aikaterini
Mathioudaki, Elissavet
Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia
Tsekitsidi, Eirini
Polyzopoulou, Zoi A.
Lappas, Andreas S.
Christodoulou, Nikos
Papazisis, Georgios
Chourdakis, Michail
description Remote delivery of interventions (e.g., online sessions, telephone sessions, e-mails, SMS, applications) facilitate access to health care and might be an efficacious alternative to face to face treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Telehealth has evolved rapidly in recent years, facilitating access to health care, as it seems to be more accessible among different groups of the population. In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared remote versus face-to-face interventions for the treatment of BN and BED. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP and reference lists of relevant articles up to April, 2023. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as abstinence from binge/bulimic episodes for at least 2 weeks) and frequency of binge episodes. We also analyzed frequency of purging episodes, response, mean values of eating disorder psychopathology, depression, anxiety, and quality of life rating scales as well as drop-out rates and adverse effects. Six RCTs were identified with a total of 698 participants. Face-to-face interventions were found more effective than remote interventions in terms of remission (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.89, P = 0.004, 4 RCTs, N = 526), but the result was mainly driven by one study. No important differences were found in the remaining outcomes; nevertheless, most comparisons were underpowered. Few adverse effects were reported. Remote interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy to face-to-face interventions in treating BN and BED, providing effective and acceptable healthcare to patients who would otherwise go untreated. Nonetheless, to arrive at more definitive and secure conclusions, it is imperative that additional randomized controlled trials and robust real-world effectiveness studies, preferably with appropriate comparison groups, are conducted.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3093957520</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3093957520</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278y-bdc15e594032f9744ea3c92cb46aa24db4863c6107eee793ea946167ff71978f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxBdRsNR-AU8Bz9H826TxZqvVQlWoeg5p9q1s6W5qsq3stzd2BT15mscwMzx-WXZOySUlRF1FQblQmDCOCeEix91RNmBcSpxryY__3KfZKMY1IYQpShhRg6xbQu1bQPuIZtYBbj0uk6J500LYQ9NWvomo9AFNdpuqrix6Sr6PFtmmQJOqeQcMtk2KbqvoQwHhGln00sUW6uQ7tIR9BZ-H-CO0FtvGbrpYxbPspLSbCKMfHWZvs7vX6QNePN_PpzcL7Jgad3hVOJpDrgXhrNRKCLDcaeZWQlrLRLESY8mdpEQBgNIcrBaSSlWWimo1Lvkwu-h3t8F_7CC2Zu13IT0RDSea61zljKQU61Mu-BgDlGYbqtqGzlBivimbnrJJlM2BsulSifelmMKJRPid_qf1BUvugJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093957520</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Samara, Myrto T. ; Michou, Niki ; Argyrou, Aikaterini ; Mathioudaki, Elissavet ; Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia ; Tsekitsidi, Eirini ; Polyzopoulou, Zoi A. ; Lappas, Andreas S. ; Christodoulou, Nikos ; Papazisis, Georgios ; Chourdakis, Michail</creator><creatorcontrib>Samara, Myrto T. ; Michou, Niki ; Argyrou, Aikaterini ; Mathioudaki, Elissavet ; Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia ; Tsekitsidi, Eirini ; Polyzopoulou, Zoi A. ; Lappas, Andreas S. ; Christodoulou, Nikos ; Papazisis, Georgios ; Chourdakis, Michail</creatorcontrib><description>Remote delivery of interventions (e.g., online sessions, telephone sessions, e-mails, SMS, applications) facilitate access to health care and might be an efficacious alternative to face to face treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Telehealth has evolved rapidly in recent years, facilitating access to health care, as it seems to be more accessible among different groups of the population. In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared remote versus face-to-face interventions for the treatment of BN and BED. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP and reference lists of relevant articles up to April, 2023. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as abstinence from binge/bulimic episodes for at least 2 weeks) and frequency of binge episodes. We also analyzed frequency of purging episodes, response, mean values of eating disorder psychopathology, depression, anxiety, and quality of life rating scales as well as drop-out rates and adverse effects. Six RCTs were identified with a total of 698 participants. Face-to-face interventions were found more effective than remote interventions in terms of remission (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.89, P = 0.004, 4 RCTs, N = 526), but the result was mainly driven by one study. No important differences were found in the remaining outcomes; nevertheless, most comparisons were underpowered. Few adverse effects were reported. Remote interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy to face-to-face interventions in treating BN and BED, providing effective and acceptable healthcare to patients who would otherwise go untreated. Nonetheless, to arrive at more definitive and secure conclusions, it is imperative that additional randomized controlled trials and robust real-world effectiveness studies, preferably with appropriate comparison groups, are conducted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2366-5963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2366-5963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Binge eating ; Bulimia ; Clinical Psychology ; Clinical trials ; Eating disorders ; Health care access ; Internet ; Intervention ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Meta-analysis ; Missing data ; Psychiatry ; Psychology ; Quality of life ; Remission (Medicine) ; Self help ; Social Work and Community Development ; Systematic review ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.452-462</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278y-bdc15e594032f9744ea3c92cb46aa24db4863c6107eee793ea946167ff71978f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c278y-bdc15e594032f9744ea3c92cb46aa24db4863c6107eee793ea946167ff71978f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6943-5091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samara, Myrto T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michou, Niki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyrou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathioudaki, Elissavet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekitsidi, Eirini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polyzopoulou, Zoi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, Andreas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christodoulou, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papazisis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chourdakis, Michail</creatorcontrib><title>Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of technology in behavioral science</title><addtitle>J. technol. behav. sci</addtitle><description>Remote delivery of interventions (e.g., online sessions, telephone sessions, e-mails, SMS, applications) facilitate access to health care and might be an efficacious alternative to face to face treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Telehealth has evolved rapidly in recent years, facilitating access to health care, as it seems to be more accessible among different groups of the population. In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared remote versus face-to-face interventions for the treatment of BN and BED. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP and reference lists of relevant articles up to April, 2023. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as abstinence from binge/bulimic episodes for at least 2 weeks) and frequency of binge episodes. We also analyzed frequency of purging episodes, response, mean values of eating disorder psychopathology, depression, anxiety, and quality of life rating scales as well as drop-out rates and adverse effects. Six RCTs were identified with a total of 698 participants. Face-to-face interventions were found more effective than remote interventions in terms of remission (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.89, P = 0.004, 4 RCTs, N = 526), but the result was mainly driven by one study. No important differences were found in the remaining outcomes; nevertheless, most comparisons were underpowered. Few adverse effects were reported. Remote interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy to face-to-face interventions in treating BN and BED, providing effective and acceptable healthcare to patients who would otherwise go untreated. Nonetheless, to arrive at more definitive and secure conclusions, it is imperative that additional randomized controlled trials and robust real-world effectiveness studies, preferably with appropriate comparison groups, are conducted.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Binge eating</subject><subject>Bulimia</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Eating disorders</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Self help</subject><subject>Social Work and Community Development</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>2366-5963</issn><issn>2366-5963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxBdRsNR-AU8Bz9H826TxZqvVQlWoeg5p9q1s6W5qsq3stzd2BT15mscwMzx-WXZOySUlRF1FQblQmDCOCeEix91RNmBcSpxryY__3KfZKMY1IYQpShhRg6xbQu1bQPuIZtYBbj0uk6J500LYQ9NWvomo9AFNdpuqrix6Sr6PFtmmQJOqeQcMtk2KbqvoQwHhGln00sUW6uQ7tIR9BZ-H-CO0FtvGbrpYxbPspLSbCKMfHWZvs7vX6QNePN_PpzcL7Jgad3hVOJpDrgXhrNRKCLDcaeZWQlrLRLESY8mdpEQBgNIcrBaSSlWWimo1Lvkwu-h3t8F_7CC2Zu13IT0RDSea61zljKQU61Mu-BgDlGYbqtqGzlBivimbnrJJlM2BsulSifelmMKJRPid_qf1BUvugJY</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Samara, Myrto T.</creator><creator>Michou, Niki</creator><creator>Argyrou, Aikaterini</creator><creator>Mathioudaki, Elissavet</creator><creator>Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia</creator><creator>Tsekitsidi, Eirini</creator><creator>Polyzopoulou, Zoi A.</creator><creator>Lappas, Andreas S.</creator><creator>Christodoulou, Nikos</creator><creator>Papazisis, Georgios</creator><creator>Chourdakis, Michail</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-5091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</title><author>Samara, Myrto T. ; Michou, Niki ; Argyrou, Aikaterini ; Mathioudaki, Elissavet ; Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia ; Tsekitsidi, Eirini ; Polyzopoulou, Zoi A. ; Lappas, Andreas S. ; Christodoulou, Nikos ; Papazisis, Georgios ; Chourdakis, Michail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c278y-bdc15e594032f9744ea3c92cb46aa24db4863c6107eee793ea946167ff71978f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Binge eating</topic><topic>Bulimia</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Eating disorders</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Self help</topic><topic>Social Work and Community Development</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samara, Myrto T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michou, Niki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Argyrou, Aikaterini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathioudaki, Elissavet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsekitsidi, Eirini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polyzopoulou, Zoi A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lappas, Andreas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christodoulou, Nikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papazisis, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chourdakis, Michail</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of technology in behavioral science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samara, Myrto T.</au><au>Michou, Niki</au><au>Argyrou, Aikaterini</au><au>Mathioudaki, Elissavet</au><au>Bakaloudi, Dimitra Rafailia</au><au>Tsekitsidi, Eirini</au><au>Polyzopoulou, Zoi A.</au><au>Lappas, Andreas S.</au><au>Christodoulou, Nikos</au><au>Papazisis, Georgios</au><au>Chourdakis, Michail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of technology in behavioral science</jtitle><stitle>J. technol. behav. sci</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>452-462</pages><issn>2366-5963</issn><eissn>2366-5963</eissn><abstract>Remote delivery of interventions (e.g., online sessions, telephone sessions, e-mails, SMS, applications) facilitate access to health care and might be an efficacious alternative to face to face treatments for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED). Telehealth has evolved rapidly in recent years, facilitating access to health care, as it seems to be more accessible among different groups of the population. In the light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we decided to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared remote versus face-to-face interventions for the treatment of BN and BED. We searched EMBASE, PubMed, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP and reference lists of relevant articles up to April, 2023. The primary outcomes were remission (defined as abstinence from binge/bulimic episodes for at least 2 weeks) and frequency of binge episodes. We also analyzed frequency of purging episodes, response, mean values of eating disorder psychopathology, depression, anxiety, and quality of life rating scales as well as drop-out rates and adverse effects. Six RCTs were identified with a total of 698 participants. Face-to-face interventions were found more effective than remote interventions in terms of remission (RR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.89, P = 0.004, 4 RCTs, N = 526), but the result was mainly driven by one study. No important differences were found in the remaining outcomes; nevertheless, most comparisons were underpowered. Few adverse effects were reported. Remote interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy to face-to-face interventions in treating BN and BED, providing effective and acceptable healthcare to patients who would otherwise go untreated. Nonetheless, to arrive at more definitive and secure conclusions, it is imperative that additional randomized controlled trials and robust real-world effectiveness studies, preferably with appropriate comparison groups, are conducted.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-5091</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2366-5963
ispartof Journal of technology in behavioral science, 2024-09, Vol.9 (3), p.452-462
issn 2366-5963
2366-5963
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3093957520
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Behavioral Science and Psychology
Binge eating
Bulimia
Clinical Psychology
Clinical trials
Eating disorders
Health care access
Internet
Intervention
Mental disorders
Mental health
Meta-analysis
Missing data
Psychiatry
Psychology
Quality of life
Remission (Medicine)
Self help
Social Work and Community Development
Systematic review
Telemedicine
title Remote vs Face-to-face Interventions for Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-eating Disorder: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A01%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Remote%20vs%20Face-to-face%20Interventions%20for%20Bulimia%20Nervosa%20and%20Binge-eating%20Disorder:%20a%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20technology%20in%20behavioral%20science&rft.au=Samara,%20Myrto%20T.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=452-462&rft.issn=2366-5963&rft.eissn=2366-5963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41347-023-00345-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3093957520%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093957520&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true