PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT

The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that devel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey) Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109
Hauptverfasser: Celik, Sener, Baydur, Mithat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)
container_volume 29
creator Celik, Sener
Baydur, Mithat
description The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3093622750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A804851551</galeid><sourcerecordid>A804851551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g950-ccedbb1c82f7d1baa76b9b233896366b3b81c9e0c94bbb0472a6d37a066aed9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjU9rgzAAxXPYoF3X7xDY2ZE_GpPexFkXsCoqg50kibFYWt20_f4LbLAdxjs8ePzee3dgjSlCHmc-XoGHZTkhxDhh_hrsyqpIq6Su5ZusD1DmMDoklYyjHO6LKpFpDssik_H7DpZR3cAof4Gl45O8eQT3vTovdvvjG9DskyZ-9bIidQOZdxQB8oyxndbYcNKHHdZKhUwLTSjlglHGNNUcG2GREb7WGvkhUayjoUKMKduJnm7A0_fsxzx93uxybU_TbR7dY0uRoIyQMEC_1FGdbTuM_XSdlbkMi2kjjnwe4CDAjnr-h3Lq7GUw02j7weV_Cl-c0Vfh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093622750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><description>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-8641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Balgat: Center for Strategic Research</publisher><subject>19th century ; 20th century ; 21st century ; Analysis ; China ; Clearing houses ; Cooperation ; Corporations ; Corruption ; Diplomacy ; Ethical aspects ; Foreign investments ; Foreign policy ; Health care policy ; Hegemony ; Imperialism ; International cooperation ; International relations ; Internationalism ; Interventionism ; Iran ; Land use ; Landowners ; Legislation ; Local elections ; Modernism ; Multilateralism ; Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria ; Philosophy ; Political parties ; Political philosophy ; Political theory ; Pollution ; Progressivism ; Roosevelt, Theodore ; Sanders, Bernard ; Sanders, Bernie ; United Kingdom ; Warren, Elizabeth ; Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</subject><ispartof>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Center for Strategic Research</rights><rights>Copyright Center for Strategic Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spring 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,27864</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><title>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</title><description>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Clearing houses</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Foreign investments</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Internationalism</subject><subject>Interventionism</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Progressivism</subject><subject>Roosevelt, Theodore</subject><subject>Sanders, Bernard</subject><subject>Sanders, Bernie</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Warren, Elizabeth</subject><subject>Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</subject><issn>1300-8641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjU9rgzAAxXPYoF3X7xDY2ZE_GpPexFkXsCoqg50kibFYWt20_f4LbLAdxjs8ePzee3dgjSlCHmc-XoGHZTkhxDhh_hrsyqpIq6Su5ZusD1DmMDoklYyjHO6LKpFpDssik_H7DpZR3cAof4Gl45O8eQT3vTovdvvjG9DskyZ-9bIidQOZdxQB8oyxndbYcNKHHdZKhUwLTSjlglHGNNUcG2GREb7WGvkhUayjoUKMKduJnm7A0_fsxzx93uxybU_TbR7dY0uRoIyQMEC_1FGdbTuM_XSdlbkMi2kjjnwe4CDAjnr-h3Lq7GUw02j7weV_Cl-c0Vfh</recordid><startdate>20240322</startdate><enddate>20240322</enddate><creator>Celik, Sener</creator><creator>Baydur, Mithat</creator><general>Center for Strategic Research</general><general>Center for Strategic Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240322</creationdate><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><author>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g950-ccedbb1c82f7d1baa76b9b233896366b3b81c9e0c94bbb0472a6d37a066aed9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Clearing houses</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Foreign investments</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Internationalism</topic><topic>Interventionism</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Progressivism</topic><topic>Roosevelt, Theodore</topic><topic>Sanders, Bernard</topic><topic>Sanders, Bernie</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Warren, Elizabeth</topic><topic>Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, Sener</au><au>Baydur, Mithat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</atitle><jtitle>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</jtitle><date>2024-03-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>90-109</pages><issn>1300-8641</issn><abstract>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</abstract><cop>Balgat</cop><pub>Center for Strategic Research</pub><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1300-8641
ispartof Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109
issn 1300-8641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3093622750
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects 19th century
20th century
21st century
Analysis
China
Clearing houses
Cooperation
Corporations
Corruption
Diplomacy
Ethical aspects
Foreign investments
Foreign policy
Health care policy
Hegemony
Imperialism
International cooperation
International relations
Internationalism
Interventionism
Iran
Land use
Landowners
Legislation
Local elections
Modernism
Multilateralism
Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria
Philosophy
Political parties
Political philosophy
Political theory
Pollution
Progressivism
Roosevelt, Theodore
Sanders, Bernard
Sanders, Bernie
United Kingdom
Warren, Elizabeth
Wilson, Woodrow (American president)
title PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A58%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROGRESSIVISM%20IN%20AMERICAN%20FOREIGN%20POLICY:%20PAST%20AND%20PRESENT&rft.jtitle=Perceptions%20(Ankara,%20Turkey)&rft.au=Celik,%20Sener&rft.date=2024-03-22&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=90-109&rft.issn=1300-8641&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA804851551%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093622750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A804851551&rfr_iscdi=true