Extending dual-class stock: A proposal
The increasing use of dual-class voting structures in public companies—and the frequency with which such structures contain sunset provisions—raises the issue of when and how such sunset provisions should be modified, extending the company’s use of the dual-class structure. Recent decisions have app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theoretical inquiries in law 2024-06, Vol.25 (1), p.23-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 41 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 23 |
container_title | Theoretical inquiries in law |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Berger, David J. Fisch, Jill Solomon, Steven Davidoff |
description | The increasing use of dual-class voting structures in public companies—and the frequency with which such structures contain sunset provisions—raises the issue of when and how such sunset provisions should be modified, extending the company’s use of the dual-class structure. Recent decisions have applied the entire fairness legal standard to dual-class extensions, but, in the recent Trade Desk case, the Delaware Chancery court concluded that the extension complied with the MFW standard and should therefore receive the protection of the business judgment rule.
We question the practicality of applying either entire fairness or MFW to dual-class extensions. Instead, we argue for a contractual approach in which the initial charter specifies the conditions under which a dual-class structure can be extended. The contractual approach increases the information available to shareholders at the IPO stage, thereby improving market efficiency. We argue that extensions that comply with such charter provisions should be insulated from entire fairness review. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/til-2024-0003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3077603236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3077603236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-8cf3615a4b26975ed4cef2d3d00ca05e6cd98363215813e5f29af9c7b5f523923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gOCu9F75-YmTXeltCoU3Oh6mM6jtMamziRo_70pLbhxdc7iPOAT4hbhARn5sV3XUoHKJQDQmRggFywph_z85JGhuhRXKW0AkMtcDcT97Kf1W7ferjLXmVra2qSUpbaxH-Nsku1is2uSqa_FRTB18jcnHYr3-ext-iwXr08v08lCWsSS5MgGKpBNvlRFVbJ3ufVBOXIA1gD7wrpqRAUp5BGS56AqEypbLjmwokrRUNwdd_vjr86nVm-aLm77S01QlgWQ6utDIY8pG5uUog96F9efJu41gj6g0D0KfUChDyj6_PiY_zZ166Pzq9jte_M3_m9PMSqiX70NYkc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3077603236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extending dual-class stock: A proposal</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Berger, David J. ; Fisch, Jill ; Solomon, Steven Davidoff</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, David J. ; Fisch, Jill ; Solomon, Steven Davidoff</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing use of dual-class voting structures in public companies—and the frequency with which such structures contain sunset provisions—raises the issue of when and how such sunset provisions should be modified, extending the company’s use of the dual-class structure. Recent decisions have applied the entire fairness legal standard to dual-class extensions, but, in the recent Trade Desk case, the Delaware Chancery court concluded that the extension complied with the MFW standard and should therefore receive the protection of the business judgment rule.
We question the practicality of applying either entire fairness or MFW to dual-class extensions. Instead, we argue for a contractual approach in which the initial charter specifies the conditions under which a dual-class structure can be extended. The contractual approach increases the information available to shareholders at the IPO stage, thereby improving market efficiency. We argue that extensions that comply with such charter provisions should be insulated from entire fairness review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1565-1509</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1565-3404</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/til-2024-0003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tel Aviv: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>Sunset provisions</subject><ispartof>Theoretical inquiries in law, 2024-06, Vol.25 (1), p.23-41</ispartof><rights>2024 by Theoretical Inquiries in Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven Davidoff</creatorcontrib><title>Extending dual-class stock: A proposal</title><title>Theoretical inquiries in law</title><description>The increasing use of dual-class voting structures in public companies—and the frequency with which such structures contain sunset provisions—raises the issue of when and how such sunset provisions should be modified, extending the company’s use of the dual-class structure. Recent decisions have applied the entire fairness legal standard to dual-class extensions, but, in the recent Trade Desk case, the Delaware Chancery court concluded that the extension complied with the MFW standard and should therefore receive the protection of the business judgment rule.
We question the practicality of applying either entire fairness or MFW to dual-class extensions. Instead, we argue for a contractual approach in which the initial charter specifies the conditions under which a dual-class structure can be extended. The contractual approach increases the information available to shareholders at the IPO stage, thereby improving market efficiency. We argue that extensions that comply with such charter provisions should be insulated from entire fairness review.</description><subject>Sunset provisions</subject><issn>1565-1509</issn><issn>1565-3404</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtLw0AUhQdRsFaX7gOCu9F75-YmTXeltCoU3Oh6mM6jtMamziRo_70pLbhxdc7iPOAT4hbhARn5sV3XUoHKJQDQmRggFywph_z85JGhuhRXKW0AkMtcDcT97Kf1W7ferjLXmVra2qSUpbaxH-Nsku1is2uSqa_FRTB18jcnHYr3-ext-iwXr08v08lCWsSS5MgGKpBNvlRFVbJ3ufVBOXIA1gD7wrpqRAUp5BGS56AqEypbLjmwokrRUNwdd_vjr86nVm-aLm77S01QlgWQ6utDIY8pG5uUog96F9efJu41gj6g0D0KfUChDyj6_PiY_zZ166Pzq9jte_M3_m9PMSqiX70NYkc</recordid><startdate>20240625</startdate><enddate>20240625</enddate><creator>Berger, David J.</creator><creator>Fisch, Jill</creator><creator>Solomon, Steven Davidoff</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Walter De Gruyter & Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240625</creationdate><title>Extending dual-class stock: A proposal</title><author>Berger, David J. ; Fisch, Jill ; Solomon, Steven Davidoff</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-8cf3615a4b26975ed4cef2d3d00ca05e6cd98363215813e5f29af9c7b5f523923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Sunset provisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisch, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Steven Davidoff</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Theoretical inquiries in law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, David J.</au><au>Fisch, Jill</au><au>Solomon, Steven Davidoff</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extending dual-class stock: A proposal</atitle><jtitle>Theoretical inquiries in law</jtitle><date>2024-06-25</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>23-41</pages><issn>1565-1509</issn><eissn>1565-3404</eissn><abstract>The increasing use of dual-class voting structures in public companies—and the frequency with which such structures contain sunset provisions—raises the issue of when and how such sunset provisions should be modified, extending the company’s use of the dual-class structure. Recent decisions have applied the entire fairness legal standard to dual-class extensions, but, in the recent Trade Desk case, the Delaware Chancery court concluded that the extension complied with the MFW standard and should therefore receive the protection of the business judgment rule.
We question the practicality of applying either entire fairness or MFW to dual-class extensions. Instead, we argue for a contractual approach in which the initial charter specifies the conditions under which a dual-class structure can be extended. The contractual approach increases the information available to shareholders at the IPO stage, thereby improving market efficiency. We argue that extensions that comply with such charter provisions should be insulated from entire fairness review.</abstract><cop>Tel Aviv</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/til-2024-0003</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1565-1509 |
ispartof | Theoretical inquiries in law, 2024-06, Vol.25 (1), p.23-41 |
issn | 1565-1509 1565-3404 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3077603236 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Sunset provisions |
title | Extending dual-class stock: A proposal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A26%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extending%20dual-class%20stock:%20A%20proposal&rft.jtitle=Theoretical%20inquiries%20in%20law&rft.au=Berger,%20David%20J.&rft.date=2024-06-25&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=23-41&rft.issn=1565-1509&rft.eissn=1565-3404&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/til-2024-0003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3077603236%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3077603236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |