Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics
Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delinea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political studies 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.845-861 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 861 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 845 |
container_title | Political studies |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Meyer, John M |
description | Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of “anti-populist” responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00323217231160370 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3086981275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00323217231160370</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3086981275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-952396b457d2e1b94db606d45827a949a7dc903e1066e5fb6e32e2ea724d17e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssU7xK3bMDlXlISpRlbKOknjSuqRxsBMV_p6EIrFArGYx554ZXYQuKZlQqtQ1IZxxRhXjlErCFTlCIyqkijQTyTEaDftoAE7RWQhbQihnUoyQW7g9eJzVBq98126wrfFLYaEuIFpClbVg8MI1XWXD7gYvod3Y-s3Wa9xuAC9dBdiV-Kl2-wrMGr49s48GfGsDDK5pZXe9pHdUtrVFOEcnZVYFuPiZY_R6N1tNH6L58_3j9HYeFZyoNtIx41rmIlaGAc21MLkk0og4YSrTQmfKFJpwoERKiMtcAmfAIFNMGKpA8jG6Ongb7947CG26dZ2v-5MpJ4nUCWUq7il6oArvQvBQpo3v__WfKSXp0Gv6p9c-MzlkQraGX-v_gS-svHbK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086981275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Meyer, John M</creator><creatorcontrib>Meyer, John M</creatorcontrib><description>Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of “anti-populist” responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00323217231160370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Elites ; Elitism ; Experts ; Knowledge ; Politics ; Populism ; Power ; Power elite ; Truth</subject><ispartof>Political studies, 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.845-861</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-952396b457d2e1b94db606d45827a949a7dc903e1066e5fb6e32e2ea724d17e63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3565-7435</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00323217231160370$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00323217231160370$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meyer, John M</creatorcontrib><title>Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics</title><title>Political studies</title><description>Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of “anti-populist” responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Elites</subject><subject>Elitism</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power elite</subject><subject>Truth</subject><issn>0032-3217</issn><issn>1467-9248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAewssU7xK3bMDlXlISpRlbKOknjSuqRxsBMV_p6EIrFArGYx554ZXYQuKZlQqtQ1IZxxRhXjlErCFTlCIyqkijQTyTEaDftoAE7RWQhbQihnUoyQW7g9eJzVBq98126wrfFLYaEuIFpClbVg8MI1XWXD7gYvod3Y-s3Wa9xuAC9dBdiV-Kl2-wrMGr49s48GfGsDDK5pZXe9pHdUtrVFOEcnZVYFuPiZY_R6N1tNH6L58_3j9HYeFZyoNtIx41rmIlaGAc21MLkk0og4YSrTQmfKFJpwoERKiMtcAmfAIFNMGKpA8jG6Ongb7947CG26dZ2v-5MpJ4nUCWUq7il6oArvQvBQpo3v__WfKSXp0Gv6p9c-MzlkQraGX-v_gS-svHbK</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Meyer, John M</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-7435</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics</title><author>Meyer, John M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-952396b457d2e1b94db606d45827a949a7dc903e1066e5fb6e32e2ea724d17e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Elites</topic><topic>Elitism</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power elite</topic><topic>Truth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meyer, John M</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meyer, John M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics</atitle><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>861</epage><pages>845-861</pages><issn>0032-3217</issn><eissn>1467-9248</eissn><abstract>Populism is often characterized as a rejection of scientific expertise and a key obstacle to societies’ ability to address the climate crisis today. I challenge this account, arguing for a more inclusive conception of populism and a more critical account of expertise. Consistent with this, I delineate a range of responses to the challenges of climate politics in populist times. In doing so, I have two primary aims: first, to highlight limitations of “anti-populist” responses among proponents of climate change action, and, second, to lean into populist criticisms of elite expertise, by delineating how some challenges to dominant forms of science and elite power are themselves expert knowledge and integral to promising movements that address climate change. This can allow expertise to be distinguished from elitism and to be recognized in caring relations to the subjects of knowledge. Here, expertise is not manifest as separation from the common world, but as immersion in it.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00323217231160370</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-7435</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3217 |
ispartof | Political studies, 2024-08, Vol.72 (3), p.845-861 |
issn | 0032-3217 1467-9248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3086981275 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Climate change Elites Elitism Experts Knowledge Politics Populism Power Power elite Truth |
title | Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism: Rethinking the Role of Knowledge and Expertise in Climate Politics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A57%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Power%20and%20Truth%20in%20Science-Related%20Populism:%20Rethinking%20the%20Role%20of%20Knowledge%20and%20Expertise%20in%20Climate%20Politics&rft.jtitle=Political%20studies&rft.au=Meyer,%20John%20M&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=861&rft.pages=845-861&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00323217231160370&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3086981275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086981275&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00323217231160370&rfr_iscdi=true |