The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis

This study aims to verify the necessity of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique, by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) procedure. 40 patients with a total of 120 computed tomography angiography examinations (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics of fluids (1994) 2024-08, Vol.36 (8)
1. Verfasser: Ventikos, Yiannis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Physics of fluids (1994)
container_volume 36
creator Ventikos, Yiannis
description This study aims to verify the necessity of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique, by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) procedure. 40 patients with a total of 120 computed tomography angiography examinations (including Pre, Post1, and Post2 for each case) were included and divided into PETTICOAT group (n = 20) and TEVAR group (n = 20) according to the employed intervention technique. The potential risk factors for distal stent-induced new entry (SINE) and morphological and hemodynamic indices related to the aortic remodeling were computed and compared between two groups. All computed potential risk factors for distal SINE showed insignificant difference between PETTICOAT and TEVAR groups. There is no statistically significant difference in the morphological parameters when assessing the aortic remodeling. Regarding hemodynamic factors, the percentage of high relative residence time of Post2 was greater in PETTICOAT group than that of TEVAR group (median, 0.22; interquartile range (IQR), [0.00–0.56] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.01; IQR, [0.00–0.10] in TEVAR; p = 0.01). The first balance position of computed luminal pressure difference shifted more distally from Post1 to Post2 for patients underwent PETTICOAT than those underwent TEVAR (median, 1.04 cm; IQR, [0.00–6.29 cm] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.00 cm; IQR, [−1.66 to 1.28 cm] in TEVAR; p = 0.02). PETTICOAT procedure could effectively enhance false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling when assessed from functional perspective. However, there is a lack of evidence to support that PETTICOAT can prevent distal SINE.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0215846
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3089945959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3089945959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-53324b13da1cf2c5cbcdc1615a6b778b5068268c48dc0078daa8c9343b87e3ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A0scQIpxY5jxzlCxZ9UiUs5R87GKanSOHgdUI68OUnbM6cdab8d7Qwh15wtOFPiXi5YzKVO1AmZcaazKFVKnU46ZZFSgp-TC8QtY0xksZqR3_Wnpa0Fi1iHgdpv0_Qm1K6lrqJljcE0tDDeUgy2DbRyngZvR6Ld0DB0lj5S43yoYYLRwv60x2ld78zGRoVBW1Jwu64Pe-PRsGrcDzWjGrDGS3JWmQbt1XHOycfz03r5Gq3eX96WD6sIuI5DJIWIk4KL0nCoYpBQQAlccWlUkaa6kEzpWGlIdAmMpbo0RkMmElHo1AowYk5uDr6dd1-9xZBvXe_HJzAXY1FZIjOZjdTtgQLvEL2t8s6PQfyQc5ZPDecyPzY8sncHFqE-ZPsH_gMw831D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3089945959</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Ventikos, Yiannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Ventikos, Yiannis</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to verify the necessity of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique, by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) procedure. 40 patients with a total of 120 computed tomography angiography examinations (including Pre, Post1, and Post2 for each case) were included and divided into PETTICOAT group (n = 20) and TEVAR group (n = 20) according to the employed intervention technique. The potential risk factors for distal stent-induced new entry (SINE) and morphological and hemodynamic indices related to the aortic remodeling were computed and compared between two groups. All computed potential risk factors for distal SINE showed insignificant difference between PETTICOAT and TEVAR groups. There is no statistically significant difference in the morphological parameters when assessing the aortic remodeling. Regarding hemodynamic factors, the percentage of high relative residence time of Post2 was greater in PETTICOAT group than that of TEVAR group (median, 0.22; interquartile range (IQR), [0.00–0.56] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.01; IQR, [0.00–0.10] in TEVAR; p = 0.01). The first balance position of computed luminal pressure difference shifted more distally from Post1 to Post2 for patients underwent PETTICOAT than those underwent TEVAR (median, 1.04 cm; IQR, [0.00–6.29 cm] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.00 cm; IQR, [−1.66 to 1.28 cm] in TEVAR; p = 0.02). PETTICOAT procedure could effectively enhance false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling when assessed from functional perspective. However, there is a lack of evidence to support that PETTICOAT can prevent distal SINE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1070-6631</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1089-7666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0215846</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHFLE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Angiography ; Aorta ; Computed tomography ; Hemodynamics ; Morphology ; Stents ; Thrombosis</subject><ispartof>Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-08, Vol.36 (8)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-53324b13da1cf2c5cbcdc1615a6b778b5068268c48dc0078daa8c9343b87e3ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8685-3834 ; 0000-0002-5706-4369 ; 0000-0001-5576-4559 ; 0000-0002-8589-8117</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,790,4498,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ventikos, Yiannis</creatorcontrib><title>The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis</title><title>Physics of fluids (1994)</title><description>This study aims to verify the necessity of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique, by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) procedure. 40 patients with a total of 120 computed tomography angiography examinations (including Pre, Post1, and Post2 for each case) were included and divided into PETTICOAT group (n = 20) and TEVAR group (n = 20) according to the employed intervention technique. The potential risk factors for distal stent-induced new entry (SINE) and morphological and hemodynamic indices related to the aortic remodeling were computed and compared between two groups. All computed potential risk factors for distal SINE showed insignificant difference between PETTICOAT and TEVAR groups. There is no statistically significant difference in the morphological parameters when assessing the aortic remodeling. Regarding hemodynamic factors, the percentage of high relative residence time of Post2 was greater in PETTICOAT group than that of TEVAR group (median, 0.22; interquartile range (IQR), [0.00–0.56] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.01; IQR, [0.00–0.10] in TEVAR; p = 0.01). The first balance position of computed luminal pressure difference shifted more distally from Post1 to Post2 for patients underwent PETTICOAT than those underwent TEVAR (median, 1.04 cm; IQR, [0.00–6.29 cm] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.00 cm; IQR, [−1.66 to 1.28 cm] in TEVAR; p = 0.02). PETTICOAT procedure could effectively enhance false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling when assessed from functional perspective. However, there is a lack of evidence to support that PETTICOAT can prevent distal SINE.</description><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><issn>1070-6631</issn><issn>1089-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw4A0scQIpxY5jxzlCxZ9UiUs5R87GKanSOHgdUI68OUnbM6cdab8d7Qwh15wtOFPiXi5YzKVO1AmZcaazKFVKnU46ZZFSgp-TC8QtY0xksZqR3_Wnpa0Fi1iHgdpv0_Qm1K6lrqJljcE0tDDeUgy2DbRyngZvR6Ld0DB0lj5S43yoYYLRwv60x2ld78zGRoVBW1Jwu64Pe-PRsGrcDzWjGrDGS3JWmQbt1XHOycfz03r5Gq3eX96WD6sIuI5DJIWIk4KL0nCoYpBQQAlccWlUkaa6kEzpWGlIdAmMpbo0RkMmElHo1AowYk5uDr6dd1-9xZBvXe_HJzAXY1FZIjOZjdTtgQLvEL2t8s6PQfyQc5ZPDecyPzY8sncHFqE-ZPsH_gMw831D</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Ventikos, Yiannis</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-3834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-4559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-8117</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis</title><author>Ventikos, Yiannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c182t-53324b13da1cf2c5cbcdc1615a6b778b5068268c48dc0078daa8c9343b87e3ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ventikos, Yiannis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ventikos, Yiannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis</atitle><jtitle>Physics of fluids (1994)</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>1070-6631</issn><eissn>1089-7666</eissn><coden>PHFLE6</coden><abstract>This study aims to verify the necessity of the provisional extension to induce complete attachment (PETTICOAT) technique, by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR) procedure. 40 patients with a total of 120 computed tomography angiography examinations (including Pre, Post1, and Post2 for each case) were included and divided into PETTICOAT group (n = 20) and TEVAR group (n = 20) according to the employed intervention technique. The potential risk factors for distal stent-induced new entry (SINE) and morphological and hemodynamic indices related to the aortic remodeling were computed and compared between two groups. All computed potential risk factors for distal SINE showed insignificant difference between PETTICOAT and TEVAR groups. There is no statistically significant difference in the morphological parameters when assessing the aortic remodeling. Regarding hemodynamic factors, the percentage of high relative residence time of Post2 was greater in PETTICOAT group than that of TEVAR group (median, 0.22; interquartile range (IQR), [0.00–0.56] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.01; IQR, [0.00–0.10] in TEVAR; p = 0.01). The first balance position of computed luminal pressure difference shifted more distally from Post1 to Post2 for patients underwent PETTICOAT than those underwent TEVAR (median, 1.04 cm; IQR, [0.00–6.29 cm] in PETTICOAT vs median, 0.00 cm; IQR, [−1.66 to 1.28 cm] in TEVAR; p = 0.02). PETTICOAT procedure could effectively enhance false lumen thrombosis and aortic remodeling when assessed from functional perspective. However, there is a lack of evidence to support that PETTICOAT can prevent distal SINE.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0215846</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8685-3834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5706-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-4559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8589-8117</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1070-6631
ispartof Physics of fluids (1994), 2024-08, Vol.36 (8)
issn 1070-6631
1089-7666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3089945959
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Angiography
Aorta
Computed tomography
Hemodynamics
Morphology
Stents
Thrombosis
title The necessity evaluation of distal bare stent for treating type B aortic dissection using image-based computational flow analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A48%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20necessity%20evaluation%20of%20distal%20bare%20stent%20for%20treating%20type%20B%20aortic%20dissection%20using%20image-based%20computational%20flow%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Physics%20of%20fluids%20(1994)&rft.au=Ventikos,%20Yiannis&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=1070-6631&rft.eissn=1089-7666&rft.coden=PHFLE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0215846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3089945959%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3089945959&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true