Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students

Training in implicit bias is broadly recognized as important in medical education and is mandated by some accrediting bodies. This study examined medical students' retention of concepts immediately following and one-year post participation in an implicit bias workshop. Study subjects were 272 t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical teacher 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.744-751
Hauptverfasser: Gill, Anne C., Zhou, Yuanyuan, Greely, Jocelyn T., Beasley, Anitra D., Purkiss, Joel, Juneja, Malvika
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 751
container_issue 7
container_start_page 744
container_title Medical teacher
container_volume 44
creator Gill, Anne C.
Zhou, Yuanyuan
Greely, Jocelyn T.
Beasley, Anitra D.
Purkiss, Joel
Juneja, Malvika
description Training in implicit bias is broadly recognized as important in medical education and is mandated by some accrediting bodies. This study examined medical students' retention of concepts immediately following and one-year post participation in an implicit bias workshop. Study subjects were 272 third-year medical students who participated in workshops held between 2018-2020 that used the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) as a trigger for discussions in small groups. We developed a survey and administered it to students to capture their awareness of implicit bias pre-, post-, and one-year post-workshop attendance. Repeated Measures Analyses and independent-samples t-tests were used to examine for differences in responses on each of the seven survey items and a tabulated 7-item average of these seven items. Six of seven survey items and the tabulated 7-item average examined by Repeated Measures Analyses showed statistically significant increases between the pre-, post-, and one-year post-surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.07), with a small to moderate effect sizes (ƞ p 2 s range: 0.01-0.07). Pairwise comparisons among these three surveys' results indicated statistically significant improvements between the pre- and the post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.03) but no statistically significant differences between the post- and the one-year post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.57-0.99). A separate sample of 17 off-cycle students who took the one-year post- workshop survey two years after the workshop did not differ statistically on the level of awareness of bias compared to those taking the same survey one year later, as examined by the two-group independent t-tests for the seven one-year post-workshop survey items (ps range: 0.56-0.99). The findings support one-year retention of knowledge and attitudes gained from an implicit bias workshop and suggest similar retention at two years. Future educational interventions that train learners to recognize and manage implicit and explicit behaviors in clinical practice are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2023120
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087520650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2619544574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-1a447923ac81463b4d5ee121da8739f8cfdcfbaa5831f09775f3f235ae8340f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlZ_gjLgxs1onp3JThFfUHChQnchzSQlJZPUZAbpvzdjWxcu3CQQzr35vgPAOYLXCNbwBiKKEePzawwxGg6CMDwAY0Sn0xLV1fwQjAemHKAROElpBSFknLNjMCIshzhhY_A2C35pu76xXroi9J0KrU5F8LrYaBkLE5wLX9YvC9uunVW2KxZWpqKL0vqfZ1-0urEqp1Ou0b5Lp-DISJf02e6egI_Hh_f753L2-vRyfzcrFeG0K5GktOKYSFXnocmCNkxrhFEj64pwUyvTKLOQktUEGcirihliMGFS14RCw8kEXG171zF89jp1orVJaeek16FPAk8RZ5Syimb08g-6Cn3MKydBYF0xDKcMZoptKRVDSlEbsY62lXEjEBSDdbG3LgbrYmc95y527f0iy_hN7TVn4HYLWG9CbOVXiK4Rndy4EE2UXtk8x_9_fANTlZFK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087520650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Gill, Anne C. ; Zhou, Yuanyuan ; Greely, Jocelyn T. ; Beasley, Anitra D. ; Purkiss, Joel ; Juneja, Malvika</creator><creatorcontrib>Gill, Anne C. ; Zhou, Yuanyuan ; Greely, Jocelyn T. ; Beasley, Anitra D. ; Purkiss, Joel ; Juneja, Malvika</creatorcontrib><description>Training in implicit bias is broadly recognized as important in medical education and is mandated by some accrediting bodies. This study examined medical students' retention of concepts immediately following and one-year post participation in an implicit bias workshop. Study subjects were 272 third-year medical students who participated in workshops held between 2018-2020 that used the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) as a trigger for discussions in small groups. We developed a survey and administered it to students to capture their awareness of implicit bias pre-, post-, and one-year post-workshop attendance. Repeated Measures Analyses and independent-samples t-tests were used to examine for differences in responses on each of the seven survey items and a tabulated 7-item average of these seven items. Six of seven survey items and the tabulated 7-item average examined by Repeated Measures Analyses showed statistically significant increases between the pre-, post-, and one-year post-surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.07), with a small to moderate effect sizes (ƞ p 2 s range: 0.01-0.07). Pairwise comparisons among these three surveys' results indicated statistically significant improvements between the pre- and the post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.03) but no statistically significant differences between the post- and the one-year post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.57-0.99). A separate sample of 17 off-cycle students who took the one-year post- workshop survey two years after the workshop did not differ statistically on the level of awareness of bias compared to those taking the same survey one year later, as examined by the two-group independent t-tests for the seven one-year post-workshop survey items (ps range: 0.56-0.99). The findings support one-year retention of knowledge and attitudes gained from an implicit bias workshop and suggest similar retention at two years. Future educational interventions that train learners to recognize and manage implicit and explicit behaviors in clinical practice are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.2023120</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35021935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Bias ; Clinical medicine ; Effect Size ; Ethics/attitudes ; implicit bias ; Medical education ; Medical students ; medicine ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Retention ; Retention (Psychology) ; small group ; Small groups ; Tests ; undergraduate ; Workshops</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.744-751</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-1a447923ac81463b4d5ee121da8739f8cfdcfbaa5831f09775f3f235ae8340f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-1a447923ac81463b4d5ee121da8739f8cfdcfbaa5831f09775f3f235ae8340f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35021935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gill, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Jocelyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beasley, Anitra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juneja, Malvika</creatorcontrib><title>Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>Training in implicit bias is broadly recognized as important in medical education and is mandated by some accrediting bodies. This study examined medical students' retention of concepts immediately following and one-year post participation in an implicit bias workshop. Study subjects were 272 third-year medical students who participated in workshops held between 2018-2020 that used the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) as a trigger for discussions in small groups. We developed a survey and administered it to students to capture their awareness of implicit bias pre-, post-, and one-year post-workshop attendance. Repeated Measures Analyses and independent-samples t-tests were used to examine for differences in responses on each of the seven survey items and a tabulated 7-item average of these seven items. Six of seven survey items and the tabulated 7-item average examined by Repeated Measures Analyses showed statistically significant increases between the pre-, post-, and one-year post-surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.07), with a small to moderate effect sizes (ƞ p 2 s range: 0.01-0.07). Pairwise comparisons among these three surveys' results indicated statistically significant improvements between the pre- and the post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.03) but no statistically significant differences between the post- and the one-year post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.57-0.99). A separate sample of 17 off-cycle students who took the one-year post- workshop survey two years after the workshop did not differ statistically on the level of awareness of bias compared to those taking the same survey one year later, as examined by the two-group independent t-tests for the seven one-year post-workshop survey items (ps range: 0.56-0.99). The findings support one-year retention of knowledge and attitudes gained from an implicit bias workshop and suggest similar retention at two years. Future educational interventions that train learners to recognize and manage implicit and explicit behaviors in clinical practice are needed.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Ethics/attitudes</subject><subject>implicit bias</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>medicine</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Retention (Psychology)</subject><subject>small group</subject><subject>Small groups</subject><subject>Tests</subject><subject>undergraduate</subject><subject>Workshops</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEYRYMotlZ_gjLgxs1onp3JThFfUHChQnchzSQlJZPUZAbpvzdjWxcu3CQQzr35vgPAOYLXCNbwBiKKEePzawwxGg6CMDwAY0Sn0xLV1fwQjAemHKAROElpBSFknLNjMCIshzhhY_A2C35pu76xXroi9J0KrU5F8LrYaBkLE5wLX9YvC9uunVW2KxZWpqKL0vqfZ1-0urEqp1Ou0b5Lp-DISJf02e6egI_Hh_f753L2-vRyfzcrFeG0K5GktOKYSFXnocmCNkxrhFEj64pwUyvTKLOQktUEGcirihliMGFS14RCw8kEXG171zF89jp1orVJaeek16FPAk8RZ5Syimb08g-6Cn3MKydBYF0xDKcMZoptKRVDSlEbsY62lXEjEBSDdbG3LgbrYmc95y527f0iy_hN7TVn4HYLWG9CbOVXiK4Rndy4EE2UXtk8x_9_fANTlZFK</recordid><startdate>20220703</startdate><enddate>20220703</enddate><creator>Gill, Anne C.</creator><creator>Zhou, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Greely, Jocelyn T.</creator><creator>Beasley, Anitra D.</creator><creator>Purkiss, Joel</creator><creator>Juneja, Malvika</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220703</creationdate><title>Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students</title><author>Gill, Anne C. ; Zhou, Yuanyuan ; Greely, Jocelyn T. ; Beasley, Anitra D. ; Purkiss, Joel ; Juneja, Malvika</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-1a447923ac81463b4d5ee121da8739f8cfdcfbaa5831f09775f3f235ae8340f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Ethics/attitudes</topic><topic>implicit bias</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>medicine</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Retention (Psychology)</topic><topic>small group</topic><topic>Small groups</topic><topic>Tests</topic><topic>undergraduate</topic><topic>Workshops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gill, Anne C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Jocelyn T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beasley, Anitra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juneja, Malvika</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gill, Anne C.</au><au>Zhou, Yuanyuan</au><au>Greely, Jocelyn T.</au><au>Beasley, Anitra D.</au><au>Purkiss, Joel</au><au>Juneja, Malvika</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2022-07-03</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>744</spage><epage>751</epage><pages>744-751</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><abstract>Training in implicit bias is broadly recognized as important in medical education and is mandated by some accrediting bodies. This study examined medical students' retention of concepts immediately following and one-year post participation in an implicit bias workshop. Study subjects were 272 third-year medical students who participated in workshops held between 2018-2020 that used the Implicit Associations Test (IAT) as a trigger for discussions in small groups. We developed a survey and administered it to students to capture their awareness of implicit bias pre-, post-, and one-year post-workshop attendance. Repeated Measures Analyses and independent-samples t-tests were used to examine for differences in responses on each of the seven survey items and a tabulated 7-item average of these seven items. Six of seven survey items and the tabulated 7-item average examined by Repeated Measures Analyses showed statistically significant increases between the pre-, post-, and one-year post-surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.07), with a small to moderate effect sizes (ƞ p 2 s range: 0.01-0.07). Pairwise comparisons among these three surveys' results indicated statistically significant improvements between the pre- and the post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.01-0.03) but no statistically significant differences between the post- and the one-year post-workshop surveys (ps range: 0.57-0.99). A separate sample of 17 off-cycle students who took the one-year post- workshop survey two years after the workshop did not differ statistically on the level of awareness of bias compared to those taking the same survey one year later, as examined by the two-group independent t-tests for the seven one-year post-workshop survey items (ps range: 0.56-0.99). The findings support one-year retention of knowledge and attitudes gained from an implicit bias workshop and suggest similar retention at two years. Future educational interventions that train learners to recognize and manage implicit and explicit behaviors in clinical practice are needed.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>35021935</pmid><doi>10.1080/0142159X.2021.2023120</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-159X
ispartof Medical teacher, 2022-07, Vol.44 (7), p.744-751
issn 0142-159X
1466-187X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3087520650
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Bias
Clinical medicine
Effect Size
Ethics/attitudes
implicit bias
Medical education
Medical students
medicine
Polls & surveys
Retention
Retention (Psychology)
small group
Small groups
Tests
undergraduate
Workshops
title Longitudinal outcomes one year following implicit bias training in medical students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A08%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Longitudinal%20outcomes%20one%20year%20following%20implicit%20bias%20training%20in%20medical%20students&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Gill,%20Anne%20C.&rft.date=2022-07-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=744&rft.epage=751&rft.pages=744-751&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0142159X.2021.2023120&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2619544574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087520650&rft_id=info:pmid/35021935&rfr_iscdi=true