Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality

The Energy‐consuming rights trading policy (ECRTP) is an important environmental regulatory policy in China. The study's goal is to determine how trading in energy‐consuming rights and urban innovation status effects also promote ecological civilization and high‐quality development. The purpose...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2024-08, Vol.32 (4), p.3248-3270
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Bingnan, Hu, Peiji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3270
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3248
container_title Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)
container_volume 32
creator Guo, Bingnan
Hu, Peiji
description The Energy‐consuming rights trading policy (ECRTP) is an important environmental regulatory policy in China. The study's goal is to determine how trading in energy‐consuming rights and urban innovation status effects also promote ecological civilization and high‐quality development. The purpose of the study examines the relationship between ECRTP and urban innovation quality (UIQ). Using data from 271 Chinese cities between 2011 and 2020, a difference‐in‐difference (DID) model is used to theoretically and empirically analyze the effects of ECRTP on UIQ. The findings of the study are as follows: First, ECRTP showed a significant improvement in UIQ, although a lagged effect. This outcome offers fresh proof that the “Porter hypothesis” holds water in China. Second, mechanism analysis indicated that ECRTP could improve UIQ with industrial structure upgrading (ISU) and capital deepening. Third, analysis of spillover effects indicates that ECRTP has a key spillover impact on UIQ. Analysis of spillover effects indicates a positive influence of ECRTP on UIQ in surrounding cities. Fourth, heteroggeneity analysis further reveals the impact of ECRTP on UIQ is particularly pronounced in resource‐based and large‐scale cities. These findings are significant and also provide a valuable supplement to the existing study.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sd.2820
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3087267962</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3087267962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2840-c420b3226f64cf5e9f1a8bc2875053b442bb65b7289b6c1a6e1b591876684893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAUhC0EEqUgrmCJBQuU8uwkjr1E5a9SJRZ0b9mJk7pqndZOWmXHETgjJyFp2bJ6Gs2nGb1B6JbAhADQx1BMKKdwhkYEhIhIRsQ5GoFgPAIO9BJdhbACAE5JMkJm5vYmNLZSjXUVbpYGe7PuRe3C0m6xNs3BGIeNM77qfr6-895oNwPrbbVsAm68KgapXIFbr5XD1rl6f4zAu1atbdNdo4tSrYO5-btjtHh9WUzfo_nH22z6NI9yyhOI8oSCjillJUvyMjWiJIrr3stSSGOdJFRrluqMcqFZThQzRKeC8IwxnnARj9HdKXbr613bvyVXdetd3yhj4BllmWC0p-5PVO7rELwp5dbbjfKdJCCHCWUo5DBhTz6cyINdm-4_TH4-H-lfYp1zMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087267962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Guo, Bingnan ; Hu, Peiji</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Bingnan ; Hu, Peiji</creatorcontrib><description>The Energy‐consuming rights trading policy (ECRTP) is an important environmental regulatory policy in China. The study's goal is to determine how trading in energy‐consuming rights and urban innovation status effects also promote ecological civilization and high‐quality development. The purpose of the study examines the relationship between ECRTP and urban innovation quality (UIQ). Using data from 271 Chinese cities between 2011 and 2020, a difference‐in‐difference (DID) model is used to theoretically and empirically analyze the effects of ECRTP on UIQ. The findings of the study are as follows: First, ECRTP showed a significant improvement in UIQ, although a lagged effect. This outcome offers fresh proof that the “Porter hypothesis” holds water in China. Second, mechanism analysis indicated that ECRTP could improve UIQ with industrial structure upgrading (ISU) and capital deepening. Third, analysis of spillover effects indicates that ECRTP has a key spillover impact on UIQ. Analysis of spillover effects indicates a positive influence of ECRTP on UIQ in surrounding cities. Fourth, heteroggeneity analysis further reveals the impact of ECRTP on UIQ is particularly pronounced in resource‐based and large‐scale cities. These findings are significant and also provide a valuable supplement to the existing study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.2820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>capital deepening ; Cities ; Data quality ; difference‐in‐differences ; Ecological effects ; Empirical analysis ; Energy ; Energy consumption ; energy‐consuming rights trading policy ; Environmental policy ; Impact analysis ; Industrial structure ; industrial structure upgrading ; Innovations ; Rights ; spatial spillover effect ; Sustainable development ; Trading ; urban innovation quality</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2024-08, Vol.32 (4), p.3248-3270</ispartof><rights>2023 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 ERP Environment and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2840-c420b3226f64cf5e9f1a8bc2875053b442bb65b7289b6c1a6e1b591876684893</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5627-2764</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.2820$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.2820$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Bingnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Peiji</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>The Energy‐consuming rights trading policy (ECRTP) is an important environmental regulatory policy in China. The study's goal is to determine how trading in energy‐consuming rights and urban innovation status effects also promote ecological civilization and high‐quality development. The purpose of the study examines the relationship between ECRTP and urban innovation quality (UIQ). Using data from 271 Chinese cities between 2011 and 2020, a difference‐in‐difference (DID) model is used to theoretically and empirically analyze the effects of ECRTP on UIQ. The findings of the study are as follows: First, ECRTP showed a significant improvement in UIQ, although a lagged effect. This outcome offers fresh proof that the “Porter hypothesis” holds water in China. Second, mechanism analysis indicated that ECRTP could improve UIQ with industrial structure upgrading (ISU) and capital deepening. Third, analysis of spillover effects indicates that ECRTP has a key spillover impact on UIQ. Analysis of spillover effects indicates a positive influence of ECRTP on UIQ in surrounding cities. Fourth, heteroggeneity analysis further reveals the impact of ECRTP on UIQ is particularly pronounced in resource‐based and large‐scale cities. These findings are significant and also provide a valuable supplement to the existing study.</description><subject>capital deepening</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>difference‐in‐differences</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>energy‐consuming rights trading policy</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Industrial structure</subject><subject>industrial structure upgrading</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>spatial spillover effect</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Trading</subject><subject>urban innovation quality</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAUhC0EEqUgrmCJBQuU8uwkjr1E5a9SJRZ0b9mJk7pqndZOWmXHETgjJyFp2bJ6Gs2nGb1B6JbAhADQx1BMKKdwhkYEhIhIRsQ5GoFgPAIO9BJdhbACAE5JMkJm5vYmNLZSjXUVbpYGe7PuRe3C0m6xNs3BGIeNM77qfr6-895oNwPrbbVsAm68KgapXIFbr5XD1rl6f4zAu1atbdNdo4tSrYO5-btjtHh9WUzfo_nH22z6NI9yyhOI8oSCjillJUvyMjWiJIrr3stSSGOdJFRrluqMcqFZThQzRKeC8IwxnnARj9HdKXbr613bvyVXdetd3yhj4BllmWC0p-5PVO7rELwp5dbbjfKdJCCHCWUo5DBhTz6cyINdm-4_TH4-H-lfYp1zMA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Guo, Bingnan</creator><creator>Hu, Peiji</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5627-2764</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality</title><author>Guo, Bingnan ; Hu, Peiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2840-c420b3226f64cf5e9f1a8bc2875053b442bb65b7289b6c1a6e1b591876684893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>capital deepening</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>difference‐in‐differences</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>energy‐consuming rights trading policy</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Industrial structure</topic><topic>industrial structure upgrading</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>spatial spillover effect</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Trading</topic><topic>urban innovation quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Bingnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Peiji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Bingnan</au><au>Hu, Peiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3248</spage><epage>3270</epage><pages>3248-3270</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>The Energy‐consuming rights trading policy (ECRTP) is an important environmental regulatory policy in China. The study's goal is to determine how trading in energy‐consuming rights and urban innovation status effects also promote ecological civilization and high‐quality development. The purpose of the study examines the relationship between ECRTP and urban innovation quality (UIQ). Using data from 271 Chinese cities between 2011 and 2020, a difference‐in‐difference (DID) model is used to theoretically and empirically analyze the effects of ECRTP on UIQ. The findings of the study are as follows: First, ECRTP showed a significant improvement in UIQ, although a lagged effect. This outcome offers fresh proof that the “Porter hypothesis” holds water in China. Second, mechanism analysis indicated that ECRTP could improve UIQ with industrial structure upgrading (ISU) and capital deepening. Third, analysis of spillover effects indicates that ECRTP has a key spillover impact on UIQ. Analysis of spillover effects indicates a positive influence of ECRTP on UIQ in surrounding cities. Fourth, heteroggeneity analysis further reveals the impact of ECRTP on UIQ is particularly pronounced in resource‐based and large‐scale cities. These findings are significant and also provide a valuable supplement to the existing study.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.2820</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5627-2764</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0968-0802
ispartof Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2024-08, Vol.32 (4), p.3248-3270
issn 0968-0802
1099-1719
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3087267962
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; PAIS Index
subjects capital deepening
Cities
Data quality
difference‐in‐differences
Ecological effects
Empirical analysis
Energy
Energy consumption
energy‐consuming rights trading policy
Environmental policy
Impact analysis
Industrial structure
industrial structure upgrading
Innovations
Rights
spatial spillover effect
Sustainable development
Trading
urban innovation quality
title Investigating the relationship between energy‐consuming rights trading and urban innovation quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T02%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20the%20relationship%20between%20energy%E2%80%90consuming%20rights%20trading%20and%20urban%20innovation%20quality&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Guo,%20Bingnan&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3248&rft.epage=3270&rft.pages=3248-3270&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.2820&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3087267962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087267962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true