Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative
Different manifestations of infrastructure diplomacy have been used as a prime example of how major powers dissatisfied with their position in the international system have been using economic tools to pursue their national objectives. On the other hand, the status quo powers have attempted to count...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.229-249 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 249 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 229 |
container_title | Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Grgić, Gorana Kolar, Đuro Bašić, Maja |
description | Different manifestations of infrastructure diplomacy have been used as a prime example of how major powers dissatisfied with their position in the international system have been using economic tools to pursue their national objectives. On the other hand, the status quo powers have attempted to counter these moves by implementing their own versions of infrastructure diplomacy. This article explores the said dynamics within the context of the Three Seas Initiative (TSI). Merging insights from international relations, international economics and strategic project management, this article interrogates how the heightened geopolitical competition spills over to regional economies through infrastructure diplomacy and major infrastructure projects and whether and how policymakers deploy economic tools in major infrastructure projects to promote geopolitical interests within the TSI. Our findings imply that while informal state-to-state signalling is a predecessor to corporate-to-corporate signalling, formal state-to-state signals also support corporate-to-corporate actions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14683857.2022.2111803 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3076861673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076861673</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ca7dd1c83be393774656a3556a29b271820092e839d636a591ab628bd0ac54ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQh43ppkdpPsTSn-KRQEreeQZrNtyjZbk6zSb29K69XLzDC892b4IXRLyYQSSe5pySXISkwYYWzCKKWSwBkaUVFCUXOoz_OcNcVBdImuYtwQwqBkYoTeZ74NOqYwmDQEixu36_qtNnusfYPzXie7cgZHt_K665xf4R-X1s7jtLZ4sQ7W4g-rI555l5xO7tteo4tWd9HenPoYfT4_LaavxfztZTZ9nBcGQKbCaNE01EhYWqhBiJJXXEOVC6uXTFDJCKmZlVA3HLiuaqqXnMllQ7SpStvCGN0dc3eh_xpsTGrTDyF_GRUQwSWnXEBWVUeVCX2MwbZqF9xWh72iRB3wqT986oBPnfBl38PR53zbh63-6UPXqKT3XR8yMW9cPvN_xC-Ignae</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076861673</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Grgić, Gorana ; Kolar, Đuro ; Bašić, Maja</creator><creatorcontrib>Grgić, Gorana ; Kolar, Đuro ; Bašić, Maja</creatorcontrib><description>Different manifestations of infrastructure diplomacy have been used as a prime example of how major powers dissatisfied with their position in the international system have been using economic tools to pursue their national objectives. On the other hand, the status quo powers have attempted to counter these moves by implementing their own versions of infrastructure diplomacy. This article explores the said dynamics within the context of the Three Seas Initiative (TSI). Merging insights from international relations, international economics and strategic project management, this article interrogates how the heightened geopolitical competition spills over to regional economies through infrastructure diplomacy and major infrastructure projects and whether and how policymakers deploy economic tools in major infrastructure projects to promote geopolitical interests within the TSI. Our findings imply that while informal state-to-state signalling is a predecessor to corporate-to-corporate signalling, formal state-to-state signals also support corporate-to-corporate actions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-3857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9639</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14683857.2022.2111803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Diplomacy ; European Union ; Geopolitics ; Infrastructure ; infrastructure diplomacy ; International economics ; International finance ; International relations ; Policy making ; Project management ; Russia ; signalling ; State ; Three Seas Initiative ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.229-249</ispartof><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2022</rights><rights>2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ca7dd1c83be393774656a3556a29b271820092e839d636a591ab628bd0ac54ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ca7dd1c83be393774656a3556a29b271820092e839d636a591ab628bd0ac54ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0680-9524 ; 0000-0003-1825-9427 ; 0000-0002-1842-7091</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grgić, Gorana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolar, Đuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bašić, Maja</creatorcontrib><title>Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative</title><title>Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies</title><description>Different manifestations of infrastructure diplomacy have been used as a prime example of how major powers dissatisfied with their position in the international system have been using economic tools to pursue their national objectives. On the other hand, the status quo powers have attempted to counter these moves by implementing their own versions of infrastructure diplomacy. This article explores the said dynamics within the context of the Three Seas Initiative (TSI). Merging insights from international relations, international economics and strategic project management, this article interrogates how the heightened geopolitical competition spills over to regional economies through infrastructure diplomacy and major infrastructure projects and whether and how policymakers deploy economic tools in major infrastructure projects to promote geopolitical interests within the TSI. Our findings imply that while informal state-to-state signalling is a predecessor to corporate-to-corporate signalling, formal state-to-state signals also support corporate-to-corporate actions.</description><subject>Diplomacy</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>infrastructure diplomacy</subject><subject>International economics</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Russia</subject><subject>signalling</subject><subject>State</subject><subject>Three Seas Initiative</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1468-3857</issn><issn>1743-9639</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQQh43ppkdpPsTSn-KRQEreeQZrNtyjZbk6zSb29K69XLzDC892b4IXRLyYQSSe5pySXISkwYYWzCKKWSwBkaUVFCUXOoz_OcNcVBdImuYtwQwqBkYoTeZ74NOqYwmDQEixu36_qtNnusfYPzXie7cgZHt_K665xf4R-X1s7jtLZ4sQ7W4g-rI555l5xO7tteo4tWd9HenPoYfT4_LaavxfztZTZ9nBcGQKbCaNE01EhYWqhBiJJXXEOVC6uXTFDJCKmZlVA3HLiuaqqXnMllQ7SpStvCGN0dc3eh_xpsTGrTDyF_GRUQwSWnXEBWVUeVCX2MwbZqF9xWh72iRB3wqT986oBPnfBl38PR53zbh63-6UPXqKT3XR8yMW9cPvN_xC-Ignae</recordid><startdate>20230403</startdate><enddate>20230403</enddate><creator>Grgić, Gorana</creator><creator>Kolar, Đuro</creator><creator>Bašić, Maja</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-9524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-7091</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230403</creationdate><title>Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative</title><author>Grgić, Gorana ; Kolar, Đuro ; Bašić, Maja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-ca7dd1c83be393774656a3556a29b271820092e839d636a591ab628bd0ac54ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Diplomacy</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>infrastructure diplomacy</topic><topic>International economics</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Russia</topic><topic>signalling</topic><topic>State</topic><topic>Three Seas Initiative</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grgić, Gorana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolar, Đuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bašić, Maja</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grgić, Gorana</au><au>Kolar, Đuro</au><au>Bašić, Maja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative</atitle><jtitle>Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies</jtitle><date>2023-04-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>229</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>229-249</pages><issn>1468-3857</issn><eissn>1743-9639</eissn><abstract>Different manifestations of infrastructure diplomacy have been used as a prime example of how major powers dissatisfied with their position in the international system have been using economic tools to pursue their national objectives. On the other hand, the status quo powers have attempted to counter these moves by implementing their own versions of infrastructure diplomacy. This article explores the said dynamics within the context of the Three Seas Initiative (TSI). Merging insights from international relations, international economics and strategic project management, this article interrogates how the heightened geopolitical competition spills over to regional economies through infrastructure diplomacy and major infrastructure projects and whether and how policymakers deploy economic tools in major infrastructure projects to promote geopolitical interests within the TSI. Our findings imply that while informal state-to-state signalling is a predecessor to corporate-to-corporate signalling, formal state-to-state signals also support corporate-to-corporate actions.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14683857.2022.2111803</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-9524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1825-9427</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-7091</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-3857 |
ispartof | Journal of southeast European and Black Sea studies, 2023-04, Vol.23 (2), p.229-249 |
issn | 1468-3857 1743-9639 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3076861673 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Diplomacy European Union Geopolitics Infrastructure infrastructure diplomacy International economics International finance International relations Policy making Project management Russia signalling State Three Seas Initiative United States |
title | Infrastructure diplomacy and strategic signalling within the Three Seas Initiative |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T04%3A52%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infrastructure%20diplomacy%20and%20strategic%20signalling%20within%20the%20Three%20Seas%20Initiative&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20southeast%20European%20and%20Black%20Sea%20studies&rft.au=Grgi%C4%87,%20Gorana&rft.date=2023-04-03&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=229-249&rft.issn=1468-3857&rft.eissn=1743-9639&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14683857.2022.2111803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076861673%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076861673&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |