Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks
Context Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Landscape ecology 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 128 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Olimpi, Elissa M. Ke, Alison Baur, Patrick Carlisle, Liz Esquivel, Kenzo E. Glaser, Tyler Snyder, William E. Waterhouse, Hannah Bowles, Timothy M. Kremen, Claire Karp, Daniel S. |
description | Context
Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.
Objectives
We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.
Methods
We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic
E. coli
,
Campylobacter
spp
.
, and
Salmonella
spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.
Results
Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3076132431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153718091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JofnoH-hJ0EsuTmYk27KPITQfEMglexZja7yrZFfaSnLL5tfXyQZScshpBuZ5h2GeoviBcIYA-jwhdC2UIKsSsANd7r4Uh1hrWXa6wYP_-m_FUUqPAKAUwGERFn4Z6ZmtSLxxnvIUaS1W1LtMOQmKYfJWjBQ3SfTseXRZ9C5aMQSfOP6h7IIXf11ehSkL9ivyg_NLMYZg-xA9iy3NsyV7EV16SifF15HWib-_1eNicfXr4fKmvLu_vr28uCsHqXUuLfLAVMkOqYMe0Day1Z2SgKpu-mpsLLSo0I51ZytgTbKtFNV2kCM2lbbquDjd793G8HvilM3GpYHXa_IcpmQU1kpjCx3O6M8P6GOYop-vMwrmjylZqRdK7qkhhpQij2Yb3YbiziCYFwdm78DMDsyrA7ObQ2ofSjPslxzfV3-S-gfVE4va</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076132431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><description>Context
Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.
Objectives
We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.
Methods
We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic
E. coli
,
Campylobacter
spp
.
, and
Salmonella
spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.
Results
Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Agricultural practices ; Agriculture ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; California ; Campylobacter ; Conservation ; Contamination ; Context ; Crop fields ; E coli ; Ecology ; Environmental Management ; Escherichia coli ; Farm management ; Farming systems ; farmland preservation ; Farms ; Fecal coliforms ; Feces ; Food consumption ; Food contamination ; food pathogens ; Food safety ; Foodborne diseases ; foodborne illness ; Foodborne pathogens ; Grazing ; habitat conservation ; Habitats ; Health risks ; humans ; Landscape Ecology ; Landscape preservation ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; landscapes ; lettuce ; Life Sciences ; Nature Conservation ; Pathogens ; Rangelands ; Research Article ; Safety ; Salmonella ; species ; Species diversity ; Sustainable Development ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41099,41467,42168,42536,51297,51554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterhouse, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><addtitle>Landsc Ecol</addtitle><description>Context
Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.
Objectives
We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.
Methods
We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic
E. coli
,
Campylobacter
spp
.
, and
Salmonella
spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.
Results
Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Campylobacter</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>farmland preservation</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fecal coliforms</subject><subject>Feces</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food contamination</subject><subject>food pathogens</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Foodborne diseases</subject><subject>foodborne illness</subject><subject>Foodborne pathogens</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>humans</subject><subject>Landscape Ecology</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>landscapes</subject><subject>lettuce</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1JofnoH-hJ0EsuTmYk27KPITQfEMglexZja7yrZFfaSnLL5tfXyQZScshpBuZ5h2GeoviBcIYA-jwhdC2UIKsSsANd7r4Uh1hrWXa6wYP_-m_FUUqPAKAUwGERFn4Z6ZmtSLxxnvIUaS1W1LtMOQmKYfJWjBQ3SfTseXRZ9C5aMQSfOP6h7IIXf11ehSkL9ivyg_NLMYZg-xA9iy3NsyV7EV16SifF15HWib-_1eNicfXr4fKmvLu_vr28uCsHqXUuLfLAVMkOqYMe0Day1Z2SgKpu-mpsLLSo0I51ZytgTbKtFNV2kCM2lbbquDjd793G8HvilM3GpYHXa_IcpmQU1kpjCx3O6M8P6GOYop-vMwrmjylZqRdK7qkhhpQij2Yb3YbiziCYFwdm78DMDsyrA7ObQ2ofSjPslxzfV3-S-gfVE4va</recordid><startdate>20240705</startdate><enddate>20240705</enddate><creator>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creator><creator>Ke, Alison</creator><creator>Baur, Patrick</creator><creator>Carlisle, Liz</creator><creator>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creator><creator>Glaser, Tyler</creator><creator>Snyder, William E.</creator><creator>Waterhouse, Hannah</creator><creator>Bowles, Timothy M.</creator><creator>Kremen, Claire</creator><creator>Karp, Daniel S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240705</creationdate><title>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</title><author>Olimpi, Elissa M. ; Ke, Alison ; Baur, Patrick ; Carlisle, Liz ; Esquivel, Kenzo E. ; Glaser, Tyler ; Snyder, William E. ; Waterhouse, Hannah ; Bowles, Timothy M. ; Kremen, Claire ; Karp, Daniel S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-d1ecea4291a90b01d628793201356b4f6d08131df59d40e7a2843a5dc2f1647d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Campylobacter</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>farmland preservation</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fecal coliforms</topic><topic>Feces</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food contamination</topic><topic>food pathogens</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Foodborne diseases</topic><topic>foodborne illness</topic><topic>Foodborne pathogens</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>humans</topic><topic>Landscape Ecology</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>landscapes</topic><topic>lettuce</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olimpi, Elissa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ke, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baur, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlisle, Liz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glaser, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, William E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waterhouse, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowles, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremen, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karp, Daniel S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olimpi, Elissa M.</au><au>Ke, Alison</au><au>Baur, Patrick</au><au>Carlisle, Liz</au><au>Esquivel, Kenzo E.</au><au>Glaser, Tyler</au><au>Snyder, William E.</au><au>Waterhouse, Hannah</au><au>Bowles, Timothy M.</au><au>Kremen, Claire</au><au>Karp, Daniel S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><stitle>Landsc Ecol</stitle><date>2024-07-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>128</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>128-128</pages><artnum>128</artnum><issn>1572-9761</issn><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Context
Conservation in working landscapes is critical for halting biodiversity declines and ensuring farming system sustainability. However, concerns that wildlife may carry foodborne pathogens has created pressure on farmers to remove habitat and reduce biodiversity, undermining farmland conservation. Nonetheless, simplified farming landscapes may host bird communities that carry higher foodborne disease risks.
Objectives
We analyzed the effects of local farming practices and surrounding landscapes on bird communities and food-safety risks across 30 California lettuce farms. Specifically, we sought to determine how farmland diversification affects bird diversity, fecal contamination, and foodborne pathogen incidences, thereby identifying potential tradeoffs between managing farms for bird conservation versus food safety.
Methods
We surveyed birds at 227 point-count locations, quantified fecal contamination along 120 transects, and assayed 601 bird feces for pathogenic
E. coli
,
Campylobacter
spp
.
, and
Salmonella
spp. We then used hierarchical models to quantify effects of farm management and landscape context on bird communities and food-safety risks.
Results
Surrounding ungrazed seminatural areas were associated with higher bird diversity, more species of conservation concern, and fewer flocks that may increase risks from foodborne pathogens. In contrast, on-farm diversification practices and surrounding grazing lands offered weaker bird conservation benefits. Surrounding grazed lands were associated with more potentially pathogenic bird feces in crop fields.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that habitat conservation around produce farms could support bird conservation without increasing foodborne pathogens, especially on farms further from grazing lands. Thus, interventions that diversify farming systems offer potential to simultaneously conserve biodiversity and provide safe food for human consumption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1572-9761 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2024-07, Vol.39 (7), p.128-128, Article 128 |
issn | 1572-9761 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3076132431 |
source | Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Agricultural land Agricultural practices Agriculture Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds California Campylobacter Conservation Contamination Context Crop fields E coli Ecology Environmental Management Escherichia coli Farm management Farming systems farmland preservation Farms Fecal coliforms Feces Food consumption Food contamination food pathogens Food safety Foodborne diseases foodborne illness Foodborne pathogens Grazing habitat conservation Habitats Health risks humans Landscape Ecology Landscape preservation Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning landscapes lettuce Life Sciences Nature Conservation Pathogens Rangelands Research Article Safety Salmonella species Species diversity Sustainable Development Wildlife Wildlife conservation Wildlife management |
title | Ungrazed seminatural habitats around farms benefit bird conservation without enhancing foodborne pathogen risks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A23%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ungrazed%20seminatural%20habitats%20around%20farms%20benefit%20bird%20conservation%20without%20enhancing%20foodborne%20pathogen%20risks&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=Olimpi,%20Elissa%20M.&rft.date=2024-07-05&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=128-128&rft.artnum=128&rft.issn=1572-9761&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10980-024-01907-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153718091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076132431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |