Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques
Well logging can be classified under the general category of big data, as the datasets are intricate for conventional data processing application software to handle. This study aims at working on three entire wells drilled up to 1751–2690.4 m in upper Assam basin for lithofacies identification with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta geophysica 2024, Vol.72 (5), p.3191-3210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 3191 |
container_title | Acta geophysica |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Das, Shikha Singha, Dip Kumar Mandal, Partha Pratim Agrahari, Shudha |
description | Well logging can be classified under the general category of big data, as the datasets are intricate for conventional data processing application software to handle. This study aims at working on three entire wells drilled up to 1751–2690.4 m in upper Assam basin for lithofacies identification with each well comprising of huge datasets. Conventional methods for lithofacies classification are a challenging task for this enormous amount of data. It can be subject to biases, substantially laborious and time consuming. To deal with this problem, machine learning (ML) classification algorithms have come into picture, which systematically speed up accurate prediction of lithofacies. Five such algorithms (Support vector, Random forest, Multi-layer Perceptron,
K
Nearest Neighbors and Decision tree) are chosen and then evaluate each of the model’s performance exhibiting varying hyperparameters and input features. We established a thorough approach that entails all classifiers operating concurrently within the same ML framework. The best algorithm was selected following the comparison of each model’s Jaccard index and F1-score based on optimized hyperparameters. In addition, introduction of water saturation, a derived petrophysical property affects the model’s performance. This feature selection process brags the importance of inclusion of useful features to improve the accuracy of any ML model’s prediction capability. We observed that after introduction of water saturation profile, Jaccard index and F1-score of the best classification model, Random Forest has increased by on average 10.74% and 7.82%, respectively. Finally, we correlated identified lithofacies, including the reservoir facies from well to well in the study area. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3084374118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3084374118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-54a5d719ac51eeba48d726f8b690aceb7ff9cadb3289e6762be77646716fb5273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkbZP2uCz-WVjwoueQppNt1jatSYr47W2toCcvM8PjvXnwQ-iakltKiLgLlHJCEsLShFDGyqQ4QStalHkisjw__XOfo4sQjoTwbDKu0NuuBhetsVpF2zvcG9za2PRGaQsBG993-APaFrf9AdcqKmwdjg3gcRjA400IqsOVCpM6TuOAO6Ub6wC3oLybhQi6cfZ9hHCJzoxqA1z97DV6fbh_2T4l--fH3XazTzQTJCZ5pvJa0FLpnAJUKitqwbgpKl4SpaESxpRa1VXKihK44KwCIXjGBeWmyplI1-hm-Tv4fu6N8tiP3k2VMiVFloqM0mJyscWlfR-CByMHbzvlPyUlcoYqF6hygiq_oco5lC6hMJndAfzv639SX0g1e24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084374118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Das, Shikha ; Singha, Dip Kumar ; Mandal, Partha Pratim ; Agrahari, Shudha</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Shikha ; Singha, Dip Kumar ; Mandal, Partha Pratim ; Agrahari, Shudha</creatorcontrib><description>Well logging can be classified under the general category of big data, as the datasets are intricate for conventional data processing application software to handle. This study aims at working on three entire wells drilled up to 1751–2690.4 m in upper Assam basin for lithofacies identification with each well comprising of huge datasets. Conventional methods for lithofacies classification are a challenging task for this enormous amount of data. It can be subject to biases, substantially laborious and time consuming. To deal with this problem, machine learning (ML) classification algorithms have come into picture, which systematically speed up accurate prediction of lithofacies. Five such algorithms (Support vector, Random forest, Multi-layer Perceptron,
K
Nearest Neighbors and Decision tree) are chosen and then evaluate each of the model’s performance exhibiting varying hyperparameters and input features. We established a thorough approach that entails all classifiers operating concurrently within the same ML framework. The best algorithm was selected following the comparison of each model’s Jaccard index and F1-score based on optimized hyperparameters. In addition, introduction of water saturation, a derived petrophysical property affects the model’s performance. This feature selection process brags the importance of inclusion of useful features to improve the accuracy of any ML model’s prediction capability. We observed that after introduction of water saturation profile, Jaccard index and F1-score of the best classification model, Random Forest has increased by on average 10.74% and 7.82%, respectively. Finally, we correlated identified lithofacies, including the reservoir facies from well to well in the study area.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1895-7455</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1895-6572</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1895-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Big Data ; Classification ; Data logging ; Data processing ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Logging ; Machine learning ; Multilayer perceptrons ; Multilayers ; Performance evaluation ; Research Article - Applied Geophysics ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Acta geophysica, 2024, Vol.72 (5), p.3191-3210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences & Polish Academy of Sciences 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-54a5d719ac51eeba48d726f8b690aceb7ff9cadb3289e6762be77646716fb5273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Shikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singha, Dip Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Partha Pratim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrahari, Shudha</creatorcontrib><title>Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques</title><title>Acta geophysica</title><addtitle>Acta Geophys</addtitle><description>Well logging can be classified under the general category of big data, as the datasets are intricate for conventional data processing application software to handle. This study aims at working on three entire wells drilled up to 1751–2690.4 m in upper Assam basin for lithofacies identification with each well comprising of huge datasets. Conventional methods for lithofacies classification are a challenging task for this enormous amount of data. It can be subject to biases, substantially laborious and time consuming. To deal with this problem, machine learning (ML) classification algorithms have come into picture, which systematically speed up accurate prediction of lithofacies. Five such algorithms (Support vector, Random forest, Multi-layer Perceptron,
K
Nearest Neighbors and Decision tree) are chosen and then evaluate each of the model’s performance exhibiting varying hyperparameters and input features. We established a thorough approach that entails all classifiers operating concurrently within the same ML framework. The best algorithm was selected following the comparison of each model’s Jaccard index and F1-score based on optimized hyperparameters. In addition, introduction of water saturation, a derived petrophysical property affects the model’s performance. This feature selection process brags the importance of inclusion of useful features to improve the accuracy of any ML model’s prediction capability. We observed that after introduction of water saturation profile, Jaccard index and F1-score of the best classification model, Random Forest has increased by on average 10.74% and 7.82%, respectively. Finally, we correlated identified lithofacies, including the reservoir facies from well to well in the study area.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Data logging</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Multilayer perceptrons</subject><subject>Multilayers</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Research Article - Applied Geophysics</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1895-7455</issn><issn>1895-6572</issn><issn>1895-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AU8Bz9UkbZP2uCz-WVjwoueQppNt1jatSYr47W2toCcvM8PjvXnwQ-iakltKiLgLlHJCEsLShFDGyqQ4QStalHkisjw__XOfo4sQjoTwbDKu0NuuBhetsVpF2zvcG9za2PRGaQsBG993-APaFrf9AdcqKmwdjg3gcRjA400IqsOVCpM6TuOAO6Ub6wC3oLybhQi6cfZ9hHCJzoxqA1z97DV6fbh_2T4l--fH3XazTzQTJCZ5pvJa0FLpnAJUKitqwbgpKl4SpaESxpRa1VXKihK44KwCIXjGBeWmyplI1-hm-Tv4fu6N8tiP3k2VMiVFloqM0mJyscWlfR-CByMHbzvlPyUlcoYqF6hygiq_oco5lC6hMJndAfzv639SX0g1e24</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Das, Shikha</creator><creator>Singha, Dip Kumar</creator><creator>Mandal, Partha Pratim</creator><creator>Agrahari, Shudha</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques</title><author>Das, Shikha ; Singha, Dip Kumar ; Mandal, Partha Pratim ; Agrahari, Shudha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-54a5d719ac51eeba48d726f8b690aceb7ff9cadb3289e6762be77646716fb5273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Data logging</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Multilayer perceptrons</topic><topic>Multilayers</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Research Article - Applied Geophysics</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Shikha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singha, Dip Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mandal, Partha Pratim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agrahari, Shudha</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Acta geophysica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Shikha</au><au>Singha, Dip Kumar</au><au>Mandal, Partha Pratim</au><au>Agrahari, Shudha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques</atitle><jtitle>Acta geophysica</jtitle><stitle>Acta Geophys</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3191</spage><epage>3210</epage><pages>3191-3210</pages><issn>1895-7455</issn><issn>1895-6572</issn><eissn>1895-7455</eissn><abstract>Well logging can be classified under the general category of big data, as the datasets are intricate for conventional data processing application software to handle. This study aims at working on three entire wells drilled up to 1751–2690.4 m in upper Assam basin for lithofacies identification with each well comprising of huge datasets. Conventional methods for lithofacies classification are a challenging task for this enormous amount of data. It can be subject to biases, substantially laborious and time consuming. To deal with this problem, machine learning (ML) classification algorithms have come into picture, which systematically speed up accurate prediction of lithofacies. Five such algorithms (Support vector, Random forest, Multi-layer Perceptron,
K
Nearest Neighbors and Decision tree) are chosen and then evaluate each of the model’s performance exhibiting varying hyperparameters and input features. We established a thorough approach that entails all classifiers operating concurrently within the same ML framework. The best algorithm was selected following the comparison of each model’s Jaccard index and F1-score based on optimized hyperparameters. In addition, introduction of water saturation, a derived petrophysical property affects the model’s performance. This feature selection process brags the importance of inclusion of useful features to improve the accuracy of any ML model’s prediction capability. We observed that after introduction of water saturation profile, Jaccard index and F1-score of the best classification model, Random Forest has increased by on average 10.74% and 7.82%, respectively. Finally, we correlated identified lithofacies, including the reservoir facies from well to well in the study area.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1895-7455 |
ispartof | Acta geophysica, 2024, Vol.72 (5), p.3191-3210 |
issn | 1895-7455 1895-6572 1895-7455 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3084374118 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Algorithms Big Data Classification Data logging Data processing Datasets Decision trees Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Logging Machine learning Multilayer perceptrons Multilayers Performance evaluation Research Article - Applied Geophysics Structural Geology |
title | Identification of lithofacies from well log data in the upper Assam basin using machine learning techniques |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T12%3A27%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identification%20of%20lithofacies%20from%20well%20log%20data%20in%20the%20upper%20Assam%20basin%20using%20machine%20learning%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Acta%20geophysica&rft.au=Das,%20Shikha&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3191&rft.epage=3210&rft.pages=3191-3210&rft.issn=1895-7455&rft.eissn=1895-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11600-023-01229-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3084374118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084374118&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |