Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units

The current analysis utilizes semi-structured qualitative interviews with sworn cybercrime detectives, civilian digital forensics analysts, and unit administrators to consider variations between cybercrime units which bear significant implications for cybercrime investigative policy and practice. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Criminal justice policy review 2024-08, Vol.35 (4), p.194-215
Hauptverfasser: Steinmetz, Kevin F., Schaefer, Brian P., McCarthy, Adrienne L., Brewer, Christopher G., Kurtz, Don L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 215
container_issue 4
container_start_page 194
container_title Criminal justice policy review
container_volume 35
creator Steinmetz, Kevin F.
Schaefer, Brian P.
McCarthy, Adrienne L.
Brewer, Christopher G.
Kurtz, Don L.
description The current analysis utilizes semi-structured qualitative interviews with sworn cybercrime detectives, civilian digital forensics analysts, and unit administrators to consider variations between cybercrime units which bear significant implications for cybercrime investigative policy and practice. The first variation observed in this study concerns differences in the structure of digital forensics assignments. Such duties may be assigned to sworn officers, civilians, sworn officers and civilian, outsourced to other departments, or a dedicated forensic lab. Second, variations between units were noted in resource availability (tools, training, and finances). These variations among cybercrime units may have implications for personnel recruitment and retention, the sophistication of cases considered by investigators, and case success.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/08874034241265106
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3091295823</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_08874034241265106</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3091295823</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-ea7d278b892f8ada4fdb1deca9dd507b86d4868fa65227fa7e89f4e6418d6d303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AUxBdRsFY_gLeA59R9-z_eSqhaKAhivYZNdjdsSZO4mxb77U2pICKe3mF-M28YhG4BzwCkvMdKSYYpIwyI4IDFGZoA5ySlXIlzNDnq6RG4RFcxbjAGCopM0Ovis2-64Ns6yQ-lDVXwW5vkutelb_zgbXxI3nXwevBdG5P5tvtNLtu9jYOvR31vk3Xrh3iNLpxuor35vlO0fly85c_p6uVpmc9XaQU4E6nV0hCpSpURp7TRzJkSjK10ZgzHslTCMCWU04ITIp2WVmWOWcFAGWEoplN0d8rtQ_exG1sUm24X2vFlQXEGJOOK0JGCE1WFLsZgXdGPxXU4FICL43TFn-lGz-zkibq2P6n_G74Ar81uzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3091295823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Steinmetz, Kevin F. ; Schaefer, Brian P. ; McCarthy, Adrienne L. ; Brewer, Christopher G. ; Kurtz, Don L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinmetz, Kevin F. ; Schaefer, Brian P. ; McCarthy, Adrienne L. ; Brewer, Christopher G. ; Kurtz, Don L.</creatorcontrib><description>The current analysis utilizes semi-structured qualitative interviews with sworn cybercrime detectives, civilian digital forensics analysts, and unit administrators to consider variations between cybercrime units which bear significant implications for cybercrime investigative policy and practice. The first variation observed in this study concerns differences in the structure of digital forensics assignments. Such duties may be assigned to sworn officers, civilians, sworn officers and civilian, outsourced to other departments, or a dedicated forensic lab. Second, variations between units were noted in resource availability (tools, training, and finances). These variations among cybercrime units may have implications for personnel recruitment and retention, the sophistication of cases considered by investigators, and case success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-4034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08874034241265106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Administrators ; Cybercrime ; Detectives ; Forensic sciences ; Outsourcing ; Recruitment</subject><ispartof>Criminal justice policy review, 2024-08, Vol.35 (4), p.194-215</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-ea7d278b892f8ada4fdb1deca9dd507b86d4868fa65227fa7e89f4e6418d6d303</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1297-078X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08874034241265106$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08874034241265106$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27865,27923,27924,43620,43621</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinmetz, Kevin F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Don L.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units</title><title>Criminal justice policy review</title><description>The current analysis utilizes semi-structured qualitative interviews with sworn cybercrime detectives, civilian digital forensics analysts, and unit administrators to consider variations between cybercrime units which bear significant implications for cybercrime investigative policy and practice. The first variation observed in this study concerns differences in the structure of digital forensics assignments. Such duties may be assigned to sworn officers, civilians, sworn officers and civilian, outsourced to other departments, or a dedicated forensic lab. Second, variations between units were noted in resource availability (tools, training, and finances). These variations among cybercrime units may have implications for personnel recruitment and retention, the sophistication of cases considered by investigators, and case success.</description><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Cybercrime</subject><subject>Detectives</subject><subject>Forensic sciences</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><issn>0887-4034</issn><issn>1552-3586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AUxBdRsFY_gLeA59R9-z_eSqhaKAhivYZNdjdsSZO4mxb77U2pICKe3mF-M28YhG4BzwCkvMdKSYYpIwyI4IDFGZoA5ySlXIlzNDnq6RG4RFcxbjAGCopM0Ovis2-64Ns6yQ-lDVXwW5vkutelb_zgbXxI3nXwevBdG5P5tvtNLtu9jYOvR31vk3Xrh3iNLpxuor35vlO0fly85c_p6uVpmc9XaQU4E6nV0hCpSpURp7TRzJkSjK10ZgzHslTCMCWU04ITIp2WVmWOWcFAGWEoplN0d8rtQ_exG1sUm24X2vFlQXEGJOOK0JGCE1WFLsZgXdGPxXU4FICL43TFn-lGz-zkibq2P6n_G74Ar81uzw</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Steinmetz, Kevin F.</creator><creator>Schaefer, Brian P.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Adrienne L.</creator><creator>Brewer, Christopher G.</creator><creator>Kurtz, Don L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-078X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units</title><author>Steinmetz, Kevin F. ; Schaefer, Brian P. ; McCarthy, Adrienne L. ; Brewer, Christopher G. ; Kurtz, Don L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-ea7d278b892f8ada4fdb1deca9dd507b86d4868fa65227fa7e89f4e6418d6d303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Cybercrime</topic><topic>Detectives</topic><topic>Forensic sciences</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinmetz, Kevin F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaefer, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Adrienne L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brewer, Christopher G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurtz, Don L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Criminal justice policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinmetz, Kevin F.</au><au>Schaefer, Brian P.</au><au>McCarthy, Adrienne L.</au><au>Brewer, Christopher G.</au><au>Kurtz, Don L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units</atitle><jtitle>Criminal justice policy review</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>194-215</pages><issn>0887-4034</issn><eissn>1552-3586</eissn><abstract>The current analysis utilizes semi-structured qualitative interviews with sworn cybercrime detectives, civilian digital forensics analysts, and unit administrators to consider variations between cybercrime units which bear significant implications for cybercrime investigative policy and practice. The first variation observed in this study concerns differences in the structure of digital forensics assignments. Such duties may be assigned to sworn officers, civilians, sworn officers and civilian, outsourced to other departments, or a dedicated forensic lab. Second, variations between units were noted in resource availability (tools, training, and finances). These variations among cybercrime units may have implications for personnel recruitment and retention, the sophistication of cases considered by investigators, and case success.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/08874034241265106</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1297-078X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-4034
ispartof Criminal justice policy review, 2024-08, Vol.35 (4), p.194-215
issn 0887-4034
1552-3586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3091295823
source PAIS Index; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Administrators
Cybercrime
Detectives
Forensic sciences
Outsourcing
Recruitment
title Exploring Cybercrime Capabilities: Variations Among Cybercrime Investigative Units
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A25%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20Cybercrime%20Capabilities:%20Variations%20Among%20Cybercrime%20Investigative%20Units&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20justice%20policy%20review&rft.au=Steinmetz,%20Kevin%20F.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=194-215&rft.issn=0887-4034&rft.eissn=1552-3586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08874034241265106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3091295823%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3091295823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08874034241265106&rfr_iscdi=true