Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport
The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely considered an important infrastructure for enhancing the transparency of processes and the quality of business decisions in the era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Yet, little is known about the differential drivers of the adoption of IoT for different modes of freight...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on engineering management 2024, Vol.71, p.11125-11137 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 11137 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 11125 |
| container_title | IEEE transactions on engineering management |
| container_volume | 71 |
| creator | Rajak, Binay Kumar Chatterjee, Swagato Upadhyay, Amit Rani, M. Vimala |
| description | The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely considered an important infrastructure for enhancing the transparency of processes and the quality of business decisions in the era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Yet, little is known about the differential drivers of the adoption of IoT for different modes of freight transport. Since the modes of freight transport differ substantially, the purpose of this article is to compare the contextual differences among IoT adoption drivers in road, rail, and maritime freight transport and assess the suitability of different modes of freight transport for IoT adoption. The identified drivers for IoT adoption are classified under the technology, organization, and environmental framework, and the relative weight of drivers for road, rail, and maritime freight transport are compared using fuzzy analytic network process method. The most important drivers for freight transport are competitive advantage, management support (MGS), and security and privacy. Comparatively, the most prioritized driver for road transport is investment cost, for rail transport is MGS, and for maritime is the ease of use. This article found the maritime transport as the best mode to adopt IoT using multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form method. The results identify prospective customers for IoT adoption, help the government and policymakers develop transport policies, including freight modal share and National Rail Plan vision, and assist transport managers in developing strategies for I4.0. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TEM.2024.3413353 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3072324176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>10555413</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>3072324176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-e66c8bbcbbf1c35e17f280980cc3ddfe4051911699c0a9a59d62e6eccacfe53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM9rwjAYhsPYYM7tvsMOgV2tS5qmbY7ij01QBs57iekXjWhSkzi2_34tetjp44XnfT94EHqmZEgpEW_r6XKYkjQbsowyxtkN6lHOy4SQjNyiHiG0TAQT9B49hLBvY8ZT0kOnsbMRfuJZHvDEaA0erAJsLI47wBNvvsEH7DSet5i3EBOnk_XO2G1IRrVronG2o1dO1gO8kuYwwNLWeCm9ieYIeObBbHcRr720oXE-PqI7LQ8Bnq63j75m0_X4I1l8vs_Ho0WiUlrEBPJclZuN2mw0VYwDLXRaElESpVhda8gIp4LSXAhFpJBc1HkKOSgllQbO-uj1stp4dzpDiNXenb1tH1aMFClLM1rkLUUulPIuBA-6arw5Sv9bUVJ1WqtWa9Vpra5a28rLpWIA4B_OOe-IPz8FdK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072324176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Rajak, Binay Kumar ; Chatterjee, Swagato ; Upadhyay, Amit ; Rani, M. Vimala</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajak, Binay Kumar ; Chatterjee, Swagato ; Upadhyay, Amit ; Rani, M. Vimala</creatorcontrib><description>The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely considered an important infrastructure for enhancing the transparency of processes and the quality of business decisions in the era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Yet, little is known about the differential drivers of the adoption of IoT for different modes of freight transport. Since the modes of freight transport differ substantially, the purpose of this article is to compare the contextual differences among IoT adoption drivers in road, rail, and maritime freight transport and assess the suitability of different modes of freight transport for IoT adoption. The identified drivers for IoT adoption are classified under the technology, organization, and environmental framework, and the relative weight of drivers for road, rail, and maritime freight transport are compared using fuzzy analytic network process method. The most important drivers for freight transport are competitive advantage, management support (MGS), and security and privacy. Comparatively, the most prioritized driver for road transport is investment cost, for rail transport is MGS, and for maritime is the ease of use. This article found the maritime transport as the best mode to adopt IoT using multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form method. The results identify prospective customers for IoT adoption, help the government and policymakers develop transport policies, including freight modal share and National Rail Plan vision, and assist transport managers in developing strategies for I4.0.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2024.3413353</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEMA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>and environmental (TOE) framework ; Business competition ; Costs ; Decision analysis ; Freight transport ; Freight transportation ; fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) ; Industrial applications ; Industries ; Industry 4.0 ; Internet of Things ; Internet of Things (IoT) ; Locomotives ; logistics management ; Marine transportation ; multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) ; multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) ; Multiple objective analysis ; organization ; Rail transportation ; Rails ; Ratio analysis ; Road transportation ; Roads ; Supply chains ; technology ; Technology adoption ; Transportation ; Vehicles</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024, Vol.71, p.11125-11137</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-e66c8bbcbbf1c35e17f280980cc3ddfe4051911699c0a9a59d62e6eccacfe53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2599-1771 ; 0000-0001-9731-4089 ; 0000-0002-3907-3528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10555413$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,4024,27923,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10555413$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajak, Binay Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Swagato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhyay, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rani, M. Vimala</creatorcontrib><title>Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport</title><title>IEEE transactions on engineering management</title><addtitle>TEM</addtitle><description>The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely considered an important infrastructure for enhancing the transparency of processes and the quality of business decisions in the era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Yet, little is known about the differential drivers of the adoption of IoT for different modes of freight transport. Since the modes of freight transport differ substantially, the purpose of this article is to compare the contextual differences among IoT adoption drivers in road, rail, and maritime freight transport and assess the suitability of different modes of freight transport for IoT adoption. The identified drivers for IoT adoption are classified under the technology, organization, and environmental framework, and the relative weight of drivers for road, rail, and maritime freight transport are compared using fuzzy analytic network process method. The most important drivers for freight transport are competitive advantage, management support (MGS), and security and privacy. Comparatively, the most prioritized driver for road transport is investment cost, for rail transport is MGS, and for maritime is the ease of use. This article found the maritime transport as the best mode to adopt IoT using multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form method. The results identify prospective customers for IoT adoption, help the government and policymakers develop transport policies, including freight modal share and National Rail Plan vision, and assist transport managers in developing strategies for I4.0.</description><subject>and environmental (TOE) framework</subject><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Freight transport</subject><subject>Freight transportation</subject><subject>fuzzy analytic network process (FANP)</subject><subject>Industrial applications</subject><subject>Industries</subject><subject>Industry 4.0</subject><subject>Internet of Things</subject><subject>Internet of Things (IoT)</subject><subject>Locomotives</subject><subject>logistics management</subject><subject>Marine transportation</subject><subject>multicriteria decision-making (MCDM)</subject><subject>multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA)</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>organization</subject><subject>Rail transportation</subject><subject>Rails</subject><subject>Ratio analysis</subject><subject>Road transportation</subject><subject>Roads</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Vehicles</subject><issn>0018-9391</issn><issn>1558-0040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM9rwjAYhsPYYM7tvsMOgV2tS5qmbY7ij01QBs57iekXjWhSkzi2_34tetjp44XnfT94EHqmZEgpEW_r6XKYkjQbsowyxtkN6lHOy4SQjNyiHiG0TAQT9B49hLBvY8ZT0kOnsbMRfuJZHvDEaA0erAJsLI47wBNvvsEH7DSet5i3EBOnk_XO2G1IRrVronG2o1dO1gO8kuYwwNLWeCm9ieYIeObBbHcRr720oXE-PqI7LQ8Bnq63j75m0_X4I1l8vs_Ho0WiUlrEBPJclZuN2mw0VYwDLXRaElESpVhda8gIp4LSXAhFpJBc1HkKOSgllQbO-uj1stp4dzpDiNXenb1tH1aMFClLM1rkLUUulPIuBA-6arw5Sv9bUVJ1WqtWa9Vpra5a28rLpWIA4B_OOe-IPz8FdK4</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Rajak, Binay Kumar</creator><creator>Chatterjee, Swagato</creator><creator>Upadhyay, Amit</creator><creator>Rani, M. Vimala</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1771</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-4089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-3528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport</title><author>Rajak, Binay Kumar ; Chatterjee, Swagato ; Upadhyay, Amit ; Rani, M. Vimala</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c217t-e66c8bbcbbf1c35e17f280980cc3ddfe4051911699c0a9a59d62e6eccacfe53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>and environmental (TOE) framework</topic><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Freight transport</topic><topic>Freight transportation</topic><topic>fuzzy analytic network process (FANP)</topic><topic>Industrial applications</topic><topic>Industries</topic><topic>Industry 4.0</topic><topic>Internet of Things</topic><topic>Internet of Things (IoT)</topic><topic>Locomotives</topic><topic>logistics management</topic><topic>Marine transportation</topic><topic>multicriteria decision-making (MCDM)</topic><topic>multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA)</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>organization</topic><topic>Rail transportation</topic><topic>Rails</topic><topic>Ratio analysis</topic><topic>Road transportation</topic><topic>Roads</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Vehicles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajak, Binay Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee, Swagato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Upadhyay, Amit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rani, M. Vimala</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajak, Binay Kumar</au><au>Chatterjee, Swagato</au><au>Upadhyay, Amit</au><au>Rani, M. Vimala</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle><stitle>TEM</stitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>11125</spage><epage>11137</epage><pages>11125-11137</pages><issn>0018-9391</issn><eissn>1558-0040</eissn><coden>IEEMA4</coden><abstract>The Internet of Things (IoT) is widely considered an important infrastructure for enhancing the transparency of processes and the quality of business decisions in the era of Industry 4.0 (I4.0). Yet, little is known about the differential drivers of the adoption of IoT for different modes of freight transport. Since the modes of freight transport differ substantially, the purpose of this article is to compare the contextual differences among IoT adoption drivers in road, rail, and maritime freight transport and assess the suitability of different modes of freight transport for IoT adoption. The identified drivers for IoT adoption are classified under the technology, organization, and environmental framework, and the relative weight of drivers for road, rail, and maritime freight transport are compared using fuzzy analytic network process method. The most important drivers for freight transport are competitive advantage, management support (MGS), and security and privacy. Comparatively, the most prioritized driver for road transport is investment cost, for rail transport is MGS, and for maritime is the ease of use. This article found the maritime transport as the best mode to adopt IoT using multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form method. The results identify prospective customers for IoT adoption, help the government and policymakers develop transport policies, including freight modal share and National Rail Plan vision, and assist transport managers in developing strategies for I4.0.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEM.2024.3413353</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2599-1771</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9731-4089</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3907-3528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-9391 |
| ispartof | IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2024, Vol.71, p.11125-11137 |
| issn | 0018-9391 1558-0040 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3072324176 |
| source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) |
| subjects | and environmental (TOE) framework Business competition Costs Decision analysis Freight transport Freight transportation fuzzy analytic network process (FANP) Industrial applications Industries Industry 4.0 Internet of Things Internet of Things (IoT) Locomotives logistics management Marine transportation multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) multiobjective optimization on the basis of a ratio analysis plus the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) Multiple objective analysis organization Rail transportation Rails Ratio analysis Road transportation Roads Supply chains technology Technology adoption Transportation Vehicles |
| title | Contextual Difference in the Drivers of Internet-of-Things-Adoption in Road, Rail, and Maritime Freight Transport |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A55%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contextual%20Difference%20in%20the%20Drivers%20of%20Internet-of-Things-Adoption%20in%20Road,%20Rail,%20and%20Maritime%20Freight%20Transport&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20engineering%20management&rft.au=Rajak,%20Binay%20Kumar&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=11125&rft.epage=11137&rft.pages=11125-11137&rft.issn=0018-9391&rft.eissn=1558-0040&rft.coden=IEEMA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2024.3413353&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E3072324176%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072324176&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=10555413&rfr_iscdi=true |