Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes
In the general practice of performance-based seismic assessment and dynamic analysis of building structures, the recorded ground motions from past earthquake events are selected and modified according to the site conditions and hazard level of the project’s site. For this purpose, only the mainshock...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2024-07, Vol.22 (9), p.4547-4579 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4579 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4547 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Munir, Saima Najam, Fawad Ahmed Rahman, Asad ur Malik, Umair Jalil Rana, Irfan Ahmad Ali, Ather |
description | In the general practice of performance-based seismic assessment and dynamic analysis of building structures, the recorded ground motions from past earthquake events are selected and modified according to the site conditions and hazard level of the project’s site. For this purpose, only the mainshock earthquake event is considered for the analysis while neglecting the foreshocks and aftershocks. However, in several real cases, especially for existing RC buildings with non-seismic detailing, low- to moderate-magnitude foreshocks and aftershocks may also affect the seismic performance. Several studies have shown that the application of repeated earthquake events may lead to damage accumulation and significant seismic losses, even if the structure is at a life safety performance level. This study examines the seismic performance of mid-rise RC frame structures in Pakistan under repeated earthquakes. For this purpose, a representative case study building has been selected for the detailed analysis after surveying typical existing RC buildings in Pakistan. The detailed nonlinear finite element model is constructed and subjected to several cases of repeated earthquakes with different intensity levels. The seismic performance in terms of key demand parameters is evaluated for single earthquake scenarios (mainshock only) and seismic sequences (foreshock, mainshock, and aftershock). The results showed the application of seismic sequences has a negligible effect on the peak seismic force and displacement demands of the buildings compared to the single mainshock event. However, an increase in seismic performance indicators, including residual displacements and inelastic hysteretic energy, is observed. Resultantly, an increase in structural damage (quantified in terms of material cracking, yielding, crushing, etc.) is also observed for ground motion sequences compared to the single ground motion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3074867917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074867917</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7d06edf709d1f51d45475c14a0914ad46fd6c64fa3b195b7438115fcb0abfb723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxTAQhYso-PwDrgKuo5M2aVp3cvEFguID3IVpHtdom16TVvAX-Lett4I7NzMH5pwz8GXZIYNjBiBPEgPBKgo5p8DqQtBqI9thQhaUcVFurjVQWbLn7Ww3pVeAXMgadrKvB-tT5zWxH9iOOPg-kN6R0Aea5gu27ScxdkDfWkPuF6QZfWt8WCbiA7nDN58GDKdkZaPrY4dBW4LBEIMdLiep9diN7dw8BmMjiXZlcZjKLMbh5X3EN5v2sy2HbbIHv3sve7o4f1xc0Zvby-vF2Q3VOcBApYHSGiehNswJZrjgUmjGEeppGF46U-qSOywaVotG8qJiTDjdADaukXmxlx3NvavYv482Deq1H2OYXqoCJK9KWTM5ufLZpWOfUrROraLvMH4qBuoHuJqBqwm4WgNX1RQq5lCazGFp41_1P6lvUqqGVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074867917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Munir, Saima ; Najam, Fawad Ahmed ; Rahman, Asad ur ; Malik, Umair Jalil ; Rana, Irfan Ahmad ; Ali, Ather</creator><creatorcontrib>Munir, Saima ; Najam, Fawad Ahmed ; Rahman, Asad ur ; Malik, Umair Jalil ; Rana, Irfan Ahmad ; Ali, Ather</creatorcontrib><description>In the general practice of performance-based seismic assessment and dynamic analysis of building structures, the recorded ground motions from past earthquake events are selected and modified according to the site conditions and hazard level of the project’s site. For this purpose, only the mainshock earthquake event is considered for the analysis while neglecting the foreshocks and aftershocks. However, in several real cases, especially for existing RC buildings with non-seismic detailing, low- to moderate-magnitude foreshocks and aftershocks may also affect the seismic performance. Several studies have shown that the application of repeated earthquake events may lead to damage accumulation and significant seismic losses, even if the structure is at a life safety performance level. This study examines the seismic performance of mid-rise RC frame structures in Pakistan under repeated earthquakes. For this purpose, a representative case study building has been selected for the detailed analysis after surveying typical existing RC buildings in Pakistan. The detailed nonlinear finite element model is constructed and subjected to several cases of repeated earthquakes with different intensity levels. The seismic performance in terms of key demand parameters is evaluated for single earthquake scenarios (mainshock only) and seismic sequences (foreshock, mainshock, and aftershock). The results showed the application of seismic sequences has a negligible effect on the peak seismic force and displacement demands of the buildings compared to the single mainshock event. However, an increase in seismic performance indicators, including residual displacements and inelastic hysteretic energy, is observed. Resultantly, an increase in structural damage (quantified in terms of material cracking, yielding, crushing, etc.) is also observed for ground motion sequences compared to the single ground motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Aftershocks ; Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Cracking (fracturing) ; Damage accumulation ; Dynamic analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Finite element method ; Frame structures ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Original Article ; Seismic activity ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic response ; Structural damage ; Structural Geology</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2024-07, Vol.22 (9), p.4547-4579</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7d06edf709d1f51d45475c14a0914ad46fd6c64fa3b195b7438115fcb0abfb723</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1448-773X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munir, Saima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najam, Fawad Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Asad ur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Umair Jalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rana, Irfan Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Ather</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>In the general practice of performance-based seismic assessment and dynamic analysis of building structures, the recorded ground motions from past earthquake events are selected and modified according to the site conditions and hazard level of the project’s site. For this purpose, only the mainshock earthquake event is considered for the analysis while neglecting the foreshocks and aftershocks. However, in several real cases, especially for existing RC buildings with non-seismic detailing, low- to moderate-magnitude foreshocks and aftershocks may also affect the seismic performance. Several studies have shown that the application of repeated earthquake events may lead to damage accumulation and significant seismic losses, even if the structure is at a life safety performance level. This study examines the seismic performance of mid-rise RC frame structures in Pakistan under repeated earthquakes. For this purpose, a representative case study building has been selected for the detailed analysis after surveying typical existing RC buildings in Pakistan. The detailed nonlinear finite element model is constructed and subjected to several cases of repeated earthquakes with different intensity levels. The seismic performance in terms of key demand parameters is evaluated for single earthquake scenarios (mainshock only) and seismic sequences (foreshock, mainshock, and aftershock). The results showed the application of seismic sequences has a negligible effect on the peak seismic force and displacement demands of the buildings compared to the single mainshock event. However, an increase in seismic performance indicators, including residual displacements and inelastic hysteretic energy, is observed. Resultantly, an increase in structural damage (quantified in terms of material cracking, yielding, crushing, etc.) is also observed for ground motion sequences compared to the single ground motion.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Aftershocks</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Cracking (fracturing)</subject><subject>Damage accumulation</subject><subject>Dynamic analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Frame structures</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Structural damage</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxTAQhYso-PwDrgKuo5M2aVp3cvEFguID3IVpHtdom16TVvAX-Lett4I7NzMH5pwz8GXZIYNjBiBPEgPBKgo5p8DqQtBqI9thQhaUcVFurjVQWbLn7Ww3pVeAXMgadrKvB-tT5zWxH9iOOPg-kN6R0Aea5gu27ScxdkDfWkPuF6QZfWt8WCbiA7nDN58GDKdkZaPrY4dBW4LBEIMdLiep9diN7dw8BmMjiXZlcZjKLMbh5X3EN5v2sy2HbbIHv3sve7o4f1xc0Zvby-vF2Q3VOcBApYHSGiehNswJZrjgUmjGEeppGF46U-qSOywaVotG8qJiTDjdADaukXmxlx3NvavYv482Deq1H2OYXqoCJK9KWTM5ufLZpWOfUrROraLvMH4qBuoHuJqBqwm4WgNX1RQq5lCazGFp41_1P6lvUqqGVg</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Munir, Saima</creator><creator>Najam, Fawad Ahmed</creator><creator>Rahman, Asad ur</creator><creator>Malik, Umair Jalil</creator><creator>Rana, Irfan Ahmad</creator><creator>Ali, Ather</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-773X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes</title><author>Munir, Saima ; Najam, Fawad Ahmed ; Rahman, Asad ur ; Malik, Umair Jalil ; Rana, Irfan Ahmad ; Ali, Ather</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7d06edf709d1f51d45475c14a0914ad46fd6c64fa3b195b7438115fcb0abfb723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Aftershocks</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Cracking (fracturing)</topic><topic>Damage accumulation</topic><topic>Dynamic analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Frame structures</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Structural damage</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munir, Saima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najam, Fawad Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahman, Asad ur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malik, Umair Jalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rana, Irfan Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Ather</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munir, Saima</au><au>Najam, Fawad Ahmed</au><au>Rahman, Asad ur</au><au>Malik, Umair Jalil</au><au>Rana, Irfan Ahmad</au><au>Ali, Ather</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4547</spage><epage>4579</epage><pages>4547-4579</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>In the general practice of performance-based seismic assessment and dynamic analysis of building structures, the recorded ground motions from past earthquake events are selected and modified according to the site conditions and hazard level of the project’s site. For this purpose, only the mainshock earthquake event is considered for the analysis while neglecting the foreshocks and aftershocks. However, in several real cases, especially for existing RC buildings with non-seismic detailing, low- to moderate-magnitude foreshocks and aftershocks may also affect the seismic performance. Several studies have shown that the application of repeated earthquake events may lead to damage accumulation and significant seismic losses, even if the structure is at a life safety performance level. This study examines the seismic performance of mid-rise RC frame structures in Pakistan under repeated earthquakes. For this purpose, a representative case study building has been selected for the detailed analysis after surveying typical existing RC buildings in Pakistan. The detailed nonlinear finite element model is constructed and subjected to several cases of repeated earthquakes with different intensity levels. The seismic performance in terms of key demand parameters is evaluated for single earthquake scenarios (mainshock only) and seismic sequences (foreshock, mainshock, and aftershock). The results showed the application of seismic sequences has a negligible effect on the peak seismic force and displacement demands of the buildings compared to the single mainshock event. However, an increase in seismic performance indicators, including residual displacements and inelastic hysteretic energy, is observed. Resultantly, an increase in structural damage (quantified in terms of material cracking, yielding, crushing, etc.) is also observed for ground motion sequences compared to the single ground motion.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1448-773X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2024-07, Vol.22 (9), p.4547-4579 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3074867917 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Accumulation Aftershocks Buildings Civil Engineering Cracking (fracturing) Damage accumulation Dynamic analysis Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake damage Earthquakes Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Finite element method Frame structures Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground motion Hydrogeology Original Article Seismic activity Seismic analysis Seismic response Structural damage Structural Geology |
title | Seismic evaluation of non-seismically detailed RC buildings in Pakistan: performance and damage accumulation under repeated earthquakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20evaluation%20of%20non-seismically%20detailed%20RC%20buildings%20in%20Pakistan:%20performance%20and%20damage%20accumulation%20under%20repeated%20earthquakes&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Munir,%20Saima&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4547&rft.epage=4579&rft.pages=4547-4579&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-024-01935-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074867917%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074867917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |