CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS
May et al argues that jurisprudential developments in the US and Brazil show that rights-based lawsuits to vindicate a right to a stable or healthy climate--that is, to "climate rights"--have potential to play an important interstitial role in addressing climate pollution in both countries...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Case Western Reserve journal of international law 2024-03, Vol.56 (1-2), p.439-467 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 467 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 439 |
| container_title | Case Western Reserve journal of international law |
| container_volume | 56 |
| creator | May, James R Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo Bauer, Luciana |
| description | May et al argues that jurisprudential developments in the US and Brazil show that rights-based lawsuits to vindicate a right to a stable or healthy climate--that is, to "climate rights"--have potential to play an important interstitial role in addressing climate pollution in both countries--despite a world of differences in judicial systems, procedures, and traditions. While progress has been made in recognizing climate rights, challenges remain. In the US, standing and justiciability issues have hindered climate litigation, while in Brazil, the implementation of climate policies and the protection of biomes are ongoing concerns. Overall, courts can play a crucial role in addressing climate change and enforcing climate rights. By directing governments to take action and enforcing constitutional provisions, courts can contribute to the global effort to combat climate change and protect the environment for future generations. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3083712778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A812242193</galeid><sourcerecordid>A812242193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1708-c15ceb3494a46da809dfec942d858ee38876c5ed3ef169fee6d4e54872bb451e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0F9LwzAQAPAiCs7pdwj4aiVpkib1rXZ1q9QO2swHX0r_XGvH1mqzfn8jCk4YBwl3_O4S7syaEY8Sm3qSn1szjLG0hcPZpXWl9RZjgpmkM-s5iKMXX4UojZYrlaEoQY-p_xbFyE8WSK1CtEkiFS5QpozKHpCPgnXyGqbLMAnCb25SlfqZyq6ti6bYabj5vefW5ilUwcqO18so8GO7JcJ8oiK8gpIyjxXMrQuJvbqBymNOLbkEoFIKt-JQU2iI6zUAbs2AMymcsmScAJ1btz9zP8bhcwJ9yLfDNPbmyZxiSQVxhJB_qi12kHd9MxzGotp3usp9SRyHOWY9RtknVAs9jMVu6KHpTPmfvz_hTdSw76qTDXdHDeWkux60OXTXvh90W0xaH_MvoY18kw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3083712778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>May, James R ; Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo ; Bauer, Luciana</creator><creatorcontrib>May, James R ; Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo ; Bauer, Luciana</creatorcontrib><description>May et al argues that jurisprudential developments in the US and Brazil show that rights-based lawsuits to vindicate a right to a stable or healthy climate--that is, to "climate rights"--have potential to play an important interstitial role in addressing climate pollution in both countries--despite a world of differences in judicial systems, procedures, and traditions. While progress has been made in recognizing climate rights, challenges remain. In the US, standing and justiciability issues have hindered climate litigation, while in Brazil, the implementation of climate policies and the protection of biomes are ongoing concerns. Overall, courts can play a crucial role in addressing climate change and enforcing climate rights. By directing governments to take action and enforcing constitutional provisions, courts can contribute to the global effort to combat climate change and protect the environment for future generations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-7254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3985</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University School of Law</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Climate policy ; Climatic changes ; Constitutional courts ; Constitutional law ; Evaluation ; Human rights ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Litigation ; Pollution ; Right of action ; Rights ; Standing (Law)</subject><ispartof>Case Western Reserve journal of international law, 2024-03, Vol.56 (1-2), p.439-467</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Case Western Reserve University School of Law</rights><rights>Copyright Case Western Reserve University, School of Law Spring 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>May, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Luciana</creatorcontrib><title>CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS</title><title>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</title><description>May et al argues that jurisprudential developments in the US and Brazil show that rights-based lawsuits to vindicate a right to a stable or healthy climate--that is, to "climate rights"--have potential to play an important interstitial role in addressing climate pollution in both countries--despite a world of differences in judicial systems, procedures, and traditions. While progress has been made in recognizing climate rights, challenges remain. In the US, standing and justiciability issues have hindered climate litigation, while in Brazil, the implementation of climate policies and the protection of biomes are ongoing concerns. Overall, courts can play a crucial role in addressing climate change and enforcing climate rights. By directing governments to take action and enforcing constitutional provisions, courts can contribute to the global effort to combat climate change and protect the environment for future generations.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate policy</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Constitutional courts</subject><subject>Constitutional law</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Litigation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Right of action</subject><subject>Rights</subject><subject>Standing (Law)</subject><issn>0008-7254</issn><issn>1931-3985</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0F9LwzAQAPAiCs7pdwj4aiVpkib1rXZ1q9QO2swHX0r_XGvH1mqzfn8jCk4YBwl3_O4S7syaEY8Sm3qSn1szjLG0hcPZpXWl9RZjgpmkM-s5iKMXX4UojZYrlaEoQY-p_xbFyE8WSK1CtEkiFS5QpozKHpCPgnXyGqbLMAnCb25SlfqZyq6ti6bYabj5vefW5ilUwcqO18so8GO7JcJ8oiK8gpIyjxXMrQuJvbqBymNOLbkEoFIKt-JQU2iI6zUAbs2AMymcsmScAJ1btz9zP8bhcwJ9yLfDNPbmyZxiSQVxhJB_qi12kHd9MxzGotp3usp9SRyHOWY9RtknVAs9jMVu6KHpTPmfvz_hTdSw76qTDXdHDeWkux60OXTXvh90W0xaH_MvoY18kw</recordid><startdate>20240322</startdate><enddate>20240322</enddate><creator>May, James R</creator><creator>Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo</creator><creator>Bauer, Luciana</creator><general>Case Western Reserve University School of Law</general><general>Case Western Reserve University, School of Law</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240322</creationdate><title>CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS</title><author>May, James R ; Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo ; Bauer, Luciana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1708-c15ceb3494a46da809dfec942d858ee38876c5ed3ef169fee6d4e54872bb451e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate policy</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Constitutional courts</topic><topic>Constitutional law</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Litigation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Right of action</topic><topic>Rights</topic><topic>Standing (Law)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>May, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Luciana</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>May, James R</au><au>Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo</au><au>Bauer, Luciana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS</atitle><jtitle>Case Western Reserve journal of international law</jtitle><date>2024-03-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>439-467</pages><issn>0008-7254</issn><eissn>1931-3985</eissn><abstract>May et al argues that jurisprudential developments in the US and Brazil show that rights-based lawsuits to vindicate a right to a stable or healthy climate--that is, to "climate rights"--have potential to play an important interstitial role in addressing climate pollution in both countries--despite a world of differences in judicial systems, procedures, and traditions. While progress has been made in recognizing climate rights, challenges remain. In the US, standing and justiciability issues have hindered climate litigation, while in Brazil, the implementation of climate policies and the protection of biomes are ongoing concerns. Overall, courts can play a crucial role in addressing climate change and enforcing climate rights. By directing governments to take action and enforcing constitutional provisions, courts can contribute to the global effort to combat climate change and protect the environment for future generations.</abstract><cop>Cleveland</cop><pub>Case Western Reserve University School of Law</pub><tpages>29</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0008-7254 |
| ispartof | Case Western Reserve journal of international law, 2024-03, Vol.56 (1-2), p.439-467 |
| issn | 0008-7254 1931-3985 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3083712778 |
| source | Education Source; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Climate change Climate policy Climatic changes Constitutional courts Constitutional law Evaluation Human rights Laws, regulations and rules Litigation Pollution Right of action Rights Standing (Law) |
| title | CLIMATE RIGHTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES: A CONVERGENCE IN CONTRASTS |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CLIMATE%20RIGHTS%20IN%20BRAZIL%20AND%20THE%20UNITED%20STATES:%20A%20CONVERGENCE%20IN%20CONTRASTS&rft.jtitle=Case%20Western%20Reserve%20journal%20of%20international%20law&rft.au=May,%20James%20R&rft.date=2024-03-22&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=439-467&rft.issn=0008-7254&rft.eissn=1931-3985&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA812242193%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3083712778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A812242193&rfr_iscdi=true |