Choice between Sustainable versus Conventional Investments—Relative Efficiency Analysis from Global and Regional Stock Markets

We use the daily data from 1 October 2010 to 1 March 2021 on the stock prices of several global, regional, and country-specific ESG indices of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index family (DJSI) and MSCI family to analyse the relative performance of sustainable indices (ESG) and corresponding conventio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2024-07, Vol.16 (13), p.5340
Hauptverfasser: Rehman, Mohd Ziaur, Nain, Md Zulquar, Alhashim, Mohammed, Bhat, Javed Ahmad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We use the daily data from 1 October 2010 to 1 March 2021 on the stock prices of several global, regional, and country-specific ESG indices of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index family (DJSI) and MSCI family to analyse the relative performance of sustainable indices (ESG) and corresponding conventional benchmarks. In terms of classic risk and return characteristics and modern portfolio metrics, we report mixed evidence with some sustainability indices marginally outperforming the traditional benchmarks and others staying at parity. Regionally, the evidence is heterogeneous; the Pan Arab, the Middle East (including Israel), the United States, Emerging Markets, and Europe indices reported a slightly superior performance and those belonging to Asia Pacific, Emerging Africa, and Latin America marginally underperformed compared to their conventional counterparts. The findings of this study imply that sustainable investments appear to be an encouraging investment option, although their progress has not been substantial. For an appreciable outperformance of sustainable investments, a more conducive regulatory framework should be established, including robust incentivizing policies concerning tax rebates or low capital costs.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su16135340