Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects
AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction 2024-11, Vol.16 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Shabana, Omar Gad, Ghada M. Minchin, Edward |
description | AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3082104768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3082104768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwHP1aRJk_ZYNnWTiWPMc0jTV9faNTXphP33tnToyct774Pv-z34ELql5J4SQR9eVuk8Xdz3cxNQSpIzNKEJZwGnkpz_3iK8RFfeV4SISDA-QdVy32rTYVvgtbMV9Occ6vIb3BG_Qrezuce2wZvSf-K0rq3RXdnr_ODK5gN3O8DrWjfNINY77WEAbZ1ufGtdN3pPXH-NLgpde7g57Sl6f3rczhbB6u15OUtXgQ656AJjCkiSjAsmTW64oEkui0yD1jLmmSwYi6lkVIZhQSKgMoNIiohoDibMTZawKbobua2zXwfwnarswTX9S8VIHFLCpYh7FxldxlnvHRSqdeVeu6OiRA2NqrFRNTSqhkb7SDBGtDfwB_3X_wPIVXkq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082104768</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1943-4162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Delivery contracts ; Federal government ; Land acquisition ; Management methods ; Project management ; Relocation ; Risk allocation ; Risk analysis ; Risk management ; Scholarly Paper ; Scholarly Papers</subject><ispartof>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2024-11, Vol.16 (4)</ispartof><rights>2024 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3684-4905 ; 0000-0003-0938-0583 ; 0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,75936,75944</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, Ghada M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><title>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</title><description>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</description><subject>Delivery contracts</subject><subject>Federal government</subject><subject>Land acquisition</subject><subject>Management methods</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Relocation</subject><subject>Risk allocation</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scholarly Paper</subject><subject>Scholarly Papers</subject><issn>1943-4162</issn><issn>1943-4170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFLwzAUxoMoOKd3jwHP1aRJk_ZYNnWTiWPMc0jTV9faNTXphP33tnToyct774Pv-z34ELql5J4SQR9eVuk8Xdz3cxNQSpIzNKEJZwGnkpz_3iK8RFfeV4SISDA-QdVy32rTYVvgtbMV9Occ6vIb3BG_Qrezuce2wZvSf-K0rq3RXdnr_ODK5gN3O8DrWjfNINY77WEAbZ1ufGtdN3pPXH-NLgpde7g57Sl6f3rczhbB6u15OUtXgQ656AJjCkiSjAsmTW64oEkui0yD1jLmmSwYi6lkVIZhQSKgMoNIiohoDibMTZawKbobua2zXwfwnarswTX9S8VIHFLCpYh7FxldxlnvHRSqdeVeu6OiRA2NqrFRNTSqhkb7SDBGtDfwB_3X_wPIVXkq</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Shabana, Omar</creator><creator>Gad, Ghada M.</creator><creator>Minchin, Edward</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-4905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</title><author>Shabana, Omar ; Gad, Ghada M. ; Minchin, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a246t-ccfe99b4637cdc4619d7fbaeaa784b7f3381731722f05e17be57650a4ec2dcb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Delivery contracts</topic><topic>Federal government</topic><topic>Land acquisition</topic><topic>Management methods</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Relocation</topic><topic>Risk allocation</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scholarly Paper</topic><topic>Scholarly Papers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shabana, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gad, Ghada M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minchin, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shabana, Omar</au><au>Gad, Ghada M.</au><au>Minchin, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1943-4162</issn><eissn>1943-4170</eissn><abstract>AbstractThe construction of transportation projects in the United States has been increasing over the last few decades; more mega projects are expected to be procured in the next few years due to the new bipartisan infrastructure bill, for example, the federal government has allocated USD 110 billion in additional funds for transportation repairs over the next five years. It thus becomes crucial to develop and adapt innovative and effective risk management strategies to minimize the potential impact of claims or disputes on these mega projects, which could include the use of innovative project delivery methods. Construction risks can materialize at any of the project phases: planning, pre-award, and postaward stage. However, the planning stage is considered the most critical stage of any construction project’s life cycle as it sets the stage for projects’ expectations and risk management strategies. Parties in this project phase need to make risk allocation decisions such as those for land acquisition, utility relocation, and third-party agreements risks, while allocating these risks to the parties best able to manage them. This paper aims to conduct an analysis of risk allocation strategies that could be employed in the planning phase of mega transportation projects in the United States, considering different project delivery methods. The aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the risk allocation strategies employed by owners in drafting their contracts, including factors they need to consider at that stage. Results showed that the most critical risks to be taken into consideration during the planning phase are governmental approvals, third-party approvals, environmental approvals, right of way, and utilities. The contribution of this paper is that it addresses contract risk allocation in various project delivery methods while considering the increased size and risk of transportation projects, with a focus on preplanning stage. It also provides owners and stakeholders with risk allocation strategies they can employ on their projects.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-4905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0938-0583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1246-6639</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1943-4162 |
ispartof | Journal of legal affairs and dispute resolution in engineering and construction, 2024-11, Vol.16 (4) |
issn | 1943-4162 1943-4170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3082104768 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Delivery contracts Federal government Land acquisition Management methods Project management Relocation Risk allocation Risk analysis Risk management Scholarly Paper Scholarly Papers |
title | Impact of Project Delivery Methods on Risk Allocation during the Planning Phase of Transportation Projects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T07%3A30%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Project%20Delivery%20Methods%20on%20Risk%20Allocation%20during%20the%20Planning%20Phase%20of%20Transportation%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20legal%20affairs%20and%20dispute%20resolution%20in%20engineering%20and%20construction&rft.au=Shabana,%20Omar&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1943-4162&rft.eissn=1943-4170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082104768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082104768&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |