Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey

Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:SN computer science 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763
Hauptverfasser: Mattoo, Aditee, Jain, Neeraj, Gandhi, Charu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 763
container_title SN computer science
container_volume 5
creator Mattoo, Aditee
Jain, Neeraj
Gandhi, Charu
description Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087466989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087466989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOOa-gKeA5-iTtHnzNqabwsTD9BzS9unsmO1MusG-vdEKevLyvMD_BX6EXHK45gD6JubCastA5AwynmkGJ2QklOLMWNCnf-5zMolxAwBCQp4rOSLmDg9NiXSFWyz7pmvpE_ZvXRVp09I5Vhh8jxVdog9t065v6ZSu9uGAxwtyVvttxMnPHpPX-f3L7IEtnxePs-mSlZxLYFIWAr0AYU0hVamwsCZVg_EqfRUgr0tVKAs-rzJdCKhtjdr7ArksdeazMbkacneh-9hj7N2m24c2VboMjM6VssYmlRhUZehiDFi7XWjefTg6Du4LkhsguQTJfUNKc0yywRSTuF1j-I3-x_UJzERn7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087466989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><description>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2661-8907</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2662-995X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2661-8907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Communication ; Computer Imaging ; Computer Science ; Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks ; Connectivity ; Data integrity ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Datasets ; Devices ; Energy consumption ; Federated learning ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Internet of Things ; Machine learning ; Optimization ; Parameter identification ; Pattern Recognition and Graphics ; Privacy ; Resource utilization ; Review Article ; Sensors ; Servers ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; User behavior ; Vision</subject><ispartof>SN computer science, 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><title>SN computer science</title><addtitle>SN COMPUT. SCI</addtitle><description>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Imaging</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Federated learning</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition and Graphics</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Servers</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>User behavior</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>2661-8907</issn><issn>2662-995X</issn><issn>2661-8907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOOa-gKeA5-iTtHnzNqabwsTD9BzS9unsmO1MusG-vdEKevLyvMD_BX6EXHK45gD6JubCastA5AwynmkGJ2QklOLMWNCnf-5zMolxAwBCQp4rOSLmDg9NiXSFWyz7pmvpE_ZvXRVp09I5Vhh8jxVdog9t065v6ZSu9uGAxwtyVvttxMnPHpPX-f3L7IEtnxePs-mSlZxLYFIWAr0AYU0hVamwsCZVg_EqfRUgr0tVKAs-rzJdCKhtjdr7ArksdeazMbkacneh-9hj7N2m24c2VboMjM6VssYmlRhUZehiDFi7XWjefTg6Du4LkhsguQTJfUNKc0yywRSTuF1j-I3-x_UJzERn7w</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Mattoo, Aditee</creator><creator>Jain, Neeraj</creator><creator>Gandhi, Charu</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><author>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Imaging</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Federated learning</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition and Graphics</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Servers</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>User behavior</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>SN computer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattoo, Aditee</au><au>Jain, Neeraj</au><au>Gandhi, Charu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</atitle><jtitle>SN computer science</jtitle><stitle>SN COMPUT. SCI</stitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>763</spage><pages>763-</pages><artnum>763</artnum><issn>2661-8907</issn><issn>2662-995X</issn><eissn>2661-8907</eissn><abstract>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2661-8907
ispartof SN computer science, 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763
issn 2661-8907
2662-995X
2661-8907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3087466989
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Algorithms
Artificial intelligence
Communication
Computer Imaging
Computer Science
Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks
Connectivity
Data integrity
Data Structures and Information Theory
Datasets
Devices
Energy consumption
Federated learning
Information Systems and Communication Service
Internet of Things
Machine learning
Optimization
Parameter identification
Pattern Recognition and Graphics
Privacy
Resource utilization
Review Article
Sensors
Servers
Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems
User behavior
Vision
title Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Device%20Selection%20Methods%20in%20Federated%20Learning:%20A%20Survey&rft.jtitle=SN%20computer%20science&rft.au=Mattoo,%20Aditee&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=763&rft.pages=763-&rft.artnum=763&rft.issn=2661-8907&rft.eissn=2661-8907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087466989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087466989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true