Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys

The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method ha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IAENG international journal of computer science 2024-07, Vol.51 (7), p.918
Hauptverfasser: Bonhin, Eduardo Pires, Müzel, Sarah David, de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario, Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros, Guidi, Erick Siqueira, Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado, Silva, Fernando de Azevedo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page 918
container_title IAENG international journal of computer science
container_volume 51
creator Bonhin, Eduardo Pires
Müzel, Sarah David
de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario
Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros
Guidi, Erick Siqueira
Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado
Silva, Fernando de Azevedo
description The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3081844573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3081844573</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-20468645e096355230e75563dc64554719efc21c672d037931f81ae635b1d7bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjVtLwzAAhYMoOOb-Q8DnQu6Xx1E3FTb24ATfStokGumS2qTC_r3F7ekcDh_fuQELrLCuNCHs9toFFx_3YJVzaBFjkirF6QI0m1_TT6aEFKGJFm6dmYHQh3KGycOn4L0bXSxwn6zr8z-zd-Ur2Qx9GmGdTkPKoTj4Fk5TfxG95xA_4Trmc34Ad9702a2uuQTH7eZYv1S7w_Nrvd5Vg1alIogJJRh3SAvKOaHISc4Ftd08ciaxdr4juBOSWESlptgrbNzMttjK1tIleLxohzH9TC6X5jtNY5wfG4oUVoxxSekf7ShRAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3081844573</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires ; Müzel, Sarah David ; de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario ; Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros ; Guidi, Erick Siqueira ; Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado ; Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</creator><creatorcontrib>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires ; Müzel, Sarah David ; de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario ; Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros ; Guidi, Erick Siqueira ; Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado ; Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</creatorcontrib><description>The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1819-656X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1819-9224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hong Kong: International Association of Engineers</publisher><subject>Composite materials ; Finite element method ; Heterogeneity ; Mathematical models</subject><ispartof>IAENG international journal of computer science, 2024-07, Vol.51 (7), p.918</ispartof><rights>Copyright International Association of Engineers Jul 1, 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müzel, Sarah David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Erick Siqueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys</title><title>IAENG international journal of computer science</title><description>The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.</description><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><issn>1819-656X</issn><issn>1819-9224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjVtLwzAAhYMoOOb-Q8DnQu6Xx1E3FTb24ATfStokGumS2qTC_r3F7ekcDh_fuQELrLCuNCHs9toFFx_3YJVzaBFjkirF6QI0m1_TT6aEFKGJFm6dmYHQh3KGycOn4L0bXSxwn6zr8z-zd-Ur2Qx9GmGdTkPKoTj4Fk5TfxG95xA_4Trmc34Ad9702a2uuQTH7eZYv1S7w_Nrvd5Vg1alIogJJRh3SAvKOaHISc4Ftd08ciaxdr4juBOSWESlptgrbNzMttjK1tIleLxohzH9TC6X5jtNY5wfG4oUVoxxSekf7ShRAA</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires</creator><creator>Müzel, Sarah David</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario</creator><creator>Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros</creator><creator>Guidi, Erick Siqueira</creator><creator>Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado</creator><creator>Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</creator><general>International Association of Engineers</general><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys</title><author>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires ; Müzel, Sarah David ; de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario ; Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros ; Guidi, Erick Siqueira ; Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado ; Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-20468645e096355230e75563dc64554719efc21c672d037931f81ae635b1d7bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Müzel, Sarah David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, Erick Siqueira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</creatorcontrib><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IAENG international journal of computer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bonhin, Eduardo Pires</au><au>Müzel, Sarah David</au><au>de Oliveira, Geraldo Cesar Rosario</au><au>Tupinambá, Walter Luiz Medeiros</au><au>Guidi, Erick Siqueira</au><au>Silva, Carlos Alexis Alvarado</au><au>Silva, Fernando de Azevedo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys</atitle><jtitle>IAENG international journal of computer science</jtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>918</spage><pages>918-</pages><issn>1819-656X</issn><eissn>1819-9224</eissn><abstract>The utilization of composite materials in various engineering sectors has gained significant prominence due to their unique characteristics. However, owing to their inherent heterogeneity, these materials often exhibit nonlinear and unpredictable behaviors. Consequently, the finite element method has seen a growing application as an invaluable tool for analyzing composites subjected to diverse scenarios. This study aims to assess the advantages and disadvantages of ANSYS APDL and Workbench modules (specifically, ACP and Static Structural) while also examining the impact of the choice of elements in simulating composite materials. The results obtained reveal that, irrespective of the chosen method and element type, the strain patterns exhibited remarkable similarity. Nonetheless, models employing shell elements demonstrated a notable advantage, requiring fewer elements and nodes. Furthermore, the recommended model is the integrated ACP model. This preference is based in its capacity to simplify layer modeling and enable the detailed analysis of strains within each layer.</abstract><cop>Hong Kong</cop><pub>International Association of Engineers</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1819-656X
ispartof IAENG international journal of computer science, 2024-07, Vol.51 (7), p.918
issn 1819-656X
1819-9224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3081844573
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Composite materials
Finite element method
Heterogeneity
Mathematical models
title Evaluation and Feasibility of Different Models and Methods for Composite Simulation Using Ansys
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T03%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20Feasibility%20of%20Different%20Models%20and%20Methods%20for%20Composite%20Simulation%20Using%20Ansys&rft.jtitle=IAENG%20international%20journal%20of%20computer%20science&rft.au=Bonhin,%20Eduardo%20Pires&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=918&rft.pages=918-&rft.issn=1819-656X&rft.eissn=1819-9224&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3081844573%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3081844573&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true