Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned
There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Machine learning 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7010 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 6977 |
container_title | Machine learning |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Davis, Jesse Bransen, Lotte Devos, Laurens Jaspers, Arne Meert, Wannes Robberechts, Pieter Van Haaren, Jan Van Roy, Maaike |
description | There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090099549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090099549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisSUwjh912KGKl1TEBlYsrGkybVOFOHhSpP49pkVix2I0Y_veq_ER4lzClQSYXLOEstQ5FKmscSaHAzGSZqJyMNYcihG4dGllYY7FCfMaAArr7Ei8P9OwCnVow3KbYVdn9IXtBocmdFnTZdyHOHB6wHY7NBXfZNUK25a6JfFlhn0fA1ar3Zy8LTGHjlPH2FF9Ko4W2DKd_faxeLu_e50-5rOXh6fp7SyvCq2H3Bgo5MTpWmtXSu2w0nNAZ21plARaOJS2RpVOlhzNFSGhKrStcE41qVqNxcU-N23zuSEe_DpsYlqZvYISEhmjy6Qq9qoqBuZIC9_H5gPj1kvwPxD9HqJPEP0OoodkUnsTJ3H6dPyL_sf1DVKvdXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><description>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Athletic recruitment ; Automation ; Computer Science ; Control ; Data analysis ; Data science ; Decision making ; Indicators ; Machine Learning ; Mechatronics ; Movable bridges ; Natural Language Processing (NLP) ; Robotics ; Simulation and Modeling ; Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer ; SWOT analysis</subject><ispartof>Machine learning, 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devos, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspers, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meert, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robberechts, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Haaren, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><title>Machine learning</title><addtitle>Mach Learn</addtitle><description>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Athletic recruitment</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data science</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Movable bridges</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Simulation and Modeling</subject><subject>Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer</subject><subject>SWOT analysis</subject><issn>0885-6125</issn><issn>1573-0565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisSUwjh912KGKl1TEBlYsrGkybVOFOHhSpP49pkVix2I0Y_veq_ER4lzClQSYXLOEstQ5FKmscSaHAzGSZqJyMNYcihG4dGllYY7FCfMaAArr7Ei8P9OwCnVow3KbYVdn9IXtBocmdFnTZdyHOHB6wHY7NBXfZNUK25a6JfFlhn0fA1ar3Zy8LTGHjlPH2FF9Ko4W2DKd_faxeLu_e50-5rOXh6fp7SyvCq2H3Bgo5MTpWmtXSu2w0nNAZ21plARaOJS2RpVOlhzNFSGhKrStcE41qVqNxcU-N23zuSEe_DpsYlqZvYISEhmjy6Qq9qoqBuZIC9_H5gPj1kvwPxD9HqJPEP0OoodkUnsTJ3H6dPyL_sf1DVKvdXw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Davis, Jesse</creator><creator>Bransen, Lotte</creator><creator>Devos, Laurens</creator><creator>Jaspers, Arne</creator><creator>Meert, Wannes</creator><creator>Robberechts, Pieter</creator><creator>Van Haaren, Jan</creator><creator>Van Roy, Maaike</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><author>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Athletic recruitment</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data science</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Movable bridges</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Simulation and Modeling</topic><topic>Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer</topic><topic>SWOT analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devos, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspers, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meert, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robberechts, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Haaren, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Machine learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Jesse</au><au>Bransen, Lotte</au><au>Devos, Laurens</au><au>Jaspers, Arne</au><au>Meert, Wannes</au><au>Robberechts, Pieter</au><au>Van Haaren, Jan</au><au>Van Roy, Maaike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</atitle><jtitle>Machine learning</jtitle><stitle>Mach Learn</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6977</spage><epage>7010</epage><pages>6977-7010</pages><issn>0885-6125</issn><eissn>1573-0565</eissn><abstract>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-6125 |
ispartof | Machine learning, 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010 |
issn | 0885-6125 1573-0565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3090099549 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Athletic recruitment Automation Computer Science Control Data analysis Data science Decision making Indicators Machine Learning Mechatronics Movable bridges Natural Language Processing (NLP) Robotics Simulation and Modeling Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer SWOT analysis |
title | Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20and%20evaluation%20in%20sports%20analytics:%20challenges,%20approaches,%20and%20lessons%20learned&rft.jtitle=Machine%20learning&rft.au=Davis,%20Jesse&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6977&rft.epage=7010&rft.pages=6977-7010&rft.issn=0885-6125&rft.eissn=1573-0565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3090099549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |