Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles
In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from prac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical teacher 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1139 |
container_title | Medical teacher |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Heeneman, Sylvia de Jong, Lubberta H. Dawson, Luke J. Wilkinson, Tim J. Ryan, Anna Tait, Glendon R. Rice, Neil Torre, Dario Freeman, Adrian van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. |
description | In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment.
For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research.
Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087520284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2558091791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1rHDEQhoVJsM8fP8FBkCbNXvS5kjobkzgBg5sEXASEbndkr9ld2Rotxv8-utw5RYpUU-iZd149hJxztubMss-MK8G1u1sLJviaO22YtQdkxVXbNtyau3dktWWaLXREjhEfGWPaOX1IjqSSSgmjVuTXbSnhJdCawmiXZoQZF6RYQoEJ5kJjyvQpp_scpimUoaMBERD_vDWUr-nlfYYdmmZaHqDSw9wNTyPgKXkfw4hwtp8n5OfXLz-uvjU3t9ffry5vmk4pXpoNRGEDMN32mkuhlHI29rGXQgtoW-g719u4Ea0RwhjZQa-jsdIot2HSSCFPyKddbi36vAAWPw3YwTiGGdKCXmhtmePG8Yp-_Ad9TEueazsvmTW6erCqUnpHdTkhZoi-fmoK-dVz5rf6_Zt-v9Xv9_rr3od9-rKZoP-79ea7Ahc7YJir2Cm8pDz2voTXMeWYQ_VWe_z_xm_lRJMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087520284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment.
For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research.
Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34344274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Allied Health Occupations Education ; Consensus ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; decision-making ; Educational Assessment ; Evaluation ; feedback ; Humans ; learners ; Medical personnel ; Programmatic assessment ; teachers</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6802-3119 ; 0000-0002-4924-4888 ; 0000-0002-4080-4164 ; 0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Glendon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment.
For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research.
Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</description><subject>Allied Health Occupations Education</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>decision-making</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>learners</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Programmatic assessment</subject><subject>teachers</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1rHDEQhoVJsM8fP8FBkCbNXvS5kjobkzgBg5sEXASEbndkr9ld2Rotxv8-utw5RYpUU-iZd149hJxztubMss-MK8G1u1sLJviaO22YtQdkxVXbNtyau3dktWWaLXREjhEfGWPaOX1IjqSSSgmjVuTXbSnhJdCawmiXZoQZF6RYQoEJ5kJjyvQpp_scpimUoaMBERD_vDWUr-nlfYYdmmZaHqDSw9wNTyPgKXkfw4hwtp8n5OfXLz-uvjU3t9ffry5vmk4pXpoNRGEDMN32mkuhlHI29rGXQgtoW-g719u4Ea0RwhjZQa-jsdIot2HSSCFPyKddbi36vAAWPw3YwTiGGdKCXmhtmePG8Yp-_Ad9TEueazsvmTW6erCqUnpHdTkhZoi-fmoK-dVz5rf6_Zt-v9Xv9_rr3od9-rKZoP-79ea7Ahc7YJir2Cm8pDz2voTXMeWYQ_VWe_z_xm_lRJMA</recordid><startdate>20211003</startdate><enddate>20211003</enddate><creator>Heeneman, Sylvia</creator><creator>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creator><creator>Dawson, Luke J.</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><creator>Ryan, Anna</creator><creator>Tait, Glendon R.</creator><creator>Rice, Neil</creator><creator>Torre, Dario</creator><creator>Freeman, Adrian</creator><creator>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-4888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211003</creationdate><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><author>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allied Health Occupations Education</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>learners</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Programmatic assessment</topic><topic>teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Glendon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heeneman, Sylvia</au><au>de Jong, Lubberta H.</au><au>Dawson, Luke J.</au><au>Wilkinson, Tim J.</au><au>Ryan, Anna</au><au>Tait, Glendon R.</au><au>Rice, Neil</au><au>Torre, Dario</au><au>Freeman, Adrian</au><au>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2021-10-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1139</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1139-1148</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><abstract>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment.
For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research.
Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>34344274</pmid><doi>10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-4888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-159X |
ispartof | Medical teacher, 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148 |
issn | 0142-159X 1466-187X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3087520284 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Education Source |
subjects | Allied Health Occupations Education Consensus Curricula Curriculum decision-making Educational Assessment Evaluation feedback Humans learners Medical personnel Programmatic assessment teachers |
title | Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ottawa%202020%20consensus%20statement%20for%20programmatic%20assessment%20-%201.%20Agreement%20on%20the%20principles&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Heeneman,%20Sylvia&rft.date=2021-10-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1139&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1139-1148&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2558091791%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087520284&rft_id=info:pmid/34344274&rfr_iscdi=true |