Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction

We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mob...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal for STEM education research. 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323
Hauptverfasser: Ives, Joss, Rieger, Georg, Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 323
container_issue 2
container_start_page 307
container_title Journal for STEM education research.
container_volume 7
creator Ives, Joss
Rieger, Georg
Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh
description We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3073444062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3073444062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxNowtvMyO2h5VAoPoSKWluNMIFUat3Zawd-TNAh2rGZGumdGc4LglME5A0gufMhkIilwQQEYMAoHwYhHHGiaMHH420N0HEy8XwIAT0SYcDkKPl9ws61c1byTB5tXNZIZ7iqDnlQNaT-QTGvtvbN2dbkfXz0SW5I3zOm19liQZ1vXPT2zHfNoW5KhLkhrybwxDveRDHdY-x6bVb512rSVbU6Co1LXHic_dRwsbm8W03uaPd3Np1cZNZxLoEZEhYhjgyBDBrKQIApTmDAyGMbIpE4Z5GGexCjKqBRC5CLlGEcpF4XmpRgHZ8PatbObLfpWLe3WNd1FJaCTEIYQ8y7Fh5RxtvsWS7V21Uq7L8VA9Y7V4Fh1jtXesYIOEgPk170_dH-r_6G-AR-OfaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3073444062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><description>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2520-8705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2520-8713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Active learning ; Cellular telephones ; College students ; Education ; Educational technology ; Engineering/Technology Education ; Learning activities ; Mathematics Education ; Research Article ; Science Curriculum ; Science Education ; Self report ; Smartphones ; Student Surveys ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal for STEM education research., 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><title>Journal for STEM education research.</title><addtitle>Journal for STEM Educ Res</addtitle><description>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</description><subject>Active learning</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational technology</subject><subject>Engineering/Technology Education</subject><subject>Learning activities</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Smartphones</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>2520-8705</issn><issn>2520-8713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRSMEElXpD7CyxNowtvMyO2h5VAoPoSKWluNMIFUat3Zawd-TNAh2rGZGumdGc4LglME5A0gufMhkIilwQQEYMAoHwYhHHGiaMHH420N0HEy8XwIAT0SYcDkKPl9ws61c1byTB5tXNZIZ7iqDnlQNaT-QTGvtvbN2dbkfXz0SW5I3zOm19liQZ1vXPT2zHfNoW5KhLkhrybwxDveRDHdY-x6bVb512rSVbU6Co1LXHic_dRwsbm8W03uaPd3Np1cZNZxLoEZEhYhjgyBDBrKQIApTmDAyGMbIpE4Z5GGexCjKqBRC5CLlGEcpF4XmpRgHZ8PatbObLfpWLe3WNd1FJaCTEIYQ8y7Fh5RxtvsWS7V21Uq7L8VA9Y7V4Fh1jtXesYIOEgPk170_dH-r_6G-AR-OfaY</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Ives, Joss</creator><creator>Rieger, Georg</creator><creator>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</title><author>Ives, Joss ; Rieger, Georg ; Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2290-c35d366ce094109d903dcdc45ce46e19a810b4b76e3f5f333b382e65823da2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active learning</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational technology</topic><topic>Engineering/Technology Education</topic><topic>Learning activities</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Smartphones</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ives, Joss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal for STEM education research.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ives, Joss</au><au>Rieger, Georg</au><au>Renani, Fatemeh Rostamzadeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction</atitle><jtitle>Journal for STEM education research.</jtitle><stitle>Journal for STEM Educ Res</stitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>323</epage><pages>307-323</pages><issn>2520-8705</issn><eissn>2520-8713</eissn><abstract>We conducted an observational exploratory study of distraction by digital devices in multiple different sections across three large undergraduate physics courses. We collected data from two different settings based on the type of devices used for classroom polling: lecture sections that required mobile devices for polling and those that used standalone clickers. Our analysis shows no difference in the average distraction level between the two settings. However, we did observe an overall lower level of distraction during active learning modes, as compared to passive learning modes. Based on there being no observable difference in distraction levels in the mobile polling and standalone clicker classrooms, we recommend that instructors should choose the polling technology that best suits their needs without worrying about the impact on student distraction. The observed difference in distraction between the active and passive learning modes is consistent with previous results from the literature, which reinforces support for the use of active learning modes as much as possible.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-6229</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2520-8705
ispartof Journal for STEM education research., 2024-08, Vol.7 (2), p.307-323
issn 2520-8705
2520-8713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3073444062
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Active learning
Cellular telephones
College students
Education
Educational technology
Engineering/Technology Education
Learning activities
Mathematics Education
Research Article
Science Curriculum
Science Education
Self report
Smartphones
Student Surveys
Undergraduate Students
title Requiring Mobile Devices in the Classroom: the Use of Web-Based Polling Does Not Lead to Increased Levels of Distraction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A09%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Requiring%20Mobile%20Devices%20in%20the%20Classroom:%20the%20Use%20of%20Web-Based%20Polling%20Does%20Not%20Lead%20to%20Increased%20Levels%20of%20Distraction&rft.jtitle=Journal%20for%20STEM%20education%20research.&rft.au=Ives,%20Joss&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=323&rft.pages=307-323&rft.issn=2520-8705&rft.eissn=2520-8713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s41979-023-00101-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3073444062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3073444062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true