PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT
The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that devel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey) Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey) |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Celik, Sener Baydur, Mithat |
description | The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3093622750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A804851551</galeid><sourcerecordid>A804851551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g950-ccedbb1c82f7d1baa76b9b233896366b3b81c9e0c94bbb0472a6d37a066aed9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjU9rgzAAxXPYoF3X7xDY2ZE_GpPexFkXsCoqg50kibFYWt20_f4LbLAdxjs8ePzee3dgjSlCHmc-XoGHZTkhxDhh_hrsyqpIq6Su5ZusD1DmMDoklYyjHO6LKpFpDssik_H7DpZR3cAof4Gl45O8eQT3vTovdvvjG9DskyZ-9bIidQOZdxQB8oyxndbYcNKHHdZKhUwLTSjlglHGNNUcG2GREb7WGvkhUayjoUKMKduJnm7A0_fsxzx93uxybU_TbR7dY0uRoIyQMEC_1FGdbTuM_XSdlbkMi2kjjnwe4CDAjnr-h3Lq7GUw02j7weV_Cl-c0Vfh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093622750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</creator><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><description>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-8641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Balgat: Center for Strategic Research</publisher><subject>19th century ; 20th century ; 21st century ; Analysis ; China ; Clearing houses ; Cooperation ; Corporations ; Corruption ; Diplomacy ; Ethical aspects ; Foreign investments ; Foreign policy ; Health care policy ; Hegemony ; Imperialism ; International cooperation ; International relations ; Internationalism ; Interventionism ; Iran ; Land use ; Landowners ; Legislation ; Local elections ; Modernism ; Multilateralism ; Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria ; Philosophy ; Political parties ; Political philosophy ; Political theory ; Pollution ; Progressivism ; Roosevelt, Theodore ; Sanders, Bernard ; Sanders, Bernie ; United Kingdom ; Warren, Elizabeth ; Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</subject><ispartof>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Center for Strategic Research</rights><rights>Copyright Center for Strategic Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spring 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12843,27864</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><title>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</title><description>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>20th century</subject><subject>21st century</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Clearing houses</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Foreign investments</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Imperialism</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Internationalism</subject><subject>Interventionism</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Local elections</subject><subject>Modernism</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Political theory</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Progressivism</subject><subject>Roosevelt, Theodore</subject><subject>Sanders, Bernard</subject><subject>Sanders, Bernie</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Warren, Elizabeth</subject><subject>Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</subject><issn>1300-8641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptjU9rgzAAxXPYoF3X7xDY2ZE_GpPexFkXsCoqg50kibFYWt20_f4LbLAdxjs8ePzee3dgjSlCHmc-XoGHZTkhxDhh_hrsyqpIq6Su5ZusD1DmMDoklYyjHO6LKpFpDssik_H7DpZR3cAof4Gl45O8eQT3vTovdvvjG9DskyZ-9bIidQOZdxQB8oyxndbYcNKHHdZKhUwLTSjlglHGNNUcG2GREb7WGvkhUayjoUKMKduJnm7A0_fsxzx93uxybU_TbR7dY0uRoIyQMEC_1FGdbTuM_XSdlbkMi2kjjnwe4CDAjnr-h3Lq7GUw02j7weV_Cl-c0Vfh</recordid><startdate>20240322</startdate><enddate>20240322</enddate><creator>Celik, Sener</creator><creator>Baydur, Mithat</creator><general>Center for Strategic Research</general><general>Center for Strategic Research, Ministry of Foreign Affairs</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240322</creationdate><title>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</title><author>Celik, Sener ; Baydur, Mithat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g950-ccedbb1c82f7d1baa76b9b233896366b3b81c9e0c94bbb0472a6d37a066aed9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>20th century</topic><topic>21st century</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Clearing houses</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Foreign investments</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Imperialism</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Internationalism</topic><topic>Interventionism</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Local elections</topic><topic>Modernism</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Political theory</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Progressivism</topic><topic>Roosevelt, Theodore</topic><topic>Sanders, Bernard</topic><topic>Sanders, Bernie</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Warren, Elizabeth</topic><topic>Wilson, Woodrow (American president)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Celik, Sener</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baydur, Mithat</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Celik, Sener</au><au>Baydur, Mithat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT</atitle><jtitle>Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey)</jtitle><date>2024-03-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>90-109</pages><issn>1300-8641</issn><abstract>The article examines the impact of progressivism on contemporary U.S. foreign policy. American progressivism, which is said to have its roots in the British settlement house movement and the Fabian Society in Britain in the late 19th century, was a political philosophy and reform movement that developed against the consequences of modernism such as business corruption, environmental pollution, and the growth of capital at the expense of society S interest. Strongly affiliated with expansionism and interventionism, it was also influential in foreign policy during the period between 1890 and 1910. Theodore Roosevelt's Big Stick Diplomacy, William Taft's Dollar Diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy prominently reflected this liberal internationalist trend. In this study, we investigate the foreign policy understanding of today's progressives, analyzing the bills, resolutions, and joint/concurrent resolutions sponsored by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren who represent the progressive wing in the Democratic Party. We argue that modern progressivism differs from its origins in that it prioritizes international cooperation, the non-intervention principle, and refraining from the use of force. Among the article's important findings are that progressives do not seek hegemonic supremacy, that they advocate a normative understanding of foreign policy that prioritizes values over interests, and that they distance themselves from a pro-interventionist political philosophy. On the other hand, they do not strongly question American leadership at the dawn of the 21st century. Keywords Progressivism, American foreign policy, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren</abstract><cop>Balgat</cop><pub>Center for Strategic Research</pub><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1300-8641 |
ispartof | Perceptions (Ankara, Turkey), 2024-03, Vol.29 (1), p.90-109 |
issn | 1300-8641 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3093622750 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | 19th century 20th century 21st century Analysis China Clearing houses Cooperation Corporations Corruption Diplomacy Ethical aspects Foreign investments Foreign policy Health care policy Hegemony Imperialism International cooperation International relations Internationalism Interventionism Iran Land use Landowners Legislation Local elections Modernism Multilateralism Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria Philosophy Political parties Political philosophy Political theory Pollution Progressivism Roosevelt, Theodore Sanders, Bernard Sanders, Bernie United Kingdom Warren, Elizabeth Wilson, Woodrow (American president) |
title | PROGRESSIVISM IN AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY: PAST AND PRESENT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T02%3A58%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PROGRESSIVISM%20IN%20AMERICAN%20FOREIGN%20POLICY:%20PAST%20AND%20PRESENT&rft.jtitle=Perceptions%20(Ankara,%20Turkey)&rft.au=Celik,%20Sener&rft.date=2024-03-22&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=90-109&rft.issn=1300-8641&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA804851551%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093622750&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A804851551&rfr_iscdi=true |