Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned

There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Machine learning 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010
Hauptverfasser: Davis, Jesse, Bransen, Lotte, Devos, Laurens, Jaspers, Arne, Meert, Wannes, Robberechts, Pieter, Van Haaren, Jan, Van Roy, Maaike
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7010
container_issue 9
container_start_page 6977
container_title Machine learning
container_volume 113
creator Davis, Jesse
Bransen, Lotte
Devos, Laurens
Jaspers, Arne
Meert, Wannes
Robberechts, Pieter
Van Haaren, Jan
Van Roy, Maaike
description There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3090099549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3090099549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisSUwjh912KGKl1TEBlYsrGkybVOFOHhSpP49pkVix2I0Y_veq_ER4lzClQSYXLOEstQ5FKmscSaHAzGSZqJyMNYcihG4dGllYY7FCfMaAArr7Ei8P9OwCnVow3KbYVdn9IXtBocmdFnTZdyHOHB6wHY7NBXfZNUK25a6JfFlhn0fA1ar3Zy8LTGHjlPH2FF9Ko4W2DKd_faxeLu_e50-5rOXh6fp7SyvCq2H3Bgo5MTpWmtXSu2w0nNAZ21plARaOJS2RpVOlhzNFSGhKrStcE41qVqNxcU-N23zuSEe_DpsYlqZvYISEhmjy6Qq9qoqBuZIC9_H5gPj1kvwPxD9HqJPEP0OoodkUnsTJ3H6dPyL_sf1DVKvdXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090099549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</creator><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><description>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6125</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Athletic recruitment ; Automation ; Computer Science ; Control ; Data analysis ; Data science ; Decision making ; Indicators ; Machine Learning ; Mechatronics ; Movable bridges ; Natural Language Processing (NLP) ; Robotics ; Simulation and Modeling ; Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer ; SWOT analysis</subject><ispartof>Machine learning, 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devos, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspers, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meert, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robberechts, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Haaren, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><title>Machine learning</title><addtitle>Mach Learn</addtitle><description>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Athletic recruitment</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data science</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Movable bridges</subject><subject>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Simulation and Modeling</subject><subject>Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer</subject><subject>SWOT analysis</subject><issn>0885-6125</issn><issn>1573-0565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wisSUwjh912KGKl1TEBlYsrGkybVOFOHhSpP49pkVix2I0Y_veq_ER4lzClQSYXLOEstQ5FKmscSaHAzGSZqJyMNYcihG4dGllYY7FCfMaAArr7Ei8P9OwCnVow3KbYVdn9IXtBocmdFnTZdyHOHB6wHY7NBXfZNUK25a6JfFlhn0fA1ar3Zy8LTGHjlPH2FF9Ko4W2DKd_faxeLu_e50-5rOXh6fp7SyvCq2H3Bgo5MTpWmtXSu2w0nNAZ21plARaOJS2RpVOlhzNFSGhKrStcE41qVqNxcU-N23zuSEe_DpsYlqZvYISEhmjy6Qq9qoqBuZIC9_H5gPj1kvwPxD9HqJPEP0OoodkUnsTJ3H6dPyL_sf1DVKvdXw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Davis, Jesse</creator><creator>Bransen, Lotte</creator><creator>Devos, Laurens</creator><creator>Jaspers, Arne</creator><creator>Meert, Wannes</creator><creator>Robberechts, Pieter</creator><creator>Van Haaren, Jan</creator><creator>Van Roy, Maaike</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</title><author>Davis, Jesse ; Bransen, Lotte ; Devos, Laurens ; Jaspers, Arne ; Meert, Wannes ; Robberechts, Pieter ; Van Haaren, Jan ; Van Roy, Maaike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-55021784d4489148ac4b0a86695310ef8a16da39536e8eb3eaea3246cabede3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Athletic recruitment</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data science</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Movable bridges</topic><topic>Natural Language Processing (NLP)</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Simulation and Modeling</topic><topic>Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer</topic><topic>SWOT analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davis, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransen, Lotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devos, Laurens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaspers, Arne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meert, Wannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robberechts, Pieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Haaren, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Roy, Maaike</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Machine learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davis, Jesse</au><au>Bransen, Lotte</au><au>Devos, Laurens</au><au>Jaspers, Arne</au><au>Meert, Wannes</au><au>Robberechts, Pieter</au><au>Van Haaren, Jan</au><au>Van Roy, Maaike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned</atitle><jtitle>Machine learning</jtitle><stitle>Mach Learn</stitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>6977</spage><epage>7010</epage><pages>6977-7010</pages><issn>0885-6125</issn><eissn>1573-0565</eissn><abstract>There has been an explosion of data collected about sports. Because such data is extremely rich and complex, machine learning is increasingly being used to extract actionable insights from it. Typically, machine learning is used to build models and indicators that capture the skills, capabilities, and tendencies of athletes and teams. Such indicators and models are in turn used to inform decision-making at professional clubs. Designing these indicators requires paying careful attention to a number of subtle issues from a methodological and evaluation perspective. In this paper, we highlight these challenges in sports and discuss a variety of approaches for handling them. Methodologically, we highlight that dependencies affect how to perform data partitioning for evaluation as well as the need to consider contextual factors. From an evaluation perspective, we draw a distinction between evaluating the developed indicators themselves versus the underlying models that power them. We argue that both aspects must be considered, but that they require different approaches. We hope that this article helps bridge the gap between traditional sports expertise and modern data analytics by providing a structured framework with practical examples.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6125
ispartof Machine learning, 2024-09, Vol.113 (9), p.6977-7010
issn 0885-6125
1573-0565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3090099549
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Athletic recruitment
Automation
Computer Science
Control
Data analysis
Data science
Decision making
Indicators
Machine Learning
Mechatronics
Movable bridges
Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Robotics
Simulation and Modeling
Special Issue on Machine Learning for Soccer
SWOT analysis
title Methodology and evaluation in sports analytics: challenges, approaches, and lessons learned
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20and%20evaluation%20in%20sports%20analytics:%20challenges,%20approaches,%20and%20lessons%20learned&rft.jtitle=Machine%20learning&rft.au=Davis,%20Jesse&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=6977&rft.epage=7010&rft.pages=6977-7010&rft.issn=0885-6125&rft.eissn=1573-0565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10994-024-06585-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3090099549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090099549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true