Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer

This report is focused on understanding the mixing performance of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in an SMX static mixer through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study in Simcenter STAR‐CCM+. For this, the standard SMX mixer with four mixer elements of radius 26 mm was chosen. The aspect ratio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of chemical engineering 2024-08, Vol.102 (8), p.2768-2785
Hauptverfasser: Gayen, Neelabja, Swamy, Srikanth, Hari, Sridhar, Sonawane, Shirish H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2785
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2768
container_title Canadian journal of chemical engineering
container_volume 102
creator Gayen, Neelabja
Swamy, Srikanth
Hari, Sridhar
Sonawane, Shirish H.
description This report is focused on understanding the mixing performance of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in an SMX static mixer through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study in Simcenter STAR‐CCM+. For this, the standard SMX mixer with four mixer elements of radius 26 mm was chosen. The aspect ratio (L/D) was taken as 1. The model constructed was compared using pressure drop ratio values available in literature. First, the design was validated for Newtonian fluid, then for shear‐thinning fluid (non‐Newtonian). Mixing patterns produced through particle tracking approach revealed how blending improved as the fluid moved downstream and interacted with increasing number of mixer elements. A sensitivity study was undertaken to investigate the effect of particle injection mechanism on the mixing process. Two injection methods, vertical and horizontal, were explored to check the influence of injection position on mixing. The results indicate that for the given configuration irrespective of the injection location, at least four mixing elements are needed to achieve good mixing for both Newtonian and shear‐thinning fluids investigated in this study. Statistical reports were used to quantify mixing to understand the mixing behaviour for Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids with change in Reynolds number. At high Reynolds number, non‐Newtonian fluids exhibited better mixing abilities. Further, efforts were taken to optimize the various design parameters to produce the most optimum solution with a single mixer element for Newtonian fluid.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cjce.25232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3076525073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076525073</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2602-76bd6d827a2bee68e8b3a279ab992788336f38b7e841cea7e76eb5133ceaa3c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsbnyDgTpian5kks5ShVkvVhQrdhUzmjqS0mZpMqd35CD6jT-LUEdy5unyX890LB6FzSkaUEHZlFxZGLGOcHaABzXmeEJrPD9GAEKKSlPD0GJ3EuOgiIykdoOnMrJw3Aa_cu_OvuKnxA2zbxjvjsfEV9o3_-vj829XLjasidh4_3c9xbE3r7L4M4RQd1WYZ4ex3DtHLzfi5uE1mj5O74nqWWCYIS6QoK1EpJg0rAYQCVXLDZG7KPGdSKc5FzVUpQaXUgpEgBZQZ5bwLhlvJh-iiv7sOzdsGYqsXzSb47qXmRIqMZUTyjrrsKRuaGAPUeh3cyoSdpkTvXem9K_3jqoNpD2_dEnb_kLqYFuO-8w3femw0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076525073</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gayen, Neelabja ; Swamy, Srikanth ; Hari, Sridhar ; Sonawane, Shirish H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gayen, Neelabja ; Swamy, Srikanth ; Hari, Sridhar ; Sonawane, Shirish H.</creatorcontrib><description>This report is focused on understanding the mixing performance of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in an SMX static mixer through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study in Simcenter STAR‐CCM+. For this, the standard SMX mixer with four mixer elements of radius 26 mm was chosen. The aspect ratio (L/D) was taken as 1. The model constructed was compared using pressure drop ratio values available in literature. First, the design was validated for Newtonian fluid, then for shear‐thinning fluid (non‐Newtonian). Mixing patterns produced through particle tracking approach revealed how blending improved as the fluid moved downstream and interacted with increasing number of mixer elements. A sensitivity study was undertaken to investigate the effect of particle injection mechanism on the mixing process. Two injection methods, vertical and horizontal, were explored to check the influence of injection position on mixing. The results indicate that for the given configuration irrespective of the injection location, at least four mixing elements are needed to achieve good mixing for both Newtonian and shear‐thinning fluids investigated in this study. Statistical reports were used to quantify mixing to understand the mixing behaviour for Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids with change in Reynolds number. At high Reynolds number, non‐Newtonian fluids exhibited better mixing abilities. Further, efforts were taken to optimize the various design parameters to produce the most optimum solution with a single mixer element for Newtonian fluid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-4034</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-019X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cjce.25232</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aspect ratio ; coefficient of variance ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Design optimization ; Design parameters ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; High Reynolds number ; Laminar mixing ; Mixers ; Newtonian fluids ; non‐Newtonian mixing ; Particle injection ; Particle tracking ; Pressure drop ; Reynolds number ; single SMX mixer ; static mixer ; Thinning</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of chemical engineering, 2024-08, Vol.102 (8), p.2768-2785</ispartof><rights>2024 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering.</rights><rights>2024 Canadian Society for Chemical Engineering</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2602-76bd6d827a2bee68e8b3a279ab992788336f38b7e841cea7e76eb5133ceaa3c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3201-6731</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcjce.25232$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcjce.25232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gayen, Neelabja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamy, Srikanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hari, Sridhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Shirish H.</creatorcontrib><title>Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer</title><title>Canadian journal of chemical engineering</title><description>This report is focused on understanding the mixing performance of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in an SMX static mixer through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study in Simcenter STAR‐CCM+. For this, the standard SMX mixer with four mixer elements of radius 26 mm was chosen. The aspect ratio (L/D) was taken as 1. The model constructed was compared using pressure drop ratio values available in literature. First, the design was validated for Newtonian fluid, then for shear‐thinning fluid (non‐Newtonian). Mixing patterns produced through particle tracking approach revealed how blending improved as the fluid moved downstream and interacted with increasing number of mixer elements. A sensitivity study was undertaken to investigate the effect of particle injection mechanism on the mixing process. Two injection methods, vertical and horizontal, were explored to check the influence of injection position on mixing. The results indicate that for the given configuration irrespective of the injection location, at least four mixing elements are needed to achieve good mixing for both Newtonian and shear‐thinning fluids investigated in this study. Statistical reports were used to quantify mixing to understand the mixing behaviour for Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids with change in Reynolds number. At high Reynolds number, non‐Newtonian fluids exhibited better mixing abilities. Further, efforts were taken to optimize the various design parameters to produce the most optimum solution with a single mixer element for Newtonian fluid.</description><subject>Aspect ratio</subject><subject>coefficient of variance</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Design parameters</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>High Reynolds number</subject><subject>Laminar mixing</subject><subject>Mixers</subject><subject>Newtonian fluids</subject><subject>non‐Newtonian mixing</subject><subject>Particle injection</subject><subject>Particle tracking</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>single SMX mixer</subject><subject>static mixer</subject><subject>Thinning</subject><issn>0008-4034</issn><issn>1939-019X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsbnyDgTpian5kks5ShVkvVhQrdhUzmjqS0mZpMqd35CD6jT-LUEdy5unyX890LB6FzSkaUEHZlFxZGLGOcHaABzXmeEJrPD9GAEKKSlPD0GJ3EuOgiIykdoOnMrJw3Aa_cu_OvuKnxA2zbxjvjsfEV9o3_-vj829XLjasidh4_3c9xbE3r7L4M4RQd1WYZ4ex3DtHLzfi5uE1mj5O74nqWWCYIS6QoK1EpJg0rAYQCVXLDZG7KPGdSKc5FzVUpQaXUgpEgBZQZ5bwLhlvJh-iiv7sOzdsGYqsXzSb47qXmRIqMZUTyjrrsKRuaGAPUeh3cyoSdpkTvXem9K_3jqoNpD2_dEnb_kLqYFuO-8w3femw0</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Gayen, Neelabja</creator><creator>Swamy, Srikanth</creator><creator>Hari, Sridhar</creator><creator>Sonawane, Shirish H.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6731</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer</title><author>Gayen, Neelabja ; Swamy, Srikanth ; Hari, Sridhar ; Sonawane, Shirish H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2602-76bd6d827a2bee68e8b3a279ab992788336f38b7e841cea7e76eb5133ceaa3c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aspect ratio</topic><topic>coefficient of variance</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Design parameters</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>High Reynolds number</topic><topic>Laminar mixing</topic><topic>Mixers</topic><topic>Newtonian fluids</topic><topic>non‐Newtonian mixing</topic><topic>Particle injection</topic><topic>Particle tracking</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>single SMX mixer</topic><topic>static mixer</topic><topic>Thinning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gayen, Neelabja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swamy, Srikanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hari, Sridhar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonawane, Shirish H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of chemical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gayen, Neelabja</au><au>Swamy, Srikanth</au><au>Hari, Sridhar</au><au>Sonawane, Shirish H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of chemical engineering</jtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2768</spage><epage>2785</epage><pages>2768-2785</pages><issn>0008-4034</issn><eissn>1939-019X</eissn><abstract>This report is focused on understanding the mixing performance of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in an SMX static mixer through computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study in Simcenter STAR‐CCM+. For this, the standard SMX mixer with four mixer elements of radius 26 mm was chosen. The aspect ratio (L/D) was taken as 1. The model constructed was compared using pressure drop ratio values available in literature. First, the design was validated for Newtonian fluid, then for shear‐thinning fluid (non‐Newtonian). Mixing patterns produced through particle tracking approach revealed how blending improved as the fluid moved downstream and interacted with increasing number of mixer elements. A sensitivity study was undertaken to investigate the effect of particle injection mechanism on the mixing process. Two injection methods, vertical and horizontal, were explored to check the influence of injection position on mixing. The results indicate that for the given configuration irrespective of the injection location, at least four mixing elements are needed to achieve good mixing for both Newtonian and shear‐thinning fluids investigated in this study. Statistical reports were used to quantify mixing to understand the mixing behaviour for Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids with change in Reynolds number. At high Reynolds number, non‐Newtonian fluids exhibited better mixing abilities. Further, efforts were taken to optimize the various design parameters to produce the most optimum solution with a single mixer element for Newtonian fluid.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cjce.25232</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3201-6731</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-4034
ispartof Canadian journal of chemical engineering, 2024-08, Vol.102 (8), p.2768-2785
issn 0008-4034
1939-019X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3076525073
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aspect ratio
coefficient of variance
Computational fluid dynamics
Design optimization
Design parameters
Fluid flow
Fluids
High Reynolds number
Laminar mixing
Mixers
Newtonian fluids
non‐Newtonian mixing
Particle injection
Particle tracking
Pressure drop
Reynolds number
single SMX mixer
static mixer
Thinning
title Laminar mixing of Newtonian and non‐Newtonian fluids in SMX static mixer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A11%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laminar%20mixing%20of%20Newtonian%20and%20non%E2%80%90Newtonian%20fluids%20in%20SMX%20static%20mixer&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20chemical%20engineering&rft.au=Gayen,%20Neelabja&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2768&rft.epage=2785&rft.pages=2768-2785&rft.issn=0008-4034&rft.eissn=1939-019X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cjce.25232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076525073%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076525073&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true