Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video

Effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. This study examines learners' engagement with instructor‐generated video. It contributes an analytical synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data that provides the basis for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of educational technology 2024-09, Vol.55 (5), p.2192-2211
Hauptverfasser: Truss, Aron, McBride, Karen, Porter, Hannah, Anderson, Valerie, Stilwell, Geraldine, Philippou, Christina, Taggart, Andy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2211
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2192
container_title British journal of educational technology
container_volume 55
creator Truss, Aron
McBride, Karen
Porter, Hannah
Anderson, Valerie
Stilwell, Geraldine
Philippou, Christina
Taggart, Andy
description Effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. This study examines learners' engagement with instructor‐generated video. It contributes an analytical synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data that provides the basis for investigating the extent to which, and how, learners engage with video resources provided in their courses. Specifically, three dimensions of learner engagement with video are studied: behavioural, cognitive and affective. The study contributes to educational technology research by identifying distinctive patterns of learner control over the use of video which diverges from instructors' assumptions. It shows the complex and nuanced features of cognitive and affective engagement. Videos can have positive effects, but inappropriate use of technical features results in learner disengagement. This study contributes a novel use of signalling theory, suggesting the importance of instructor signals concerning relevance, focus and utility as a feature of video generation, as a prerequisite of cognitive engagement. A research and theory development agenda is developed, locating video‐based learning in student contexts as a basis for explaining both engagement and disengagement with video technology affordances. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Higher education tutors are increasingly expected to generate video content as a feature of their course delivery. Although effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, the extent to which this occurs is unclear. Video technology affordances rarely feature in academic professional development programmes leaving tutors ill‐equipped to understand how and in what ways students engage with video resources as a part of their courses. What this paper adds A novel use of signalling theory to explain different patterns of learner engagement and disengagement. Learner agency and control results in video technology affordances being fitted and ‘flexed’ around factors that instructors rarely consider in the video generation process. A new model to describe factors that affect student engagement with instructor‐generated video. Implications for practice and/or policy Raise awareness for instructors about patterns of student engagement with video technology affordances that affect learning experience and outcomes. Implement professional development programmes to equip instructors to design and generat
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bjet.13450
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3092122355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3092122355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2960-20651e9ece79a6de9d1f12a26f87cf9decb32de1a3d09ea617a32a96ae9df2fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_AgCtbqxSdY8CZszSSbbHPUUr8oeKnnkG4mdUu7W5OspTcfwWf0SUxdz85lGPjNDPwJuQQ6glQ3ixXGEfBC0CMygEKW-VhwcUwGlNIyBwr8lJyFsEoj5aIYkGKGxjfoM2yWZokbbGK2q-NbVjch-q6Krf_-_FpiIiaizT5qi-05OXFmHfDirw_J6_10PnnMZy8PT5PbWV4xJWnOqBSACisslZEWlQUHzDDpxmXllMVqwZlFMNxShUZCaTgzSpokHXPIh-Sqv7v17XuHIepV2_kmvdScKgaMcSGSuu5V5dsQPDq99fXG-L0Gqg-p6EMq-jeVhKHHu3qN-3-kvnuezvudH7fJZg4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3092122355</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Truss, Aron ; McBride, Karen ; Porter, Hannah ; Anderson, Valerie ; Stilwell, Geraldine ; Philippou, Christina ; Taggart, Andy</creator><creatorcontrib>Truss, Aron ; McBride, Karen ; Porter, Hannah ; Anderson, Valerie ; Stilwell, Geraldine ; Philippou, Christina ; Taggart, Andy</creatorcontrib><description>Effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. This study examines learners' engagement with instructor‐generated video. It contributes an analytical synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data that provides the basis for investigating the extent to which, and how, learners engage with video resources provided in their courses. Specifically, three dimensions of learner engagement with video are studied: behavioural, cognitive and affective. The study contributes to educational technology research by identifying distinctive patterns of learner control over the use of video which diverges from instructors' assumptions. It shows the complex and nuanced features of cognitive and affective engagement. Videos can have positive effects, but inappropriate use of technical features results in learner disengagement. This study contributes a novel use of signalling theory, suggesting the importance of instructor signals concerning relevance, focus and utility as a feature of video generation, as a prerequisite of cognitive engagement. A research and theory development agenda is developed, locating video‐based learning in student contexts as a basis for explaining both engagement and disengagement with video technology affordances. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Higher education tutors are increasingly expected to generate video content as a feature of their course delivery. Although effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, the extent to which this occurs is unclear. Video technology affordances rarely feature in academic professional development programmes leaving tutors ill‐equipped to understand how and in what ways students engage with video resources as a part of their courses. What this paper adds A novel use of signalling theory to explain different patterns of learner engagement and disengagement. Learner agency and control results in video technology affordances being fitted and ‘flexed’ around factors that instructors rarely consider in the video generation process. A new model to describe factors that affect student engagement with instructor‐generated video. Implications for practice and/or policy Raise awareness for instructors about patterns of student engagement with video technology affordances that affect learning experience and outcomes. Implement professional development programmes to equip instructors to design and generate video content that takes account of patterns of behavioural, cognitive and affective engagement and signals relevance, focus and utility. Develop clear policies regarding technical features of video generation to avoid learner disengagement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1013</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjet.13450</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Coventry: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Affordances ; digital learning ; Educational Technology ; Learner Controlled Instruction ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Professional development ; Qualitative analysis ; Signal generation ; signalling theory ; Student participation ; Teachers ; video ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>British journal of educational technology, 2024-09, Vol.55 (5), p.2192-2211</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Educational Research Association.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2960-20651e9ece79a6de9d1f12a26f87cf9decb32de1a3d09ea617a32a96ae9df2fe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5581-4894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjet.13450$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjet.13450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truss, Aron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilwell, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippou, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, Andy</creatorcontrib><title>Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video</title><title>British journal of educational technology</title><description>Effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. This study examines learners' engagement with instructor‐generated video. It contributes an analytical synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data that provides the basis for investigating the extent to which, and how, learners engage with video resources provided in their courses. Specifically, three dimensions of learner engagement with video are studied: behavioural, cognitive and affective. The study contributes to educational technology research by identifying distinctive patterns of learner control over the use of video which diverges from instructors' assumptions. It shows the complex and nuanced features of cognitive and affective engagement. Videos can have positive effects, but inappropriate use of technical features results in learner disengagement. This study contributes a novel use of signalling theory, suggesting the importance of instructor signals concerning relevance, focus and utility as a feature of video generation, as a prerequisite of cognitive engagement. A research and theory development agenda is developed, locating video‐based learning in student contexts as a basis for explaining both engagement and disengagement with video technology affordances. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Higher education tutors are increasingly expected to generate video content as a feature of their course delivery. Although effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, the extent to which this occurs is unclear. Video technology affordances rarely feature in academic professional development programmes leaving tutors ill‐equipped to understand how and in what ways students engage with video resources as a part of their courses. What this paper adds A novel use of signalling theory to explain different patterns of learner engagement and disengagement. Learner agency and control results in video technology affordances being fitted and ‘flexed’ around factors that instructors rarely consider in the video generation process. A new model to describe factors that affect student engagement with instructor‐generated video. Implications for practice and/or policy Raise awareness for instructors about patterns of student engagement with video technology affordances that affect learning experience and outcomes. Implement professional development programmes to equip instructors to design and generate video content that takes account of patterns of behavioural, cognitive and affective engagement and signals relevance, focus and utility. Develop clear policies regarding technical features of video generation to avoid learner disengagement.</description><subject>Affordances</subject><subject>digital learning</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Learner Controlled Instruction</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Signal generation</subject><subject>signalling theory</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>video</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><issn>0007-1013</issn><issn>1467-8535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp90M1KAzEQB_AgCtbqxSdY8CZszSSbbHPUUr8oeKnnkG4mdUu7W5OspTcfwWf0SUxdz85lGPjNDPwJuQQ6glQ3ixXGEfBC0CMygEKW-VhwcUwGlNIyBwr8lJyFsEoj5aIYkGKGxjfoM2yWZokbbGK2q-NbVjch-q6Krf_-_FpiIiaizT5qi-05OXFmHfDirw_J6_10PnnMZy8PT5PbWV4xJWnOqBSACisslZEWlQUHzDDpxmXllMVqwZlFMNxShUZCaTgzSpokHXPIh-Sqv7v17XuHIepV2_kmvdScKgaMcSGSuu5V5dsQPDq99fXG-L0Gqg-p6EMq-jeVhKHHu3qN-3-kvnuezvudH7fJZg4</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Truss, Aron</creator><creator>McBride, Karen</creator><creator>Porter, Hannah</creator><creator>Anderson, Valerie</creator><creator>Stilwell, Geraldine</creator><creator>Philippou, Christina</creator><creator>Taggart, Andy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-4894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video</title><author>Truss, Aron ; McBride, Karen ; Porter, Hannah ; Anderson, Valerie ; Stilwell, Geraldine ; Philippou, Christina ; Taggart, Andy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2960-20651e9ece79a6de9d1f12a26f87cf9decb32de1a3d09ea617a32a96ae9df2fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Affordances</topic><topic>digital learning</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Learner Controlled Instruction</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Signal generation</topic><topic>signalling theory</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>video</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truss, Aron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McBride, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Valerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stilwell, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippou, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, Andy</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truss, Aron</au><au>McBride, Karen</au><au>Porter, Hannah</au><au>Anderson, Valerie</au><au>Stilwell, Geraldine</au><au>Philippou, Christina</au><au>Taggart, Andy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video</atitle><jtitle>British journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2192</spage><epage>2211</epage><pages>2192-2211</pages><issn>0007-1013</issn><eissn>1467-8535</eissn><abstract>Effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, but the extent to which this occurs is unclear. This study examines learners' engagement with instructor‐generated video. It contributes an analytical synthesis of qualitative and quantitative data that provides the basis for investigating the extent to which, and how, learners engage with video resources provided in their courses. Specifically, three dimensions of learner engagement with video are studied: behavioural, cognitive and affective. The study contributes to educational technology research by identifying distinctive patterns of learner control over the use of video which diverges from instructors' assumptions. It shows the complex and nuanced features of cognitive and affective engagement. Videos can have positive effects, but inappropriate use of technical features results in learner disengagement. This study contributes a novel use of signalling theory, suggesting the importance of instructor signals concerning relevance, focus and utility as a feature of video generation, as a prerequisite of cognitive engagement. A research and theory development agenda is developed, locating video‐based learning in student contexts as a basis for explaining both engagement and disengagement with video technology affordances. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Higher education tutors are increasingly expected to generate video content as a feature of their course delivery. Although effective video resources are assumed to promote learner engagement, the extent to which this occurs is unclear. Video technology affordances rarely feature in academic professional development programmes leaving tutors ill‐equipped to understand how and in what ways students engage with video resources as a part of their courses. What this paper adds A novel use of signalling theory to explain different patterns of learner engagement and disengagement. Learner agency and control results in video technology affordances being fitted and ‘flexed’ around factors that instructors rarely consider in the video generation process. A new model to describe factors that affect student engagement with instructor‐generated video. Implications for practice and/or policy Raise awareness for instructors about patterns of student engagement with video technology affordances that affect learning experience and outcomes. Implement professional development programmes to equip instructors to design and generate video content that takes account of patterns of behavioural, cognitive and affective engagement and signals relevance, focus and utility. Develop clear policies regarding technical features of video generation to avoid learner disengagement.</abstract><cop>Coventry</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/bjet.13450</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5581-4894</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-1013
ispartof British journal of educational technology, 2024-09, Vol.55 (5), p.2192-2211
issn 0007-1013
1467-8535
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3092122355
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Affordances
digital learning
Educational Technology
Learner Controlled Instruction
Learner Engagement
Learning
Professional development
Qualitative analysis
Signal generation
signalling theory
Student participation
Teachers
video
Video Technology
title Learner engagement with instructor‐generated video
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T22%3A35%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learner%20engagement%20with%20instructor%E2%80%90generated%20video&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Truss,%20Aron&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2192&rft.epage=2211&rft.pages=2192-2211&rft.issn=0007-1013&rft.eissn=1467-8535&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjet.13450&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3092122355%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3092122355&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true