Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion

Companies often make claims about the success rates of their products and/or the failure rates of competitors' products. We examine whether changes in the grammatical subject used in these claims affect persuasion. Specifically, we differentiate between user-subjects, where users are the gramma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ostinelli, Max, Luna, David
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 794
container_issue
container_start_page 793
container_title
container_volume 45
creator Ostinelli, Max
Luna, David
description Companies often make claims about the success rates of their products and/or the failure rates of competitors' products. We examine whether changes in the grammatical subject used in these claims affect persuasion. Specifically, we differentiate between user-subjects, where users are the grammatical subject of the sentence, and product subjects, where the product is the grammatical subject of the sentence. For example, the success of a weight loss program can be presented either with a user-subject claim stating that "80% of participants succeed in reducing their excess weight" or with a product-subject claim stating that our program succeeds in reducing excess weight for 80% of participants. This work makes several contributions. First, it contributes to research on linguistic framing in a significant manner: Whereas most examples of verbal framing examine changes in specific words, our work examines changes in syntax, which can, in principle, be applied to a broader variety of marketing communications of product success and failure. Second, it contributes to research on causality.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3084479789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3084479789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30844797893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MLC00LU0MrXgYOAqLs4yMDA0NzEz42TQdy9KzM1NLMlMTsxRCC5NykpNLtFRcEosTlUISixJLdZRSMxLUQhILSouTSzOzM_jYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4YwMLExNzS3MLS2PiVAEAiawxow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3084479789</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Ostinelli, Max ; Luna, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Ostinelli, Max ; Luna, David</creatorcontrib><description>Companies often make claims about the success rates of their products and/or the failure rates of competitors' products. We examine whether changes in the grammatical subject used in these claims affect persuasion. Specifically, we differentiate between user-subjects, where users are the grammatical subject of the sentence, and product subjects, where the product is the grammatical subject of the sentence. For example, the success of a weight loss program can be presented either with a user-subject claim stating that "80% of participants succeed in reducing their excess weight" or with a product-subject claim stating that our program succeeds in reducing excess weight for 80% of participants. This work makes several contributions. First, it contributes to research on linguistic framing in a significant manner: Whereas most examples of verbal framing examine changes in specific words, our work examines changes in syntax, which can, in principle, be applied to a broader variety of marketing communications of product success and failure. Second, it contributes to research on causality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-9258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Urbana: Association for Consumer Research</publisher><subject>Causality ; Marketing ; Syntax ; Weight control</subject><ispartof>Advances in consumer research, 2017, Vol.45, p.793-794</ispartof><rights>Copyright Association for Consumer Research 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ostinelli, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, David</creatorcontrib><title>Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion</title><title>Advances in consumer research</title><description>Companies often make claims about the success rates of their products and/or the failure rates of competitors' products. We examine whether changes in the grammatical subject used in these claims affect persuasion. Specifically, we differentiate between user-subjects, where users are the grammatical subject of the sentence, and product subjects, where the product is the grammatical subject of the sentence. For example, the success of a weight loss program can be presented either with a user-subject claim stating that "80% of participants succeed in reducing their excess weight" or with a product-subject claim stating that our program succeeds in reducing excess weight for 80% of participants. This work makes several contributions. First, it contributes to research on linguistic framing in a significant manner: Whereas most examples of verbal framing examine changes in specific words, our work examines changes in syntax, which can, in principle, be applied to a broader variety of marketing communications of product success and failure. Second, it contributes to research on causality.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Weight control</subject><issn>0098-9258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MLC00LU0MrXgYOAqLs4yMDA0NzEz42TQdy9KzM1NLMlMTsxRCC5NykpNLtFRcEosTlUISixJLdZRSMxLUQhILSouTSzOzM_jYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMym6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8Vn5pUV5QKl4YwMLExNzS3MLS2PiVAEAiawxow</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Ostinelli, Max</creator><creator>Luna, David</creator><general>Association for Consumer Research</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion</title><author>Ostinelli, Max ; Luna, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30844797893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Weight control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ostinelli, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luna, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ostinelli, Max</au><au>Luna, David</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion</atitle><btitle>Advances in consumer research</btitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>45</volume><spage>793</spage><epage>794</epage><pages>793-794</pages><issn>0098-9258</issn><abstract>Companies often make claims about the success rates of their products and/or the failure rates of competitors' products. We examine whether changes in the grammatical subject used in these claims affect persuasion. Specifically, we differentiate between user-subjects, where users are the grammatical subject of the sentence, and product subjects, where the product is the grammatical subject of the sentence. For example, the success of a weight loss program can be presented either with a user-subject claim stating that "80% of participants succeed in reducing their excess weight" or with a product-subject claim stating that our program succeeds in reducing excess weight for 80% of participants. This work makes several contributions. First, it contributes to research on linguistic framing in a significant manner: Whereas most examples of verbal framing examine changes in specific words, our work examines changes in syntax, which can, in principle, be applied to a broader variety of marketing communications of product success and failure. Second, it contributes to research on causality.</abstract><cop>Urbana</cop><pub>Association for Consumer Research</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0098-9258
ispartof Advances in consumer research, 2017, Vol.45, p.793-794
issn 0098-9258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3084479789
source Business Source Complete
subjects Causality
Marketing
Syntax
Weight control
title Grammatical Subject, Base Rates, and Persuasion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T01%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Grammatical%20Subject,%20Base%20Rates,%20and%20Persuasion&rft.btitle=Advances%20in%20consumer%20research&rft.au=Ostinelli,%20Max&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.spage=793&rft.epage=794&rft.pages=793-794&rft.issn=0098-9258&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3084479789%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084479789&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true