Machine learning for autonomous vehicles

To perform complex subjects in perception, decision making and motion planning, driverless vehicles depend on machine learning. However, automotive software safety standards have not completely matured to handle machine learning safety concerns such as interpretability, verification, and performance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Misra, Praveen Kumar, Devi, G. Meena, Prasad, Umesh, Chakravarty, Soumitro, Raffik, R., Pant, Bhasker
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2937
creator Misra, Praveen Kumar
Devi, G. Meena
Prasad, Umesh
Chakravarty, Soumitro
Raffik, R.
Pant, Bhasker
description To perform complex subjects in perception, decision making and motion planning, driverless vehicles depend on machine learning. However, automotive software safety standards have not completely matured to handle machine learning safety concerns such as interpretability, verification, and performance limits. In this paper, we review recent developments in planning, decision-making, and perception for autonomous cars that resulted in significant functional gains, with numerous prototypes currently operating on our streets and roads. However, issues endure in ensuring assured performance and dependability in all driving conditions. Many businesses are evolving self-driving automobiles, which are likely to be widely used in the near future. Considering this, there is no consensus on effective techniques for testing, debugging, and certifying the system performance. One key challenge is that many unmanned driving systems use ML (machine learning) elements like DNN (deep neural networks), which seem to be hard to interpret in formal terms. It is necessary to develop planning solutions that provide safe and scheme performance in complex, crowded situations, such as predicting the unanticipated interaction with other traffic participants.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0218191
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087405116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087405116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-1d3f39d520e6a385f36d2a0801a2df50c098bef03809819262378dcc5c12daaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkM1KxDAYRYMoWEcXvkHBjQgdvy9p0mQpg38w4mYW7kLMj5Oh09SmFXx7KzOrexeHe-EQco2wRBDsni-BokSFJ6RAzrFqBIpTUgCouqI1-zgnFznvAKhqGlmQ2zdjt7HzZevN0MXuqwxpKM00pi7t05TLH7-NtvX5kpwF02Z_dcwF2Tw9blYv1fr9-XX1sK56wbBCxwJTjlPwwjDJAxOOGpCAhrrAwYKSnz4Ak3NBRQVljXTWcovUGRPYgtwcZvshfU8-j3qXpqGbHzUD2dTAEcVM3R2obONoxpg63Q9xb4ZfjaD_RWiujyLYH_TMTdM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3087405116</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Machine learning for autonomous vehicles</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Misra, Praveen Kumar ; Devi, G. Meena ; Prasad, Umesh ; Chakravarty, Soumitro ; Raffik, R. ; Pant, Bhasker</creator><contributor>Kumaresan ; Shanmugam, Siva ; Rajagopal, Karthikeyan ; Vijayakumar, M.D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Misra, Praveen Kumar ; Devi, G. Meena ; Prasad, Umesh ; Chakravarty, Soumitro ; Raffik, R. ; Pant, Bhasker ; Kumaresan ; Shanmugam, Siva ; Rajagopal, Karthikeyan ; Vijayakumar, M.D.</creatorcontrib><description>To perform complex subjects in perception, decision making and motion planning, driverless vehicles depend on machine learning. However, automotive software safety standards have not completely matured to handle machine learning safety concerns such as interpretability, verification, and performance limits. In this paper, we review recent developments in planning, decision-making, and perception for autonomous cars that resulted in significant functional gains, with numerous prototypes currently operating on our streets and roads. However, issues endure in ensuring assured performance and dependability in all driving conditions. Many businesses are evolving self-driving automobiles, which are likely to be widely used in the near future. Considering this, there is no consensus on effective techniques for testing, debugging, and certifying the system performance. One key challenge is that many unmanned driving systems use ML (machine learning) elements like DNN (deep neural networks), which seem to be hard to interpret in formal terms. It is necessary to develop planning solutions that provide safe and scheme performance in complex, crowded situations, such as predicting the unanticipated interaction with other traffic participants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0218191</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Artificial neural networks ; Automobiles ; Autonomous cars ; Decision making ; Driving conditions ; Machine learning ; Motion planning ; Perception ; Performance prediction ; Traffic planning ; Traffic safety</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2937 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0218191$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,790,4498,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,76126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kumaresan</contributor><contributor>Shanmugam, Siva</contributor><contributor>Rajagopal, Karthikeyan</contributor><contributor>Vijayakumar, M.D.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Misra, Praveen Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, G. Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarty, Soumitro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, Bhasker</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning for autonomous vehicles</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>To perform complex subjects in perception, decision making and motion planning, driverless vehicles depend on machine learning. However, automotive software safety standards have not completely matured to handle machine learning safety concerns such as interpretability, verification, and performance limits. In this paper, we review recent developments in planning, decision-making, and perception for autonomous cars that resulted in significant functional gains, with numerous prototypes currently operating on our streets and roads. However, issues endure in ensuring assured performance and dependability in all driving conditions. Many businesses are evolving self-driving automobiles, which are likely to be widely used in the near future. Considering this, there is no consensus on effective techniques for testing, debugging, and certifying the system performance. One key challenge is that many unmanned driving systems use ML (machine learning) elements like DNN (deep neural networks), which seem to be hard to interpret in formal terms. It is necessary to develop planning solutions that provide safe and scheme performance in complex, crowded situations, such as predicting the unanticipated interaction with other traffic participants.</description><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Autonomous cars</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Driving conditions</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Motion planning</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Performance prediction</subject><subject>Traffic planning</subject><subject>Traffic safety</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkM1KxDAYRYMoWEcXvkHBjQgdvy9p0mQpg38w4mYW7kLMj5Oh09SmFXx7KzOrexeHe-EQco2wRBDsni-BokSFJ6RAzrFqBIpTUgCouqI1-zgnFznvAKhqGlmQ2zdjt7HzZevN0MXuqwxpKM00pi7t05TLH7-NtvX5kpwF02Z_dcwF2Tw9blYv1fr9-XX1sK56wbBCxwJTjlPwwjDJAxOOGpCAhrrAwYKSnz4Ak3NBRQVljXTWcovUGRPYgtwcZvshfU8-j3qXpqGbHzUD2dTAEcVM3R2obONoxpg63Q9xb4ZfjaD_RWiujyLYH_TMTdM</recordid><startdate>20240802</startdate><enddate>20240802</enddate><creator>Misra, Praveen Kumar</creator><creator>Devi, G. Meena</creator><creator>Prasad, Umesh</creator><creator>Chakravarty, Soumitro</creator><creator>Raffik, R.</creator><creator>Pant, Bhasker</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240802</creationdate><title>Machine learning for autonomous vehicles</title><author>Misra, Praveen Kumar ; Devi, G. Meena ; Prasad, Umesh ; Chakravarty, Soumitro ; Raffik, R. ; Pant, Bhasker</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p631-1d3f39d520e6a385f36d2a0801a2df50c098bef03809819262378dcc5c12daaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Autonomous cars</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Driving conditions</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Motion planning</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Performance prediction</topic><topic>Traffic planning</topic><topic>Traffic safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Misra, Praveen Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devi, G. Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravarty, Soumitro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pant, Bhasker</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Misra, Praveen Kumar</au><au>Devi, G. Meena</au><au>Prasad, Umesh</au><au>Chakravarty, Soumitro</au><au>Raffik, R.</au><au>Pant, Bhasker</au><au>Kumaresan</au><au>Shanmugam, Siva</au><au>Rajagopal, Karthikeyan</au><au>Vijayakumar, M.D.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Machine learning for autonomous vehicles</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-08-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2937</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>To perform complex subjects in perception, decision making and motion planning, driverless vehicles depend on machine learning. However, automotive software safety standards have not completely matured to handle machine learning safety concerns such as interpretability, verification, and performance limits. In this paper, we review recent developments in planning, decision-making, and perception for autonomous cars that resulted in significant functional gains, with numerous prototypes currently operating on our streets and roads. However, issues endure in ensuring assured performance and dependability in all driving conditions. Many businesses are evolving self-driving automobiles, which are likely to be widely used in the near future. Considering this, there is no consensus on effective techniques for testing, debugging, and certifying the system performance. One key challenge is that many unmanned driving systems use ML (machine learning) elements like DNN (deep neural networks), which seem to be hard to interpret in formal terms. It is necessary to develop planning solutions that provide safe and scheme performance in complex, crowded situations, such as predicting the unanticipated interaction with other traffic participants.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0218191</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2937 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3087405116
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Artificial neural networks
Automobiles
Autonomous cars
Decision making
Driving conditions
Machine learning
Motion planning
Perception
Performance prediction
Traffic planning
Traffic safety
title Machine learning for autonomous vehicles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T01%3A07%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20for%20autonomous%20vehicles&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Misra,%20Praveen%20Kumar&rft.date=2024-08-02&rft.volume=2937&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0218191&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3087405116%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087405116&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true