Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks

Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Landscape ecology 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128
Hauptverfasser: Olimpi, Elissa M., Ke, Alison, Baur, Patrick, Carlisle, Liz, Esquivel, Kenzo E., Glaser, Tyler, Snyder, William E., Waterhouse, Hannah, Bowles, Timothy M., Kremen, Claire, Karp, Daniel S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 128
container_issue 7
container_start_page 128
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 39
creator Olimpi, Elissa M.
Ke, Alison
Baur, Patrick
Carlisle, Liz
Esquivel, Kenzo E.
Glaser, Tyler
Snyder, William E.
Waterhouse, Hannah
Bowles, Timothy M.
Kremen, Claire
Karp, Daniel S.
description Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks. Objectives We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety. Methods We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic E. coli , Campylobacter spp . , and Salmonella spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks. Results Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields. Conclusions Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3076132431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153718091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JofnoH-hJ0EsuTmYk27KPITQfEMglexZja7yrZFfaSnLL5tfXyQZScshpBuZ5h2GeoviBcIYA-jwhdC2UIKsSsANd7r4Uh1hrWXa6wYP_-m_FUUqPAKAUwGERFn4Z6ZmtSLxxnvIUaS1W1LtMOQmKYfJWjBQ3SfTseXRZ9C5aMQSfOP6h7IIXf11ehSkL9ivyg_NLMYZg-xA9iy3NsyV7EV16SifF15HWib-_1eNicfXr4fKmvLu_vr28uCsHqXUuLfLAVMkOqYMe0Day1Z2SgKpu-mpsLLSo0I51ZytgTbKtFNV2kCM2lbbquDjd793G8HvilM3GpYHXa_IcpmQU1kpjCx3O6M8P6GOYop-vMwrmjylZqRdK7qkhhpQij2Yb3YbiziCYFwdm78DMDsyrA7ObQ2ofSjPslxzfV3-S-gfVE4va</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076132431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks. Objectives We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety. Methods We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic E. coli , Campylobacter spp . , and Salmonella spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks. Results Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields. Conclusions Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; California ; Campylobacter ; Conservation ; Contamination ; Context ; Crop fields ; E coli ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Escherichia coli ; Farm management ; Farming systems ; farmland preservation ; Farms ; Fecal coliforms ; Feces ; Food consumption ; Food contamination ; food pathogens ; Food safety ; Foodborne diseases ; foodborne illness ; Foodborne pathogens ; Grazing ; habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Health risks ; humans ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape preservation ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; landscapes ; lettuce ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Pathogens ; Rangelands ; Research Article ; Safety ; Salmonella ; species ; Species diversity ; Sustainable Development ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41099,41467,42168,42536,51297,51554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterhouse, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks. Objectives We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety. Methods We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic E. coli , Campylobacter spp . , and Salmonella spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks. Results Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields. Conclusions Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>farmland preservation</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fecal coliforms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>food pathogens</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Foodborne diseases</subject><subject>foodborne illness</subject><subject>Foodborne pathogens</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>lettuce</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JofnoH-hJ0EsuTmYk27KPITQfEMglexZja7yrZFfaSnLL5tfXyQZScshpBuZ5h2GeoviBcIYA-jwhdC2UIKsSsANd7r4Uh1hrWXa6wYP_-m_FUUqPAKAUwGERFn4Z6ZmtSLxxnvIUaS1W1LtMOQmKYfJWjBQ3SfTseXRZ9C5aMQSfOP6h7IIXf11ehSkL9ivyg_NLMYZg-xA9iy3NsyV7EV16SifF15HWib-_1eNicfXr4fKmvLu_vr28uCsHqXUuLfLAVMkOqYMe0Day1Z2SgKpu-mpsLLSo0I51ZytgTbKtFNV2kCM2lbbquDjd793G8HvilM3GpYHXa_IcpmQU1kpjCx3O6M8P6GOYop-vMwrmjylZqRdK7qkhhpQij2Yb3YbiziCYFwdm78DMDsyrA7ObQ2ofSjPslxzfV3-S-gfVE4va</recordid><startdate>20240705</startdate><enddate>20240705</enddate><creator>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creator><creator>Ke, Alison</creator><creator>Baur, Patrick</creator><creator>Carlisle, Liz</creator><creator>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creator><creator>Glaser, Tyler</creator><creator>Snyder, William E.</creator><creator>Waterhouse, Hannah</creator><creator>Bowles, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Kremen, Claire</creator><creator>Karp, Daniel S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240705</creationdate><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><author>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>farmland preservation</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fecal coliforms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>food pathogens</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Foodborne diseases</topic><topic>foodborne illness</topic><topic>Foodborne pathogens</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>lettuce</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterhouse, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olimpi, Elissa M.</au><au>Ke, Alison</au><au>Baur, Patrick</au><au>Carlisle, Liz</au><au>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</au><au>Glaser, Tyler</au><au>Snyder, William E.</au><au>Waterhouse, Hannah</au><au>Bowles, Timothy M.</au><au>Kremen, Claire</au><au>Karp, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2024-07-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>128-128</pages><artnum>128</artnum><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks. Objectives We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety. Methods We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic E. coli , Campylobacter spp . , and Salmonella spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks. Results Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields. Conclusions Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-9761
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128
issn 1572-9761
0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3076132431
source Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural land
Agricultural practices
Agriculture
Biodiversity
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
California
Campylobacter
Conservation
Contamination
Context
Crop fields
E coli
Ecology
Environmental Management
Escherichia coli
Farm management
Farming systems
farmland preservation
Farms
Fecal coliforms
Feces
Food consumption
Food contamination
food pathogens
Food safety
Foodborne diseases
foodborne illness
Foodborne pathogens
Grazing
habitat conservation
Habitats
Health risks
humans
Landscape Ecology
Landscape preservation
Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning
landscapes
lettuce
Life Sciences
Nature Conservation
Pathogens
Rangelands
Research Article
Safety
Salmonella
species
Species diversity
Sustainable Development
Wildlife
Wildlife conservation
Wildlife management
title Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A23%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ungrazed%20seminatural%20habitats%20around%20farms%20benefit%20bird%20conservation%20without%20enhancing%20foodborne%20pathogen%20risks&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Olimpi,%20Elissa%20M.&rft.date=2024-07-05&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=128-128&rft.artnum=128&rft.issn=1572-9761&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153718091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076132431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true