Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool

Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational technology research and development 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329
Hauptverfasser: Jacobs, Jennifer, Scornavacco, Karla, Clevenger, Charis, Suresh, Abhijit, Sumner, Tamara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1329
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1307
container_title Educational technology research and development
container_volume 72
creator Jacobs, Jennifer
Scornavacco, Karla
Clevenger, Charis
Suresh, Abhijit
Sumner, Tamara
description Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3079620405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3079620405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8kzgJu6riT6rEBtaWOxmXlDQutlOpO67B9TgJhiCxY6TRzOJ9ozePkHPOLjlj5VXgPBcyY6k5k7LK1AGZ8KJQmSoYP0w7y0XGlaiPyUkIa5aqVNWENLMhuo2J2FCL2CwNvFLX06YN4AYfkG7cDsM1jWjgBX34fP-gW_SA7S4hQ2y7Nu6ps9TQrXcWQ2hdbzraofF9269odK47JUfWdAHPfueUPN_ePM3vs8Xj3cN8tshAlCxmFpYlLm3VQFHKCqyqbV1zY0soBIdc5BZEsmgraZuyVoDAoEBplrKpIU9jSi7Gu8nK24Ah6nV6ItkJWrJECJazIqnEqALvQvBo9da3G-P3mjP9naYe09QpTf2TplYJkiMUkrhfof87_Q_1Bc61e5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3079620405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-1629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-6501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Automation ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Feedback ; Instructional Improvement ; Learning and Instruction ; Mathematics Teachers ; Professional Training ; Research Article ; Teacher attitudes ; Teachers ; Teaching</subject><ispartof>Educational technology research and development, 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329</ispartof><rights>Association for Educational Communications and Technology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scornavacco, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clevenger, Charis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><title>Educational technology research and development</title><addtitle>Education Tech Research Dev</addtitle><description>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</description><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Instructional Improvement</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Teachers</subject><subject>Professional Training</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Teacher attitudes</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><issn>1042-1629</issn><issn>1556-6501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAf8kzgJu6riT6rEBtaWOxmXlDQutlOpO67B9TgJhiCxY6TRzOJ9ozePkHPOLjlj5VXgPBcyY6k5k7LK1AGZ8KJQmSoYP0w7y0XGlaiPyUkIa5aqVNWENLMhuo2J2FCL2CwNvFLX06YN4AYfkG7cDsM1jWjgBX34fP-gW_SA7S4hQ2y7Nu6ps9TQrXcWQ2hdbzraofF9269odK47JUfWdAHPfueUPN_ePM3vs8Xj3cN8tshAlCxmFpYlLm3VQFHKCqyqbV1zY0soBIdc5BZEsmgraZuyVoDAoEBplrKpIU9jSi7Gu8nK24Ah6nV6ItkJWrJECJazIqnEqALvQvBo9da3G-P3mjP9naYe09QpTf2TplYJkiMUkrhfof87_Q_1Bc61e5k</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Jacobs, Jennifer</creator><creator>Scornavacco, Karla</creator><creator>Clevenger, Charis</creator><creator>Suresh, Abhijit</creator><creator>Sumner, Tamara</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</title><author>Jacobs, Jennifer ; Scornavacco, Karla ; Clevenger, Charis ; Suresh, Abhijit ; Sumner, Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-fcb7ebf8dc5738cf69f991af7c521c424fc2edbf83fd796cec0c5e3ab3d9c4ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Instructional Improvement</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Teachers</topic><topic>Professional Training</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Teacher attitudes</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scornavacco, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clevenger, Charis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suresh, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumner, Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jacobs, Jennifer</au><au>Scornavacco, Karla</au><au>Clevenger, Charis</au><au>Suresh, Abhijit</au><au>Sumner, Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool</atitle><jtitle>Educational technology research and development</jtitle><stitle>Education Tech Research Dev</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1307</spage><epage>1329</epage><pages>1307-1329</pages><issn>1042-1629</issn><eissn>1556-6501</eissn><abstract>Technological tools that provide automated feedback on classroom teaching afford a unique opportunity for educators to engage in self-reflection and work towards improvement goals, in particular to ensure that their instructional environment is equitable and productive for students. More information is needed about how teachers experience automated professional learning tools, including what they perceive as relevant and impactful for their everyday teaching. This mixed-methods study explored the perceptions and engagement of 21 math teachers who used an AI-based tool that generates information about their discourse practices from classroom recordings. Findings indicate that teachers perceived the tool to have a high utility value, especially those who elected to use it over two school years. These teachers increased their use of talk moves over time, suggesting that they were making intentional changes due to their review and uptake of the personalized feedback. These results from this study speak to promising directions for developing AI-based professional learning tools that can support teacher learning and instructional improvement, particularly tools with robust perceived utility.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2300-4771</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-1629
ispartof Educational technology research and development, 2024-06, Vol.72 (3), p.1307-1329
issn 1042-1629
1556-6501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3079620405
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Automation
Education
Educational Technology
Feedback
Instructional Improvement
Learning and Instruction
Mathematics Teachers
Professional Training
Research Article
Teacher attitudes
Teachers
Teaching
title Automated feedback on discourse moves: teachers’ perceived utility of a professional learning tool
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A50%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20feedback%20on%20discourse%20moves:%20teachers%E2%80%99%20perceived%20utility%20of%20a%20professional%20learning%20tool&rft.jtitle=Educational%20technology%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Jacobs,%20Jennifer&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1307&rft.epage=1329&rft.pages=1307-1329&rft.issn=1042-1629&rft.eissn=1556-6501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11423-023-10338-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3079620405%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3079620405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true