Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool
Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational technology research and development 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1329 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1307 |
container_title | Educational technology research and development |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Jacobs, Jennifer Scornavacco, Karla Clevenger, Charis Suresh, Abhijit Sumner, Tamara |
description | Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3079620405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079620405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8kzgJu6riT6rEBtaWOxmXlDQutlOpO67B9TgJhiCxY6TRzOJ9ozePkHPOLjlj5VXgPBcyY6k5k7LK1AGZ8KJQmSoYP0w7y0XGlaiPyUkIa5aqVNWENLMhuo2J2FCL2CwNvFLX06YN4AYfkG7cDsM1jWjgBX34fP-gW_SA7S4hQ2y7Nu6ps9TQrXcWQ2hdbzraofF9269odK47JUfWdAHPfueUPN_ePM3vs8Xj3cN8tshAlCxmFpYlLm3VQFHKCqyqbV1zY0soBIdc5BZEsmgraZuyVoDAoEBplrKpIU9jSi7Gu8nK24Ah6nV6ItkJWrJECJazIqnEqALvQvBo9da3G-P3mjP9naYe09QpTf2TplYJkiMUkrhfof87_Q_1Bc61e5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079620405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Automation ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Feedback ; Instructional Improvement ; Learning and Instruction ; Mathematics Teachers ; Professional Training ; Research Article ; Teacher attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scornavacco, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clevenger, Charis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Instructional Improvement</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Teachers</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Teacher attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8kzgJu6riT6rEBtaWOxmXlDQutlOpO67B9TgJhiCxY6TRzOJ9ozePkHPOLjlj5VXgPBcyY6k5k7LK1AGZ8KJQmSoYP0w7y0XGlaiPyUkIa5aqVNWENLMhuo2J2FCL2CwNvFLX06YN4AYfkG7cDsM1jWjgBX34fP-gW_SA7S4hQ2y7Nu6ps9TQrXcWQ2hdbzraofF9269odK47JUfWdAHPfueUPN_ePM3vs8Xj3cN8tshAlCxmFpYlLm3VQFHKCqyqbV1zY0soBIdc5BZEsmgraZuyVoDAoEBplrKpIU9jSi7Gu8nK24Ah6nV6ItkJWrJECJazIqnEqALvQvBo9da3G-P3mjP9naYe09QpTf2TplYJkiMUkrhfof87_Q_1Bc61e5k</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Jacobs, Jennifer</creator><creator>Scornavacco, Karla</creator><creator>Clevenger, Charis</creator><creator>Suresh, Abhijit</creator><creator>Sumner, Tamara</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><author>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Instructional Improvement</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Teachers</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Teacher attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scornavacco, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clevenger, Charis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobs, Jennifer</au><au>Scornavacco, Karla</au><au>Clevenger, Charis</au><au>Suresh, Abhijit</au><au>Sumner, Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1307-1329</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-1629 |
ispartof | Educational technology research and development, 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329 |
issn | 1042-1629 1556-6501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3079620405 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Automation Education Educational Technology Feedback Instructional Improvement Learning and Instruction Mathematics Teachers Professional Training Research Article Teacher attitudes Teachers Teaching |
title | Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A50%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20feedback%20on%20discourse%20moves:%20teachers%E2%80%99%20perceived%20utility%20of%20a%20professional%20learning%20tool&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Jacobs,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1307-1329&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079620405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079620405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |