The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis
In 2020, police activities decreased substantially across large U.S. cities in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the killing of George Floyd by a police officer. Less well understood are when and where the de-policing phenomenon took place. Using NYC panel data from 2017 to 2022 at the census tr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Police quarterly 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.380-402 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 402 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 380 |
container_title | Police quarterly |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Kim, Dae-Young |
description | In 2020, police activities decreased substantially across large U.S. cities in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the killing of George Floyd by a police officer. Less well understood are when and where the de-policing phenomenon took place. Using NYC panel data from 2017 to 2022 at the census tract level, the study found significant declines in proactive policing, immediately subsequent to the stay-at-home order and/or death of George Floyd. However, all police activities began increasing during the summer of 2020 and ultimately returned to the pre-intervention level and afterwards above it in early 2022. In addition, there is evidence that both the pandemic and BLM protests interact with neighborhood factors in affecting police activities, but not in the same direction. The results are robust across a range of model specifications. Finally, research and policy implications are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10986111231218438 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3088688683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10986111231218438</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3088688683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-def94225e97646677446fef3afb825b70f0774b8a677f455b6809fd59ba379133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwGXkpqb97grtT6goIsK7kJmmtSUaWdM2kX_3gwjuBDhwn2cB5eD0DWQCYBSd0BKLQGAMqCgOdMnaARCUKy4-DjNc8ZxTzhHFyltCCFMKTFCt8tPV1BCSfHg8FvbhDrs1vfFdFfMt12IobZNXmxzTCFdojNvm-SufvoYvT_Ol7NnvHh9eplNF7imku_xyvmSUypcqSSXUinOpXeeWV9pKipFPMm3StsMeS5EJTUp_UqUlWWqBMbG6Gbw7WL7dXBpbzbtIeYnkmFEa9lXz4KBVcc2pei86WLY2ng0QEyfifmTSdZMBk2ya_fr-r_gGyW6XMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3088688683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Kim, Dae-Young</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Young</creatorcontrib><description>In 2020, police activities decreased substantially across large U.S. cities in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the killing of George Floyd by a police officer. Less well understood are when and where the de-policing phenomenon took place. Using NYC panel data from 2017 to 2022 at the census tract level, the study found significant declines in proactive policing, immediately subsequent to the stay-at-home order and/or death of George Floyd. However, all police activities began increasing during the summer of 2020 and ultimately returned to the pre-intervention level and afterwards above it in early 2022. In addition, there is evidence that both the pandemic and BLM protests interact with neighborhood factors in affecting police activities, but not in the same direction. The results are robust across a range of model specifications. Finally, research and policy implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-6111</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-745X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10986111231218438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>COVID-19 ; Floyd, George ; Law enforcement ; Pandemics ; Police ; Police reform</subject><ispartof>Police quarterly, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.380-402</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-def94225e97646677446fef3afb825b70f0774b8a677f455b6809fd59ba379133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7932-4627</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10986111231218438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10986111231218438$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Young</creatorcontrib><title>The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis</title><title>Police quarterly</title><description>In 2020, police activities decreased substantially across large U.S. cities in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the killing of George Floyd by a police officer. Less well understood are when and where the de-policing phenomenon took place. Using NYC panel data from 2017 to 2022 at the census tract level, the study found significant declines in proactive policing, immediately subsequent to the stay-at-home order and/or death of George Floyd. However, all police activities began increasing during the summer of 2020 and ultimately returned to the pre-intervention level and afterwards above it in early 2022. In addition, there is evidence that both the pandemic and BLM protests interact with neighborhood factors in affecting police activities, but not in the same direction. The results are robust across a range of model specifications. Finally, research and policy implications are discussed.</description><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Floyd, George</subject><subject>Law enforcement</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Police reform</subject><issn>1098-6111</issn><issn>1552-745X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtKAzEUDaJgrX6AuwGXkpqb97grtT6goIsK7kJmmtSUaWdM2kX_3gwjuBDhwn2cB5eD0DWQCYBSd0BKLQGAMqCgOdMnaARCUKy4-DjNc8ZxTzhHFyltCCFMKTFCt8tPV1BCSfHg8FvbhDrs1vfFdFfMt12IobZNXmxzTCFdojNvm-SufvoYvT_Ol7NnvHh9eplNF7imku_xyvmSUypcqSSXUinOpXeeWV9pKipFPMm3StsMeS5EJTUp_UqUlWWqBMbG6Gbw7WL7dXBpbzbtIeYnkmFEa9lXz4KBVcc2pei86WLY2ng0QEyfifmTSdZMBk2ya_fr-r_gGyW6XMk</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Kim, Dae-Young</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-4627</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis</title><author>Kim, Dae-Young</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-def94225e97646677446fef3afb825b70f0774b8a677f455b6809fd59ba379133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Floyd, George</topic><topic>Law enforcement</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Police reform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Dae-Young</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Police quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Dae-Young</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Police quarterly</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>380</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>380-402</pages><issn>1098-6111</issn><eissn>1552-745X</eissn><abstract>In 2020, police activities decreased substantially across large U.S. cities in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the killing of George Floyd by a police officer. Less well understood are when and where the de-policing phenomenon took place. Using NYC panel data from 2017 to 2022 at the census tract level, the study found significant declines in proactive policing, immediately subsequent to the stay-at-home order and/or death of George Floyd. However, all police activities began increasing during the summer of 2020 and ultimately returned to the pre-intervention level and afterwards above it in early 2022. In addition, there is evidence that both the pandemic and BLM protests interact with neighborhood factors in affecting police activities, but not in the same direction. The results are robust across a range of model specifications. Finally, research and policy implications are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10986111231218438</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-4627</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-6111 |
ispartof | Police quarterly, 2024-09, Vol.27 (3), p.380-402 |
issn | 1098-6111 1552-745X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3088688683 |
source | Access via SAGE |
subjects | COVID-19 Floyd, George Law enforcement Pandemics Police Police reform |
title | The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T21%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%202020%20De-Policing:%20An%20Empirical%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Police%20quarterly&rft.au=Kim,%20Dae-Young&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=380&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=380-402&rft.issn=1098-6111&rft.eissn=1552-745X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10986111231218438&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3088688683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3088688683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10986111231218438&rfr_iscdi=true |