Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading

Using a unique setting where stand-alone banks submit filings to bank regulators instead of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we examine the consequences of fragmented securities regulation for information-processing costs and opportunistic insider trading. We find the market reacti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Management science 2024-07, Vol.70 (7), p.4407-4428
1. Verfasser: Kim, Sehwa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4428
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4407
container_title Management science
container_volume 70
creator Kim, Sehwa
description Using a unique setting where stand-alone banks submit filings to bank regulators instead of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we examine the consequences of fragmented securities regulation for information-processing costs and opportunistic insider trading. We find the market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect is less timely than to those on SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, suggesting FDICconnect generates higher information-processing costs. We also find only large investors trade more on insider-trading filings on FDICconnect than on insider-trading filings on SEC EDGAR, thus extracting benefits from the delayed market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect. Finally, we find increased insider selling in stand-alone banks prior to negative earnings news, suggesting insiders’ opportunistic use of private information. These findings collectively suggest regulatory fragmentation undermines market efficiency and distorts the level playing field. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: This work was supported by the Eugene Lang Junior Faculty Fellowship. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903 .
doi_str_mv 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3085714216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3085714216</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e64146c634e4d78aaf8b6c5994cf4650fca16d6793a02fd08477b3a7c716fc513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXzwWva31J86M5ynA6GChunkOWJiNjTWfSHvzvbTfBo6fH432-3wcfhO4xFJhU4rEJyRQESFlQCeUFmmBGeM4Y4Es0ASAsxxLkNbpJaQ8AohJ8gtaLqHeNDZ2ts7U1ffSdtyn7sLv-oDvfhlm2DK6NzWnJ32NrbEo-7LJ5m7o0y3SoByL52sZsE3U9nG7RldOHZO9-5xR9Lp4389d89faynD-tckOo6HLLKabc8JJaWotKa1dtuWFSUuMoZ-CMxrzmQpYaiKuhokJsSy2MwNwZhsspejj3HmP71dvUqX3bxzC8VCVUTGBKMB-o4kyZ2KYUrVPH6BsdvxUGNYpTozg1ilOjuCGQnQPWtMGnP7ySEqjkYkTyM-JPbtJ_lT8tVXqZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085714216</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading</title><source>INFORMS PubsOnLine</source><creator>Kim, Sehwa</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehwa</creatorcontrib><description>Using a unique setting where stand-alone banks submit filings to bank regulators instead of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we examine the consequences of fragmented securities regulation for information-processing costs and opportunistic insider trading. We find the market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect is less timely than to those on SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, suggesting FDICconnect generates higher information-processing costs. We also find only large investors trade more on insider-trading filings on FDICconnect than on insider-trading filings on SEC EDGAR, thus extracting benefits from the delayed market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect. Finally, we find increased insider selling in stand-alone banks prior to negative earnings news, suggesting insiders’ opportunistic use of private information. These findings collectively suggest regulatory fragmentation undermines market efficiency and distorts the level playing field. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: This work was supported by the Eugene Lang Junior Faculty Fellowship. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Banks ; Costs ; Delayed ; Earnings ; FDICconnect ; Financial reporting ; Information processing ; information processing costs ; Insider trading ; Investor behavior ; Investors ; regulation ; Regulation of financial institutions ; Retrieval ; SEC EDGAR ; Securities markets ; Segmentation</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2024-07, Vol.70 (7), p.4407-4428</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Jul 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e64146c634e4d78aaf8b6c5994cf4650fca16d6793a02fd08477b3a7c716fc513</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0604-7611 ; 0000-0002-3311-822X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3679,27901,27902,62589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehwa</creatorcontrib><title>Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading</title><title>Management science</title><description>Using a unique setting where stand-alone banks submit filings to bank regulators instead of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we examine the consequences of fragmented securities regulation for information-processing costs and opportunistic insider trading. We find the market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect is less timely than to those on SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, suggesting FDICconnect generates higher information-processing costs. We also find only large investors trade more on insider-trading filings on FDICconnect than on insider-trading filings on SEC EDGAR, thus extracting benefits from the delayed market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect. Finally, we find increased insider selling in stand-alone banks prior to negative earnings news, suggesting insiders’ opportunistic use of private information. These findings collectively suggest regulatory fragmentation undermines market efficiency and distorts the level playing field. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: This work was supported by the Eugene Lang Junior Faculty Fellowship. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903 .</description><subject>Banks</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Delayed</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>FDICconnect</subject><subject>Financial reporting</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>information processing costs</subject><subject>Insider trading</subject><subject>Investor behavior</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>regulation</subject><subject>Regulation of financial institutions</subject><subject>Retrieval</subject><subject>SEC EDGAR</subject><subject>Securities markets</subject><subject>Segmentation</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXzwWva31J86M5ynA6GChunkOWJiNjTWfSHvzvbTfBo6fH432-3wcfhO4xFJhU4rEJyRQESFlQCeUFmmBGeM4Y4Es0ASAsxxLkNbpJaQ8AohJ8gtaLqHeNDZ2ts7U1ffSdtyn7sLv-oDvfhlm2DK6NzWnJ32NrbEo-7LJ5m7o0y3SoByL52sZsE3U9nG7RldOHZO9-5xR9Lp4389d89faynD-tckOo6HLLKabc8JJaWotKa1dtuWFSUuMoZ-CMxrzmQpYaiKuhokJsSy2MwNwZhsspejj3HmP71dvUqX3bxzC8VCVUTGBKMB-o4kyZ2KYUrVPH6BsdvxUGNYpTozg1ilOjuCGQnQPWtMGnP7ySEqjkYkTyM-JPbtJ_lT8tVXqZ</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Kim, Sehwa</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3311-822X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading</title><author>Kim, Sehwa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c247t-e64146c634e4d78aaf8b6c5994cf4650fca16d6793a02fd08477b3a7c716fc513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Banks</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Delayed</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>FDICconnect</topic><topic>Financial reporting</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>information processing costs</topic><topic>Insider trading</topic><topic>Investor behavior</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>regulation</topic><topic>Regulation of financial institutions</topic><topic>Retrieval</topic><topic>SEC EDGAR</topic><topic>Securities markets</topic><topic>Segmentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sehwa</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sehwa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4407</spage><epage>4428</epage><pages>4407-4428</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>Using a unique setting where stand-alone banks submit filings to bank regulators instead of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), we examine the consequences of fragmented securities regulation for information-processing costs and opportunistic insider trading. We find the market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect is less timely than to those on SEC’s Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system, suggesting FDICconnect generates higher information-processing costs. We also find only large investors trade more on insider-trading filings on FDICconnect than on insider-trading filings on SEC EDGAR, thus extracting benefits from the delayed market reaction to insider-trading filings on FDICconnect. Finally, we find increased insider selling in stand-alone banks prior to negative earnings news, suggesting insiders’ opportunistic use of private information. These findings collectively suggest regulatory fragmentation undermines market efficiency and distorts the level playing field. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting. Funding: This work was supported by the Eugene Lang Junior Faculty Fellowship. Supplemental Material: The data files and online appendix are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903 .</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0604-7611</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3311-822X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-1909
ispartof Management science, 2024-07, Vol.70 (7), p.4407-4428
issn 0025-1909
1526-5501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3085714216
source INFORMS PubsOnLine
subjects Banks
Costs
Delayed
Earnings
FDICconnect
Financial reporting
Information processing
information processing costs
Insider trading
Investor behavior
Investors
regulation
Regulation of financial institutions
Retrieval
SEC EDGAR
Securities markets
Segmentation
title Fragmented Securities Regulation, Information-Processing Costs, and Insider Trading
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A48%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fragmented%20Securities%20Regulation,%20Information-Processing%20Costs,%20and%20Insider%20Trading&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Kim,%20Sehwa&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4407&rft.epage=4428&rft.pages=4407-4428&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4903&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3085714216%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085714216&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true