Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey
Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | SN computer science 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 763 |
container_title | SN computer science |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Mattoo, Aditee Jain, Neeraj Gandhi, Charu |
description | Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087466989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087466989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOOa-gKeA5-iTtHnzNqabwsTD9BzS9unsmO1MusG-vdEKevLyvMD_BX6EXHK45gD6JubCastA5AwynmkGJ2QklOLMWNCnf-5zMolxAwBCQp4rOSLmDg9NiXSFWyz7pmvpE_ZvXRVp09I5Vhh8jxVdog9t065v6ZSu9uGAxwtyVvttxMnPHpPX-f3L7IEtnxePs-mSlZxLYFIWAr0AYU0hVamwsCZVg_EqfRUgr0tVKAs-rzJdCKhtjdr7ArksdeazMbkacneh-9hj7N2m24c2VboMjM6VssYmlRhUZehiDFi7XWjefTg6Du4LkhsguQTJfUNKc0yywRSTuF1j-I3-x_UJzERn7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087466989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</creator><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><description>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2661-8907</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2662-995X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2661-8907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Communication ; Computer Imaging ; Computer Science ; Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks ; Connectivity ; Data integrity ; Data Structures and Information Theory ; Datasets ; Devices ; Energy consumption ; Federated learning ; Information Systems and Communication Service ; Internet of Things ; Machine learning ; Optimization ; Parameter identification ; Pattern Recognition and Graphics ; Privacy ; Resource utilization ; Review Article ; Sensors ; Servers ; Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems ; User behavior ; Vision</subject><ispartof>SN computer science, 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><title>SN computer science</title><addtitle>SN COMPUT. SCI</addtitle><description>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Imaging</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks</subject><subject>Connectivity</subject><subject>Data integrity</subject><subject>Data Structures and Information Theory</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Federated learning</subject><subject>Information Systems and Communication Service</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition and Graphics</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Resource utilization</subject><subject>Review Article</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Servers</subject><subject>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</subject><subject>User behavior</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>2661-8907</issn><issn>2662-995X</issn><issn>2661-8907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYx4MoOOa-gKeA5-iTtHnzNqabwsTD9BzS9unsmO1MusG-vdEKevLyvMD_BX6EXHK45gD6JubCastA5AwynmkGJ2QklOLMWNCnf-5zMolxAwBCQp4rOSLmDg9NiXSFWyz7pmvpE_ZvXRVp09I5Vhh8jxVdog9t065v6ZSu9uGAxwtyVvttxMnPHpPX-f3L7IEtnxePs-mSlZxLYFIWAr0AYU0hVamwsCZVg_EqfRUgr0tVKAs-rzJdCKhtjdr7ArksdeazMbkacneh-9hj7N2m24c2VboMjM6VssYmlRhUZehiDFi7XWjefTg6Du4LkhsguQTJfUNKc0yywRSTuF1j-I3-x_UJzERn7w</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Mattoo, Aditee</creator><creator>Jain, Neeraj</creator><creator>Gandhi, Charu</creator><general>Springer Nature Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</title><author>Mattoo, Aditee ; Jain, Neeraj ; Gandhi, Charu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1150-55b2ea20298b56c6eb9804408a66c6d0e1fc6b690a4d37b20f9fe7aabe15c73a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Imaging</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks</topic><topic>Connectivity</topic><topic>Data integrity</topic><topic>Data Structures and Information Theory</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Federated learning</topic><topic>Information Systems and Communication Service</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition and Graphics</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Resource utilization</topic><topic>Review Article</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Servers</topic><topic>Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems</topic><topic>User behavior</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mattoo, Aditee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jain, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandhi, Charu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>SN computer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mattoo, Aditee</au><au>Jain, Neeraj</au><au>Gandhi, Charu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey</atitle><jtitle>SN computer science</jtitle><stitle>SN COMPUT. SCI</stitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>763</spage><pages>763-</pages><artnum>763</artnum><issn>2661-8907</issn><issn>2662-995X</issn><eissn>2661-8907</eissn><abstract>Federated learning, a type of distributed machine learning, is used as local learning on large, distributed datasets produced by massive devices. It eliminates the need for data to be transported from end devices to a cloud or central server. In order to aggregate global models, it entails learning local datasets using models on devices and passing the learned parameters to a central server. The primary difficulty faced in federated learning for training is identifying devices at a given time. This paper primarily focuses on the analysis of the selection methodology for identifying the optimal sensor or device for training using federated learning algorithms. To make well-informed judgements, factors including device capabilities, network circumstances, privacy restrictions, and data quality are taken into account. The research indicates that the most suitable sensor or device should be dynamically chosen for each training iteration in order to optimize the federated learning process’s accuracy and performance. Utilizing the traditional learning patterns of supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, a comparative analysis of the three approaches is presented in the paper. This comparison includes the efficacy and efficiency of the approaches, demonstrating enhanced training accuracy and resource utilization in different environments.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Nature Singapore</pub><doi>10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-5741</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2661-8907 |
ispartof | SN computer science, 2024-08, Vol.5 (6), p.763, Article 763 |
issn | 2661-8907 2662-995X 2661-8907 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3087466989 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Communication Computer Imaging Computer Science Computer Systems Organization and Communication Networks Connectivity Data integrity Data Structures and Information Theory Datasets Devices Energy consumption Federated learning Information Systems and Communication Service Internet of Things Machine learning Optimization Parameter identification Pattern Recognition and Graphics Privacy Resource utilization Review Article Sensors Servers Software Engineering/Programming and Operating Systems User behavior Vision |
title | Device Selection Methods in Federated Learning: A Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A02%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Device%20Selection%20Methods%20in%20Federated%20Learning:%20A%20Survey&rft.jtitle=SN%20computer%20science&rft.au=Mattoo,%20Aditee&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=763&rft.pages=763-&rft.artnum=763&rft.issn=2661-8907&rft.eissn=2661-8907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s42979-024-03137-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087466989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087466989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |