Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles

In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from prac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical teacher 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148
Hauptverfasser: Heeneman, Sylvia, de Jong, Lubberta H., Dawson, Luke J., Wilkinson, Tim J., Ryan, Anna, Tait, Glendon R., Rice, Neil, Torre, Dario, Freeman, Adrian, van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1148
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1139
container_title Medical teacher
container_volume 43
creator Heeneman, Sylvia
de Jong, Lubberta H.
Dawson, Luke J.
Wilkinson, Tim J.
Ryan, Anna
Tait, Glendon R.
Rice, Neil
Torre, Dario
Freeman, Adrian
van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.
description In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment. For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research. Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087520284</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2558091791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1rHDEQhoVJsM8fP8FBkCbNXvS5kjobkzgBg5sEXASEbndkr9ld2Rotxv8-utw5RYpUU-iZd149hJxztubMss-MK8G1u1sLJviaO22YtQdkxVXbNtyau3dktWWaLXREjhEfGWPaOX1IjqSSSgmjVuTXbSnhJdCawmiXZoQZF6RYQoEJ5kJjyvQpp_scpimUoaMBERD_vDWUr-nlfYYdmmZaHqDSw9wNTyPgKXkfw4hwtp8n5OfXLz-uvjU3t9ffry5vmk4pXpoNRGEDMN32mkuhlHI29rGXQgtoW-g719u4Ea0RwhjZQa-jsdIot2HSSCFPyKddbi36vAAWPw3YwTiGGdKCXmhtmePG8Yp-_Ad9TEueazsvmTW6erCqUnpHdTkhZoi-fmoK-dVz5rf6_Zt-v9Xv9_rr3od9-rKZoP-79ea7Ahc7YJir2Cm8pDz2voTXMeWYQ_VWe_z_xm_lRJMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087520284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><description>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment. For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research. Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-159X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-187X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34344274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Allied Health Occupations Education ; Consensus ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; decision-making ; Educational Assessment ; Evaluation ; feedback ; Humans ; learners ; Medical personnel ; Programmatic assessment ; teachers</subject><ispartof>Medical teacher, 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6802-3119 ; 0000-0002-4924-4888 ; 0000-0002-4080-4164 ; 0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34344274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Glendon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><title>Medical teacher</title><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><description>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment. For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research. Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</description><subject>Allied Health Occupations Education</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>decision-making</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>learners</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Programmatic assessment</subject><subject>teachers</subject><issn>0142-159X</issn><issn>1466-187X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1rHDEQhoVJsM8fP8FBkCbNXvS5kjobkzgBg5sEXASEbndkr9ld2Rotxv8-utw5RYpUU-iZd149hJxztubMss-MK8G1u1sLJviaO22YtQdkxVXbNtyau3dktWWaLXREjhEfGWPaOX1IjqSSSgmjVuTXbSnhJdCawmiXZoQZF6RYQoEJ5kJjyvQpp_scpimUoaMBERD_vDWUr-nlfYYdmmZaHqDSw9wNTyPgKXkfw4hwtp8n5OfXLz-uvjU3t9ffry5vmk4pXpoNRGEDMN32mkuhlHI29rGXQgtoW-g719u4Ea0RwhjZQa-jsdIot2HSSCFPyKddbi36vAAWPw3YwTiGGdKCXmhtmePG8Yp-_Ad9TEueazsvmTW6erCqUnpHdTkhZoi-fmoK-dVz5rf6_Zt-v9Xv9_rr3od9-rKZoP-79ea7Ahc7YJir2Cm8pDz2voTXMeWYQ_VWe_z_xm_lRJMA</recordid><startdate>20211003</startdate><enddate>20211003</enddate><creator>Heeneman, Sylvia</creator><creator>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creator><creator>Dawson, Luke J.</creator><creator>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creator><creator>Ryan, Anna</creator><creator>Tait, Glendon R.</creator><creator>Rice, Neil</creator><creator>Torre, Dario</creator><creator>Freeman, Adrian</creator><creator>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-4888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211003</creationdate><title>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</title><author>Heeneman, Sylvia ; de Jong, Lubberta H. ; Dawson, Luke J. ; Wilkinson, Tim J. ; Ryan, Anna ; Tait, Glendon R. ; Rice, Neil ; Torre, Dario ; Freeman, Adrian ; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-bef28ae056d513244498fdfd3252e66edc9d8fb26722773ced5f783749b037323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allied Health Occupations Education</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>learners</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Programmatic assessment</topic><topic>teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heeneman, Sylvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jong, Lubberta H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Luke J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Tim J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tait, Glendon R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rice, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torre, Dario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heeneman, Sylvia</au><au>de Jong, Lubberta H.</au><au>Dawson, Luke J.</au><au>Wilkinson, Tim J.</au><au>Ryan, Anna</au><au>Tait, Glendon R.</au><au>Rice, Neil</au><au>Torre, Dario</au><au>Freeman, Adrian</au><au>van der Vleuten, Cees P. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles</atitle><jtitle>Medical teacher</jtitle><addtitle>Med Teach</addtitle><date>2021-10-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1139</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1139-1148</pages><issn>0142-159X</issn><eissn>1466-187X</eissn><abstract>In the Ottawa 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment, a set of criteria was presented for systems of assessment. Currently, programmatic assessment is being established in an increasing number of programmes. In this Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment insights from practice and research are used to define the principles of programmatic assessment. For fifteen programmes in health professions education affiliated with members of an expert group (n = 20), an inventory was completed for the perceived components, rationale, and importance of a programmatic assessment design. Input from attendees of a programmatic assessment workshop and symposium at the 2020 Ottawa conference was included. The outcome is discussed in concurrence with current theory and research. Twelve principles are presented that are considered as important and recognisable facets of programmatic assessment. Overall these principles were used in the curriculum and assessment design, albeit with a range of approaches and rigor, suggesting that programmatic assessment is an achievable education and assessment model, embedded both in practice and research. Knowledge on and sharing how programmatic assessment is being operationalized may help support educators charting their own implementation journey of programmatic assessment in their respective programmes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>34344274</pmid><doi>10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6802-3119</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4924-4888</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4080-4164</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1316</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-159X
ispartof Medical teacher, 2021-10, Vol.43 (10), p.1139-1148
issn 0142-159X
1466-187X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3087520284
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Education Source
subjects Allied Health Occupations Education
Consensus
Curricula
Curriculum
decision-making
Educational Assessment
Evaluation
feedback
Humans
learners
Medical personnel
Programmatic assessment
teachers
title Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment - 1. Agreement on the principles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ottawa%202020%20consensus%20statement%20for%20programmatic%20assessment%20-%201.%20Agreement%20on%20the%20principles&rft.jtitle=Medical%20teacher&rft.au=Heeneman,%20Sylvia&rft.date=2021-10-03&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1139&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1139-1148&rft.issn=0142-159X&rft.eissn=1466-187X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2558091791%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087520284&rft_id=info:pmid/34344274&rfr_iscdi=true