Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality
National and global politics have now subsumed consumer culture. How you vote seems to have a direct relationship to how you shop, where you shop, and the products you purchase (Dumana and Ozgenb 2018; Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018). Firms and brands are routinely categorized as either Democratic or...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 428 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 427 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Aiken, Kirk Damon Mercurio, Kathryn R Sukhdial, Ajay Soe, Kyaw |
description | National and global politics have now subsumed consumer culture. How you vote seems to have a direct relationship to how you shop, where you shop, and the products you purchase (Dumana and Ozgenb 2018; Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018). Firms and brands are routinely categorized as either Democratic or Republican (Gelb and Sorescu 2018). Moreover, consumers appear fully aware of the politicization of brands and tend to punish or reward brands "on a permanent basis because of [their] perceived association to a particular political ideology" (Sandıkçı and Ekici 2009, p. 208). While this process of political consumerism has been studied for some time (Stolle, Hooghe, and Micheletti 2005), researchers have yet to investigate what makes a particular brand Democratic or Republican. What are the underlying dimensions and specific trait-image attributes of political brand personality? And, how important are these political brand personality characteristics in consumer decision making? Accordingly, the current work has three main objectives. First, the work explores the issue of political brand personality (PBP) and uncovers the underlying dimensions behind consumer-perceived Democrat and Republican brands. Second, the work investigates the relative importance of PBP trait-attributes on consumer decision making. Third, the work serves to further validate research on political consumerism. Brand personality is defined as the "set of human characteristics associated with a brand that serves a symbolic and self-expressive function through the use of a brand" (Aaker 1997, p. 347). People consume in ways that enhance or maintain their self-concepts in relationship to these brand personalities (Aaker 1997; Sung and Kim 2010). Consumers simultaneously avoid objects they consider to be incongruent with their existing self-concept. According to Wolter, Brach, Cronin, and Bonn (2016), "The danger of having a personality is, someone, inevitably won't like you. Brands with strong personalities attract consumers through consumer brand identification but alienate other consumers through consumer brand disidentification" (p. 785). When consumers judge brands according to political personality dimensions, their actions translate to acceptance or avoidance through political consumerism. Moreover, highly partisan consumers are likely to be more inclined to accept and reward (as well as avoid and punish) brands which they perceive as congruent (incongruent) with their strong party affil |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087395830</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087395830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30873958303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi70OgjAYADtoIv68w5c4k1QrUNzUoC4QBhNH0kjBYm2xLYm8vQw8gNMll7sJ8jCOqR9vAzpDc2sbjDfRLgw9lKXsxSHt4WiYKuFiOHNwqJlQe0i-rdRGqBrck8Nd2FK_QVeQaymceDA5Tjk3Vis2yH6JphWTlq9GLtD6nNxOV781-tNx64pGd2ZobUEwjUgcUILJf9UPvbc8ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3087395830</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Aiken, Kirk Damon ; Mercurio, Kathryn R ; Sukhdial, Ajay ; Soe, Kyaw</creator><creatorcontrib>Aiken, Kirk Damon ; Mercurio, Kathryn R ; Sukhdial, Ajay ; Soe, Kyaw</creatorcontrib><description>National and global politics have now subsumed consumer culture. How you vote seems to have a direct relationship to how you shop, where you shop, and the products you purchase (Dumana and Ozgenb 2018; Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018). Firms and brands are routinely categorized as either Democratic or Republican (Gelb and Sorescu 2018). Moreover, consumers appear fully aware of the politicization of brands and tend to punish or reward brands "on a permanent basis because of [their] perceived association to a particular political ideology" (Sandıkçı and Ekici 2009, p. 208). While this process of political consumerism has been studied for some time (Stolle, Hooghe, and Micheletti 2005), researchers have yet to investigate what makes a particular brand Democratic or Republican. What are the underlying dimensions and specific trait-image attributes of political brand personality? And, how important are these political brand personality characteristics in consumer decision making? Accordingly, the current work has three main objectives. First, the work explores the issue of political brand personality (PBP) and uncovers the underlying dimensions behind consumer-perceived Democrat and Republican brands. Second, the work investigates the relative importance of PBP trait-attributes on consumer decision making. Third, the work serves to further validate research on political consumerism. Brand personality is defined as the "set of human characteristics associated with a brand that serves a symbolic and self-expressive function through the use of a brand" (Aaker 1997, p. 347). People consume in ways that enhance or maintain their self-concepts in relationship to these brand personalities (Aaker 1997; Sung and Kim 2010). Consumers simultaneously avoid objects they consider to be incongruent with their existing self-concept. According to Wolter, Brach, Cronin, and Bonn (2016), "The danger of having a personality is, someone, inevitably won't like you. Brands with strong personalities attract consumers through consumer brand identification but alienate other consumers through consumer brand disidentification" (p. 785). When consumers judge brands according to political personality dimensions, their actions translate to acceptance or avoidance through political consumerism. Moreover, highly partisan consumers are likely to be more inclined to accept and reward (as well as avoid and punish) brands which they perceive as congruent (incongruent) with their strong party affiliation. In order to assess the dimensions of PBP and understand how specific PBP traits influence consumer preferences and behaviors, we conducted two studies. The goal of Study 1 was to formalize traititem generation, to purify items through exploratory factor analysis, and to assess validity. Two important results were derived from Study 1 (n = 267). First, the research team gained initial insight into the PBP traits deemed most important to consumers when choosing a brand. The top-three traits were Patriotic, Competent, Traditional. The bottom-three were Fiscally Responsible, Original, and Curious. Second, the 25 PBP traits were put through exploratory principal components factor analyses (using varimax rotations). Two factors emerged and appeared to represent a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. The purpose of Study 2 (n = 217) was to investigate the twelve PBP traits derived from Study 1 as they related to specific firms. Eight test firms were pre-identified as Democrat or Republican according to fortune.com (2016). Results uncovered common PBP traits amongst firms perceived as either Democrat (Starbucks, Google, Levi's, and Apple) or Republican (Wal-Mart, Chic-fil-A, Ford, and Hobby Lobby). The Democrat firms were perceived as more Modern, Socially Responsible, Sophisticated and Liberal. The PBP trait adjectives more generally associated with Republican firms were Traditional, Conservative, Rugged, and Fiscally Responsible. Additionally, Study 2 found evidence of political consumerism. Members of the three parties (Republicans, Democrats, and Independents) showed significant differences in terms of rewarding firms with similar political ideologies (F = 10.14, p < .01) and punishing firms with dissimilar ideologies (F = 5.26, p < .01). In both cases, Democrats appeared as the most likely to engage in political consumerism. That is, Democrats were more likely to reward brands that were thought to share the same political views as their own and to punish brands whose political views differed from theirs. Further analysis revealed that age and educational level of the respondents did not contribute to political consumerism. However, we found that income level played an important role when it came to punishing certain brands (F = 2.93, p < .05). This result further validated the prior work of Lee, Motion, and Conroy (2009) showing that inertia (the cost of switching) is one of the primary factors contributing to avoiding a brand. They argued that this was due to the fact that the higher the income the more likely that consumers can afford to switch to a different brand regardless of the costs. Finally, female respondents reported higher levels of political consumerism than males in terms of the tendency to reward politically like-minded brands (t = 3.0, p < .01). The results of Study 1 and Study 2 provide initial evidence for the presence of a political dimension of brand personality. PBP traits can be accurately measured and appear to be evaluating a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. Brands are quite commonly, easily judged and categorized as either Democrat or Republican. Additionally, it appears that Democrat-perceived brands are more sophisticated, competent, exciting, and modern, while Republican brands are more likely to be considered traditional, conservative, rugged, and fiscally responsible. The current work also reveals that Democrat consumers are more likely to engage in political consumerism (punishing or rewarding brands as a form of political self-expression). Consumers want to buy things that are self-concept congruent, even in the realm of politics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: Association for Consumer Research</publisher><subject>Brand preferences ; Consumer behavior ; Consumerism ; Ideology ; Politics</subject><ispartof>Advances in Consumer Research, 2019, Vol.47, p.427-428</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Consumer Research 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>310,311,781,785,790,791,23935,23936,25145</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aiken, Kirk Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercurio, Kathryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukhdial, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soe, Kyaw</creatorcontrib><title>Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality</title><title>Advances in Consumer Research</title><description>National and global politics have now subsumed consumer culture. How you vote seems to have a direct relationship to how you shop, where you shop, and the products you purchase (Dumana and Ozgenb 2018; Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018). Firms and brands are routinely categorized as either Democratic or Republican (Gelb and Sorescu 2018). Moreover, consumers appear fully aware of the politicization of brands and tend to punish or reward brands "on a permanent basis because of [their] perceived association to a particular political ideology" (Sandıkçı and Ekici 2009, p. 208). While this process of political consumerism has been studied for some time (Stolle, Hooghe, and Micheletti 2005), researchers have yet to investigate what makes a particular brand Democratic or Republican. What are the underlying dimensions and specific trait-image attributes of political brand personality? And, how important are these political brand personality characteristics in consumer decision making? Accordingly, the current work has three main objectives. First, the work explores the issue of political brand personality (PBP) and uncovers the underlying dimensions behind consumer-perceived Democrat and Republican brands. Second, the work investigates the relative importance of PBP trait-attributes on consumer decision making. Third, the work serves to further validate research on political consumerism. Brand personality is defined as the "set of human characteristics associated with a brand that serves a symbolic and self-expressive function through the use of a brand" (Aaker 1997, p. 347). People consume in ways that enhance or maintain their self-concepts in relationship to these brand personalities (Aaker 1997; Sung and Kim 2010). Consumers simultaneously avoid objects they consider to be incongruent with their existing self-concept. According to Wolter, Brach, Cronin, and Bonn (2016), "The danger of having a personality is, someone, inevitably won't like you. Brands with strong personalities attract consumers through consumer brand identification but alienate other consumers through consumer brand disidentification" (p. 785). When consumers judge brands according to political personality dimensions, their actions translate to acceptance or avoidance through political consumerism. Moreover, highly partisan consumers are likely to be more inclined to accept and reward (as well as avoid and punish) brands which they perceive as congruent (incongruent) with their strong party affiliation. In order to assess the dimensions of PBP and understand how specific PBP traits influence consumer preferences and behaviors, we conducted two studies. The goal of Study 1 was to formalize traititem generation, to purify items through exploratory factor analysis, and to assess validity. Two important results were derived from Study 1 (n = 267). First, the research team gained initial insight into the PBP traits deemed most important to consumers when choosing a brand. The top-three traits were Patriotic, Competent, Traditional. The bottom-three were Fiscally Responsible, Original, and Curious. Second, the 25 PBP traits were put through exploratory principal components factor analyses (using varimax rotations). Two factors emerged and appeared to represent a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. The purpose of Study 2 (n = 217) was to investigate the twelve PBP traits derived from Study 1 as they related to specific firms. Eight test firms were pre-identified as Democrat or Republican according to fortune.com (2016). Results uncovered common PBP traits amongst firms perceived as either Democrat (Starbucks, Google, Levi's, and Apple) or Republican (Wal-Mart, Chic-fil-A, Ford, and Hobby Lobby). The Democrat firms were perceived as more Modern, Socially Responsible, Sophisticated and Liberal. The PBP trait adjectives more generally associated with Republican firms were Traditional, Conservative, Rugged, and Fiscally Responsible. Additionally, Study 2 found evidence of political consumerism. Members of the three parties (Republicans, Democrats, and Independents) showed significant differences in terms of rewarding firms with similar political ideologies (F = 10.14, p < .01) and punishing firms with dissimilar ideologies (F = 5.26, p < .01). In both cases, Democrats appeared as the most likely to engage in political consumerism. That is, Democrats were more likely to reward brands that were thought to share the same political views as their own and to punish brands whose political views differed from theirs. Further analysis revealed that age and educational level of the respondents did not contribute to political consumerism. However, we found that income level played an important role when it came to punishing certain brands (F = 2.93, p < .05). This result further validated the prior work of Lee, Motion, and Conroy (2009) showing that inertia (the cost of switching) is one of the primary factors contributing to avoiding a brand. They argued that this was due to the fact that the higher the income the more likely that consumers can afford to switch to a different brand regardless of the costs. Finally, female respondents reported higher levels of political consumerism than males in terms of the tendency to reward politically like-minded brands (t = 3.0, p < .01). The results of Study 1 and Study 2 provide initial evidence for the presence of a political dimension of brand personality. PBP traits can be accurately measured and appear to be evaluating a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. Brands are quite commonly, easily judged and categorized as either Democrat or Republican. Additionally, it appears that Democrat-perceived brands are more sophisticated, competent, exciting, and modern, while Republican brands are more likely to be considered traditional, conservative, rugged, and fiscally responsible. The current work also reveals that Democrat consumers are more likely to engage in political consumerism (punishing or rewarding brands as a form of political self-expression). Consumers want to buy things that are self-concept congruent, even in the realm of politics.</description><subject>Brand preferences</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumerism</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Politics</subject><issn>0098-9258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi70OgjAYADtoIv68w5c4k1QrUNzUoC4QBhNH0kjBYm2xLYm8vQw8gNMll7sJ8jCOqR9vAzpDc2sbjDfRLgw9lKXsxSHt4WiYKuFiOHNwqJlQe0i-rdRGqBrck8Nd2FK_QVeQaymceDA5Tjk3Vis2yH6JphWTlq9GLtD6nNxOV781-tNx64pGd2ZobUEwjUgcUILJf9UPvbc8ow</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Aiken, Kirk Damon</creator><creator>Mercurio, Kathryn R</creator><creator>Sukhdial, Ajay</creator><creator>Soe, Kyaw</creator><general>Association for Consumer Research</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality</title><author>Aiken, Kirk Damon ; Mercurio, Kathryn R ; Sukhdial, Ajay ; Soe, Kyaw</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30873958303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brand preferences</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumerism</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Politics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aiken, Kirk Damon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercurio, Kathryn R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukhdial, Ajay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soe, Kyaw</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aiken, Kirk Damon</au><au>Mercurio, Kathryn R</au><au>Sukhdial, Ajay</au><au>Soe, Kyaw</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality</atitle><btitle>Advances in Consumer Research</btitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><spage>427</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>427-428</pages><issn>0098-9258</issn><abstract>National and global politics have now subsumed consumer culture. How you vote seems to have a direct relationship to how you shop, where you shop, and the products you purchase (Dumana and Ozgenb 2018; Ordabayeva and Fernandes 2018). Firms and brands are routinely categorized as either Democratic or Republican (Gelb and Sorescu 2018). Moreover, consumers appear fully aware of the politicization of brands and tend to punish or reward brands "on a permanent basis because of [their] perceived association to a particular political ideology" (Sandıkçı and Ekici 2009, p. 208). While this process of political consumerism has been studied for some time (Stolle, Hooghe, and Micheletti 2005), researchers have yet to investigate what makes a particular brand Democratic or Republican. What are the underlying dimensions and specific trait-image attributes of political brand personality? And, how important are these political brand personality characteristics in consumer decision making? Accordingly, the current work has three main objectives. First, the work explores the issue of political brand personality (PBP) and uncovers the underlying dimensions behind consumer-perceived Democrat and Republican brands. Second, the work investigates the relative importance of PBP trait-attributes on consumer decision making. Third, the work serves to further validate research on political consumerism. Brand personality is defined as the "set of human characteristics associated with a brand that serves a symbolic and self-expressive function through the use of a brand" (Aaker 1997, p. 347). People consume in ways that enhance or maintain their self-concepts in relationship to these brand personalities (Aaker 1997; Sung and Kim 2010). Consumers simultaneously avoid objects they consider to be incongruent with their existing self-concept. According to Wolter, Brach, Cronin, and Bonn (2016), "The danger of having a personality is, someone, inevitably won't like you. Brands with strong personalities attract consumers through consumer brand identification but alienate other consumers through consumer brand disidentification" (p. 785). When consumers judge brands according to political personality dimensions, their actions translate to acceptance or avoidance through political consumerism. Moreover, highly partisan consumers are likely to be more inclined to accept and reward (as well as avoid and punish) brands which they perceive as congruent (incongruent) with their strong party affiliation. In order to assess the dimensions of PBP and understand how specific PBP traits influence consumer preferences and behaviors, we conducted two studies. The goal of Study 1 was to formalize traititem generation, to purify items through exploratory factor analysis, and to assess validity. Two important results were derived from Study 1 (n = 267). First, the research team gained initial insight into the PBP traits deemed most important to consumers when choosing a brand. The top-three traits were Patriotic, Competent, Traditional. The bottom-three were Fiscally Responsible, Original, and Curious. Second, the 25 PBP traits were put through exploratory principal components factor analyses (using varimax rotations). Two factors emerged and appeared to represent a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. The purpose of Study 2 (n = 217) was to investigate the twelve PBP traits derived from Study 1 as they related to specific firms. Eight test firms were pre-identified as Democrat or Republican according to fortune.com (2016). Results uncovered common PBP traits amongst firms perceived as either Democrat (Starbucks, Google, Levi's, and Apple) or Republican (Wal-Mart, Chic-fil-A, Ford, and Hobby Lobby). The Democrat firms were perceived as more Modern, Socially Responsible, Sophisticated and Liberal. The PBP trait adjectives more generally associated with Republican firms were Traditional, Conservative, Rugged, and Fiscally Responsible. Additionally, Study 2 found evidence of political consumerism. Members of the three parties (Republicans, Democrats, and Independents) showed significant differences in terms of rewarding firms with similar political ideologies (F = 10.14, p < .01) and punishing firms with dissimilar ideologies (F = 5.26, p < .01). In both cases, Democrats appeared as the most likely to engage in political consumerism. That is, Democrats were more likely to reward brands that were thought to share the same political views as their own and to punish brands whose political views differed from theirs. Further analysis revealed that age and educational level of the respondents did not contribute to political consumerism. However, we found that income level played an important role when it came to punishing certain brands (F = 2.93, p < .05). This result further validated the prior work of Lee, Motion, and Conroy (2009) showing that inertia (the cost of switching) is one of the primary factors contributing to avoiding a brand. They argued that this was due to the fact that the higher the income the more likely that consumers can afford to switch to a different brand regardless of the costs. Finally, female respondents reported higher levels of political consumerism than males in terms of the tendency to reward politically like-minded brands (t = 3.0, p < .01). The results of Study 1 and Study 2 provide initial evidence for the presence of a political dimension of brand personality. PBP traits can be accurately measured and appear to be evaluating a "Strength and Competence" dimension as well as a "Responsibility and Sincerity" dimension. Brands are quite commonly, easily judged and categorized as either Democrat or Republican. Additionally, it appears that Democrat-perceived brands are more sophisticated, competent, exciting, and modern, while Republican brands are more likely to be considered traditional, conservative, rugged, and fiscally responsible. The current work also reveals that Democrat consumers are more likely to engage in political consumerism (punishing or rewarding brands as a form of political self-expression). Consumers want to buy things that are self-concept congruent, even in the realm of politics.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>Association for Consumer Research</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-9258 |
ispartof | Advances in Consumer Research, 2019, Vol.47, p.427-428 |
issn | 0098-9258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3087395830 |
source | Business Source Complete |
subjects | Brand preferences Consumer behavior Consumerism Ideology Politics |
title | Make My Brand Great Again: Exploring the Wisdom of Political Brand Personality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T09%3A06%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Make%20My%20Brand%20Great%20Again:%20Exploring%20the%20Wisdom%20of%20Political%20Brand%20Personality&rft.btitle=Advances%20in%20Consumer%20Research&rft.au=Aiken,%20Kirk%20Damon&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=427-428&rft.issn=0098-9258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3087395830%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087395830&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |