REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW

A European Union member state since May 2004, Poland has in recent years been repeatedly challenging fundamental values and principles of European Union law: the rule of law, loyal co-operation, and the primacy of applying EU law. The significance of multiple international agreements binding for Pol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Zembrzuski, Tadeusz
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 8
container_start_page 666
container_title
container_volume
creator Zembrzuski, Tadeusz
description A European Union member state since May 2004, Poland has in recent years been repeatedly challenging fundamental values and principles of European Union law: the rule of law, loyal co-operation, and the primacy of applying EU law. The significance of multiple international agreements binding for Poland has been depreciated, the constitutionally guaranteed tripartite division of power and hierarchy of legal acts seriously distorted. According to the prevailing consensus, the judiciary is one of the areas to the greatest extent affected by far-reaching violations and problems. Amendments to the Common Courts Law (so-called muzzle law) made it possible to penalise judges for rulings designed to implement standards arising from international agreements Poland is signatory to and the Treaty on European Union, or even implement international courts' case law. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against judges referring to European Union law and/or the European Convention on Human Rights in their rulings. Poland's Constitutional Court - the correctness of its staffing procedures questionable - has issued judgements undermining the validity of European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights in Poland. Issues of appointing justices and the consequences of their rulings have triggered greatest doubt in Poland. Circumstances of post-2017 changes to the composition of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) have undermined the body's independence from legislative and executive powers. Most lawyers believe that the Council's composition contradicts Article 187 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland: justices making up the NCJ are selected by representatives of political parties rather than the judicial community. The situation has impacted the capacity for proposing independent and impartial candidates to judicial positions at Polish courts of law, currently involving as many as around3,000judges on all levels of the judiciary. Many believe that they have been appointed in violation of fundamental national regulations governing the procedure for judicial appointments. In a ruling in Case C-718/21 of December 21st2023, and in reference to the European Court of Human Rights' ruling of November 8th 2021 in the case of Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek (Application Nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the panel of judges of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Su
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3093913591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3093913591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-efbfd2c49a19d042cac54afbf5b5b93b3bb7820368b47abc91d3028b44ddd1a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTc1Kw0AYXETBUvsOC54D-9vmO4Zk065sk7JJkJzKbjY5FLG1ae--g2_okxiogodhfhhm7tCMCQkRCCbv_-lHtBjHAyGEAWNA5QzlVm1V1upijeuNwi9NplOd2BZXbVWrLdYF3pUmKTL8_fmFrarq0v6VbWMULnNsktcn9DC4t7Ff_PIcNbmq001kyrVOExOdKOWXqB_8EFgnwFEIRLDOdVK4KZReeuCee7-KGeHL2IuV8x3QwAmbjAghUBfzOXq-7Z7Ox49rP172h-P1_D5d7jkBDpTLCT-diUPv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3093913591</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</creatorcontrib><description>A European Union member state since May 2004, Poland has in recent years been repeatedly challenging fundamental values and principles of European Union law: the rule of law, loyal co-operation, and the primacy of applying EU law. The significance of multiple international agreements binding for Poland has been depreciated, the constitutionally guaranteed tripartite division of power and hierarchy of legal acts seriously distorted. According to the prevailing consensus, the judiciary is one of the areas to the greatest extent affected by far-reaching violations and problems. Amendments to the Common Courts Law (so-called muzzle law) made it possible to penalise judges for rulings designed to implement standards arising from international agreements Poland is signatory to and the Treaty on European Union, or even implement international courts' case law. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against judges referring to European Union law and/or the European Convention on Human Rights in their rulings. Poland's Constitutional Court - the correctness of its staffing procedures questionable - has issued judgements undermining the validity of European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights in Poland. Issues of appointing justices and the consequences of their rulings have triggered greatest doubt in Poland. Circumstances of post-2017 changes to the composition of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) have undermined the body's independence from legislative and executive powers. Most lawyers believe that the Council's composition contradicts Article 187 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland: justices making up the NCJ are selected by representatives of political parties rather than the judicial community. The situation has impacted the capacity for proposing independent and impartial candidates to judicial positions at Polish courts of law, currently involving as many as around3,000judges on all levels of the judiciary. Many believe that they have been appointed in violation of fundamental national regulations governing the procedure for judicial appointments. In a ruling in Case C-718/21 of December 21st2023, and in reference to the European Court of Human Rights' ruling of November 8th 2021 in the case of Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek (Application Nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the panel of judges of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court of Poland, the panel having been appointed by the politicised NCJ, is not an independent or impartial court previously established pursuant to legislation, as required by European Union law. It has been recognised that the totality of circumstances behind the appointment of justices forming the panel who had submitted questions in the case may - in the eyes of the public - raise reasonable doubt with regard to the independence and/or impartiality of aforesaid judges. It may further undermine the confidence that the judiciary should inspire in any democratic society or a state of law. Poland's parliamentary elections of October 15th 2023 brought a change in government, the established majority facing the task of remedying the judiciary and restoring the rule of law. Notable early announcements include measures intended to block the works of the National Council of the Judiciary, by preventing the Minister of Justice from publishing announcements concerning new judicial competitions. The Council has been continuing operations and making decisions crucial to the community, with the likely consequence of slowing down the tempo of expected changes in Poland. Such changes should be achieved through the systemic introduction of remedial laws accounting for the importance of the rule of law and principles resulting from European Union membership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2459-9425</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2459-9425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Osijek: J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Case law ; Constitutional law ; Councils ; Human rights ; International agreements ; International relations ; Judges &amp; magistrates ; Judiciary ; Parliamentary elections ; Political appointments ; Principles ; Rule of law ; Values</subject><ispartof>EU and comparative law issues and challenges series, 2024 (8), p.666-685</ispartof><rights>Copyright J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,23928,23929,25138</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</creatorcontrib><title>REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW</title><title>EU and comparative law issues and challenges series</title><description>A European Union member state since May 2004, Poland has in recent years been repeatedly challenging fundamental values and principles of European Union law: the rule of law, loyal co-operation, and the primacy of applying EU law. The significance of multiple international agreements binding for Poland has been depreciated, the constitutionally guaranteed tripartite division of power and hierarchy of legal acts seriously distorted. According to the prevailing consensus, the judiciary is one of the areas to the greatest extent affected by far-reaching violations and problems. Amendments to the Common Courts Law (so-called muzzle law) made it possible to penalise judges for rulings designed to implement standards arising from international agreements Poland is signatory to and the Treaty on European Union, or even implement international courts' case law. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against judges referring to European Union law and/or the European Convention on Human Rights in their rulings. Poland's Constitutional Court - the correctness of its staffing procedures questionable - has issued judgements undermining the validity of European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights in Poland. Issues of appointing justices and the consequences of their rulings have triggered greatest doubt in Poland. Circumstances of post-2017 changes to the composition of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) have undermined the body's independence from legislative and executive powers. Most lawyers believe that the Council's composition contradicts Article 187 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland: justices making up the NCJ are selected by representatives of political parties rather than the judicial community. The situation has impacted the capacity for proposing independent and impartial candidates to judicial positions at Polish courts of law, currently involving as many as around3,000judges on all levels of the judiciary. Many believe that they have been appointed in violation of fundamental national regulations governing the procedure for judicial appointments. In a ruling in Case C-718/21 of December 21st2023, and in reference to the European Court of Human Rights' ruling of November 8th 2021 in the case of Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek (Application Nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the panel of judges of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court of Poland, the panel having been appointed by the politicised NCJ, is not an independent or impartial court previously established pursuant to legislation, as required by European Union law. It has been recognised that the totality of circumstances behind the appointment of justices forming the panel who had submitted questions in the case may - in the eyes of the public - raise reasonable doubt with regard to the independence and/or impartiality of aforesaid judges. It may further undermine the confidence that the judiciary should inspire in any democratic society or a state of law. Poland's parliamentary elections of October 15th 2023 brought a change in government, the established majority facing the task of remedying the judiciary and restoring the rule of law. Notable early announcements include measures intended to block the works of the National Council of the Judiciary, by preventing the Minister of Justice from publishing announcements concerning new judicial competitions. The Council has been continuing operations and making decisions crucial to the community, with the likely consequence of slowing down the tempo of expected changes in Poland. Such changes should be achieved through the systemic introduction of remedial laws accounting for the importance of the rule of law and principles resulting from European Union membership.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Case law</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Councils</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Judges &amp; magistrates</subject><subject>Judiciary</subject><subject>Parliamentary elections</subject><subject>Political appointments</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Rule of law</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>2459-9425</issn><issn>2459-9425</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNTc1Kw0AYXETBUvsOC54D-9vmO4Zk065sk7JJkJzKbjY5FLG1ae--g2_okxiogodhfhhm7tCMCQkRCCbv_-lHtBjHAyGEAWNA5QzlVm1V1upijeuNwi9NplOd2BZXbVWrLdYF3pUmKTL8_fmFrarq0v6VbWMULnNsktcn9DC4t7Ff_PIcNbmq001kyrVOExOdKOWXqB_8EFgnwFEIRLDOdVK4KZReeuCee7-KGeHL2IuV8x3QwAmbjAghUBfzOXq-7Z7Ox49rP172h-P1_D5d7jkBDpTLCT-diUPv</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</creator><general>J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW</title><author>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p113t-efbfd2c49a19d042cac54afbf5b5b93b3bb7820368b47abc91d3028b44ddd1a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Case law</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Councils</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Judges &amp; magistrates</topic><topic>Judiciary</topic><topic>Parliamentary elections</topic><topic>Political appointments</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Rule of law</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zembrzuski, Tadeusz</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW</atitle><btitle>EU and comparative law issues and challenges series</btitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issue>8</issue><spage>666</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>666-685</pages><issn>2459-9425</issn><eissn>2459-9425</eissn><abstract>A European Union member state since May 2004, Poland has in recent years been repeatedly challenging fundamental values and principles of European Union law: the rule of law, loyal co-operation, and the primacy of applying EU law. The significance of multiple international agreements binding for Poland has been depreciated, the constitutionally guaranteed tripartite division of power and hierarchy of legal acts seriously distorted. According to the prevailing consensus, the judiciary is one of the areas to the greatest extent affected by far-reaching violations and problems. Amendments to the Common Courts Law (so-called muzzle law) made it possible to penalise judges for rulings designed to implement standards arising from international agreements Poland is signatory to and the Treaty on European Union, or even implement international courts' case law. Consequently, disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against judges referring to European Union law and/or the European Convention on Human Rights in their rulings. Poland's Constitutional Court - the correctness of its staffing procedures questionable - has issued judgements undermining the validity of European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights in Poland. Issues of appointing justices and the consequences of their rulings have triggered greatest doubt in Poland. Circumstances of post-2017 changes to the composition of the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) have undermined the body's independence from legislative and executive powers. Most lawyers believe that the Council's composition contradicts Article 187 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland: justices making up the NCJ are selected by representatives of political parties rather than the judicial community. The situation has impacted the capacity for proposing independent and impartial candidates to judicial positions at Polish courts of law, currently involving as many as around3,000judges on all levels of the judiciary. Many believe that they have been appointed in violation of fundamental national regulations governing the procedure for judicial appointments. In a ruling in Case C-718/21 of December 21st2023, and in reference to the European Court of Human Rights' ruling of November 8th 2021 in the case of Dolińska-Ficek and Ozimek (Application Nos. 49868/19 and 57511/19), the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the panel of judges of the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court of Poland, the panel having been appointed by the politicised NCJ, is not an independent or impartial court previously established pursuant to legislation, as required by European Union law. It has been recognised that the totality of circumstances behind the appointment of justices forming the panel who had submitted questions in the case may - in the eyes of the public - raise reasonable doubt with regard to the independence and/or impartiality of aforesaid judges. It may further undermine the confidence that the judiciary should inspire in any democratic society or a state of law. Poland's parliamentary elections of October 15th 2023 brought a change in government, the established majority facing the task of remedying the judiciary and restoring the rule of law. Notable early announcements include measures intended to block the works of the National Council of the Judiciary, by preventing the Minister of Justice from publishing announcements concerning new judicial competitions. The Council has been continuing operations and making decisions crucial to the community, with the likely consequence of slowing down the tempo of expected changes in Poland. Such changes should be achieved through the systemic introduction of remedial laws accounting for the importance of the rule of law and principles resulting from European Union membership.</abstract><cop>Osijek</cop><pub>J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek</pub><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2459-9425
ispartof EU and comparative law issues and challenges series, 2024 (8), p.666-685
issn 2459-9425
2459-9425
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3093913591
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Agreements
Case law
Constitutional law
Councils
Human rights
International agreements
International relations
Judges & magistrates
Judiciary
Parliamentary elections
Political appointments
Principles
Rule of law
Values
title REMEDYING THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM IN POLAND – RESTORING THE RULE OF LAW
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A52%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=REMEDYING%20THE%20JUDICIARY%20SYSTEM%20IN%20POLAND%20%E2%80%93%20RESTORING%20THE%20RULE%20OF%20LAW&rft.btitle=EU%20and%20comparative%20law%20issues%20and%20challenges%20series&rft.au=Zembrzuski,%20Tadeusz&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=666&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=666-685&rft.issn=2459-9425&rft.eissn=2459-9425&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3093913591%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093913591&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true