Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects

AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2024-11, Vol.16 (4)
Hauptverfasser: Shabana, Omar, Gad, Ghada M., Minchin, Edward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction
container_volume 16
creator Shabana, Omar
Gad, Ghada M.
Minchin, Edward
description AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3082104768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3082104768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwHP1aRJk_ZYNnWTiWPMc0jTV9faNTXphP33tnToyct774Pv-z34ELql5J4SQR9eVuk8Xdz3cxNQSpIzNKEJZwGnkpz_3iK8RFfeV4SISDA-QdVy32rTYVvgtbMV9Occ6vIb3BG_Qrezuce2wZvSf-K0rq3RXdnr_ODK5gN3O8DrWjfNINY77WEAbZ1ufGtdN3pPXH-NLgpde7g57Sl6f3rczhbB6u15OUtXgQ656AJjCkiSjAsmTW64oEkui0yD1jLmmSwYi6lkVIZhQSKgMoNIiohoDibMTZawKbobua2zXwfwnarswTX9S8VIHFLCpYh7FxldxlnvHRSqdeVeu6OiRA2NqrFRNTSqhkb7SDBGtDfwB_3X_wPIVXkq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082104768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Delivery contracts ; Federal government ; Land acquisition ; Management methods ; Project management ; Relocation ; Risk allocation ; Risk analysis ; Risk management ; Scholarly Paper ; Scholarly Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2024-11, Vol.16 (4)</ispartof><rights>2024 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3684-4905 ; 0000-0003-0938-0583 ; 0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, Ghada M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</description><subject>Delivery contracts</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Land acquisition</subject><subject>Management methods</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Risk allocation</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scholarly Paper</subject><subject>Scholarly Papers</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwHP1aRJk_ZYNnWTiWPMc0jTV9faNTXphP33tnToyct774Pv-z34ELql5J4SQR9eVuk8Xdz3cxNQSpIzNKEJZwGnkpz_3iK8RFfeV4SISDA-QdVy32rTYVvgtbMV9Occ6vIb3BG_Qrezuce2wZvSf-K0rq3RXdnr_ODK5gN3O8DrWjfNINY77WEAbZ1ufGtdN3pPXH-NLgpde7g57Sl6f3rczhbB6u15OUtXgQ656AJjCkiSjAsmTW64oEkui0yD1jLmmSwYi6lkVIZhQSKgMoNIiohoDibMTZawKbobua2zXwfwnarswTX9S8VIHFLCpYh7FxldxlnvHRSqdeVeu6OiRA2NqrFRNTSqhkb7SDBGtDfwB_3X_wPIVXkq</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Shabana, Omar</creator><creator>Gad, Ghada M.</creator><creator>Minchin, Edward</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-4905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><author>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Delivery contracts</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Land acquisition</topic><topic>Management methods</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Risk allocation</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scholarly Paper</topic><topic>Scholarly Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, Ghada M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shabana, Omar</au><au>Gad, Ghada M.</au><au>Minchin, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-4905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1943-4162
ispartof Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2024-11, Vol.16 (4)
issn 1943-4162
1943-4170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3082104768
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Delivery contracts
Federal government
Land acquisition
Management methods
Project management
Relocation
Risk allocation
Risk analysis
Risk management
Scholarly Paper
Scholarly Papers
title Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A30%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Project%20Delivery%20Methods%20on%20Risk%20Allocation%20during%20the%20Planning%20Phase%20of%20Transportation%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Shabana,%20Omar&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082104768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082104768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true