Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction
We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mob...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal for STEM education research. 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 323 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 307 |
container_title | Journal for STEM education research. |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Ives, Joss Rieger, Georg Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh |
description | We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3073444062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073444062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxNowtvMyO2h5VAoPoSKWluNMIFUat3Zawd-TNAh2rGZGumdGc4LglME5A0gufMhkIilwQQEYMAoHwYhHHGiaMHH420N0HEy8XwIAT0SYcDkKPl9ws61c1byTB5tXNZIZ7iqDnlQNaT-QTGvtvbN2dbkfXz0SW5I3zOm19liQZ1vXPT2zHfNoW5KhLkhrybwxDveRDHdY-x6bVb512rSVbU6Co1LXHic_dRwsbm8W03uaPd3Np1cZNZxLoEZEhYhjgyBDBrKQIApTmDAyGMbIpE4Z5GGexCjKqBRC5CLlGEcpF4XmpRgHZ8PatbObLfpWLe3WNd1FJaCTEIYQ8y7Fh5RxtvsWS7V21Uq7L8VA9Y7V4Fh1jtXesYIOEgPk170_dH-r_6G-AR-OfaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3073444062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2520-8705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-8713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Active learning ; Cellular telephones ; College students ; Education ; Educational technology ; Engineering/Technology Education ; Learning activities ; Mathematics Education ; Research Article ; Science Curriculum ; Science Education ; Self report ; Smartphones ; Student Surveys ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal for STEM education research., 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><title>Journal for STEM education research.</title><addtitle>Journal for STEM Educ Res</addtitle><description>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</description><subject>Active learning</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Engineering/Technology Education</subject><subject>Learning activities</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>2520-8705</issn><issn>2520-8713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxNowtvMyO2h5VAoPoSKWluNMIFUat3Zawd-TNAh2rGZGumdGc4LglME5A0gufMhkIilwQQEYMAoHwYhHHGiaMHH420N0HEy8XwIAT0SYcDkKPl9ws61c1byTB5tXNZIZ7iqDnlQNaT-QTGvtvbN2dbkfXz0SW5I3zOm19liQZ1vXPT2zHfNoW5KhLkhrybwxDveRDHdY-x6bVb512rSVbU6Co1LXHic_dRwsbm8W03uaPd3Np1cZNZxLoEZEhYhjgyBDBrKQIApTmDAyGMbIpE4Z5GGexCjKqBRC5CLlGEcpF4XmpRgHZ8PatbObLfpWLe3WNd1FJaCTEIYQ8y7Fh5RxtvsWS7V21Uq7L8VA9Y7V4Fh1jtXesYIOEgPk170_dH-r_6G-AR-OfaY</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Ives, Joss</creator><creator>Rieger, Georg</creator><creator>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><author>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active learning</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Engineering/Technology Education</topic><topic>Learning activities</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal for STEM education research.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ives, Joss</au><au>Rieger, Georg</au><au>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</atitle><jtitle>Journal for STEM education research.</jtitle><stitle>Journal for STEM Educ Res</stitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>307-323</pages><issn>2520-8705</issn><eissn>2520-8713</eissn><abstract>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2520-8705 |
ispartof | Journal for STEM education research., 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323 |
issn | 2520-8705 2520-8713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3073444062 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Active learning Cellular telephones College students Education Educational technology Engineering/Technology Education Learning activities Mathematics Education Research Article Science Curriculum Science Education Self report Smartphones Student Surveys Undergraduate Students |
title | Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A09%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Requiring%20Mobile%20Devices%20in%20the%20Classroom:%20the%20Use%20of%20Web-Based%20Polling%20Does%20Not%20Lead%20to%20Increased%20Levels%20of%20Distraction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20STEM%20education%20research.&rft.au=Ives,%20Joss&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=307-323&rft.issn=2520-8705&rft.eissn=2520-8713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073444062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3073444062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |